Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ethology Ecology & Evolution Volume 31, 2019 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
96
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Risk pump in Gerbillus pyramidum: quality of poor habitats increases with more conspecifics

Jorge F.S. MenezesMarco and Louise Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, SIDEER, BIDR, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion8499000, IsraelCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2224-9758View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Burt P. KotlerMarco and Louise Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, SIDEER, BIDR, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion8499000, IsraelORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2693-8788View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Austin K. DixonMarco and Louise Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, SIDEER, BIDR, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion8499000, IsraelORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2459-7422View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 140-154 | Received 14 Jan 2018, Accepted 31 Jul 2018, Published online: 03 Dec 2018

References

  • Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML, Pinshow B, Brown JS, Kotler BP. 1990. Habitat selection: an experimental field test with two gerbil species. Ecology. 71:2358–2369.
  • Abu Baker MA, Brown JS. 2011. Patch use behaviour of Elephantulus myurus and Micaelamys namaquensis: the role of diet, foraging substrates and escape substrates. Afr J Ecol. 50: 167–175. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2028.2011.01309.x/full [Accessed 8 Oct 2012].
  • Beauchamp G, Ruxton GD. 2003. Changes in vigilance with group size under scramble competition. Am Nat. 161:231–233.
  • Berger-Tal O, Embar K, Kotler BP, Saltz D. 2014. Past experiences and future expectations generate context-dependent costs of foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 68:1769–1776.
  • Berger-Tal O, Mukherjee S, Kotler BP, Brown JS. 2010. Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils. Ecol Lett. 13:302–310.
  • Brown JS. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37–47.
  • Brown JS, Kotler BP, Wa M. 1997. Competition between birds and mammals: a comparison of giving-up densities between crested larks and gerbils. Evol Ecol. 11: 757–771. Available from: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1018442503955 [Accessed 14 Aug 2013].
  • China V, Kotler BP, Shefer N, Brown JS, Abramsky Z. 2008. Density-dependent habitat and patch use in gerbils: consequences of safety in numbers? Isr J Ecol Evol. 54:295–309.
  • Doligez B, Cadet C, Danchin E, Boulinier T. 2003. When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence. Anim Behav. 66:973–988.
  • Fernández-Juricic E, Delgado JA, Remacha C, Jiménez MD, Garcia V, Hori K. 2009. Can a solitary avian species use collective detection? An assay in semi-natural conditions. Behav Processes. 82:67–74.
  • Fretwell SD, Lucas H. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19:16–36.
  • Hamilton WD. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol. 31:295–311.
  • Kotler BP, Brown JS. 1990. Rates of seed harvest by two species of gerbilline rodents. J Mammal. 71:591–596.
  • Kotler BP, Brown JS. 1999. Mechanisms of coexistence of optimal foragers as determinants of local abundances and distributions of desert granivores. J Mammal. 80:361–374. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1383285 [Accessed 21 Dec 2014].
  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Dall SRX, Gresser S, Ganey D, Bouskila A. 2002. Foraging games between gerbils and their predators: temporal dynamics of resource depletion and apprehension in gerbils. Evol Ecol Res. 4:495–518.
  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Mukherjee S, Berger-Tal O, Bouskila A. 2010. Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging. Proc R Soc Lond B. 277:1469–1474.
  • Kotler BP, Brown JS, Subach A. 1993. Mechanisms of species coexistence of optimal foragers: temporal partitioning by two species of sand dune gerbils. Oikos. 67:548–556.
  • Menezes, JFS, Mourão GM, Kotler BP. 2017. Understory cover increases patch use in rodent Thrichomys fosteri. Ethol Ecol Evol. 30:267–276. doi:10.1080/03949370.2017.1354921
  • Ovadia O. 1999. Integrating behavioral responses of individual Gerbillus allenbyi and G. pyramidum (Rodentia: Gerbillinae) with their measured population responses [Thesis]. Be’er Sheva: Ben Gurion University.
  • Ovadia O, Zu Dohna H. 2003. The effect of intra- and interspecific aggression on patch residence time in Negev Desert gerbils: a competing risk analysis. Behav Ecol. 14:583–591.
  • Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A. 1987. Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav. 35:420–425.
  • R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
  • Rosenzweig ML, Abramsky Z. 1986. Centrifugal community organization. Oikos. 46:339–348.
  • Rosenzweig ML, Abramsky Z, Subach A. 1997. Safety in numbers: sophisticated vigilance by Allenby’s gerbil. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:5713–5715.
  • Tinbergen N, Impekoven M, Franck D. 1967. An experiment on spacing-out as a defence against predation. Behaviour. 28:307–320.
  • Uetz GW, Hieber CS. 1994. Group size and predation risk in colonial web-building spiders: analysis of attack abatement mechanisms. Behav Ecol. 5:326–333.
  • Waite TA, Field KL. 2007. Foraging with others: games social foragers play. In: Stephens DW, et al., editors. Foraging behavior and ecology. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; p. 331–362.
  • Ziv Y, Kotler BP, Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Foraging efficiencies of competing rodents: why do gerbils exhibit shared-preference of habitat selection. Oikos. 73:260–268.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.