De Se Content and Action Generalisation

References

• Anscombe, E. (1963) Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, A. (1970) ‘Act and Intent,’ Journal of Philosophy 67, 648–658. doi: 10.2307/2024585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. (1987) Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. (2009) ‘Intention, Practical Rationality, and Self-Governance’ Ethics 119, 411–443. doi: 10.1086/599985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, J. (2001) ‘Normative Practical Reasoning’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 75, 175–193. doi: 10.1111/1467-8349.00085
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. (1989) Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckareff, A.A. (2011) ‘Action-Individuation and Doxastic Agency’ Theoria 77, 312–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-2567.2011.01113.x
   Google Scholar
• Cappelen, H. and Dever, J. (2013). The Inessential Indexical. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, H-N. (1966) ‘He: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness’, Ratio 8, 130–157.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, H-N. (1967) ‘Indicators and Quasi-Indicators’, American Philosophical Quaterly 4, 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, H-N. (1968) ‘On the Logic of Attributions of Sel-Knowledge to Others’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 439–456. doi: 10.2307/2024296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, H-N. (1975) Thinking and Doing. Dordrecth: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, P.M. (1989) ‘Folk Psychology and the Explanation of Human Behaviour’, Philosophical Perspectives 3, 225–241. doi: 10.2307/2214269
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. (1980) Essays on Actions and Events. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, W. (1984) ‘A Causal Theory of Intending’ in A. Mele (ed.) The Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Enç, B. (2003) How We Act: Causes, Reasons and Intentions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (1981) ‘Understanding Demonstratives’ in H. Parret and Jacques Bouveresse (eds.), Meaning and Understanding. New York: Walter De Gruyter, 280–304.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. (1982) The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. (1987) Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginet, C. (1990) On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. (1970) A Theory of Human Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J. (2003) ‘Remembering, Imagining, and the First Person’ in A. Barber (ed.), Epistemology of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 496–533.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby, J. (1980) Actions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (1977) ‘Demonstratives’ in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 481–563.
   Google Scholar
• Lavin, D. (2016) ‘Action as a Form of Temporal Unity: on Anscombe's Intention’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45, 609–629. doi: 10.1080/00455091.2015.1125589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1979) ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Review 88, 513–543. doi: 10.2307/2184843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. (2011) ‘Action Individuation: A Normative Functionalist Approach’ Philosophical Explorations 14, 99–116. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2011.544396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, E. (2009) ‘Presupposing Acquaintance: A Unified Semantics for De dicto, De re and De se Belief Reports’ Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 429–474. doi: 10.1007/s10988-010-9065-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinn, C. (1983) The Subjective View: Secondary Qualities and Indexical Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, A. (1992) The Springs of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, D.H. (1989) ‘I and Now’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89, 79–94. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/89.1.79
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R.G. (1990) ‘The Myth of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs 24, 723–734. doi: 10.2307/2215811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, R. and Stone, M. (2009) ‘Anscombe on Expression of Intention’ in C. Sandis (ed.), Agency and Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 132–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ninan, D. (2016) ‘What is the Problem of De Se Attitudes?’ in S. Torre and M. García-Carpintero (eds.), About Oneself. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paprzycka, K. (2012) ‘Ginet on the Problem of Action Externalization’, Philosophia 40, 841–855. doi: 10.1007/s11406-012-9378-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacocke, C. (1981) ‘Demonstrative Thought and Psychological Explanation’, Synthese 49, 187–217. doi: 10.1007/BF01064298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacocke, C. (2014) The Mirror of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (1977) ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review 86, 474–497. doi: 10.2307/2184564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (1979) ‘The Problem of the Essential Indexical’, Noûs 13, 3–21. doi: 10.2307/2214792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (1980) ‘Belief and Acceptance’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5, 533–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1980.tb00422.x
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (1986) ‘Thought Without Representation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 60, 137–152. doi: 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/60.1.137
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (1988) ‘Cognitive Significance and New Theories of Reference’, Noûs 22, 1–18. Reprinted in John Perry (ed.) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 227–245. doi: 10.2307/2215544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (1993) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (2002) Identity, Personal Identity and the Self. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (2006) ‘Stalnaker and Indexical Belief’ in J. Thomson and A. Byrne (eds.), Content and Modality: Themes from the Philosophy of Robert Stalnaker. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 204–221.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. (2012) ‘Thinking about the Self’ in J. Liu & J. Perry (eds.) Consciousness and the Self: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 76–100.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. and Israel, D. J. (1991) ‘Fodor and Psychological Explanation’ in John Perry (ed.) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 301–323.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, S. (2015) ‘Why Are Indexicals Essential?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115, 211–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9264.2015.00392.x
   Google Scholar
• Proust, J. (2001) ‘A Plea for Mental Acts’, Synthese 129, 105–128. doi: 10.1023/A:1012651308747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recanati, F. (2009) ‘De re and De se’ Dialectica 63, 249–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01194.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recanati, F. (2016) ‘Indexical Thought: The Communication Problem’ in S. Torre and M. García-Carpintero (eds.), About Oneself. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, M.E. (1983) ‘Direct Reference and Ascriptions of Belief’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 12, 425–452. doi: 10.1007/BF00249259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1966) ‘Thought and Action’ in K. Lehrer (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (1981) ‘Indexical Belief’, Synthese 49, 129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (2014) Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645169.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1964) The Explanation of Behavior. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (2008) Life and Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, G. (1989) The Intentionality of Human Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velleman, J.D. (1999) ‘The Voice of Conscience’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99, 57–76. doi: 10.1111/1467-9264.00045
   Google Scholar
• Verdejo, V.M. (unpublished). ‘Thought Sharing, Communication, and Perspectives about the Self’.
   Google Scholar