Are exotic species red queens?

REFERENCES

• Baker H.G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after ‘long-distance’ dispersal. Evolution 9: 347–349. doi:10.2307/2405656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell G. 1982. The masterpiece of nature: the evolution and genetics of sexuality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn T.M., Pyšek P., Bacher S., Carlton J.T., Duncan R.P., Jarošík V., Wilson J.R.U. & Richardson D.M. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 333–339. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.03.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman R.L. & Eastop V.F. 1994. Aphids on the world’s trees: an identification and information guide. Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman R.L. & Eastop V.F. 2000. Aphids on the world’s crops: an identification and information guide (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman R.L. & Eastop V.F. 2006. Aphids on the world’s herbaceous plants and shrubs. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Blossey B. & Nötzold R. 1995. Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. The Journal of Ecology 83: 887–889. doi:10.2307/2261425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budde K.B., Gallo L., Marchelli P., Mosner E., Liepelt S., Ziegenhagen B. & Leyer I. 2011. Wide spread invasion without sexual reproduction? A case study on European willows in Patagonia, Argentina. Biological Invasions 13: 45–54. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9785-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll L. 1871. Through the looking-glass, and what Alice found there. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Catford J.A., Jansson R. & Nilsson C. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions 15: 22–40. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheptou P.-O. 2012. Clarifying Baker’s law. Annals of Botany 109: 633–641. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colautti R.I., Ricciardi A., Grigorovich I. & MacIsaac H.J. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecology Letters 7: 721–733. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00616.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daehler C.C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: implications for conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34: 183–211. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorduin L.J. & Vrieling K. 2011. A review of the phytochemical support for the shifting defence hypothesis. Phytochemistry Reviews 10: 99–106. doi:10.1007/s11101-010-9195-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich P.R. & Raven P.H. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586–608. doi:10.2307/2406212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futuyma D.J. & Slatkin M. 1983. Coevolution. Massachusetts: Sinauer Sunderland.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton W.D., Axelrod R. & Tanese R. 1990. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 18: 3566–3573. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao J.H., Qiang S., Chrobock T., van Kleunen M. & Liu Q.Q. 2011. A test of Baker’s Law: breeding systems of invasive species of Asteraceae in China. Biological Invasions 13: 571–580. doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9850-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heger T., Pahl A.T., Botta-Dukát Z., Gherardi F., Hoppe C., Hoste I., Jax K., Lindström L., Boets P., Haider S., Kollmann J., Wittmann M.J. & Jeschke J.M. 2013. Conceptual frameworks and methods for advancing invasion ecology. AMBIO 42: 527–540. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke J.M., Gómez Aparicio L., Haider S., Heger T., Lortie C.J., Pyšek P. & Strayer D.L. 2012a. Taxonomic bias and lack of cross-taxonomic studies in invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10: 349–350. doi:10.1890/12.WB.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke J.M., Gómez Aparicio L., Haider S., Heger T., Lortie C.J., Pyšek P. & Strayer D.L. 2012b. Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota 14: 1–20. doi:10.3897/neobiota.14.3435.
   Google Scholar
• Jeschke J.M., Keesing F. & Ostfeld R.S. 2013. Novel organisms: comparing invasive species, GMOs, and emerging pathogens. AMBIO 42: 541–548. doi:10.1007/s13280-013-0387-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke J.M. & Strayer D.L. 2006. Determinants of vertebrate invasion success in Europe and North America. Global Change Biology 12: 1608–1619. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01213.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane R.M. & Crawley M.J. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 164–170. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02499-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley P.H. Kowalewski M. & Hansen T.A. (Eds) 2003. Predator–prey interactions in the fossil record. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen M., Genovesi P., Gollasch S., Pagad S., Starfinger U., Ten Brink P. & Shine C. 2009. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) – assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU. Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy.
