Is there a canon in this class?

References

• Akiwowo, A. (1999). Indigenous sociologies: Extending the scope of the argument. International Sociology, 14(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580999014002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hardan, A. (2018). The sociological canon reconfigured: Empire, colonial critique, and contemporary sociology. International Sociology, 33(5), 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918791967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. F. (2014). Applying Ibn Khaldūn. The recovery of a lost tradition in sociology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alatas, S. F., & Sinha, V. (2017). Sociological theory beyond the canon. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. C. (1987). The centrality of the classics. In A. Giddens & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Social Theory today (pp. 11–57). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. L. (1988). Moving our minds: Studying women of color and reconstructing sociology. Teaching Sociology, 16(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/1317412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baehr, P. ([2002] 2016). Founders, classics, canons. Modern dispute over the origins and appraisal of sociologýs heritage. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine, J., Greenwood, N., Howard, J. R., Kain, E. L., Pike, D., Schwartz, M., Smith, R. T., & Zipp, J. F. (2016). Does the center hold? Reflections on a sociological core. Teaching Sociology, 44(3), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X16647432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In R. Barthes (Ed.), Image, music, text (pp. 142–148). Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhambra, G. K. (2014). A sociological dilemma: Race, segregation, and US sociology. Current Sociology, 62(4), 472–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birn, M. (2012). Bildung und Gleichberechtigung. Die Anfänge des Frauenstudiums an der Universität Heidelberg. Kurpfälzischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. (1994). The western canon: The books and school the ages. Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, U., & Dagmar, J. (1990). Studierende, lehrende und forschende Frauen in Berlin: 1908-1945 friedrich-wilhelms Universität Berlin. Selbstverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, G., & Klein, R. (1983). Theories of women’s studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyers, J. S. (2000). Subversion and the sociological canon. Michigan Sociological Review, 14(3), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2016). The promise of sociology: Global challenges for national disciplines. Sociology, 50(5), 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516629901
   Google Scholar
• Camic, C. (1997). Reclaiming the sociological classics: The state of the scholarship. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Carreira da Silva, F., & Brito Vieira, M. (2011). Books and canon building in sociology: The case of mind, self, and society. Journal of Classical Sociology, 11(4), 356–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X11415148
   Google Scholar
• Chałubiński, M. (2006). The sociological ideas of Stanisław Ossowski: His life, fundamental ideas and sociology in Polish and World Science. Journal of Classical Sociology, 6(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X06069679
   Google Scholar
• Chan, H. (1993). Some metasociological notes on the sinicisation of sociology. International Sociology, 8(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858093008001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, H. (2011). Féministes et femmes de lettre dans le domaine de la sociologie française avant 1914. Recherches féministes, 24(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.7202/1006083ar
   Google Scholar
• Charron, H. (2013). Les formes de l’illégitimité intellectuelle. Les femmes dans les sciences sociales françaises 1890-1940. CNRS Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1997). Why is classical theory classical? American Journal of Sociology, 102(6), 1511–1557. https://doi.org/10.1086/231125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2019). Canons and colonies. The global trajectory of sociology. Estudos Históricos, 32(67), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2178-14942019000200002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. J. (1892). A voice from south. Aldine Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of sociological thought. Ideas in historical and social context. Hartcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Curato, N. (2013). A sociological reading of classical sociological theory. Philippine Sociological Review, 61(2), 265–287.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, A. (1995). Secularization and modernization in Turkey: The ideas of Ziya Gökalp. Economy and Society, 24(2), 189–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, M. J. (1981). Early women sociologists and the American sociological society: The patterns of exclusion and participation. The American Sociologist, 16, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198101)17:13.0.CO;2-6
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, M. J. (Ed.). (1991). Woman in sociology. A Bio-biographical sourcebook. Greenwood press.
   Google Scholar
• Deflem, M. (2003). The sociology of the sociology of money, simmel and the contemporary battle of the classics. Journal of Classical Sociology, 3(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X03003001695
   Google Scholar
• Dykeman, T. (Ed.). (1999). The neglected canon: Nine women philosophers. First to the twentieth century. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. H., & Evans, M. S. (2012). Sociology and christianity. In J. B. Stump & A. G. Padgett (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to science and christianity (pp. 87–105). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, E. (1990). Endless crusade. Women social scientists and progressive reform. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilcher-Holtey, I. (1992). Modelle ‘Moderner Weiblichkeit’. In R. Lepsius (Ed.), Diskussionen im akademischen Milieu Heidelbergs um 1900, Bildungsbürgertum im 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 176–205). Klett-Cotta.
   Google Scholar
• Go, J. (2020). Race, empire, and epistemic exclusion: Or the structures of sociological thought. Sociological Theory, 38(2), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120926213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., & O’Connor, H. (2015). Pearl Jephcott: The legacy of a forgotten sociological research pioneer. Sociology, 49(1), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514530536
   Google Scholar
• Grant, L., Stalp, M. C., & Ward, K. B. (2002). Women’s sociological research and writing in the AJS in the pre-World War II era. The American Sociologist, 33(3), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-002-1012-4
   Google Scholar
• Greek, C. E. (1992). The religious roots of American sociology. Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., & Stehr, N. (2001). Why is Werner Sombart not part of the core of classical sociology? From fame to (near) oblivion. Journal of Classical Sociology, 1(2), 257–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687950122232558
   Google Scholar
• Grüning, B. (2017). Beyond the Cold War? The reception of Arendt in Germany and Italy. Sociologica, 1, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2383/86985
   Google Scholar
• Grüning, B. (2021). Between politics and common sense: The epistemological and symbolic boundaries of sociology during national socialism. Journal of Classical Sociology, 21(1), 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X19900667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henking, S. E. (1992). Protestant religious experience and the rise of American sociology: Evidence from the bernard papers. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 28(October), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(199210)28:4<325::AID-JHBS2300280402>3.0.CO;2-2
   Google Scholar
• Heuerkamp, C. (1994). Jüdische Akademikerinnen in Deutschland 1900-1938. In T. Wobbe & G. Lindemann (Eds.), Denkachsen. Zur theoretischen und institutionellen Rede vom Geschlecht (pp. 86–113). Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Honegger, C., & Wobbe, T. (Eds.). (1998). Frauen in der Soziologie. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner, D. R. (2014). Becoming Mead. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. (2009). Influence and canonical supremacy: An analysis of how George Herbert Mead demoted Charles Horton Cooley in the sociological canon. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 45(2), 117–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandall, T. R. (1988). The woman question in classical sociological theory. Florida International University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koleva, S. (2020). Doing post-western sociology in Central and Eastern Europe before and after the great change: Some epistemological questions. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 7(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00133-8
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). Science in action. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lengermann, M. P., & Niebrugge, G. (1998). The women founders. Sociology and social theory 1830-1930. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mazon, P. M. (2003). Gender and the modern research university: The admission of women to German higher education 1865-1914. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, L. (Ed.). (1998). Women theorists on Society and politics. Wilfried Laurier University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milz, H. (1994). Soziologie und Frauenbewusstsein. Leske+Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. (Ed.). (2017). Canon/archive: Studies in quantitative formalism. Paper Monument.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (2015). The scholar denied: WEB Du Bois and the birth of modern sociology. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, L. (Ed.). (1990). Feminist/postmodernism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ollion, E., & Abbott, A. (2016). French connections: The reception of French sociologists in the USA (1970-2012). European Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 331–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975616000126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Outhwaite, W. (2009). Canon formation in late 20th-century British sociology. Sociology, 43(6), 1029–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509345696
   Google Scholar
• Owens, B. R. (2015). The status of the classics: A view from today. Journal of Classical Sociology, 15(4), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X15572281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, P. K. J. (2014). Africa, Asia, and the history of philosophy. Racism in the formation of the philosophical canon, 1780–1830. SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, S. (2010). The ISA handbook of diverse sociological tradition. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, S. (2021). The nationalist-indigenous and colonial modernity: An assessment of two sociologists in India. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00140-9
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, S. (2001). Sexual politics in comte and durkheim: Feminism, history and the French sociological tradition. Signs, 27(1), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.1086/495678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Der soziologische ‘Kanon’: Disziplinierung oder Grenzüberschreitung. Soziologische Revue, 25(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1524/srsr.2002.25.3.247
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, M. C. (2019). Yoruba indigenous sociologies: Africa, disconcertment and ontologies in contemporary sociology. Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro), 32(67), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2178-14942019000200004
   Google Scholar
• Roulleau-Berger, L. (2021). Introduction: On post-western sociology. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00148-9
   Google Scholar
• Royle, N. (2000). Deconstruction: A user’s guide. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, M. (2013). FOUR empire for the poor imperial dreams and the quest for an Italian sociology, 1870s–1950s. In G. Steinimetz (Ed.), Sociology and empire (pp. 106–166). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, M. (2017). The gini-merton connection. An episode in the history of sociology and its international circulation. Sociologica. Italian Journal of Sociology on Line, XI, 1–33. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/89511
   Google Scholar
• Santoro, M., & Sapiro, G. (2017). On the social life of ideas and the persistence of the author in the social and human sciences. A presentation of the symposium. Sociologica, 1. https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.2383/86980
   Google Scholar
• Sapiro, G., Santoro, M., & Baert, P. (Eds.). (2020). Ideas on the move in the human and social sciences. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Schneickert, C., Lenger, A., Steckermeier, L. C., & Rieder, T. (2019). The sociological canon, relations between theories and methods, and a latent political structure: Findings from a survey of sociology students in Germany and consequences for teaching. Teaching Sociology, 47(4), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X19865301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnitzel, S. (2012). Soziologie im National Sozialismus zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik: Elisabeth Pfeil und das ‘Archiv für Bevölkerungswissenschaft und Bevölkerungspolitik’. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schüler, A. (2004). Frauenbewegung und soziale Reform. Jane Addams and Alice Salomon im transatlantischen Dialog. Franz Stenert Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., & Bromley, R. (2013). Envisoning sociology. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shalin, D. N. (2015). Making the sociological canon: The battle over George Herbert mead’s legacy. The American Sociologist, 46(3), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9259-8
   Google Scholar
• Silveberg, H. (Ed.). (1998). Gender and the American social science. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2014). The sacred project of American sociology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. (1974). Women’s perspective as a radical critique of sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 44(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1974.tb00718.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. (2013). Sociology & empire: The imperial entanglements of a discipline. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susen, S., & Turner, B. S. (2011). Tradition and innovation in classical sociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 11(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X10391451
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. E., & Kukulan, A. (2004). “Why don't I know about these women?”: The integration of early women sociologists in classical theory courses. Teaching Sociology, 32(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0403200301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidich, A. J., & Lyman, S. M. (1985). American sociology. Worldly rejections of religion and their directions. Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. ([1917] 1919). Vom Typenwandel der studierenden Frau. In Id., Frauenfragen und Frauengedanken (pp. 179–201). Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, C. (2006). Feminist interpretations of the philosophical canon. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(2), 537–552. https://doi.org/10.1086/491677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wobbe, T., Berrebi-Hoffmann, I., & Lallement, M. (2011). Die gesellschaftliche Verortung des Geschlechts. Diskurse der Differenz in der deutschen und französischen Soziologie um 1900. Campus.
   Google Scholar