91
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Henri H. Stahl (1901–1991): some features of intellectual biography and an outline of historical sociology

Pages 72-96 | Received 15 Jun 2020, Accepted 24 Apr 2021, Published online: 06 Jun 2021

References

  • Советов, П. (1972). Исследования по истории феодализма: T. 1 (Очерки истории землевладения в XV–XVIII вв.). Штиинца.
  • Русеев, Н. (2001). Жизнь в науке во имя своих и чужих. Stratum Plus, 6, 10–19.
  • Amin, S. (1976). Unequal development. An essay on the social formations of peripheral capitalism. The Harvester Press.
  • Amin, S. (1980). Class and nation. Historically and in the current crisis. Heinenmann Educational Books.
  • Babinskas, N. (2009). The concept of tributalism: A comparative analysis of S. Amin, J. Haldon and H. H. Stahl’s approaches. Revista Română de studii Baltice şi Nordice, 1(1), 63–83.
  • Babinskas, N. (2010). Henri H. Stahl’s conception of historical sociology and the Bucharest school of sociology. Revista Română pentru Studii Baltice şi Nordice, 2(1), 69–82.
  • Bădina, O. (1983). Sociology in Romania. International Review of Modern Sociology, 13(1-2), 313–374.
  • Banaji, J. (2010). Theory as history: Essays on modes of production and exploitation. Haymarket Books.
  • Banu, I. (1967). La formation sociale „asiatique“ dans la perspective de la philosophie orientale antique. La Pensée, 132, 53–70.
  • Bejan, C. A. (2019). Intellectuals and fascism in interwar Romania. The Criterion association. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Boia, L. (2012). Capcanele istoriei. Elita intelectuală Românească între 1930 și 1950 (Ediţia a Il-a revăzută şi adăugită). Humanitas.
  • Bosomitu, Ș. (2011). Notes and remarks on the (re) institutionalization of sociology in communist Romania in the 1960s. History of Communism in Europe, 2(-1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.7761/HCE.2.169
  • Bosomitu, Ș. (2017). Sociology in commnunist Romania: An institutional and biographical overview. Studia Sociologica (Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai), 62(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2017-0005
  • Bucur, B. (2013). The Bucharest school of sociology and the failure of the interwar community development project. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 6(56), 93–102.
  • Cernea, M., Larionescu, M., Springer, E., & Stahl, H. H. (1981). Rural community studies in Rumania. In J.-L. Durand-Drouhin, L.-M. Szwengrub, & I. Mihăilescu (Eds.), Rural community studies in Europe: T. I (pp. 191–254). Pergamon Press.
  • Chirot, D. (1976). Social change in a peripheral society. The creation of a Balkan colony. Academic Press.
  • Chirot, D. (1980). Preface. In H. H. Stahl (Ed.), Traditional Romanian village communities. The transition from communal to the capitalist mode of production in the Danube region (pp. viii–xi). Cambridge University Press.
  • Chirot, D. (2002). Schimbarea socială într-o societate periferică. Fomarea unei colonii Balcanice. Corint.
  • Chirot, D. (2019). Why 20th century Romanian sociology and history are relevant today? In Daniel Chirot. Docotor honoris causa. Universitatea din București (pp. 20–31). Editura Universităţii din București.
  • Costea, Ș. (1994). Continuity and discontinuity in Romanian sociology. In M. F. Keen & J. Mucha (Eds.), Eastern Europe in transformation. The impact on sociology (pp. 69–78). Greenwood Press.
  • da Graca, L., & Zingarelli, A. (Eds.). (2015). Studies on pre-capitalist modes of production. Brill.
  • Daniel, C. (1981). Civilizația Asiro-Babiloniană. Editura sport-turism.
  • Daniel, C. (1983). Civilizația sumeriana. Editura sport-turism.
  • Drăgan, I. (1992). Sociologia ca vocația a sintezei. Sociologie Românească, III(5), 521–524.
  • Galben, A. (2007). Pavel SOVETOV, teoretician remarcabil al gîndirii istorice din secolul XX, omul care a devansat timpul. Revista națională de drept, 12(87), 81–86.
  • Georgevici, G. F. (2013). Monographic sociology of Dimitrie Gusti. Social science and reform. Peter Lang GmbH.
  • Golopenția, S. (2014). The sociological school of Bucharest between its heyday and suppression. Revista română de sociologie, XXV(5-6), 379–404.
  • Guga, Ș. (2015). Sociologia istorică a lui Henri H. Stahl. Tact.
  • Haldon, J. (1993). The state and the tributary mode of production. Verso.
  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1964). Introduction. In K. Marx (Ed.), Pre-capitalist economic formations (pp. 9–65). Lawrence & Wishart.
  • Juravle, A. (2013). Henri H. Stahl – un sociolog social-democrat. Sfera Politicii, XXI(3 (175)), 46–55.
  • Juravle, A. (2016). Henri H. Stahl’s contribution to the sociological monographs of the Bucharest school of sociology. Revista română de sociologie, XXVII(5-6), 403–444.
  • Mendras, H. (2002). The invention of the peasantry: A moment in the history of post-World War II French sociology. Revue française de sociologie, 43(Supplément), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3322761
  • Mihăilescu, I. (2005). Profesorul Henri H. Stahl și școala sociologicã de la București. Sociologie Românească, III(2), 36–42.
  • Momoc, A. (2012). Capcanele politice ale sociologiei interbelice. Școala gustiană între carlism și legionarism. Curtea Veche Publishing.
  • Momoc, A. (2013a). Engineering a good society the sociological school of Bucharest national project for building Romania. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(2), 95–104.
  • Momoc, A. (2013b). Sociology and theology building the Romanian cultural nation Gusti’s sociological school. European Journal of Science and Theology, 9(4), 101–109.
  • Momoc, A. (2016). Dimitrie Gusti şi evitarea capcanei fasciste. Polis, 4(3 (13)), 17–34.
  • Musto, M. (2008a). Dissemination and reception of the Grundrisse in the world: Introduction. In M. Musto (Ed.), Karl Marx’s Grundrisse. Foundations of the critique of political economy 150 years later (pp. 179–188). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Musto, M. (2008b). Karl Marx’s Grundrisse. Foundations of the critique of political economy 150 years later. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Ornea, Z. (2015). Anii treizeci. Extrema dreaptă românească (IV-a). Cartea Românească.
  • Panaitescu, P. P. (1964). Obștea țărănească în țara Romînească și Moldova. Orînduirea feudală. Editura Academiei Republicii Populare România.
  • Pricopie, V. (2013). Social science journals in interwar Romania and the U.S. Model of sociology. Comparative Literature and Culture, 15(1), https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol15/iss4/12/.
  • Prodan, V. (2006). Activitatea Științifică a profesorului Henri H. Stahl. Repere documentare. Sociologie Româneascã, IV(3), 57–67.
  • Rizescu, V. (2013). Ideology, nation and modernization: Romanian developments in theoretical frameworks. Editura Universităţii din București.
  • Rostás, Z. (2000a). Monografie ca utopia. Interviuri su Henri H. Stahl (1985–1987). Paideia.
  • Rostás, Z. (2000b). The Bucharest school of sociology. East Central Europe, 27(part 2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/187633000X00011
  • Rostás, Z. (2011). The second marginalisation of the Bucharest sociological school. Acum, 5(1). https://arhiva-romanilor.blogspot.com/2013/05/zoltan-rostas-second-marginalisation-of.html?m=0
  • Rostás, Z. (2018). The rehabilitation of Romanian sociology after Stalinism. In A. Hîncu, & V. Karady (Eds.), Social sciences in the other Europe since 1945 (pp. 117–138). Central European University.
  • Sandu, D. (2014). Policentrismul școlii sociologice de la București: Calea metodologică la Henri H. Stahl. Anuarul Institutului de Istorie „George Bariţiu“ din Cluj-Napoca, XII, 7–18.
  • Sawer, M. (1977). Marxism and the question of the Asiatic mode of production. Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1939). Nerej, une village d'une région archaïque: Monographie sociologique (Institut de sciences social de Roumanie, T. 1–3).
  • Stahl, H. H. (1946). Sociologia satului devălmaș românesc (T. 1). Fundația Regele Mihai I.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1958). Contribuţii la studiul satelor devălmaşe romîneşti: T. 1: Confederaţii de ocol, structuri teritoriale şi tehnici agricole. Editura Academiei Republicii Populare România.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1959). Contribuţii la studiul satelor devălmaşe romîneşti: T. 2: Structura internă a satelor devălmaşe libere. Editura Academiei Republicii Populare România.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1965). Contribuţii la studiul satelor devălmaşe romîneşti: T. 3: Procesul de aservire feudală a satelor devălmaşe. Editura Academiei Republicii Populare România.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1969a). Controverse de istorie socială românească. Editura științifică.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1969b). Les anciennes communautés villageoises roumaines: Asservissement et pénétration capitaliste. Éditions de l’Académie de la République socialiste de Roumanie; Éditions du centre national de la receherche scienitfique.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1970). Les anciennes communautés villageoises roumaines. Le deuxième servage en Europe orientale et centrale (T. 63–64, pp. 99–120). Éditions de la Nouvelle critique.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1971). Histoire et sociologie des communautés villageoises roumaines. Études rurales, 41(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3406/rural.1971.1585
  • Stahl, H. H. (1972). Studii de sociologie istorică. Editura științifică.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1973). «Urbanisation» et vie rurale en Roumanie. Études rurales, 49-50, 296–303. https://doi.org/10.3406/rural.1973.1873
  • Stahl, H. H. (1976). La comunitá di villagio. Tra feudalismo e capitalismo nei Principali danubiani. Jaca Book.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1977). Voie prussienne et «deuxième servage». In M. Dobb & P.-M. Sweezy (Eds.), Du féodalisme au capitalisme: Problèmes de la transition (pp. 81–110). François Maspero.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1978). Théories de C. D. Gherea sur les lois de la pénétration du capitalisme dans les ‘pays retardataires’. Review. A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economics, Historical Systems, and Civilizations, II(1), 101–114.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1980a). Teorii și ipoteze privind sociologia orînduirii tributale. Editura științifică și enciclopedică.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1980b). Traditional Romanian village communities. The transition from communal to the capitalist mode of production in the Danube region. Cambridge University Press.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1982). Remarks on the problems of monographs and their restudy. In H. Mendras & I. Mihăilescu (Eds.), Theories and methods in rural community studies (pp. 235–243). Pergamon Press.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1986). The Romanian tributary system. Review. A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economics, Historical Systems, and Civilizations, IX(4), 619–647.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1992). Probleme confuze în istoria socialǎ a României. Editura academiei Române.
  • Stahl, H. H. (1993). Théories des processus de «modernisation» des Principautés Danubiennes et de l’ancien Royaume de Roumanie (1850–1920). Review. A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center for the Study of Economics, Historical Systems, and Civilizations, XVI(1), 85–111.
  • Tőkei, F. (1966). Sur le mode de production Asiatique. Akadémiai Kiadó.
  • Văcărescu, T.-E. (2012). Trei în unu sau Despre cum încap dreapta, stânga şi centrul în aceeaşi oală. O abordare comparată de istorie orală a Şcolii sociologice de la Bucureşti. Sociologie Românească, X(2), 21–41.
  • Verdery, K. (1991). National ideology under socialism. Identity and cultural politics in Ceușescu’s Romania. University of California Press.
  • Wickham, C. (1985). The uniqueness of the East. In T. J. Byres & H. Mukhia (Eds.), Feudalism and non-European societies (pp. 166–196). Frank Cass.
  • Wickham, C. (1994). The uniqueness of the East. In Land and power. Studies in Italian and European social history, 400–1200 (pp. 43–75). British School at Rome.
  • Wickham, C. (2007). Memories of underdevelopment: What has Marxism done for medieval history, and what can it still do? In C. Wickham (Ed.), Marxist history-writing for the twenty-first century (pp. 32–48). Oxford University Press.
  • Wittfogel, K. A. (1957). Oriental despotism. A comparative study of total power. Yale University Press.
  • Wolf, E. R. (2010). Europe and the people without history (3rd ed.). University of California Press.
  • Zamfir, C. (2005). 9 ipoteze pentru o analiză sociologico-epistemologică a sociologiei românești în perioada comunistă: 1944–1989. Sociologie Românească, III(1), 53–71.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.