To speak or remain silent: an examination of two English teachers’ styles of leading whole-class discussion

References

• Alder, M., E. Rougle, E. Kaiser, and S. Caughlan. 2003. “Closing the Gap between Concept and Practice: Toward More Dialogic Discussion in the Classroom.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 47: 312–322.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2006. “Toward a Psychology of Human Agency.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1 (2): 164–180. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucholtz, M. 2000. “The Politics of Transcription.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1439–1465. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbules, N. C., and B. C. Bruce. 2001. “Theory and Research on Teaching as Dialogue.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching, edited by V. Richardson, 4th ed., 1102–1121. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• English, A. R. 2016. “Dialogic Teaching and Moral Learning: Self-Critique, Narrativity, Community, and ‘Blind Spots.”.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 50: 160–176. doi:10.1111/jope.2016.50.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., M. A. Britt, W. Brown, G. Cribb, M. George, C. Greenlead, … C. Shanahan. 2016. “Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy.” Educational Psychologist 512: 219–246. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741.
   Google Scholar
• Hillocks, G., and L. Ludlow. 1984. “A Taxonomy of Skills in Reading and Interpreting Fiction.” American Educational Research Journal 21: 7–24. doi:10.3102/00028312021001007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, J., and V. Elliott. 2016. “A Critical Analysis of the Role of Wait Time in Classroom Interactions and the Effects on Student and Teacher Interactional Behaviours.” Cambridge Journal of Education 46: 37–53. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2015.1009365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathard, H., D. Pillay, and M. Pillay. 2015. “A Study of Teacher-Learner Interactions: A Continuum between Monologic and Dialogic Interactions.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services 46: 222–241. doi:10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, R. S., K. R. Krohn, C. H. Skinner, A. Hilton-Prillhart, M. Hopkins, S. Waller, and F. Polite. 2011. “Improving Reading Comprehension of At-Risk High-School Students: The ART of Reading Program.” Psychology in the Schools 48 (1): 78–86. doi:10.1002/pits.v48.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, V. B. 2014. “Using Student-Led Seminars and Conceptual Workshops to Increase Student Participation.” College Teaching 62: 62–67. doi:10.1080/87567555.2014.885876.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and C. Howe. 2012. “Explaining the Dialogic Processes of Teaching and Learning: The Value and Potential of Sociocultural Theory.” Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction 1: 12–21. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 1997. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M. 2006. “Research on the Role of Classroom Discourse as It Affects Reading Comprehension.” Research in the Teaching of English 40: 392–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, P. J. 1987. Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, E. C. 2016. “Disciplinary Literacy in English Language Arts: Exploring the Social and Problem-Based Nature of Literary Reading and Reasoning.” Reading Research Quarterly 52 (1): 53–71. doi:10.1002/rrq.154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T. 2018. “Understanding and Embracing Contradictions: An Exploration of High School English Teachers’ Beliefs about Whole-Class Discussion”. Language and Education 34(4):371–385. SJR: Q1 in Education. doi:10.1080/09500782.2018.1445265.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T., J. Lampi, J. Holschuh, and L. S. Rush (2016, December). In Pursuit of Equity: Disciplinary Literacy in English/Language Arts. Paper presented at the 2016 Literacy Research Association Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T., and L. S. Rush. 2017. “Experts and Novices Reading Literature: An Analysis of Disciplinary Literacy in English Language Arts.” Literacy Research and Instruction 56: 199–216. (SJR: Q1 in Language and Linguistics). doi:10.1080/19388071.2017.1299820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A. 2012. “Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Language Use during Literature Discussions.” The Reading Teacher 65: 446–456. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., and M. Gregory. 2013. “Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanisms of Change in Dialogic Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 48 (2): 114–133. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, A. E. 2010. “Exploring Text through Student Discussions: Accountable Talk in the Middle School Classroom.” English Journal 100 (1): 83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., E. F. Mortimer, and O. G. Aguiar. 2006. “The Tension between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education 90: 605–631. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., and C. Shanahan. 2012. “What Is Disciplinary Literacy and Why Does It Matter?” Topics in Language Disorders 32 (1): 7–18. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e318244557a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar