Living together as a solidarity and generative practice: the case of co-housing and organized cohabitations

References

• Altman, I. (1976). Privacy. A concept analysis. Environment and Behavior, 8(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391657600800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzuffi, O. (2020). Quarant’anni di storia bergamasca. EQUA.
   Google Scholar
• Azzolari, B., & Zappella, E. (2021). Home page: perché la casa è una pagina tutta da scrivere: analisi di un’esperienza pilota di convivenza tra giovani con e senza disabilità. Formazione & Insegnamento, 19, 266–273.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2012). Care in everyday life: An ethic of care in practice. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batterham, D. (2019). Homelessness as capability deprivation: A conceptual model. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(3), 274–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1481142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benincasa, F. (2018). L’analisi costi-benefici del progetto Ca’nostra. Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, P. J., & Rojey, A. (2017). Aspects politiques et culturels des utopies d’aujourd’hui. Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles, 2, 86–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bezze, M., Canali, C., Geron, D., Innocenti, E., & Vecchiato, T. (2022). Le pratiche generative sono innovazione sociale: regolazioni condivise. Studi Zancan, 1, 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F. (2015). Le co-housing en Italie entre rêve et réalité. Une recherche sur les aspirations à la co-résidence. International Review of Sociology, 25(3), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1050308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F. (2020). The role of co-housing. Towards a new model of collaborative housing in Italy. The Lab’s Quarterly, 1, 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F. (2023). Ri-abitare gli spazi: immaginari, utopie e pratiche in trasformazione. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 12(24), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-13329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F., & Roberto, S. (2016). Le modalità del vivere urbano. FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P., & Kusenbach, M. (2020). For a comparative sociology of home: Relationships, cultures, structures. Current Sociology, 68(5), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120927776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccagni, P., & Miranda Nieto, A. (2022). Home in question: Uncovering meanings, desires and dilemmas of non-home. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(2), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494211037683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocci, F., & Guerini, I. (2017). Casa. dove voglio stare. Le percezioni dei “disabili intellettivi” e degli studenti universitari sull’indipendenza abitativa. L’integrazione scolastica e sociale, 16, 281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Boni, A., & Nava, L. (2018). Fronteggiare l'emergenza abitativa: ipotesi sui modelli di intervento dei Comuni e prospettive di ricerca. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 3, 485–500.
   Google Scholar
• Borgloh, S., & Westerheide, P. (2012). The impact of mutual support based housing projects on the costs of care. Housing Studies, 5(27), 620–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.697554
   Google Scholar
• Bosi, L., & Zamponi, L. (2019). Resistere alla crisi. I percorsi dell’azione sociale diretta. il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Bosis, F. (2020). Un’alleanza possibile. Un cohousing sociale per giovani nativi e stranieri. Antropologia Pubblica, 6(2), 75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bresson, S., & Denèfle, S. (2015). Diversity of self-managed co-housing initiatives in France. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresson, S., & Labit, A. (2020). How does collaborative housing address the issue of social inclusion? A French perspective. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 118–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1671488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruun, M. H. (2011). Egalitarianism and community in danish housing cooperatives: Proper forms of sharing and being together. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 55(2), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550204
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Privacy and communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 6(1), 206–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1982.11678499
   Google Scholar
• Casodi, M., Chipi, B., Serra, R., & Vitale, F. (2021). Abitazioni condivise tra utenti psichiatrici e coinquilini con bisogno abitativo. Autonomia, integrazione e inclusione nel progetto P.R.I.S.M.A. Evidence based Psychiatric Care Journal of the Italian Society of Psychiatry, 7, 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Charlebois, C. (2002). Recension des écrits sur le concept d’habitation partagée. Rapport non-publié déposé à la Société d’habitation du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, P. (2013). Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: Lessons from lilac, the UK's first ecological, affordable cohousing community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1654–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiodelli, F. (2015). What is really different between cohousing and gated communities? European Planning Studies, 23(12), 2566–2581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1096915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiola, G. (2019). La residenzialità ultra light e la frammentaria politica regionale residenziale italiana. Mantua Humanistic Studies, VI, 323–357.
   Google Scholar
• Ciarfeo Purich, R., Cricenti, O., Tommaselli, E., & Balestra, R. (2017). Residenza Intermedia per Alcolisti: da progetto sperimentale a realtà operativa. Mission, 45, 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, V., Tuffin, K., Bowker, N., & Frewin, K. (2018). A fine balance: A review of shared housing among young adults. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(10). doi:10.1111/spc3.12415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coele, M. (2014). Co-housing and intergenerational exchange: Exchange of housing equity for personal care assistance in intentional communities. Working with Older People, 18, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-01-2014-0001
   Google Scholar
• Costa, G. (2015). Abitare insieme sotto lo stesso tetto, dietro la stessa porta. Territorio, 75, 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, G. (2022). Organized cohabitation and domestic hyper-proximity in social policies. Italian Sociological Review, 12(3), 1161–1183.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, G. (2023). La coabitazione organizzata: forme di base e concetti rilevanti. In G. Costa & F. Minora (Eds.), Coabitazioni solidali. Politiche, programmi e progetti. Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, G., & Bianchi, F. (2020). Rilanciare il legame sociale attraverso pratiche di condivisione abitativa. la Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 2, 143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, G., & Magino, S. (2021). Giovani LGBT+ senza dimora trovano casa. Autonomie Locali e Servizi Sociali, 2, 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, G., & Minora, A. (2023). Coabitazioni Solidali. Politiche, programmi e progetti. Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Czischke, D. (2018). Collaborative housing and housing providers: Towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. International Journal of Housing Policy, 18(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, M. (2017). Quantifying the environmental impact of ecovillages and co-housing communities: A systematic literature review. Local Environment, 22(11), 1358–1377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2017.1348342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danesi, G. (2023). La coabitazione e l’abitare condiviso come politica abitativa. In G. Costa & F. Minora (Eds.), Coabitazioni solidali. Politiche, programmi e progetti (pp. 165–176). Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Darton, R., & Muncer, A.-M. (2008). Alternative housing and care. Arrangements: The evidence. In B. Roe & R. Beech (Eds.), Intermediate and continuing care: Policy and practice (pp. 183–203). Blackwell Pub. Ldt.
   Google Scholar
• Delendi, M. L. (2017). Sustainable living models. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(4), 772–779. https://doi.org/10.2495/sdp-v12-n4-772-779
   Google Scholar
• Deriu, F., & Bucco, G. (2013). Il social co-housing: una risposta innovativa alle incertezze presenti e future dei giovani in Italia. Sociologia urbana e rurale, 100, 4–91.
   Google Scholar
• Droste, C. (2015). German cohousing: an opportunity for municipalities to foster socially inclusive urban development? Urban Research & Practice, 1(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011428
   Google Scholar
• Falkenstjerne Beck, A. (2020). What is co-housing? Developing a conceptual framework from the studies of Danish intergenerational co-housing. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1633398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornari, S. (2019). La convivenza intrafamiliare. In M. C. Federici & U. Conti (Eds.), I luoghi del possibile. Sociologia dell’abitare e del co-housing (pp. 99–109). Carocci.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D. (2012). Seeding community: Collaborative housing as a strategy for social and neighbourhood repair. Built Environment, 38(3), 364–394. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.38.3.364
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, M. G. (2017). Great spatial expectations: On three objects, two communities and one house. Current Sociology, 65(4), 603–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117694071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuffrè, M., & Marchetti, C. (2020). Vivere insieme. Intimità e quotidianità nelle convivenze interculturali tra rifugiati e italiani a Parma. Antropologia Pubblica, 6(2), 55–74.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life (1st ed.). Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S., & McCarthy, L. (2015). Is sharing the solution?: Exploring the opportunities and challenges of privately rented shared accommodation for single people in housing need. People, Place and Policy, 9(3), 159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Guerini, I. (2020). Quale inclusione? La questione dell’indipendenza abitativa per le persone con impairment intellettivo. Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Guerini, I. (2021). Impairment intellettivo e (nuove) forme di residenzialità in Italia. Buone pratiche verso l’inclusione. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, IX(2), 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard, P., & Tsakiris, M. (2009). The experience of agency: Feelings, judgments, and responsibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01644.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S., Davies, K., Edwards, G., & Scicluna, R. (2019). Shared housing, shared lives everyday experiences across the lifecourse. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hondrich, K. O., & Koch-Arzberger, C. (1992). Solidarität in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt A.M.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, A. (2015). Age-Wohnmatrix. Bedürfnisse statt Begriffe ins Zentrum stellen. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 48(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-013-0566-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, H. (2015). Towards a deeper understanding of the social architecture of co-housing: Evidence from the UK, USA and Australia. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labit, A. (2015). Self-managed co-housing in the context of an ageing population in Europe. Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labit, A. (2016). Habiter en citoyenneté et solidarité pour mieux vieillir. Gérontologie et société, 38(149), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.3917/gs1.149.0141
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A. (2022). Habiter la vieillesse. La Découverte, 3(17), 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A., & Chaland, K. (2010). L’habitat groupé autogéré en France et en Allemagne. Perspectives d’avenir dans le contexte du vieillissement démographique, Espace populations sociétés. Space populations societies, 1, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.4000/eps.3982
   Google Scholar
• Labit, A., & Dubost, N. (2016). Housing and ageing in France and Germany: The intergenerational solution. Housing, Care and Support, 19, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-08-2016-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labit, A., Guinchard, M., & Evrard-Piat, E. (2022). Les femmes qui vieillissent, au cœur de noivelles formes d’habitat participatives et solidaires. Pour, 1(242), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.3917/pour.242.0285
   Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Helamaa, A., Kuoppa, J., & Alatalo, E. (2020). Bricolage in collaborative housing in Finland: Combining resources for alternative housing solutions. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1492438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Carriou, C., & Czischke, D. (2020). Collaborative housing research (1990–2017): A systematic review and thematic analysis of the field. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 10–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1536077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leccardi, C., & Volonté, P. (Eds.). (2017). Verso un nuovo individualismo? Individualizzazione, soggettività e legame sociale. Egea.
   Google Scholar
• Leenhardt, H. (2011). De nouvelles formes d’organisation, en Allemagne, pour pouvoir vieillir dans son quartier (même en cas de démence). Gérontologie et société, 34, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.3917/gs.136.0205
   Google Scholar
• Lumino, R. (2015). Nuove forme dell'abitare: esperienze e processi di attivazione individuale. In U. Ascoli, C. Ranci, & G. Sgritta (Eds.), Investire nel sociale. La difficile innovazione del welfare italiano. Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Maino, F., & Ferrera, M. (Eds.). (2017). Terzo Rapporto sul Welfare in Italia, Fondazione Cariplo, Centro di documentazione. Luigi Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Malaguti, E., & Fabbri, L. (2020). Progettare il futuro insieme ai giovani con disabilità intellettiva. Cohousing e Innovazione Didattica per un’inclusione sociale. Indagine esplorativa sull’opinione degli studenti universitari. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 8(1), 306–323.
   Google Scholar
• McCamant, K., & Durrett, C. (2011). Creating cohousing. Building sustainable communities (1st ed.). New Society Publishers. (Original work published 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Mezzina, R., & Ridente, P. (2015). La trasformazione della residenzialità a Trieste verso l’abitare supportato. Nuova Rassegna di Studi Psichiatrici, 12, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Molinari, P. (2018). I coraggiosi dell’Housing First. In P. Molinari & A. Zenarolla (Eds.), Prima la casa. La sperimentazione Housing First in Italia (pp. 28–43). FrancoAngeli.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. (2015). Senior co-housing communities in Denmark. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 29(1–2), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2015.989770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persico, G., & Boschetti, L. (2020). Abitare le biografie nell’esecuzione penale esterna. Lubrina Bramani Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Persico, G., & Ottaviano, C. (2018). Vivere insieme come risposta ai bisogni abitativi di giovani donne con e senza disabilita: una sfida generativa alle politiche abitative. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 1, 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Pruvost, G. (2013). Critique en acte de la vie quotidienne à la ZAD de Notre-Dame-des-Landes. Politix, (1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.117.0035
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., & Goss, K. A. (2002). Introduction. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux. The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 1–19). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricciuti, E., & Turrini, A. (2018). Foundations in Italy: What roles and challenges? American Behavioral Scientist, 62(13), 1822–1832. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogel, L., Corubolo, M., Gambarana, C., & Omegna, E. (2018). Co-housing. L’arte di vivere insieme. Altraeconomia.
   Google Scholar
• Rogojanu, A. (2015). Gemeinschaftliches Bauen und Wohnen zwischen Selbstorganisation, Solidarität und stadtpolitischen Interessen. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Volkskunde, 118(3–4), 177–201.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfelder, C. (2017). Vieillir dans un habitat autogéré: La question du «vivre ensemble». Gérontologie et société, 39(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.3917/gs1.152.0155
   Google Scholar
• Roux, N. (2014). Habiter autrement, un autre rapport au temps. Ecologie & politique, 48(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.3917/ecopo.048.0037
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. (2015). The effects of cohousing on the social housing system: The case of the threshold centre. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 4(30), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9436-7
   Google Scholar
• Ruiu, M. L. (2016). The social capital of cohousing communities. Sociology, 50(2), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515573473
   Google Scholar
• Sandstedt, E., & Westin, S. (2015). Beyond gemeinschaft and gesellschaft. Cohousing life in contemporary Sweden. Housing, Theory and Society, 32(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2015.1011687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semprebon, M., & Vicari Haddock, S. (2016). Innovative housing practices involving immigrants: The case of self-building in Italy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9464-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. (2015). Community psychology and the capabilities approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 55(3–4), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9713-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørvoll, J., & Bengtsson, B. (2020). Mechanisms of solidarity in collaborative housing - The case of co-operative housing in Denmark 1980–2017. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2018.1467341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starace, F., Marchesini, N., & Melati, E. (2015). L'esperienza del DSM-DP di Modena nel campo della “residenzialità leggera”. Nuova Rassegna di Studi Psichiatrici, 12, 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, J. (2005). But they all come back: Facing the challenges of prisoner re-entry. The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2015). Understanding co-housing from a planning perspective: Why and how? Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1011427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchiato, T. (2014). Verso nuovi diritti e doveri sociali: la sfida del welfare generativo. Diritto e società, 1, 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Vedel-Petersen, F., Jantzen, E. B., & Ranten, K. (1988). Bofællesskaber En Eksempelsamling. SBi Rapport 187. SBi Forlag Danish Building Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vestbro, D. U., & Horelli, L. (2012). Design for gender equality: The history of co-housing ideas and realities. Built Environment, 38(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.38.3.315
   Google Scholar
• Zanolini, Z. (2023). L’abitare supportato in salute mentale. In G. Costa & F. Minora (Eds.), Coabitazioni solidali. Politiche, programmi e progetti (pp. 82–94). Carocci.
   Google Scholar