Decoupling residents and dispersers from detection data improve habitat selection modelling: the case study of the wolf in a natural corridor

REFERENCES

• Abrahms B, Sawyer SC, Jordan NR, McNutt JW, Wilson AM, Brashares JS, Hayward M. 2017. Does wildlife resource selection accurately inform corridor conservation? J Appl Ecol. 54(2):412–422. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriaensen F, Chardon J, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E. 2003. The application of ‘leastcost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plann. 64:233–247. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balestrieri A, Remonti L, Ruiz‐González A, Zenato M, Gazzola A, Vergara M, Dettori E, Saino N, Capelli E, Gomez-Móliner BJ, et al. 2015. Distribution and habitat use by pine marten Martes martes in a riparian corridor crossing intensively cultivated lowlands. Ecol Res. 30:153–162. doi:10.1007/s11284-014-1220-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bani L, Orioli V, Pisa G, Dondina O, Fagiani S, Fabbri E, Randi E, Mortelliti A, Sozio G. 2018. Landscape determinants of genetic differentiation, inbreeding and genetic drift in the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius). Conserv Genet. 19:283–296. doi:10.1007/s10592-017-0999-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bani L, Pisa G, Luppi M, Spilotros G, Fabbri E, Randi E, Orioli V. 2015. Ecological connectivity assessment in a strongly structured fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra) population. Ecol Evol. 5:3472–3485. doi:10.1002/ece3.1617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beier P, Majka DR, Spencer WD. 2008. Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conserv Biol. 22:836–851. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler DE, Benton TG. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev. 80:205–225. doi:10.1017/S1464793104006645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle SA, Lourenço WC, Da Silva LR, Smith AT. 2009. Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods. Folia Primatol. 80:33–42. doi:10.1159/000201092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent RP. 1973. Algorithms for minimization without derivatives. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho F, Carvalho R, Mira A, Beja P. 2016. Assessing landscape functional connectivity in a forest carnivore using path selection functions. Landsc Ecol. 31:1021–1036. doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0326-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetkiewicz CLB, Boyce MS. 2009. Use of resource selection functions to identify conservation corridors. J Appl Ecol. 46:1036–1047. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetkiewicz CLB, St. Clair CC, Boyce MS. 2006. Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 37:317–342. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiatante G, Dondina O, Lucchelli M, Bani L, Meriggi A. 2017. Habitat selection of European badger Meles meles in a highly fragmented forest landscape in northern Italy: the importance of hedgerows and agro-forestry systems. Hystrix It J Mamm. 28:247–252. doi:10.4404/hystrix–00005-2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciucci P, Boitani L, Francisci F, Andreoli G. 1997. Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. J Zool. 243:803–819. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb01977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clevenger AP, Wierzchowski J, Chruszcz B, Gunson K. 2002. GIS-generated, expert-based models for identifying wildlife habitat linkages and planning mitigation passages. Conserv Biol. 16:503–514. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cliff AD, Ord JK. 1981. Spatial processes: models and applications. London (UK): Pion Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks KR, Sanjayan M. 2006. Connectivity conservation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK. 2006. Gene-flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat. 168:486–499. doi:10.1086/506976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman SA, McRae B, Adriansen F, Beier P, Shirley M, Zeller K. 2013. Biological corridors and connectivity. In: Macdonald DW, Willis KJ, editors. Key topics in conservation biology 2. Oxford (UK): Blackwell; p. 384–404.
   Google Scholar
• De Pasquale D, Dondina O, Scancarello E, Meriggi A. 2019. Long-term viability of a reintroduced population of roe deer Capreolus capreolus, in a lowland area of northern Italy. Folia Zool. 68:9–20. doi:10.25225/fozo.045.2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondina O, Meriggi A, Dagradi V, Perversi M, Milanesi P. 2015. Wolf predation on livestock in an area of northern Italy and prediction of damage risk. Ethol Ecol Evol. 27:200–219. doi:10.1080/03949370.2014.916352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondina O, Orioli V, Chiatante G, Meriggi A, Bani L. 2019. Species specialization limits movement ability and shapes ecological networks: the case study of 2 forest mammals. Curr Zool. 65:237–249. doi:10.1093/cz/zoy061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondina O, Orioli V, Colli L, Luppi M, Bani L. 2018b. Ecological network design from occurrence data by simulating species perception of the landscape. Landsc Ecol. 33:275–287. doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0600-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondina O, Orioli V, Torretta E, Merli F, Bani L, Meriggi A, Mingyang L. 2020. Combining ensemble models and connectivity analyses to predict wolf expected dispersal routes through a lowland corridor. PLoS ONE. 15:e0229261. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dondina O, Saura S, Bani L, Mateo-Sánchez MC. 2018a. Enhancing connectivity in agroecosystems: focus on the best existing corridors or on new pathways? Landsc Ecol. 33:1741–1756. doi:10.1007/s10980-018-0698-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs JA, Horner MW. 2009. A characteristic‐hull based method for home range estimation. T GIS. 13:527–537. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermann J, Da Costa GF, Guerra AM, Kirchner WH, Petrucci-Fonseca F. 2011. Presence of Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus) in relation to land cover, livestock and human influence in Portugal. Mamm Biol. 76:217–221. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2010.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot NB, Cushman SA, Macdonald DW, Loveridge AJ. 2014. The devil is in the dispersers: predictions of landscape connectivity change with demography. J Appl Ecol. 51:1169–1178. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epps CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS. 2007. Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. J Appl Ecol. 44:714–724. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01325.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ERSAF] Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste. 2014. Destinazione d’uso dei suoli agricoli e forestali (DUSAF) [Agricultural and forest land use]. Milan (Italy): Ente Regionale per i Servizi all’Agricoltura e alle Foreste della Lombardia. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• [ESRI] Environmental System Research Institute. 2011. ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Redlands (CA): Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett T. 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett. 27:861–874. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastón A, Blázquez-Cabrera S, Garrote G, Mateo-Sánchez MC, Beier P, Simón MA, Saura S, Wintle B. 2016. Response to agriculture by a woodland species depends on cover type and behavioural state: insights from resident and dispersing Iberian lynx. J Appl Ecol. 53:814–824. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH. 2010. A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conserv Biol. 24:660–668. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01450.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeman JJ 2018. Penalized R package, version 0.9-51. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/penalized/index.html [Accessed 2020 Oct 20].
