Urban governance and public leisure policies: a comparative analysis framework

References

• Belley, S., & Lavigne, M. A. (2008). Apolitisme, partis politiques et prégnance des institutions au niveau municipal: le cas de l'élection municipale de 2006 à Québec [Apolitical dynamics, political parties and the importance of institutions at the municipal level: The case of the 2006 municipal election in Quebec City, Canada]. Recherches sociographiques, XLIX(1), 47–68. doi:10.7202/018193ar
   Google Scholar
• Benson, A., & Henderson, S. (2005). UK leisure centres under best value: A strategic analysis. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18, 196–215. doi:10.1108/09513550510591515
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Parks and Recreation Association. (1997). The benefits catalogue. Ottawa: CPRA.
   Google Scholar
• Contandriopoulos, D. (2004). A sociological perspective on public participation in health care. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 321–330. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00164-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Alcántara, C. H. (1998). Uses and abuses of the concept of governance. International Social Science Journal, 50, 105–113. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00113
   Google Scholar
• Dulac, C., & Henry, I. P. (2001). Sport and social regulation in the city: The cases of Grenoble and Sheffield. Loisir et Société, 24(1), 47–78. doi:10.7202/000163ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enjolras, B., & Waldahl, R. H. (2007). Policy-making in sport: The Norwegian case. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 42, 201–216. doi:10.1177/1012690207084753
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K. A., Phillips, S. D., & Maslove, A. M. (1998). Urban governance in Canada representation, resources, and restructuring. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Gualini, E. (2002). Institutional capacity building as an issue of collective action and institutionalisation: Some theoretical remarks. In G. Cars, P. Healey, A. Madanipour, & C. De Magalhaes (Eds.), Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux (pp. 29–44). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J., Thibault, L., & Rail, G. (1995). Neo-corporatism: The political management system in Canadian amateur sport and fitness. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 19, 249–265. doi:10.1177/019372395019003003
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden: From relief to income maintenance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I. P. (2001). The politics of leisure policy ( 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, I. P., Amara, M., Al-Tauqi, M., & Ping Chao, L. (2005). A typology of approaches to comparative analysis of sports policy. Journal of Sport Management, 19, 480–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, I. P., & Paramio-Salcines, J. L. (1998). Leisure, culture and urban regimes in Bilbao. In I. Cooper & M. Collins (Eds.), Leisure management: Issues and applications (pp. 97–112). Wallingford: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35, 1404–1427. doi:10.1177/0149206309343469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan, B. (2005). Public sector sport policy: Developing a framework for analysis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 40, 163–185. doi:10.1177/1012690205057193
   Google Scholar
• Jobert, B., & Muller, P. (1987). L'État en action: politiques publiques et corporatismes [The state in action: Public policies and corporatisms]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (2012). Analyzing public policy ( 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jouve, B. (2003). La gouvernance urbaine en questions [Urban governance in questions]. Paris: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lauria, M. (1997). Reconstructing urban regime theory: Regulating urban politics in a global economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lecours, A. (2002). L'approche néo-institutionnaliste en science politique: unité ou diversité? [Neo-institutional approaches in political science: Unity or diversity?]. Politique et Sociétés, 21(3), 3–20. doi:10.7202/000494ar
   Google Scholar
• Lemieux, V. (2000). Réflexions sur la gouvernance [Reflections on governance]. In M. Carrier & S. Côté (Eds.), Gouvernance et territoires ruraux [Governance and rural territories] (pp. 333–338). Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Lemieux, V. (2001). Décentralisation, politiques publiques et relations de pouvoir [Decentralisation, public policies and power relations]. Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Lemieux, V. (2002). L'étude des politiques publiques: les acteurs et leur pouvoir [Studying public policies: Actors and their power] ( 2nd ed.). Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Maloutas, T., & Malouta, M. P. (2004). The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: Concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28, 449–465. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00528.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misener, L., & Mason, D. (2008). Urban regimes and the sporting events agenda: A cross-national comparison of civic development strategies. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., & Stoker, G. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36, 810–835. doi:10.1177/10780870122185109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, P. (2004). L'État en action revisité [The state in action, revised]. Pôle Sud, 2(21), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L., & Henderson, S. (2005). Best value and the market orientation of UK recreation centres. Local Government Studies, 31, 237–257. doi:10.1080/03003930500032171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, G. (1996). The impact of compulsory competitive tendering on planning in leisure departments. Managing Leisure, 1, 105–114. doi:10.1080/136067196376474
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Washington, DC: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (2005). Comparative urban governance: Uncovering complex causalities. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 446–462. doi:10.1177/1078087404273442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. doi:10.1353/jod.1995.0002
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, N. (1998). The changing regulation of public leisure provision. Leisure Studies, 17, 138. doi:10.1080/026143698375204
   Google Scholar
• Richard Frève, É. (2010). Le rôle des idées dans la formulation des politiques publiques [The role of ideas in the formulation of public policies]. In S. Paquin, L. Bernier, & G. Lachapelle (Eds.), L'analyse des politiques publiques [Public policy analysis] (pp. 125–161). Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168. doi:10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1999). The need for better theories. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 3–17). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: Assessment, revisions, and implications for scholars and practitioners. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 211–236). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmel, K. S. (2001). Sport matters: Urban regime theory and urban regeneration in the late-capitalist era. In C. Gratton & I. P. Henry (Eds.), Sport in the city: The role of sport in the economic and social regeneration (pp. 259–277). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skille, E. Å. (2008). Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers: A theoretical framework for the analysis of the implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organizations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43, 181–200. doi:10.1177/1012690208096035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skille, E. Å. (2009). State sport policy and voluntary sport clubs: The case of the Norwegian sports city program as social policy. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(1), 63–79. doi:10.1080/16184740802461736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, D., & Green, P. (2002). Explaining continuity and change in the transition from compulsory competitive tendering to best value for sport and recreation management. Managing Leisure, 7, 124–138. doi:10.1080/13606710210140684
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G., & Mossberger, K. (1994). Urban regime theory in comparative perspective. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 12, 195–212. doi:10.1068/c120195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (1989). Regime politics. Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1), 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.1993.tb00300.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, A. (2008). Public and civic leisure in Quebec. Quebec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H. (1995). Local government institutions and democratic governance. In D. Judge, G. Stoker, & H. Wolman (Eds.), Theories of urban politics (pp. 135–159). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods ( 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar