Linguistic Privilege and Justice: What Can We Learn from STEM?

References

• Anderson, E. 2012. ‘Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions.’ Social Epistemology 26(2): 163–173. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2011.652211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K.J. 1973. ‘Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice by John Rawls.’ The Journal of Philosophy 70(9): 245–263. doi: 10.2307/2025006
   Google Scholar
• Ayala, S. 2015. ‘Philosophy and the Non-Native Speaker Condition.’ The American Philosophical Society Newsletter 14(2): 2–8.
   Google Scholar
• Beaney, M. 2013. ‘What is Analytic Philosophy?’ The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, M.J., Ohashi, R., Nebashi, R., Liu, W.Y., and Shearman, S.M. 2002. ‘Attitudinal and Affective Response toward Accented English.’ Language and Communication 22: 171–185. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavero, M. 2010. ‘“Awkward Wording. Rephrase”: Linguistic Injustice in Ecological Journals.’ Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 552–553. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clavero, M.. 2011. ‘Unfortunately, Linguistic Injustice Matters.’ Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 156–157. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., Evans, R., and Gorman, M. 2010. ‘Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.’ In Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating a New Kind of Collaboration, edited by M. Gorman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Flege, J.E., Munro, M.J., and MacKay, I.R. 1995. ‘Factors Affecting Strength of Perceived Foreign Accent in a Second Language.’ The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 3125–3134. doi: 10.1121/1.413041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galison, P. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P.. 2003. ‘The Collective Author.’ In Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, edited by M. Biagioli and P. Galison, 325–358. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guariguata, M.R., Sheil, D., and Murdiyarso, D. 2011. ‘“Linguistic Injustice” Is Not Black and White.’ Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 58–59. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoddeson, L., Kolb, A.W., and Westfall, C. 2008. Fermilab, Physics, the Frontier, and Megascience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Frideger, M., and Pearce, J.L. 2013. ‘Political Skill: Explaining the Effects of Nonnative Accent on Managerial Hiring and Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions.’ Journal of Applied Psychology 98(6): 1005–1017. doi: 10.1037/a0034125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2016. ‘Academic Publishing and the Myth of Linguistic Injustice.’ Journal of Second Language Writing 31: 58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenneberg, E.H. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lenski, G.E. 1954. ‘Status Crystallization: A Non-Vertical Dimension of Social Status.’ American Sociological Review 19: 405–413. doi: 10.2307/2087459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The LIGO collaboration. 2017. LIGO (website). Accessed October 12, 2017. https://www.ligo.caltech.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Lindemann, S. 2005. ‘Who Speaks “Broken English”? US Undergraduates’ Perception of Nonnative English.’ International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15: 187–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00087.x
   Google Scholar
• Lippi-Green, R. 2012. English with an Accent. Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, M. 2013. ‘Non-native English Speakers in Philosophy.’ The Philosophers’ Cocoon. Accessed November 29, 2017. http://philosopherscocoon.typepad.com/blog/2013/01/non-native-english-speakers-in-philosophy.html.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, J.D. and Arnold, G.F. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English. Bristol: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. 1997. ‘Equality and Priority.’ Ratio 10(3): 202–221. doi: 10.1111/1467-9329.00041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrillo, V.N., and Donoghue, C. 2005. ‘Updating the Bogardus Social Distance Studies: A New National Survey.’ The Social Science Journal 42(2): 257–271. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2005.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primack, R., Ellwood, E., Miller-Rushing, A., and Mulligan, A. 2009. ‘Do Gender, Nationality or Academic Age Affect Review Decisions? An Analysis of Submissions to the Journal Biological Conservation.’ Biological Conservation 142: 2415–2418. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronskikh, V.S. 2016a. ‘Experimental Background and Theory-Ladenness of Experimentation.’ Belgrade Philosophical Annual 29: 79–89.
   Google Scholar
• Pronskikh, V.S.. 2016b. ‘E-36: The First Proto-Megascience Experiment at NAL.’ Physics in Perspective 18(4): 357–378. doi: 10.1007/s00016-016-0192-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2012. ‘Science and the Large Hadron Collider: A Probe Into Instrumentation, Periodization and Classification.’ Dialectical Anthropology 36: 291–316. doi: 10.1007/s10624-012-9278-6
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A.. 2017. ‘Signatura Rerum: Semiotics of the Subnuclear.’ Signs and Society 5(S1): 77–99. doi: 10.1086/690087
   Google Scholar
• Star, S.L., and Griesemer, J.R. 1989. ‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology.’ Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar