Global Public Reason, Diversity, and Consent

References

• Cohen, Joshua. ‘Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 12, no. 2 (2004): 190–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00197.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua.. ‘Is There a Human Right to Democracy?’ In The Arc of the Moral Universe and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, Victoria M. ‘Human Rights and the Global Original Position Argument in The Law of Peoples.’ Journal of Social Philosophy 36, no. 1 (2005):49–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00257.x
   Google Scholar
• Director, Samuel. “Justice in the Laws, a Restatement: Why Plato Endorses Public Reason.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 4, no. 2 (2018): 184–203. doi: 10.1017/apa.2018.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, Ronald. ‘The Original Position.’ University of Chicago Law Review 40, no. 3 (1973): 500–533. doi: 10.2307/1599246
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, David. ‘Against Public Reason.’ Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 1 (2015): 112–142.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, Gerald. The Order of Public Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gaus, Gerald.. ‘The Turn to a Political Liberalism.’ In A Companion to Rawls, edited by M. Jon and D. Reidy, 233–250. Hoboken: Wiley, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kekic, Laza. ‘The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy.’ The Economist Intelligence Unit. 2007. http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_INDEX_2007_v3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Klosko, George. ‘Rawls, Weithman, and the Stability of Liberal Democracy.’ Res Publica 21 (2015): 235–249. doi: 10.1007/s11158-015-9286-x
   Google Scholar
• Kogelmann, Brian. ‘Public Reason’s Chaos Theorem.’ Episteme (2018): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books. 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Pew. ‘The World’s Muslims: Unity and Diversity.’ Pew Research Center, 2012. http://www.pewforum.org/2012/08/09/the-worlds-muslims-unity-and-diversity-executive-summary/
   Google Scholar
• Quong, Jonathan. ‘Public Reason.’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John.. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John.. ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.’ The University of Chicago Law Review 64, no. 3 (1997): 765–807. doi: 10.2307/1600311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, John.. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Reidy, David A. ‘Rawls on International Justice: A Defense.’ Political Theory 32, no. 3 (2004): 291–319. doi: 10.1177/0090591703260928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shue, Henry. ‘Rawls and the Outlaws.’ Politics, Philosophy & Economics 1, no. 3 (2002): 307–323. doi: 10.1177/1470594X02001003002
   Google Scholar
• Sieger, Lynette E. ‘Global Public Reason.’ In The Encyclopedia of Global Justice, edited by Deen K. Chatterjee, 438–439. London: Springer. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A. John. Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, William. ‘Deliberation Beyond Borders: The Public Reason of a Society of Peoples.’ The Journal of International Political Theory 7, no. 2 (2011): 17–139. doi: 10.3366/jipt.2011.0011
   Google Scholar
• Stark, Cynthia A. ‘Hypothetical Consent and Justification.’ The Journal of Philosophy 97, no. 6 (2000): 313–334. doi: 10.2307/2678406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Koc-Chor. Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice. University Park: Penn State Press. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher, John and Kevin Vallier. ‘The Fragility of Consensus.’ European Journal of Philosophy 23, no. 4 (2015): 933–954. doi: 10.1111/ejop.12020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrasher, John. ‘Uniqueness and Symmetry in Bargaining Theories of Justice.’ Philosophical Studies 167, no. 3 (2014): 683–699. doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0121-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrasher, John.. ‘Constructivism, Representation, and Stability: Path-Dependence in Public Reason Theories of Justice.’ Synthese 196, no. 1 (2019): 429–450. doi: 10.1007/s11229-017-1488-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, Kevin. ‘Convergence and Consensus In Public Reason.’ Public Affairs Quarterly 25, no. 4 (2011a): 261–279.
   Google Scholar
• Vallier, Kevin.. ‘Against Public Reason Liberalism’s Accessibility Requirement.’ Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2011b): 366–389. doi: 10.1163/174552411X588991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Schoelandt, Chad. ‘Justification, Coercion, and the Place of Public Reason.’ Philosophical Studies, no. 172 (2015): 1031–1050. doi: 10.1007/s11098-014-0336-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weithman, Paul. Why Political Liberalism? On John Rawls’s Political Turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wenar, Leif. ‘John Rawls.’ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Jeremy. ‘War and Global Public Reason.’ Utilitas 29, no. 4 (2017): 398–422. doi: 10.1017/S0953820816000376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar