Seeking a Responsible Arms Trade to Reduce Human Suffering in Yemen

References

• Acheson, R. 2019. A Fight for the Moral and Political Credibility of the ATT. ATT Monitor 12 (8). https://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/att/monitor/ATTMonitor12.8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amnesty International. 2020. Human Rights in Middle East and North Africa - Review in 2019. Accessed 8 November 2020. https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east-and-north-africa/report-middle-east-and-north-africa/.
   Google Scholar
• ASER (Action Sécurité Ethique Républicaines). 2019. Conseil d’Etat. Section du Contentieux. Requête sommaire [Council of State. Litigation section. Summary request]. Paris. https://aser-asso.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Requ%C3%AAte-sommaire_Conseil-dEtat-ASER19-novembre-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Assemblée Nationale [National Assembly - France]. 2018. Compte rendu no. 66. Commission de la défense nationale et des forces armées. Mercredi 30 Mai 2018. Session Ordinaire de 2017-2018 [Report no. 66. National defence and armed forces commission. Wednesday 30 May 2018. 2017-2018 ordinary session]. http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/15/comptes-rendus/cion_def/l15cion_def1718066_compte-rendu.
   Google Scholar
• Béraud-Sudreau, L. 2020. French Arms Exports: The Business of Sovereignty. London: Routledge/IISS.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaglia, M. 2018a. Demande de suspension des licences d’exportation de matériels de guerre et matériels assimilés à destination des pays membres de la coalition menée par l’Arabie saoudite et impliqués dans la guerre au Yémen (articles L2335-4 et R2335-15 du Code de la défense) [Request for the suspension of licences for the export of military items and relatedmaterial towards countries that are members of the coalition led by Saudi Arabia and involvedin the conflict in Yemen (articles L2335-4 and R2335-15 of the Defence Code)]. Paris, 1 March. https://aser-asso.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Demande-de-suspension_ASER_01-mars-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaglia, M. 2018b. Demande de suspension des licences d’exportation de matériels de guerre et matériels assimilés à destination des pays membres de la coalition menée par l’Arabie saoudite et impliqués dans la guerre au Yémen (articles L2335-4 et R2335-15 du Code de la défense)-ANNEXE [Request for the suspension of licences for the export of military items and related material towards countries that are members of the coalition led by Saudi Arabia and involved in the conflict in Yemen (articles L2335-4 and R2335-15 of the DefenceCode)-ANNEX]. Paris. https://aser-asso.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Annexe-1-demande-de-suspension-transfert-darmes-du-gouvernement-fran%C3%A7ais-vers-lacoalition-des-pays-en-guerre-au-Yemen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Breham, J., and Greig, L. 2018. Avis Juridique: Les Transferts d’armes de la France dans le cadre du conflit au Yemen, a competer d’Avril 2015 jusqu’a la periode actuelle. [Legal advice: France’s arms transfers within the framework of the conflict in Yemen from April 2015 to the present day]. Ancile Avocats (AARPI). Paris, 16 March. https://amnestyfr.cdn.prismic.io/amnestyfr%2Fb2bf59b9-cd8e-471f-a689-e8e84f151b17_etude+juridique_cabinet+ancile_transfert+d%27armes+de+la+france+dans+le+cadre+du+conflit+au+y%C3%A9men.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, M. 2007. The Arms Trade and States’ Duty to Ensure Respect for Humanitarian and Human Rights Law. Journal of Conflict & Security Law (12) 3: 359-87.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, M. 2012. The Review of the EU Common Position on Arms Exports: Prospects for Strengthened Controls. EU Non-Proliferation Papers no. 7. Stockholm: SIPRI. https://www.nonproliferation.eu/the-review-of-the-eu-common-position-on-arms-exports-prospects-for-strenghtened-controls-2/.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, M., Cooper, N., and Holtom, P. 2012. The UN Arms Trade Treaty: Arms Export Controls, the Human Security Agenda and the Lessons of History. International Affairs 88 (5): 1029–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, M., and Maletta, G. 2020. Developments in the European Union’s Dual-use and Arms Trade Controls. In SIPRI Yearbook 2020: Armament, Disarmament and International Security: 559–67. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CAAT (Campaign Against Arms Trade). 2020. CAAT Files New Judicial Review Application Against Decision to Renew Arms Sales to Saudi Arabia. 27 October. https://caat.org.uk/news/caat-files-new-judicial-review-application-against-decision-to-renew-arms-sales-to-saudi-arabia/.
   Google Scholar
• Camera dei Deputati [Chamber of Deputies - Italy]. 2019. Mozione 1/00204 [Motion 1/00204]. 24 June. https://aic.camera.it/aic/scheda.html?numero=1-00204&ramo=C&leg=18.
   Google Scholar
• Camera dei Deputati. 2020. Mozione 8/00096 [Motion 8-/00096]. 22 December. https://aic.camera.it/aic/scheda.html?numero=8-00096&ramo=C&leg=18.
   Google Scholar
• Casey-Maslen, S., Clapham, A., Giacca, G., and Parker, S. 2016. The Arms Trade Treaty: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cops, D. 2020. Past and Future of the Review of the EU Common Position on Arms Exports. Flemish Peace Institute Blog. Accessed November 2020. https://vlaamsvredesinstituut.eu/en/blog/past-and-future-of-the-review-of-the-eu-common-position-on-arms-exports/.
   Google Scholar
• Cour Administratif d’Appel de Paris [Administrative Court of Appeal of Paris]. 2019. Ordonnance du 26 Septembre 2019 [Order of 26 September 2019]. No. 19PA02929. Paris. https://aser-asso.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Ordonnance-n%C2%B019PA02929-Cour-administrative-dappel-26-septembre-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Court of Appeal. 2019. Judgement. Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) v The Secretary of State for International Trade. Case No: T3/2017/2079. London, 20 June. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/CAAT-v-Secretary-of-State-and-Others-Open-12-June-2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2018. Udenrigsministeriet suspenderer godkendelser af eksport af våben til Saudi-Arabien [Ministry of Foreign Affairs suspends arms exports to Saudi Arabia]. 22 November. https://um.dk/da/nyheder-fra-udenrigsministeriet/NewsDisplayPage/?newsID=BDBBFF5A-060C-41FF-BD7C-FC55D691C7F5.
   Google Scholar
• Dörmann, K., and Serralvo, J., 2014. Common Article 1 to the Geneva Conventions and the Obligation to Prevent International Humanitarian Law Violations. International Review of the Red Cross 96 (895/896): 707–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquet, N., ed. 2014. Business as Usual? Assessing the Impact of the Arab Spring on European Arms Export Control Policies. Brussels: Flemish Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2019.  Dutch Arms Export Policy in 2018 1 July. https://www.government.nl/documents/reports/2019/07/01/dutch-arms-export-policy-in-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, J. L. 2011. Market Imperative Meets Normative Power: Human Rights and European Arms Transfer Policy. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 209–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, J. L. 2015. Dangerous Trade: Arms Exports, Human Rights, and International Reputation. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2020. Arms Export: Implementation of Common Position 2008/944/CFSP. 2020/2003(INI). 17 September. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0137_EN.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, L. 2019. Western Gunrunners, (Middle-)Eastern Casualties: Unlawfully Trading Arms with States Engulfed in Yemeni Civil War? Journal of Conflict & Security Law 24 (3): 503–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2018. No Foundations for Arms Export Authorisations to Saudi Arabia or the United Arab Emirates. 22 November. https://um.fi/current-affairs/-/asset_publisher/gc654PySnjTX/content/ei-edellytyksia-uusille-asevientiluville-saudi-arabiaan-tai-arabiemiraatteihin?curAsset=0&stId=44227.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. T. 2016. Taking Ambiguity Seriously: Explaining the Indeterminacy of the European Union Conventional Arms Export Control Regime. European Journal of International Relations 22 (1). DOI:10.1177/1354066115584086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. T., and Marsh, N. 2015. Normative Power and Organized Hypocrisy: European Union Member States’ Arms Export to Libya. European Security 24 (2): 264–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henckaerts, J. M., and Doswald-Beck, L. ed. 2005a. Customary International Humanitarian Law. Volume I: Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henckaerts, J. M., and Doswald-Beck, L. ed. 2005b. Customary International Humanitarian Law. Volume II: Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• High Court of Justice. 2016. Skeleton Argument of the Claimant. Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) v The Secretary of State for International Trade. Case No CO/1306/2016. London. https://caat.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2017-01-30.caat-skeleton.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• High Court of Justice. 2017. Open Skeleton Argument of the Secretary of State for Hearing 7, 8, 10 February 2017. Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT) v The Secretary of State for International Trade. Case No CO/1306/2016. London. https://caat.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2017-02-03.defendant-skeleton.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2020. World Report 2020: Yemen. Accessed 8 November 2020. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/yemen.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross). 1999a. Arms Availability and the Situation of Civilians in Armed Conflict: A Study Presented by the ICRC. ICRC publication 1999 ref. 0734. Geneva. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/icrc_002_0734_arms_availability.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 1999b. 27th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Geneva, 31 October to 6 November 1999. Plan of Action for the Years 2000-2003. Geneva. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/article/other/57jq8k.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2003. 28th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Resolution 1: Adoption of the Declaration and Agenda for Humanitarian Action. Final Goal 2.3 – Reduce the human suffering resulting from the uncontrolled availability and misuse of weapons. Geneva. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/resolution/28-international-conference-resolution-1-2003.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2007. 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement: Resolution 3. Reaffirmation and Implementation of International Humanitarian Law: Preserving Human Life and Dignity in Armed Conflict. Geneva. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/resolution/30-international-conference-resolution-3-2007.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2011. 31th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement: Resolution 2: 4-year Action Plan for the Implementation of International Humanitarian Law. Objective 5: Arms Transfers. Geneva. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/publication/p1130.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ICRC. 2016. Commentary on the First Geneva Convention. Geneva. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/ihl/full/GCI-commentary.
   Google Scholar
• Lammerant, H. 2020. Are Courts Going to Set a Higher Standard for Human Rights Due Diligence in Arms Exports? IPIS Arms Trade Bulletin September–October 2020. 5 November. https://ipisresearch.be/weekly-briefing/arms-trade-bulletin-september-october-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Landais, C. 2018. Requete no. 1807203. Memoire en défense. [Statement of defence]. 23 November. https://aser-asso.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/M%C3%A9moire-en-d%C3%A9fense-du-23-novembre-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laurance, E. J. 1998. Controlling the Availability and Unlawful Use of Arms at the International Level: The United Nations and Civil Society. In ICRC, ed. Arms Availability and Violations of International Humanitarian Law and the Deterioration of the Situation of Civilians in Armed Conflicts. Oslo: Expert Group Meeting Report, 18-20 May.
   Google Scholar
• Laurance, E. J. 2011. 1991 Arms Trade Control Efforts and Their Echoes. Arms Control Today 41 (6). https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2011-07/1991-arms-trade-control-efforts-their-echoes#11.
   Google Scholar
• Maletta, G. 2019. Legal Challenges to EU Member States’ Arms Exports to Saudi Arabia: Current Status and Potential Implications. SIPRI Topical Backgrounder. Stockholm: SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2019/legal-challenges-eu-member-states-arms-exports-saudi-arabia-current-status-and-potential.
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights). 2020. Situation of Human Rights in Yemen, Including Violations and Abuses since September 2014. Report of the Group of Eminent International and Regional Experts on Yemen. A/HRC/45/6. 28 September. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/GEE-Yemen/2020-09-09-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Open. 2019. Armi italiane in Yemen, Di Maio annuncia lo stop: «Così freniamo l’immigrazione» – Il video [Italian arms in Yemen, Di Maio announces the stop: “This is how we halt immigration” – The video]. 11 July. https://www.open.online/2019/07/11/armi-italiane-yemen-di-maio-annuncia-stop-freniamo-immigrazione/.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S. ed. 2016. The Arms Trade Treaty: A Practical Guide to National Implementation. Geneva: The Small Arms Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, S., and Wilson, M. 2016. A Guide to the UN Small Arms Process. 2016 Update. Geneva: The Small Arms Survey. http://www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/Q-Handbooks/HB-02-Diplo-Guide/SAS-HB02-Guide-UN-Small-Arms-Process.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel. 2020. Rüstungsexporte an Saudi-Arabien bleiben verboten [Arms exports to Saudi Arabia remain prohibited]. 10 December. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/saudi-arabien-bundesregierung-verlaengert-stopp-von-ruestungsexporten-a-a32661ae-96cc-4285-b9a4-ae58c0a8cb25.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrianakis, A. 2016. Legitimising Liberal Militarism: Politics, Law and War in the Arms Trade Treaty. Third World Quarterly 37 (5): 840–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrianakis, A. 2017. When ‘Anxious Scrutiny’ of Arms Exports Facilitates Humanitarian Disaster. The Political Quarterly 89 (1): 92–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrianakis, A. 2018. Controlling Weapons Circulation in a Postcolonial Militarised World. Review of International Studies 45 (1): 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrianakis, A. 2020. Requiem for Risk: Non-knowledge and Domination in the Governance of Weapons Circulation. International Political Sociology 14 (3): 233–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SVT Nyheter. 2019. Fyrpartiuppgörelsen: Stopp för vapenexport till Jemenkriget [The four-party agreement: Stop arms exports to the Yemeni war]. 20 January. https://www.svt.se/nyheter/utrikes/fyrpartiuppgorelsen-stopp-for-vapenexport-till-jemenkriget.
   Google Scholar
• Tribunal Administratif de Paris [Administrative court of Paris]. 2019. Exportation d’armes vers le Yemen [Arms exports to Yemen]. Communiqué de presse. Paris, 9 July. http://paris.tribunal-administratif.fr/Actualites-du-Tribunal/Communiques-de-presse/EXPORTATION-D-ARMES-VERS-LE-YEMEN.
   Google Scholar
• Tricot O’Farrel, K., and Isbister, R. 2018. The Beginning of the End? European Arms Exports for the Yemen War. Saferworld, 1 March. https://www.saferworld.org.uk/resources/news-and-analysis/post/759-the-beginning-of-the-end-european-arms-exports-for-the-yemen-war.
   Google Scholar
• Truss, E. 2020. Trade Update: Written Statement - HCWS339. 7 July. https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answersstatements/written-statement/Commons/2020-07-07/HCWS339/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2019. Humanitarian Crisis in Yemen Remains the Worst in the World, Warns UN. UN News, 14 February. https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/02/1032811?fbclid=IwAR0aTOMYI2J6OTtbY9KLTetPVXpwjtl86p9ZfwRiZEeyoQCda5uExbDYV1o.
   Google Scholar
• UNSC (United Nations Security Council). 2020. Letter dated 27 January 2020 from the Panel of Experts on Yemen addressed to the President of the Security Council. S/2020/326.
   Google Scholar
• Wezeman, P. D. 2018. Saudi Arabia, Armaments and Conflict in the Middle East. SIPRI Topical Backgrounder. Stockholm: SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2018/saudi-arabia-armaments-and-conflict-middle-east.
   Google Scholar
• Wezeman, P. D., and Kuimova, A. 2019. Military Spending and Arms Imports by Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE. SIPRI Fact Sheet. Stockholm: SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2019/sipri-fact-sheets/military-spending-and-arms-imports-iran-saudi-arabia-qatar-and-uae.
   Google Scholar
• Wezeman, P. D., et al. 2020. Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2019. SIPRI Factsheet. Stockholm: SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2020/sipri-fact-sheets/trends-international-arms-transfers-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Yihdego, Z. 2007. The Arms Trade and International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar