Linguistic Justice and Analytic Philosophy

References

• Aronson, J., and Inzlicht, M. (2004) ‘The ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: Stereotype vulnerability and the academic self-knowledge of African American college students’, Psychological Science, 15:2, 829–836. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00763.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banaji, M., and Greenwald, A. (2013) Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People, New York: Delacorte Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. (2013) Our Racist Heart? An Exploration of Unconscious Prejudice in Everyday Life, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand M., and Mullainathan, S. (2004) ‘Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal?’, American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013. doi: 10.1257/0002828042002561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Belin, P., and Ladd, D. R. (2015), ‘A neural marker for social bias toward in-group accents’, Cerebral Cortex, 25:10, 3953–3961. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, I. (2002) ‘The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudices’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, C. (1993), ‘Sex bias in student assessment overlooked?’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18:1, 3–8. doi: 10.1080/0260293930180101
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., and Dutton, K. A. (1995) ‘Truth and consequences: The costs and benefits of accurate self-knowledge’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bullettin, 21, 1288–1296. doi: 10.1177/01461672952112006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, B. (2016) ‘The preference satisfaction model of linguistic advantage’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, doi:10.1080/13698230.2016.1270905.
   Google Scholar
• Correll J., Urland, G., and Ito, T. (2006) ‘Event-related potentials and the decision to shoot: The role of threat perception and cognitive control’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42:1, 120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N. (2013) ‘Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233–279. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, H. (2008) ‘The linguistic territoriality principle: A critique’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25:2, 105–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00397.x
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, H., and Robichaud, D. (2015) ‘Van Parijsian linguistic injustice: Context, analysis and critiques’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 18:2, 87–112. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2015.1023627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deprez-Sims, A. S., and Morris, S. B. (2013) ‘The effect of non-native accents on the evaluation of applicants during an employment interview: The development of a path model’, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21:4, 355–367. doi: 10.1111/ijsa.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L. (2000) ‘Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999’, Psychological Science, 11, 319–323. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1983) Sour Grapes: Essays in Rationality and Irrationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, R. (2008) ‘Modest deontologism in epistemology’, Synthese, 161:3, 339–355. doi: 10.1007/s11229-006-9088-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2007) Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilabert, P., 2017, ‘Justice and feasibility: A dynamic approach’, in M. Weber and K. Vallier, eds, Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates, Oxford: Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190280598.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T. (1991) How Do We Know What Isn’t So? New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gluszek, A., and Dovidio, J. F. (2010) ‘Speaking with a non-native accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29:2, 224–234. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09359590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B., and Banaji, M., 2003, ‘Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improving scoring algorithm’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85:2, 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T., Uhlmann, E., and Banaji, M., 2009, ‘Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III meta-analysis of predictive validity’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97:1, 17–41 doi: 10.1037/a0015575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslanger, S. (2012) Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatzidaki, A., Baus, C., and Costa, A. (2015), ‘The way you say it, the way I feel it: Emotional word processing in accented speech’, Frontiers in Psychology, 6:351, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holroyd, J., 2012, ‘Responsibility for implicit bias’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 43:3, 274–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2012.01565.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hieronymi, P., 2008, ‘Responsibility for believing’, Synthese, 161:3, 357–373. doi: 10.1007/s11229-006-9089-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundleby, C. E. (2016) ‘The status quo fallacy: Implicit bias and fallacies of argumentation’, in M. Brownstein and J. Saul, eds, Implicit Bias and Philosophy. Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology, New York: Oxford University Press, 238–264.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J., and Banaji, M., 2006, ‘Fair measures: A behavioural realist revision of “affirmative action”’, California Law Review, 94, 1063–1118. doi: 10.2307/20439059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, L. H. (1995) ‘The content of our categories: A cognitive bias approach to discrimination and equal employment opportunity’, Standard Law Review, 47:6, 1161–1248. doi: 10.2307/1229191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W., and Patten, A., eds (2003), Language Rights and Political Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laitin, D. (1993) ‘The game theory of language regimes’, International Political Science Review, 14:3, 227–239. doi: 10.1177/019251219301400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K., Kang, J., and Banaji, M., 2007, ‘Implicit social cognition and law’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 427–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léger, R., Lewis, H. (2016) ‘Normative political theory’s contribution to language policy research’, Journal of Multilinguaol and Multicultural Development, doi:10.1080/01434632.2016.1192177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, B. A., Schilpzand, P., and Erez, A. (2017), ‘Not what you expected to hear: Accented messages and their effect on choice’, Journal of Management, 43:3, 804–833. doi: 10.1177/0149206314541151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, M. J. (1991) ‘Voices of America: Accent, antidiscrimination law, and a jurisprudence for the last reconstruction’ Yale Law Journal, 100:5, 1329–1407. doi: 10.2307/796694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, C., and Newen, A. (2010) ‘SD as pseudo-rational regulation of beliefs’, Consciousness and Cognition, 19: 731–744. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D., 2017, ‘Justice’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 edition), Edward N. Zalta, ed., https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/justice.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, I., 1985, The Sovereignty of Good, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B., Greenwald, A. G., and Banaji, M., 2005, ‘Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31:2, 166–180. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Linder, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., Smith, C. T., et al. (2007), ‘Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes’, European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. doi: 10.1080/10463280701489053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., and Tetlock, P. E., 2015, ‘Using the IAT to predict ethnic and racial discrimination: Small effect sizes of unknown societal significance’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108:4, 562–571. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, A. (2014) Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundation of Minority Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D. P., and Ceci, S. I. (1982) ‘Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles submitted again’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 5, 187–195. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00011183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice, Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reaume, D., and Pinto, M. (2012) ‘Philosophy of language policy’, in B. Spolsky, ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (2011) Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riera Gil, E. (2016) Why Language Matters to People, Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Istitut d’Estudis de l’Autogovern.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman L. A. (2004) ‘Social justice in our minds, homes, and society: The nature, causes, and consequences of implicit bias’, Social Justice Research, 17:2, 129–142. doi: 10.1023/B:SORE.0000027406.32604.f6
   Google Scholar
• Saul, J. (2013) ‘Scepticism and implicit bias’, Disputatio Lecture 2012, Disputatio, 7, 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitzgebel, E., Ta-Lun Huang, L., Higgins, A., and Gonzalez-Cabrera, I., (2018) ‘The insularity of Anglophone philosophy: Quantitative analyses’, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320024671_The_Insularity_of_Anglophone_Philosophy_Quantitative_Analyses (accessed January 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. M., and Aronson, J. (1995) ‘Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69:5, 797–811. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C., Spencer, S., and Aronson, J., (2002) ‘Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat’, in M. P. Zanna, ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 34, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 379–440.
   Google Scholar
• Steinpreis, R., Anders, K. A., and Ritzke, D. (1999) ‘The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study’, Sex Roles 41:7/8, 509–528. doi: 10.1023/A:1018839203698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, S., Major, B., Gangi, C., and Mendes, W. (2011) ‘From “in the air” to “under the skin”: Cortisol responses to social identity threat’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37:2, 151–164. doi: 10.1177/0146167210392384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C., Forgas, J. P., and Denson, T. F. (2008) ‘The turban effect: The influence of Muslim headgear and induced affect on aggressive responses in the shooter bias paradigm’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44:5, 1409–1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valian, V. (1998) Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V.. (2016) ‘Gender schemas and the advancement of women’, online interview, http://paid.uci.edu/chairs%20retreat%20files/ArrwhdMtrls2008/Z%20Gender%20Schemas%20Dr%20Valian.pdf (accessed December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P. (2003) ‘Linguistic justice’, in Kymlicka and Patten, Language Rights and Political Theory, 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Van Parijs, P.. (2011) Linguistic Justice for Europe and the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wentura D., and Greve, W. (2003) ‘Who wants to be erudite? Everyone! Evidence for automatic adaptations of trait definition’, Social Cognition, 22: 30–53. doi: 10.1521/soco.22.1.30.30981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar