Spatial Clustering, Local Accumulation of Knowledge and Firm Competitiveness

References

• ANDERSSON, Å.E. (1985): ‘Creativity and regional development’, Papers of the Regional Science Association 56: 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMIN, A. & MALMBERG, A. (1992): ‘Competing structural and institutional influences on the geography of production in Europe’, Environment and Planning A 24: 401–416.
   Google Scholar
• AMIN, A. & THRIFT, N. (1995): ‘Territoriality in the global political economy’, Nordisk Sainhätlsgeografisk Tidskrift 20: 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• APPOLD, S.J. (1995): ‘Agglomeration, interorganizational networks, and competitive performance in the U.S. metalworking sector’. Economic Geography 71: 27–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARCHIBUGI, D. & PIANTA, M. (1992): ‘Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: the analysis of patent data’. Research Policy 21: 79–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASHEIM, B.T. (1992): ‘Flexible specialization, industrial districts and small firms: a critical reappraisal’, in ERNESTE, H. & MAIER, V. (eds): Regional development and contemporary industrial response. Extending flexible specialization. Belhaven Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• AYDALOT, P. (1986): Milieux innovateurs en Europe. GREMI, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• BARTLETT, C.A. & GHOSHAL, S. (1990): ‘Managing innovation in the transnational corporation’, in BARTLETT, C.A., DOZ, Y. & HEDLUND, G. (eds): Managing the global firm. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• BASBERG, B.L. (1987): ‘Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature’. Research Policy 16: 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAMAGNI, R. (ed.) (1991): Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. Belhaven Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• CANTWELL, J. (1991): ‘Historical trends in international patterns of technological innovation’, in FOREMANPECK, J. (ed.): New Perspectives on the Late Victorian Economy—Essays in Quantitative Economic History 1860–1914. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• CANTWELL, J. (1995): ‘The globalization of technology: what remains of the product cycle model?’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 19: 155–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COLEMAN, J.S. (1990): Foundations of social theory. The Belknapp Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
   Google Scholar
• COFFEY & BAILLY, A. (1996): ‘Flexible economy and services: new patterns of location of economic activity’, in BAILLY, A. & LEVER, W.F. (eds): The spatial impacts of economic changes in Europe. Avebury, London.
   Google Scholar
• CONTI, S. (1993): ‘The network perspective in industrial geography: towards a model’, Geografiska Annaler Series R 75B: 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• DICKEN, P. (1992): Global shift. The internationalization of economic activity. Second edition. Paul Chapman Publishers, London.
   Google Scholar
• DICKEN, P., FORSGREN, M. & MALMBERG, A. (1994): ‘The local embeddednes of transnational corporations’, in AMIN, A. & THRIFT, N. (eds): Globalization, institutions, and regional development in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• DOSI, G. (1982): ‘Technological paradigms and technological trajectories’, Research Policy 11: 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOSI, G. (1988): ‘Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation’. Journal of Economic Literature XXVI: 1120–1171.
   Google Scholar
• DUNNING, J.H. (1993): Multinational enterprise and the global economy. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham.
   Google Scholar
• DUNNING, J.H. (1994): ‘Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity’, Research Policy 23: 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENRIGHT, M.J. (1994): Regional clusters and firm strategy. Paper presented at the Prince Bertil Symposium on The dynamic firm: the role of regions, technology, strategy and organization, Stockholm, 12–15 June.
   Google Scholar
• ESTALL, R.C. & BUCHANAN, R.O. (1961): Industrial activity and economic geography. Hutchinson & Co, London.
   Google Scholar
• FORSGREN, M., HOLM, U. & JOHANSON, J: (1991): ‘Internationlisering av andra graden’, in ANDERSSON, R. et al. (eds): Internationalisering, företagen och del lokala samhället. SNS Förlag, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• FREDRIKSSON, C. & LINDMARK, L. (1979): ‘From firms to systems of firms: a study of interregional dependence in a dynamic society’, in HAMILTON, F.E.I & LINGE, G.J.R. (eds): Spatial analysis, industry and the industrial environment—progress in research and applications: Vol. 1—industrial systems. Wiley, Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• FREEMAN, C. (1982): The economics of industrial innovation. Second edition. Frances Pinter Publishers, London.
   Google Scholar
• FREEMAN, C. (1991): ‘Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues’, Research Policy 20: 499–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GERTLER, M. S. (1995): ‘“Being there”: Proximity, organization, and culture in the development and adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies’. Economic Geography 71: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HALLÉN, L., JOHANSON, J. & SEYED-MOHAMED, N. (1993): ‘Dyadic business relationships and customer technologies’. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 1: 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• HEDLUND, G. (1986): ‘The hypermodern MNC—a heterarchy?’. Human Resource Management 25: 9–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEDLUND, G. & ROLANDER, D. (1990): ‘Action in heterarchies: new approaches to managing the MNC’, in BARTLETT, C.A., DOZ, Y. & HEDLUND, G. (eds): Managing the global firm. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• VON HIPPEL, E. (1988): The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• HIRSCHMAN, A.O. (1958): The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press, New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• HOLM, U., JOHANSON, J. & THILENIUS, P. (1995): ‘Headquarters' knowledge of subsidiary network contexts in the multinational corporation’, International Studies of Management & Organization 25: 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• HOOVER, E.M. (1948): The location of economic activity. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
   Google Scholar
• HÅKANSSON, H. (1989): Corporate technological behavior—co-operation and networks. Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• HÅKANSSON, H. & ERIKSSON, A.-K. (1993): ‘Getting innovations out of supplier networks’, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 1: 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• HÅKANSON, L. (1995): ‘Learning through acquisitions: management and integration of foreign R&D laboratories’, International Studies of Management & Organization 25: 121–157.
   Google Scholar
• HÄGERSTRAND, T. (1967): Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• JOHANNISSON, B. (1987): ‘Toward a theory of local entrepreneurship’, in WYCKMAN, R. G., MERREDITH, L. N. & BUSH, G. R. (eds): The spirit of entrepreneurship. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC.
   Google Scholar
• KILDUFF, M. (1992): ‘Performance and interaction routines in multinational corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies 23: 133–145.
   Google Scholar
• KOGUT, B. (ed.) (1993): Country competitiveness—technology and organizing of work. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• KRUGMAN, P. (1991a): Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• KRUGMAN, P. (1991b): ‘History and industry location: the case of the manufacturing belt’, The American Economic Review 81: 80–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KRUGMAN, P. (1991c): ‘Increasing returns and economic geography’, Journal of Political Economy 99: 483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAAGE-HELLMAN, J. (1989): Technological development in industrial networks. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 16, Faculty of Social Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• LEONARD-BARTON, D. (1982): Swedish entrepreneurs in manufacturing and their sources of information. Center for Policy Applications, MIT, Boston.
   Google Scholar
• LLOYD, P.E. & DICKEN, P. (1977): Location in space. A theoretical approach to economic geography. Second edition. Harper & Row, London.
   Google Scholar
• LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (1988): ‘Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation’, in DOSI, G. et al. (eds): Technical change and economic theory. Pinter Publishers, London.
   Google Scholar
• LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (1993): ‘Explaining interfirm cooperation and innovation: limits of the transaction-cost approach’, in GRABHER, G. (ed.): The Embedded Firm—On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. Routledge, London & New York.
   Google Scholar
• MAILLAT, D. (1995): ‘Territorial dynamic, innovative milieus and regional policy’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 7: 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• MALECKI, E. J. (1991): Technology and economic development—the dynamics of local, regional and national change. Longman Scientific & Technical, New York.
   Google Scholar
• MALMBERG, A. (1996): ‘Industrial geography: agglomeration and local milieu’. Progress in Human Geography 20: 392–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARSHALL, A. (1890/1916): Principles of economics. An introductory volume. Seventh Edition. Macmillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• MASKELL, P. & MALMBERG, A. (1995): Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. BRIE Working Paper 80, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy.
   Google Scholar
• McCANN, P. (1995): ‘Rethinking the economics of location and agglomeration’. Urban Studies 32: 563–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DE MEYER, A. (1991): ‘Tech talk: how managers are stimulating global R&D communication’, Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 49–58.
   Google Scholar
• DE MEYER, A. (1992): ‘Management of international R&D operations’, in GRANSTRAND, O., HÅKANSON, L. & SJÖLANDER, S. (eds): Technology management and international business—internationalization of R&D and technology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• MORGAN, K. (1995): Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. The development agency as animateur. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Conference on Regional Futures, Gothenburg, 6–9 May.
   Google Scholar
• MYRDAL, G. (1957): Economic theory and the underdeveloped regions. Ducksworth, London.
   Google Scholar
• NOHRIA, N. & ECCLES, R.G. (1992): ‘Face-to-face: making network organizations work”, in NOHRIA, N. & ECCLES, R.G. (eds): Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• PATCHELL, J. (1993): ‘From production systems to learning systems: lessons from Japan’, Environment and Planning A 25: 797–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAVITT, K. (1984): ‘Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory’. Research Policy 13: 343–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAVITT, K. (1988): International patterns of technological accumulation, in HOOD, N. & VAHLNE, J.-E. (eds): Strategies in Global Competition. Croom Helm, London.
   Google Scholar
• PAVITT, K. (1991): ‘Key characteristics of the large innovating firm’, British Journal of Management 2: 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• PAVITT, K., ROBSON, M. & TOWNSEND, J. (1989): ‘Technological accumulation, diversification and organisation in UK companies 1945–1983’, Management Science 35: 81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEARSON, A. W. (1991): ‘Managing innovation: an uncertainty reduction process’, in HENRY, J. & WALKER, D. (eds): Managing innovation. SAGE Publications, London.
   Google Scholar
• PIORE, M. & SABEL, C. (1984): The second industrial divide. Basic Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• POLANYI, K. (1962): Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• PORTER, M.E. (1990): The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, London and Basingstoke.
   Google Scholar
• PORTER, M. E. (1994): ‘The role of location in competition’, Journal of the Economics of Business 1: 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• PRAHALAD, C.K. & DOZ, Y. (1987): The multinational mission—balancing local demands and global vision. The Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• PRED, A. (1977): City systems in advanced economies. Past growth, present processes and future development options. Hutchinson, London.
   Google Scholar
• PUTNAM, R. D. (with Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R. Y.) (1993): Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• RIDDERSTRÅLE, J. (1997): Global innovation—managing international innovation projects in ABB and Electrolux. Doctoral dissertation. Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, (forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• SAXENIAN, A. (1994): Regional advantage. Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. & London.
   Google Scholar
• SCHERER, F.M. (1984): Innovation and growth—Schumpeterian perspectives. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• SCHMOOKLER, J. (1966): Inventions and economic growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Row, New York.
   Google Scholar
• SCOTT, A.J, (1983): ‘Industrial organisation and the logic of intra-metropolitan location—1. Theoretical considerations’, Economic Geography 59: 233–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCOTT, A.J. (1988): New industrial spaces: Flexible production organisation and regional development in North America and Western Europe. Pion, London.
   Google Scholar
• SCOTT, A.J. (1995): ‘The geographic foundations of industrial performance’, Competition & Change. The Journal of Global Business and Political Economy 1: 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• STORPER, M. & WALKER, R. (1989): The capitalist imperative. Territory, technology, and industrial growth. Basil Blackwell, New York.
   Google Scholar
• STORPER, M. (1995): ‘The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as a nexus of untraded interdependencies’, European Urban and Regional Studies 2: 191–221.
   Google Scholar
• SÖLVELL, Ö., ZANDER, I. & PORTER, M.E. (1991): Advantage Sweden. Norstedts, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• SÖLVELL, Ö. & ZANDER, I. (1995): ‘Organization of the dynamic multinational enterprise—the home-based and the heterarchical MNE’, International Studies of Management & Organization 25: 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• TÖRNQVIST, G. (1970): Contact systems and regional development. Lund Studies in Geography, Ser. B:35: University of Lund, Lund.
   Google Scholar
• ULLMAN, E.L. (1958): ‘Regional development and the geography of concentration’ Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association IV: 179–198.
   Google Scholar
• UTTERBACK, J. (1974): ‘Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology’, Science 183: 658–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEBER, A. (1909/1929) Theory of the location of industries. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• WINTER, S.G. (1987): ‘Knowledge and competence as strategic assets’, in TEECE, D. (ed.): The competitive challenge—strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass.
   Google Scholar
• ZANDER, I. (1994): The tortoise evolution of the multinational corporation—technological activity in Swedish multinational firms 1890–1990. Published doctoral dissertation. Institute of International Business, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• ZANDER, I. & SÖLVELL, Ö. (1995): Determinants of local technological activity—implications for innovation in the multinational firm. Paper presented at the EMOT Workshop on Technology and the theory of the firm. University of Reading, 15–16 May.
   Google Scholar