   Google Scholar
• King K.C., Delph L.F., Jokela J. & Lively C.M. 2009. The geographic mosaic of sex and the Red Queen. Current Biology 19: 1438–1441. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolar C.S. & Lodge D.M. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 199–204. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02101-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen J., Jennions M.D. & Kokko H. 2012. The many costs of sex. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 172–178. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively C.M. 1987. Evidence from a New Zealand snail for the maintenance of sex by parasitism. Nature 328: 519–521. doi:10.1038/328519a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lively C.M., Craddock C. & Vrijenhoek R.C. 1990. Red Queen hypothesis supported by parasitism in sexual and clonal fish. Nature 344: 864–866. doi:10.1038/344864a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood J.L., Hoopes M.F. & Marchetti M.P. 2013. Invasion Ecology (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Meirmans S., Meirmans P.G. & Kirkendall L.R. 2012. The costs of sex: facing real-world complexities. The Quarterly Review of Biology 87: 19–40. doi:10.1086/663945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messing R. 2008. Field release of Binodoxys communis (Gahan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for biological control of the melon aphid, Aphis gossypii in Hawaii. Draft Environmental Assessment. http://oeqc.doh.hawaii.gov/Shared%20Documents/EA_and_EIS_Online_Library/Statewide/2000s/2008-12-08-ST-DEA-Field-Release-Binodoxys-Biocontrol-of-Melon-Aphid.pdf (accessed on 22 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell C.E. & Power A.G. 2003. Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625–627. doi:10.1038/nature01317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morran L.T., Schmidt O.G., Gelarden I.A., Parrish Ii R.C. & Lively C.M. 2011. Running with the Red Queen: host-parasite coevolution selects for biparental sex. Science 333: 216–218. doi:10.1126/science.1206360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker J.D. & Hay M.E. 2005. Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecology Letters 8: 959–967. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00799.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins S.E., Altizer S., Bjornstad O., Burdon J.J., Clay K., Gomez Aparacio L., Jeschke J.M., Johnson P.T.J., Lafferty K.D., Malmstrom C.M., Martin P., Power A., Strayer D.L., Thrall P.H. & Uriarte M. 2008. Invasion biology and parasitic infections, pp. 179–204. In: Ostfeld R.S. et al., Eds. Infectious disease ecology: effects of ecosystems on disease and of disease on ecosystems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D., Zuniga R. & Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics 52: 273–288. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson D.M., Allsopp N., D’Antonio C.M.D., Milton S.J. & Rejmánek M. 2000. Plant invasions – the role of mutualisms. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 75: 65–93. doi:10.1017/S0006323199005435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson D.M. & Pyšek P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Progress in Physical Geography 30: 409–431. doi:10.1191/0309133306pp490pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax D.F., Stachowicz J.J., Brown J.H., Bruno J.F., Dawson M.N., Gaines S.D., Grosberg R.K., Hastings A., Holt R.D., Mayfield M.M., O’Connor M.I. & Rice W.R. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary insights from species invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 465–471. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea K. & Chesson P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 170–176. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02495-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemann E. & Rogers W.E. 2003. Increased competitive ability of an invasive tree may be limited by an invasive beetle. Ecological Applications 13: 1503–1507. doi:10.1890/03-5022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J.N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Kleunen M. & Richardson D.M. 2007. Invasion biology and conservation biology: time to join forces to explore the links between species traits and extinction risk and invasiveness. Progress in Physical Geography 31: 447–450. doi:10.1177/0309133307081295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Valen L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeij G.J. 1983. Intimate associations and coevolution in the sea, pp. 311–327. In: Futuyma D.J. & Slatkin M., Eds. Coevolution. UK: Sunderland Sinauer.
   Google Scholar
• Vilà M. & Weiner J. 2004. Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? Evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105: 229–238. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12682.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitousek P.M., D’antonio C.M., Loope L.L., Rejmanek M. & Westbrooks R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21: 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams G.C. 1975. Sex and evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar