Telemetry in movement ecology of aquatic and semi-aquatic turtles in world freshwater ecoregions: a systematic review

REFERENCES

• Abell R, Thieme M, Dinerstein E, Olson D. 2002. A sourcebook for conducting biological assessments and biodiversity visions for ecoregion conservation. Vol. II: freshwater ecoregions. Washington (DC): World Wildlife Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Abell R, Thieme ML, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M, Bogutskaya N, Coad B, Mandrak N, Contreras Balderas S, Bussing W, et al. 2008. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience. 58(5):403–414. doi:10.1641/B580507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abell RA, Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Hurle PT, Diggs JT, Eichbaum W, Walters S, Wettengel W, Allnutt T, Loucks J, et al. 2000. Freshwater ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen AM, Singh NJ. 2016. Linking movement ecology with wildlife management and conservation. Front Ecol Evol. 3:155. doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ASIH] American Society of Icthyologists and Herpetologists. 2022. Available from: http://www.ichthyologyandherpetology.org [Accessed 2022 Oct 19].
   Google Scholar
• Barabasi AL, Jeong H, Neda Z, Ravasz E, Schubert A, Vicsek T. 2002. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A. 311(3–4):590–614. doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(02)00736-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bárcenas-García A, Michalski F, Morgan WH, Smith RK, Sutherland WJ, Gibbs JP, Norris D. 2022. Impacts of dams on freshwater turtles: a global review to identify conservation solutions. Trop Conserv Sci. 15:19400829221103709. doi:10.1177/19400829221103709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie JR, Semlitsch RD. 2000. Spatial and temporal use of floodplain habitats by lentic and lotic species of aquatic turtles. Oecologia. 122(1):138–146. doi:10.1007/PL00008830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra R, Craine IT. 1986. Natal nest location and small mammal tracking with a spool and line technique. Can J Zool. 64(4):1034–1036. doi:10.1139/z86-153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordin AS, Gonçalves AL, Todesco JL. 2014. Análise da colaboração científica departamental através de redes de coautoria [Analysis of departmental scientific collaboration through co-authorship networks]. Perspect ciênc Inf. 19(2):37–52. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/1981-5344/1796
   Google Scholar
• Bour R. 2008. Global diversity of turtles (Chelonii; Reptilia) in freshwater. In: Balian E, et al., editors. Freshwater animal diversity assessment. Dev Hydrobiol. 198. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; p. 593–598. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8259-7_57
   Google Scholar
• Buhlmann KA, Akre TSB, Iverson JB, Karapatakis D, Mittermeier RA, Georges A, Rhodin AGJ, van Dijk PP, Gibbons JW. 2009. A global analysis of tortoise and freshwater turtle distributions with identification of priority conservation areas. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 8(2):116–149. doi:10.2744/CCB-0774.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke VJ, Gibbons JW. 1995. Terrestrial buffer zones and wetland conservation: a case study of freshwater turtles in a Carolina Bay. Conserv Biol. 9(6):1365–1369. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061365.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnacci F, Boitani L, Powell RA, Boyce MS. 2010. Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc B. 365(1550):2157–2162. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos FS, Brito D, Sole M. 2014. Diversity patterns, research trends and mismatches of the investigative efforts to amphibian conservation in Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc. 86(4):1873–1886. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201420140170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso de Lima A, Magnusson WE, da Costa VL. 1997. Diet of the turtle Phrynops rufipes in Central Amazônia. Copeia. (1):216–219. doi:10.2307/1447862
   Google Scholar
• Carter SL, Haas CA, Mitchell JC. 2000. Movements and activity of bog turtles (Clemmys muhlenbergii) in southwestern Virginia. J Herpetol. 34(1):75–80. doi:10.2307/1565241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho AV, Lopes TKM, Malvasio A. 2021. Importância social de Podocnemis expansa, tartaruga-da-amazônia, no rio Javaés, Tocantins, Brasil. [Social importance of Podocnemis expansa, Amazon turtle, in the Javaés River, Tocantins, Brazil]. Amazônica. 12(2):609–620. Portuguese. doi:10.18542/amazonica.v12i2.7265
   Google Scholar
• Chen TH, Lue KY. 2008. Home ranges and movements of the Chinese stripe-necked turtle (Ocadia sinensis) in the Keelung River, northern Taiwan. Amphibia–Reptilia. 29(3):383–392. doi:10.1163/156853808785112011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen RJ, Chow-Fraser RJC. 2014. Use of GPS loggers to enhance radio-tracking studies of semiaquatic freshwater turtles. Herpetol Cons Biol. 9(1):18–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CITES] Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. 2022. Available from: https://cites.org [Accessed 2022 Oct 29].
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane MM, Brown DJ, Moen RA. 2019. GPS technology for semiaquatic turtle research. Diversity. 11(3):34. doi:10.3390/d11030034
   Google Scholar
• Collins MK, Magle SB, Gallo T. 2021. Global trends in urban wildlife ecology and conservation. Biol Cons. 261:109236. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton BW, Rhymer JM, McCollough M. 2002. Habitat selection by wood turtles (Clemmys insculpta): an application of paired logistic regression. Ecology. 83(3):833–843. doi:10.2307/3071885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane M, Silva I, Marshall BM, Strine CT. 2021. Lots of movement, little progress: a review of reptile home range literature. PeerJ. 9:e11742. doi:10.7717/peerj.11742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz CHB. 2007. Ciência e tecnologia no Brasil [Science and technology in Brazil]. Revista Usp. 73(73):58–90. doi:10.11606/issn.2316-9036.v0i73p58-90
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva BC, De Lima IT, Da Gama VTP, Santos Lobato JC D, Martins LG, Alfaia JGP. 2022. Diagnóstico do consumo de quelônios (Testudines) no município de Abaetetuba, Pará: Implicações para a conservação de espécies. [Diagnosis of the consumption of chelonians (Testudines) in the municipality of Abaetetuba, Pará: Implications for species conservation]. Res Soc Development. 11(7):e24111730083. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Deeth C, Coleman D. 2022. Review of freshwater turtle ecology and flow. Sydney (Australia): NSW Department of Planning and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• de Leão SP, Famelli S, Vogt RC. 2019. Home range of Yellow-spotted Amazon river turtles (Podocnemis unifilis) (Testudines: Podocnemididae) in the Trombetas River Biological Reserve, Pará, Brazil. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 18(1):10–18. doi:10.2744/CCB-1273.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doody JS, Roe J, Mayes P, Ishiyama L. 2009. Telemetry tagging methods for some freshwater reptiles. Mar Freshwater Res. 60(4):293–298. doi:10.1071/MF08158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling Z, Hartwig T, Kiviat E, Keesing F. 2010. Experimental management of nesting habitat for the Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii). Ecol Rest. 28(2):154–159. doi:10.3368/er.28.2.154
   Google Scholar
• Fachin Teran A, Vogt RC, Gomez MDFS. 1995. Food habits of an assemblage of five species of turtles in the Rio Guapore, Rondônia. Brazil J Herpetol. 29(4):536–547. doi:10.2307/1564736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fachín-Terán A, Vogt RC, Thorbjarnarson JB. 2006. Seasonal movements of Podocnemis sextuberculata (Testudines: Podocnemididae) in the Mamirauá Sustainable Development Reserve, Amazonas, Brazil. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 5(1):18–24. doi:10.2744/1071-8443(2006)5[18:SMOPST]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Famelli S, Adriano LR, Pereira FP, Souza FL, Gruber B, Georges A. 2016. Home range and movement patterns of the neotropical freshwater turtle Hydromedusa maximiliani (Testudines: Chelidae) in Southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia. 37(2):215–228. doi:10.1163/15685381-00003047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows I. 2018. Package ‘wordcloud’. R package version. 2: 331.
   Google Scholar
• [FEOW] Freshwater Ecoregions of the World. 2023. A global biogeographical regionalization of the Earth’s freshwater biodiversity. Available from: https://www.feow.org. [Accessed 2022 Feb 21].
   Google Scholar
• Fingerman S. 2006. Web of science and Scopus: Current features and capabilities. Issues Sci Technol Librarianship. 48. doi:10.29173/istl2081
   Google Scholar
• Fleming CH, Calabrese JM, Dray S. 2017. A new kernel density estimator for accurate home‐range and species‐range area estimation. Methods Ecol Evol. 8(5):571–579. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forero-Medina G, Cárdenas-Arevalo G, Castaño-Mora OV. 2011. Abundance, home range, and movement patterns of the endemic species Dahl’s Toad-headed turtle (Mesoclemmys dahli) in Cesar, Colombia. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 10(2):228–236. doi:10.2744/CCB-0929.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman AB, Eisemberg CC, Stoetzel H. 2018. Habitat use and movements in an upland population of Johnstone River Snapping Turtles, Elseya irwini. Herpetol Conser Bio. 13(2):464–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galois P, Léveillé ML, Bouthillier CD, Parren S. 2002. Movement patterns, activity, and home range of the Eastern spiny softshell turtle (Apalone spinifera) in Northern Lake Champlain, Québec, Vermont. Vermont J Herpetol. 36(3):402–411. doi:10.1670/0022-1511(2002)036[0402:MPAAHR]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvão-Castro B, Cordeiro RSB, Goldenberg S. 2022. Brazilian science under continuous attack. Lancet. 399(10319):23–24. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02727-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavel Y, Iselid L. 2008. Web of science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study. Online Inform Rev. 32(1):8–21. doi:10.1108/14684520810865958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller GA, Doody JS, Clulow S, Duncan RP. 2022. Do freshwater turtles use rainfall to increase nest success? Front Ecol Evol. 10:1–14. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.852175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons JW. 1990. Life history and ecology of the slider turtle. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press; p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons JW, Lovich J, Bowden RM. 2017. Turtles: freshwater. Encycl Anim Behav. 2017:462–468. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.01218-8
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons JW, Scott DE, Ryan TJ, Buhlmann KA, Tuberville TD, Metts BS, Greene JL, Mills T, Leiden Y, Poppy S, Winne CT. 2000. The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians. BioScience. 50(8):653–666. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0653:TGDORD]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godley BJ, Blumenthal JM, Broderick AC, Coyne MS, Godfrey MH, Hawkes LA, Witt MJ. 2008. Satellite tracking of sea turtles: where have we been and where do we go next? Endanger Species Res. 4:3–22. doi:10.3354/esr00060
   Google Scholar
• Godley BJ, Lima EHSM, Åkesson S, Broderick AC, Glen F, Godfrey MH, Hays GC. 2003. Movement patterns of green turtles in Brazilian coastal waters described by satellite tracking and flipper tagging. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 253:279–288. doi:10.3354/meps253279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grelle CEV, Pinto MP, Do Rego Monteiro JP, Figueiredo MS. 2009. Uma década de biologia da conservação no Brasil [A decade of conservation biology in Brazil.]. Oecologia Brasiliensis. 13(3):420–433. Portuguese. doi:10.4257/oeco.2009.1303.02
   Google Scholar
• Guilhon AVV, Schneider L, Ferrara CR. 2011. Assessment of turtle tracking technologies in the Brazilian Amazon. Herpetol Rev. 42(4):525–530.
   Google Scholar
• Haddaway NR, Bayliss HR. 2015. Shades of gray: two forms of gray literature important for reviews in conservation. Biol Cons. 191:827–829. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamernick MG. 2000. Home ranges and habitat selection of Blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) at the Weaver Dunes, Minnesota. In: Final report prepared for the Nongame Wildlife Program. St. Paul (MN): Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; p. 18. Available from: http://www.dm.state.mn.us/ecologicalservices/nongame/projects/researchreports/abstracts/reptiles/hamernick2000.html
   Google Scholar
• Hamernick MG, Congdon JD, Mcconville DR, Lang JW. 2020. Spatial biology of Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) at Weaver Dunes, Minnesota, USA. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 19(1):58–66. doi:10.2744/CCB-1396.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays GC, Hawkes LA. 2018. Satellite tracking sea turtles: opportunities and challenges to address key questions. Front Marine Sci. 5:432. doi:10.3389/fmars.2018.00432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández O, Espín R. 2003. Consumo ilegal de tortugas por comunidades locales em el río Orinoco médio, Venezuela. [Illegal turtle consumption by local communities in the middle Orinoco River, Venezuela]. Acta Biol Venezuelica. 23(2–3):17–26. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Hipólito J, Shirai LT, Diele-Viegas LM, Halinski R, Soares Pires CS, Fontes EMG. 2022. Brazilian budget cuts further threaten gender equality in research. Nat Ecol Evol. 6(3):234–234. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01640-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Ângulo A, Bohm M, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Carpenter KE. 2010. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science. 330:1503–1509. doi:10.1126/science.1194442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak M, Casagrandi R, Nathan R, Revilla E, Spiegel O. 2008. Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 105(49):19060–19065. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800483105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne JS, Garton EO, Krone SM, Lewis JS. 2007. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology. 88(9):2354–2363. doi:10.1890/06-0957.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2022. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2022-1. Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org [Accessed 2022 Sep 17].
   Google Scholar
• Iverson JB. 1992. Global correlates of species richness in turtles. Herpetol J. 2(3):77–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers VF, Godley BJ. 2016. Satellite tracking in sea turtles: how do we find our way to the conservation dividends? Biol Cons. 199:172–184. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RL. 1996. Home range and seasonal movements of the turtle Graptemys flavimaculata. J Herpetol. 30(3):376–385. doi:10.2307/1565175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo R, Picardi S, Boone ME, Clay TA, Patrick SC, Romero-Romero VS, Basille M. 2020. A decade of movement ecology. ArXiv preprint. arXiv:2006.00110. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2006.00110
   Google Scholar
• Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Can Special Publ Fisheries Aquat Sci. 106(1):110–127.
   Google Scholar
• Karen EL, Scott AE. 1994. Announcements: Chelonian conservation and biology – A new journal. Mar Turtle Newslett. 64:30.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye DR, Walsh KM, Rulison EL, Ross CC. 2005. Spotted turtle use of a culvert under relocated route 44 in Carver, Massachusetts. Davis (CA): Road Ecology Center - UC Davis. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0qz725t8
   Google Scholar
• Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. 2003. Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med. 96(3):118–121. doi:10.1177/014107680309600304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kie JG, Matthiopoulos J, Fieberg J, Powell RA, Cagnacci F, Mitchell MS. 2010. The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? Philos Trans R Soc B. 365(1550):2221–2231. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsbury BA, Robinson NJ. 2016. Movement patterns and telemetry. Reptile Ecol Conserv. 9:110–122. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198726135.003.0009
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi R, Hasegawa M, Miyashita T. 2006. Home range and habitat use of the exotic turtle Chelydra serpentina in the Inbanuma Basin, Chiba Prefecture, Central Japan. Curr Herpetol. 25(2):47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kopperundevi S. 2019. Mapping of global tortoise research: a scientometric evaluation based on Web of Science (1999–2018). J Library Inf Commun Technol. 11(1):21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kranstauber B, Kays R, Lapoint SD, Wikelski M, Safi K. 2012. A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement. J Animal Ecol. 81:738–746. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01955.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S. 2015. Co-authorship networks: a review of the literature. Aslib J Inf Manage. 67(1):55–73. doi:10.1108/AJIM-09-2014-0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver PN, Kelly MJ. 2008. A critical review of home range studies. J Wildl Manage. 72(1):290–298. doi:10.2193/2005-589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liuzzo M, Borella S, Ottonello D, Arizza V, Malavasi S. 2021. Population abundance, structure and movements of the European pond turtle, Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus 1758) based on capture-recapture data in a Venice Lagoon wetland area, Italy. Ethol Ecol Evol. 33(6):561–575. doi:10.1080/03949370.2020.1870567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovich JE, Ennen JR, Agha M, Gibbons JW. 2018. Where have all the turtles gone, and why does it matter? BioScience. 68(10):771–781. doi:10.1093/biosci/biy095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luiselli L, Akani GC, Bello Angelici FM, Ude L. 2006. Home range area may vary considerably in relation to habitat contamination in two African terrapins from pristine and oil polluted habitats. Amphibia Reptilia. 27(2):255–261. doi:10.1163/156853806777239896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luschi P, Casale P. 2014. Movement patterns of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: a review. Ital J Zool. 81(4):478–495. doi:10.1080/11250003.2014.963714
   Google Scholar
• Marcovaldi MA, Patiri V, Thomé JC. 2005. Projeto TAMAR-IBAMA: twenty-five years protecting Brazilian sea turtles through a community-based conservation programme. Marit Stud. 3(2):39–62.
   Google Scholar
• Martins RP, Lewinsohn TM, Diniz-Filho JAF, Coutinho FÂ, Da Fonseca GAB, Drumond MA. 2007. Rumos para a formação de ecólogos no Brasil. [Directions for the training of ecologists in Brazil]. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação. 4(7):25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Mathwin R, Wassens S, Young J, Ye Q, Bradshaw CJ. 2021. Manipulating water for amphibian conservation. Conserv Biol. 35(1):24–34. doi:10.1111/cobi.13501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoard KRP, Billings AA, Anderson JT. 2016. Wood turtle home range and habitat use in the Central Appalachians. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 15(2):173–180. doi:10.2744/CCB-1215.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros LC, Leta J. 2020. Formação de mestres e doutores no Brasil: uma análise do currículo das pós-graduações em Ciências Biológicas. [Training of masters and doctors in Brazil: an analysis of the postgraduate curriculum in Biological Sciences]. Avaliação (Campinas). 25(2):375–394. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/s1414-4077/s1414-40772020000200008
   Google Scholar
• Micheli‐Campbell MA, Campbell HA, Connell M, Dwyer RG, Franklin CE. 2013. Integrating telemetry with a predictive model to assess habitat preferences and juvenile survival in an endangered freshwater turtle. Fresh Biol. 58(11):2253–2263. doi:10.1111/fwb.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli-Campbell MA, Connell MJ, Dwyer RG, Franklin CE, Fry B, Kennard MJ. 2017. Identifying critical habitat for freshwater turtles: integrating long-term monitoring tools to enhance conservation and management. Biodivers Conserv. 26(7):1675–1688. doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1325-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell CI, Shoemaker KT, Esque TC, Vandergast AG, Hromada SJ, Dutcher KE, Nussear KE. 2021. Integrating telemetry data at several scales with spatial capture–recapture to improve density estimates. Ecosphere. 12(8):e03689. doi:10.1002/ecs2.3689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Stewart LA. 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 4(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. 2016. The journal coverage of web of science and scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 106(1):213–228. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller MMP, Ortega Z, Antunes PC, Seino LL, Hammarstron MJ, Balbino-Silva ACF, Rodrigues Oliveira-Santos LG. 2019. The home range of adult Phrynops geoffroanus (Testudines, Chelidae) in relation to sex and body mass. Herpetozoa. 32:259–265. doi:10.3897/herpetozoa.32.e38237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E, Holyoak M, Kadmon R, Saltz D, Smouse PE. 2008. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105(49):19052–19059. doi:10.1073/pnas.0800375105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obbard ME, Brooks RJ. 1980. Nesting migrations of the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina). Herpetologica. 26(2):158–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obbard ME, Brooks RJ. 1981. A radio-telemetry and mark-recapture study of activity in the common snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. Copeia. (3):630–637. doi:10.2307/1444568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dea RE, Lagisz M, Jennions MD, Koricheva J, Noble DW, Parker TH, Nakagawa S, Page MJ, Stewart G, Moher D, Nakagawa S. 2021. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension. Biol Rev. 96(5):1695–1722. doi:10.1111/brv.12721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira SL, Bastos RP, Lacerda KAP, Alves SE. 2020. Ecologia de estradas: estado da arte no Brasil e no mundo. [Road ecology: state of the art in Brazil and the world]. Braz J Dev. 6(12):98546–98573. Portuguese. doi:10.34117/bjdv6n12-371
   Google Scholar
• Paterson J, Steinberg B, Litzgus J. 2012. Revealing a cryptic life-history stage: differences in habitat selection and survivorship between hatchlings of two turtle species at risk (Glyptemys insculpta and Emydoidea blandingii). Wildl Res. 39(5):408–418. doi:10.1071/WR12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson J, Steinberg B, Litzgus J. 2014. Effects of body size, habitat selection and exposure on hatchling turtle survival. J Zool. 294(4):278–285. doi:10.1111/jzo.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pheasey H, Roberts DL, Rojas-Cañizales D, Mejías-Balsalobre C, Griffiths RA, Williams-Guillen K. 2020. Using GPS-enabled decoy turtle eggs to track illegal trade. Curr Biol. 30(19):R1066–R1068. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer MV. 1977. Activity, habitat and population structure in the turtle, Trionyx muticus. Copeia. (3):431–440. doi:10.2307/1443260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pough FH, Andrews RM, Cadle JE, Crump ML, Savitzky AH, Wells KD. 2001. Herpetology, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; p. 260.
   Google Scholar
• Prance GT. 1979. Notes on the vegetation of Amazonia III. The terminology of Amazonian forest types subject to inundation. Brittonia. 31:26–38. doi:10.2307/2806669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price C, Burnett MJ, O’Brie G, Downs CT. 2022. Presence and temporal activities of serrated hinged terrapin (Pelusios sinuatus) and marsh terrapin (Pelomedusa galeata) in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, assessed using telemetry. Trop Cons Sci. 15:1. doi:10.1177/19400829221074241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullin AS, Stewart GB. 2006. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv Biol. 20(6):1647–1656. doi:10.1111/j.1523–1739.2006.00485.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaglietta L, Martins BH, de Jongh A, Mira A, Boitani L, Clarke RH. 2012. A low-cost GPS GSM/GPRS telemetry system: performance in stationary field tests and preliminary data on wild otters (Lutra lutra). PLoS ONE. 7(1):e29235. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rebêlo G, Pezzuti J. 2000. Percepções sobre o consumo de quelônios na Amazônia: sustentabilidade e alternativas ao manejo atual. [Perceptions about the consumption of chelonians in the Amazon: sustainability and alternatives to current management]. Amb Soc. 6–7:85–104. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/S1414-753X2000000100005
   Google Scholar
• Rebouças R. 2022. Cladograma dos herpetólogos do Brasil. [Cladogram of Brazilian herpetologists]. Herp Bras. 11:17–35. Portuguese. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6533137
   Google Scholar
• Refsnider JM, Linck MH. 2012. Habitat use and movement patterns of blanding’s turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) in Minnesota, USA: a landscape approach to species conservation. Herpetol Cons Biol. 7(2):185–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Refsnider JM, Strickland J, Janzen FJ. 2012. Home range and site fidelity of imperiled ornate box turtles (Terrapene ornata) in northwestern Illinois. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 11(1):78–83. doi:10.2744/CCB-0919.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remsberg AJ, Lewis TL, Huber PW, Asmus KA. 2006. Home ranges of wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta) in Northern Michigan. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 5(1):42–47. doi:10.2744/1071-8443(2006)5[42:HROWTG]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodin AG, Stanford CB, Van Dijk PP, Eisemberg C, Luiselli L, Mittermeier RA. 2018. Global conservation status of turtles and tortoises (order Testudines). Chelonian Conserv Biol. 17(2):135–161. doi:10.2744/CCB-1348.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro MDSL, Nabout JC, Pinto MP, Moura IOD, Melo TLD, Costa SS, Rangel TFLVDB. 2007. Análise cienciométrica em ecologia de populações: importância e tendências dos últimos 60 anos. [Scientometric analysis in population ecology: importance and trends over the last 60 years]. Acta Sci Biol Sci. 29(1):39–47. Portuguese. doi:10.4025/actascibiolsci.v29i1.125
   Google Scholar
• Roe JH, Georges A. 2008. Terrestrial activity, movements and spatial ecology of an Australian freshwater turtle, Chelodina longicollis, in a temporally dynamic wetland system. Austral Ecol. 33(8):1045–1056. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01877.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe JW, Lehr GC, Mccarthy PM, Converse PM. 2009. Activity, movements and activity area size in stinkpot turtles (Sternotherus odoratus) in a southwestern Michigan lake. Am Midl Nat. 162(2):266–275. doi:10.1674/0003-0031-162.2.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe JW, Moll EO. 1991. A radiotelemetric study of activity and movements of the Blanding’s turtle (Emydoidea blandingi) in northeastern Illinois. J Herpetol. 25(2):178–185. doi:10.2307/1564646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumjanek F. 2006. Ciência burocrática [Bureaucratic science]. Ciência Hoje. 32(233):23. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Scarano FR. 2008. A expansão e as perspectivas da pós-graduação em Ecologia no Brasil. [The expansion and perspectives of postgraduate studies in Ecology in Brazil]. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação. 5(9):89–102. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Schneegans S, Lewis J, Straza T 2021. Relatório de Ciências da UNESCO: A corrida contra o tempo por um desenvolvimento mais inteligente – Resumo executivo e cenário brasileiro. [UNESCO Science Report: The race against time for smarter development – Executive summary and Brazilian scenario]. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield G, Bishop CM, MacLean G, Brown P, Baker M, Katselidis KA, Hays GC. 2007. Novel GPS tracking of sea turtles as a tool for conservation management. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 347(1–2):58–68. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2007.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CC, Arthur SM. 1999. Radiotracking large wilderness mammals: integration of GPS and Argos technology. Ursus. 11:261–273.
   Google Scholar
• Signer J, Balkenhol N. 2015. Reproducible home ranges (rhr): a new, user‐friendly R package for analyses of wildlife telemetry data. Wild Soc Bull. 39(2):358–363. doi:10.1002/wsb.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva I, Crane M, Marshall BM, Strine CT. 2020. Reptiles on the wrong track? Moving beyond traditional estimators with dynamic brownian bridge movement models. Mov Ecol. 8(1):43. doi:10.1186/s40462-020-00229-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva I, Crane M, Suwanwaree P, Strine C, Goode M, Munderloh UG. 2018. Using dynamic brownian bridge movement models to identify home range size and movement patterns in king cobras. PLoS ONE. 13(9):e0203449. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva I, Fleming CH, Noonan MJ, Alston J, Folta C, Fagan WF. 2021. Autocorrelation-informed home range estimation: a review and practical guide. Methods Ecol Evol. 13(3):534–544. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith NJ. 1979. Quelônios aquáticos da Amazônia: um recurso ameaçado. [Amazonian aquatic chelonians: a threatened resource]. Acta amazónica. 9:87–97. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/1809-43921979091087
   Google Scholar
• Stanford CB, Iverson JB, Rhodin AG, van Dijk PP, Mittermeier RA, Kuchling G, Walde AD. 2020. Turtles and tortoises are in trouble. Curr Biol. 30(12):R721–R735. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swihart RK, Slade NA. 1985. Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology. 66(4):1176–1184. doi:10.2307/1939170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidman R, Abela-Ridder B, Castañeda RR D. 2021. The impact of climate change on neglected tropical diseases: a systematic review. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 115(2):147–168. doi:10.1093/trstmh/traa192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomassini M, Luthi L. 2007. Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific collaboration network. Physica A. 385(2):750–764. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkiewicz SM, Fuller MR, Kie JG, Bates KK. 2010. Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behavior and ecological research. Philos Trans R Soc B. 365(1550):2163–2176. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker ADCJ, Priest TE, J CAY, Glen Colli G. 2001. Home ranges of Fitzroy River turtles (Rheodytes leukops) overlap riffle zones: potential concerns related to river regulation. Biol Conserv. 102(2):171–181. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00097-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtle Conservation Fund. 2002. A global action plan for conservation of tortoises and freshwater turtles. Strategy and funding prospectus 2002–2007. Washington (DC): Conservation International and Chelonian Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Uetz P, Freed P, Aguilar R, Hošek J 2022. The reptile database. Available from: http://www.reptile-database.org [Accessed 2022 Sep 17].
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk P. 2000. The status of turtles in Asia. Chelonian Res Mon. 2(804):15–23.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk PP, Harding J. 2011. Glyptemys insculpta (errata version published in 2016). The IUCN red list of threatened species. e.T4965A97416259. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T4965A11102820.en [Accessed 2022 Oct 10].
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk PP, Rhodin AGJ. 2011. Emydoidea blandingii (errata version published in 2019). The IUCN red list of threatened species 2011: e.T7709A155088836. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011-1.RLTS.T7709A155088836.en> [Accessed 2022 Oct 10].
   Google Scholar
• Velamazan M, Perea R, Bugalho MN. 2020. Ungulates and ecosystem services in Mediterranean woody systems: a semiquantitative review. J Nat Cons. 55:125837. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez JDLO, Vogt RC. 2011. Ecologia populacional de Peltocephalus dumerilianus (Testudines, Podocnemididae) em dois tributários do Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brasil. [Population ecology of Peltocephalus dumerilianus (Testudines, Podocnemididae) in two tributaries of the Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazi]. Interciencia. 36(1):53–58. Portuguese.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vences-Pérez S, Díaz-Larrea J, Cruz-Aviña JR, Cabrera R. 2022. Análisis bibliométrico de Chelonia mydas en México utilizando VOSviewer y Scopus [Bibliometric analysis of Chelonia mydas in Mexico using VOSviewer and Scopus]. Braz J Anim Environ Res. 5(3):2650–2663. Spanish. doi:10.34188/bjaerv5n3-007
   Google Scholar
• Vieira E, Gomes J. 2009. A comparison of Scopus and web of science for a typical university. Scientometrics. 81(2):587–600. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace SD, Forbes GJ, Nocera JJ. 2020. Habitat selection, movement, and food preferences of wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta) in an agri–forested landscape. Can J Zool. 98(11):743–750. doi:10.1139/cjz-2020-0074
   Google Scholar
• White GC, Garrott RA. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio–tracking data. London (UK): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zagorski GM, Boreham DR, Litzgus JD. 2019. Endangered species protection and evidence–based decision–making: case study of a quarry proposal in endangered turtle habitat. Glob Ecol Conserv. 20:e00751. doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hill.
   Google Scholar