   Google Scholar
• Graves TA, Beier P, Royle JA. 2013. Current approaches using genetic distances produce poor estimates of landscape resistance to interindividual dispersal. Mol Ecol. 22:3888–3903. doi:10.1111/mec.12348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics. Nature. 396:41–49. doi:10.1038/23876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindrikson M, Remm J, Pilot M, Godinho R, Stronen AV, Baltrūnaité L, Czarnomska SD, Leonard JA, Randi E, Nowak C, et al. 2017. Wolf population genetics in Europe: a systematic review, meta‐analysis and suggestions for conservation and management. Biol Rev. 92:1601–1629. doi:10.1111/brv.12298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton JW, Proctor C, Kelly MJ, van Manen FT, Vaughan MR, Chamberlain MJ, Yue B-S. 2016. Space use and habitat selection by resident and transient red wolves (Canis rufus). PLoS ONE. 10:e0167603. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggard DJ. 1993. Prey selectivity of wolves in Banff National Park. I. Prey species. Can J Zool. 71:130–139. doi:10.1139/z93-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliopoulos Y, Youlatos D, Sgardelis S. 2014. Wolf pack rendezvous site selection in Greece is mainly affected by anthropogenic landscape features. Eur J Wildl Res. 60:23–34. doi:10.1007/s10344-013-0746-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbert C, Caniglia R, Fabbri E, Milanesi P, Randi E, Serafini M, Torretta E, Meriggi A. 2016. Why do wolves eat livestock?: factors influencing wolf diet in northern Italy. Biol Conserv. 195:156–168. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarnevich CS, Stohlgren TJ, Kumar S, Morisette JT, Holcombe TR. 2015. Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling. Ecol Inform. 29:6–15. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jędrzejewski W, Niedzialkowska M, Nowak S, Jędrzejewska B. 2004. Habitat variables associated with wolf (Canis lupus) distribution and abundance in northern Poland. Divers Distrib. 10:225–233. doi:10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Jedrzejewska B, Okarma H. 2001. Daily movements and territory use by radio-collared wolves (Canis lupus) in Bialowieza Primeval Forest in Poland. Can J Zool. 79:1993–2004. doi:10.1139/z01-147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jędrzejewski W, Schmidt K, Theuerkauf J, Jędrzejewska B, Selva N, Zub K, Szymura L. 2002. Kill rates and predation by wolves on ungulate populations in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland). Ecology. 83:1341–1356. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1341:KRAPBW]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi R, Hemami MR, Cushman SA, Thuiller W. 2018. Multispecies assessment of core areas and connectivity of desert carnivores in central Iran. Divers Distrib. 24:193–207. doi:10.1111/ddi.12672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langduth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Murphy M, Luikart G. 2010. Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol. 19:4179–4191. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04808.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnell JD, Odden J, Smith ME, Aanes R, Swenson JE. 1999. Large carnivores that kill livestock: do ‘problem individuals’ really exist? Wildl Soc Bull. 27:698–705. www.jstor.org/stable/3784091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancinelli S, Boitani L, Ciucci P. 2018. Determinants of home range size and space use patterns in a protected wolf (Canis lupus) population in the central Apennines, Italy. Can J Zool. 96:828–838. doi:10.1139/cjz-2017-0210
   Google Scholar
• Mancinelli S, Ciucci P. 2018. Beyond home: preliminary data on wolf extraterritorial forays and dispersal in Central Italy. Mamm Biol. 93:51–55. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2018.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Boston (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marucco F, Avanzinelli E, Bassano B, Bionda R, Bisi F, Calderola S, Chioso C, Fattori U, Pedrotti L, Righetti D, et al. 2018. La popolazione di lupo sulle Alpi Italiane 2014-2018 [The wolf population in the Italian Alps 2014-2018]. Technical report, LIFE Project 12 NAT/IT/00080 WOLFALPS – Actions A4 and D1. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Massolo A, Meriggi A. 1998. Factors affecting habitat occupancy by wolves in northern Apennines (northern Italy): a model of habitat suitability. Ecography. 21:97–107. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo-Sánchez MC, Balkenhol N, Cushman SA, Pérez T, Domínguez A, Saura S. 2015. A comparative framework to infer landscape effects on population genetic structure: are habitat suitability models effective in explaining gene flow? Landsc Ecol. 30:1405–1420. doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0194-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo‐Sánchez MC, Cushman SA, Saura S. 2014. Connecting endangered brown bear subpopulations in the Cantabrian Range (north‐western Spain). Anim Conserv. 17:430–440. doi:10.1111/acv.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriggi A, Brangi A, Matteucci C, Sacchi O. 1996. The feeding habits of wolves in relation to large prey availability in northern Italy. Ecography. 19:287–295. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb01256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriggi A, Dagradi V, Dondina O, Perversi M, Milanesi P, Lombardini M, Raviglione S, Repossi A. 2015. Short term responses of wolves feeding habits to changes of wild and domestic ungulate abundance in Northern Italy. Ethol Ecol Evol. 27:389–411. doi:10.1080/03949370.2014.986768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriggi A, Lovari S. 1996. A review of wolf predation in Southern Europe: does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? J Appl Ecol. 33:1561–1571. doi:10.2307/2404794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriggi A, Rosa P, Brangi A, Matteucci C. 1991. Habitat use and diet of the wolf in northern Italy. Acta Theriol. 36:141–151. doi:10.4098/AT.arch.91-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriggi A, Torretta E, Dondina O. 2020. Recent changes in wolf habitat occupancy and feeding habits in Italy: implications for conservation and reducing conflict with humans. In Angelici FM, Rossi L, editors. Problematic wildlife II. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; p. 111–138. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42335-3
   Google Scholar
• Packard JM. 2003. Wolf behavior: reproductive, social and intelligent. In: Mech LD, Boitani L, editors. Wolves behaviour, ecology, and conservation. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; p. 35–65.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce J, Cherry K, Drielsma M, Ferrier S, Whish G. 2001. Incorporating expert opinion and fine-scale vegetation mapping into statistical models of faunal distribution. J Appl Ecol. 38:412–424. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce J, Ferrier S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol Model. 133:225–245. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterman WE. 2018. ResistanceGA: an R package for the optimization of resistance surfaces using genetic algorithms. Methods Ecol Evol. 9:1638–1647. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/ [Accessed 2020 Dec 22].
   Google Scholar
• Reding DM, Cushman SA, Gosselink TE, Clark WR. 2013. Linking movement behavior and fine-scale genetic structure to model landscape connectivity for bobcats (Lynx rufus). Landsc Ecol. 28:471–486. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9844-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rio-Maior H, Nakamura M, Álvares F, Beja P. 2019. Designing the landscape of coexistence: integrating risk avoidance, habitat selection and functional connectivity to inform large carnivore conservation. Biol Conserv. 235:178–188. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura S, Bodin Ö, Fortin MJ, Frair J. 2014. Stepping stones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. J Appl Ecol. 51:171–182. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf AK, Belant JL, Beyer DE, Wikelski M, Safi K. 2018. Habitat suitability does not capture the essence of animal-defined corridors. Mov Ecol. 6:18. doi:10.1186/s40462-018-0136-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seoane J, Bustamante J, Diaz-Delgado R. 2005. Effect of expert opinion on the predictive ability of environmental models of bird distribution. Conserv Biol. 19:512–522. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirk A, Wallin D, Cushman SA, Rice C, Warheit K. 2010. Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework. Mol Ecol. 19:3603–3619. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04745.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman BW. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Soh Y, Hae Y, Mehmood A, Ashraf RH, Kim I. 2013. Performance evaluation of various functions for kernel density estimation. Open J Appl Sci. 3:58–64. doi:10.4236/ojapps.2013.31B012
   Google Scholar
• Swets KA. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science. 240:1285–1293. doi:10.1126/science.3287615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theuerkauf J, Rouys S, Jedrzejewski W. 2003. Selection of den, rendezvous, and resting sites by wolves in the Bialowieza Forest, Poland. Can J Zool. 81:163–167. doi:10.1139/z02-190
   Google Scholar
• Vasudev D, Fletcher RJJ, Goswami VR, Krishnadas M. 2015. From dispersal constraints to landscape connectivity: lessons from species distribution modeling. Ecography. 38:967–978. doi:10.1111/ecog.01306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Beier P, Cushman SA, Vickers TW, Boyce WM. 2014. Sensitivity of landscape resistance estimates based on point selection functions to scale and behavioral state: pumas as a case study. Landsc Ecol. 29(3):541–557. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR. 2012. Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol. 27:777–797. doi:10.10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziółkowska E, Ostapowicz K, Radeloff VC, Kuemmerle T, Sergiel A, Zwijacz-Kozica T, Ziȩba F, Śmietana W, Selva N. 2016. Assessing differences in connectivity based on habitat versus movement models for brown bears in the Carpathians. Landsc Ecol. 31:1863–1882. doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0368-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar