Bourdieu in hyperspace: from social topology to the space of flows

References

• Anheier, H., Gerhards, J., & Romo, F. P. (1995). Forms of capital and social structure in cultural fields: Examining Bourdieu’s social topography. American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 859–903. doi: 10.1086/230603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bottero, W., & Crossley, N. (2011). Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), 99–119. doi: 10.1177/1749975510389726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984a). Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984b). Homo Academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information, 24(2), 195–220. doi: 10.1177/053901885024002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990a). In other words. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1992). Les règles de l’art. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & R. Neveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp. 29–47). Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, R., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• De Nooy, W. (2003). Fields and networks: Correspondence analysis and social network analysis in the framework of field theory. Poetics, 31, 305–327. doi: 10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00035-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dépelteau, F. (2008). Relational thinking: A critique of Co-deterministic theories of structure and agency. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 51–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317. doi: 10.1086/231209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogle, N. (2011). The spatial logic of social struggle: A Bourdieuian topology. New York: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, J.-S. (2017). Functional systems as metric forms and institutions as nonmetric forms: A neo-Luhmannian approach. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 29(1), 32–47. doi: 10.1177/0260107916673270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2002). Pierre Bourdieu. revised edition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1999). Against structure: A critique of morphogenetic social theory. Sociological Review, 47(2), 199–227. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2006). How not to structure a social theory: A reply to a critical response. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(4), 464–479. doi: 10.1177/0048393106293456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (2007). Why I am not an individualist. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(2), 211–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions, fourth edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lebaron, F. (2009). How Bourdieu ‘quantified’ Bourdieu: The geometric modelling of data. In K. Robson & C. Sanders (Eds.), Quantifying theory: Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 11–29). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lebaron, F., & Le Roux, B. (2013). Géométrie du champ. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 200, 106–109. doi: 10.3917/arss.200.0106
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological Communication. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a social system. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marquis, J.-P. (2009). From a geometrical point of view. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, J. W. (2013). Bourdieu’s relational method in theory and in practice: From fields and capitals to networks and institutions (and back again). In F. Dépelteau & C. Power (Eds.), Applying relational sociology (pp. 101–135). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, P. J., & Ritzer, G. (2010). Conceptualizing globalization in terms of flows. Current Perspective in Social Theory, 27, 247–271. doi: 10.1108/S0278-1204(2010)0000027011
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, F. (1999). ‘The real is relational’: An epistemological analysis of Pierre Bourdieu’s generative structuralism. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 32–67. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. (2013). Symbolic power and group-making: On Pierre Bourdieu’s reframing of class. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), 274–291. doi: 10.1177/1468795X12468737
   Google Scholar