REFERENCES
- Araya-Salas M, Smith-Vidaurre G. 2017. warbleR: an R package to streamline analysis of animal acoustic signals. Met Ecol Evol. 8:184–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12624
- Ballentine B. 2009. The ability to perform physically challenging songs predicts age and size in male swamp sparrow, Melospiza georgiana. Anim Behav. 77:973–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.027
- Ballentine B, Hyman J, Nowicki S. 2004. Vocal performance influences female response to male bird song: an experimental test. Behav Ecol. 15:163–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arg090
- Cardoso GC. 2017. Advancing the inference of performance in birdsong. Anim Behav. 125:e29–e32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.034
- Cardoso GC, Atwell JW, Hu Y, Ketterson ED, Price TD. 2012. No correlation between three selected trade-offs in birdsong performance and male quality for a species with song repertoires. Ethology. 118:584–593. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02047.x
- Cardoso GC, Atwell JW, Ketterson ED, Price TD. 2007. Inferring performance in the songs of dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol. 18:1051–1057. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm078
- Cardoso GC, Atwell JW, Ketterson ED, Price TD. 2009. Song types, song performance, and the use of repertoire in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol. 20:901–907. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp079
- Cramer ERA, Price JJ. 2007. Red-winged blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus respond differently to song types with different performance levels. J Avian Biol. 38:122–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03839.x
- Derryberry EP, Seddon N, Claramunt S, Tobias JA, Baker A, Aleixo A, Brumfield RT. 2012. Correlated evolution of beak morphology and song in the Neotropical woodcreeper radiation. Evolution. 66:2784–2797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01642.x
- Derryberry EP, Seddon N, Derryberry GE, Claramunt S, Seeholzer GF, Brumfield RT, Tobias JA. 2018. Ecological drivers of song evolution in birds: disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology. Ecol Evol. 8:1890–1905. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3760
- DuBois AL, Nowicki S, Searcy WA. 2009. Swamp sparrows modulate vocal performance in an aggressive context. Biol Lett. 5:163–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0626
- Goodwin SE, Podos J. 2014. Team of rivals: alliance formation in territorial songbirds is predicted by vocal signal structure. Biol Lett. 10:20131083. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.1083
- Hall ML, Kingma SA, Peters A, Johnson N. 2013. Male songbird indicates body size with low-pitched advertising songs. PLoS ONE. 8:e56717. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056717
- Illes AE, Hall ML, Vehrencamp SL. 2006. Vocal performance influences male receiver response in the banded wren. Proc R Soc Lond B. 273:1907–1912.
- Kroodsma D. 2017. Birdsong performance studies: a contrary view. Anim Behav. 125:e1–e16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.06.015
- Kroodsma DE. 1989. Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Anim Behav. 37:600–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90039-0
- Kroodsma DE, Byers BE, Goodale E, Johnson S, Lui W-C. 2001. Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later. Anim Behav. 61:1029–1033. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1676
- Lambrechts MM. 1996. Organization of birdsong and constraints on performance. In: Kroodsma D, Miller E, editors. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press; p. 305–320.
- Liu IA, Soha JA, Nowicki S. 2018. Song type matching and vocal performance in territorial signaling by male swamp sparrows. Anim Behav. 139:117–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.03.007
- Liu JP, Ma LK, Zhang ZQ, Gu DH, Wang JJ, Li JJ, Gao LJ, Hou JH. 2017. Maximum frequency of songs reflects body size among male dusky warblers Phylloscopus fuscatus (Passeriformes: Phylloscopidae). Europ Zool J. 84:186–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2017.1301578
- Liu W-C, Kroodsma DE. 2006. Song learning by chipping sparrows: when, where, and from whom. Condor. 108:509–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/108.3.509
- Moseley DL, Lahti DC, Podos J. 2013. Responses to playback vary with the vocal performance of both signal senders and receiver. Proc R Soc Lond B. 280:20131401.
- Pebesma E. 2018. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R Journal. 10:439–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-009
- Petrusková T, Kinštová A, Pišvejcová I, Laguna JM, Cortezón A, Brinke T, Petrusek A. 2014. Variation in trill characteristics in tree pipit songs: different trills for different use? Ethology. 120:586–597.
- Phillips JN, Derryberry EP. 2017. Equivalent effects of bandwidth and trill rate: support for a performance constraint as a competitive signal. Anim Behav. 132:209–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.08.012
- Podos J. 1997. A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution. 51:537–551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02441.x
- Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches. Nature. 409:185–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35051570
- Podos J. 2017. Birdsong performance studies: report of their death have been greatly exaggerated. Anim Behav. 125:e17–e24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.010
- Podos J, Patek SN. 2015. Acoustic signal evolution: biomechanics, size and performance. In: Irschick DJ, et al., editors. Animal signalling and function: an integrative approach. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley and Sons Inc.; p. 175–255.
- Podos J, Sung H-C. 2020. Vocal performance in songbirds: from mechanisms to evolution. In: Sakata JT, et al., editors. The neuroethology of birdsong. Basel (Switzerland): Springer Nature Switzerland AG; p. 245–268.
- R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org [Accessed 03 Jun 2020].
- Sakata JT, Vehrencamp SL. 2012. Integrating perspectives on vocal performance and consistency. J Exp Biol. 215:201–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.056911
- Vehrencamp SL, de Kort SR, Illes AE. 2017. Response to Kroodsma’s critique of banded wren song performance research. Anim Behav. 125:e25–e28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.004
- Vehrencamp SL, Yantachka J, Hall ML, de Kort SR. 2013. Trill performance components vary with age, season, and motivation in the banded wren. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 67:409–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1461-x
- Wilson DR, Bitton P-P, Podos J, Mennill DJ. 2014. Uneven sampling and the analysis of vocal performance constraints. Am Nat. 183:214–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/674379