The dimensions of gender in the last twenty years: an analysis of the International Review of Sociology

References

• Acker, J. (2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31(3), 214–224. doi: 10.1108/02610151211209072
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. M., & Jarman, J. (2005). Gendered segregation and inequality, GeNet Working Paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolasco, S. (1999). Analisi multidimensionale dei dati: Metodi, strategie e criteri d'interpretazione. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Cotesta, V., Cicchelli, V., & Nocenzi, M. (Eds.). (2013). Global society, cosmopolitanism and human rights. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Decataldo, A., & Ruspini, E. (2014). La ricerca di genere. Roma: Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Einsenstadt, S. (2000). Multiple modernities. London: Transaction Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (1884). The origin of the family, private property and the state. Zurich: Hottingen.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, K., & Chertok, E. (1993). Social conflict theories of the family. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 357–384). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, Catherine. (1999). Models of the family, women’s role and social policy. European Societies, 1, 33–58. doi: 10.1080/14616696.1999.10749924
   Google Scholar
• Hawke, L. A. (2007). Gender roles within American marriage: Are they really changing? ESSAI, 5, 70–74. Article 23.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, J. F., & Stepnick, A. (2017). Diversity and society: Race, ethnicity, and gender. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (2000). The gendered society. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P. (2017). Radicalizing community development: The changing face of the Queer Movement in Hyderabad City. Community Development Journal, 52(3), 470–487. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsx026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafon, P. (1980). Sur la variabilité de la fréquence des formes dans un corpus. Mots. Les langages du politique, 1, 127–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lebart, L., Salem, A., & Berry, L. (1998). Exploring textual data. Switzerland AG: Kluwer-Academic Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Lerbart, L., & Salem, A. (1994). Statistique textuelle. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Money, J., Hampson, J. G., & Hampson, J. (1955). An examination of some basic sexual concepts: The evidence of human hermaphroditism. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 97(4), 301–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nocenzi, M., & Ferrari Occhionero, M. (2009). Gender inequalities: The integrated approach of the gender dimension in Europe. International Review of Sociology, 17(1), 155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., Bales, R. F., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.). (1953). Working papers in the theory of action. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (Eds.). (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratinaud, P. (2009). IRAMUTEQ: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires. Retrieved from http://www.iramuteq.org
   Google Scholar
• Reinert, M. (1983). Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique: Application à l’analyse lexicale par contexte. Les Cahiers de L’Analyse Des Données, 8, 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Reinert, M. (1993). Les “mondes lexicaux” et leur ‘logique” à travers l'analyse statistique d'un corpus de récits de cauchemars. Langage et Société, 66(1), 5–39. doi: 10.3406/lsoc.1993.2632
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B., Froyum, C., & Scarborough, W. J. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of the sociology of gender. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J., & Johnson-Sumerford, D. (1998). Doing it fairly: A study of postgender marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 23–40. doi: 10.2307/353439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzman Chafetz, J. (1978). Masculine, feminine or human?An overview of the sociology of the gender roles. Minneapolis: F. E. Peacock Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzman Chafetz, J. (2006). Handbook of the sociology of gender. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sanday, P. R. (2004). Women at the center: Life in a modern matriarch. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, C., & Kay, K. (2009). Womenomics: Write your own rules for success. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender and Society, 9, 8–37. doi: 10.1177/089124395009001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, N. (2009). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Harper&Collins.
   Google Scholar