Truth in Virtue of Meaning Reconsidered

References

• Armstrong, D. M. (2004). Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. J. (1936). Truth by convention. Analysis, 4(2/3), 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. J. (1952). Language, Truth and Logic (2nd ed.). New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, G. P. & Hacker, P. M. S. (2009). Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar, and Necessity. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Boghossian, P. A. (1996). Analyticity reconsidered. Noûs, 30(3), 360–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boghossian, P. A. (2011). Truth in virtue of meaning. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89(2), 370–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzano, B. (1973). Theory of science (B. Terrell, Trans.). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• BonJour, L. (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of a Priori Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broad, C. D. (1936). Are there synthetic a priori truths? Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 15, 102–117.
   Google Scholar
• Frege, G. (1950). The Foundations of Arithmetic (J. L. Austin, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Carpintero, M. & Otero, M. P. (2009). The conventional and the analytic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78(2), 239–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glock, H.-J. (2003). The linguistic doctrine revisited. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 66(1), 143–170.
   Google Scholar
• Glock, H.-J. (2010). From armchair to reality? Ratio, XXIII(3), 339–348.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, B. (2002). The source of necessity. Philosophical Perspectives, 16, 299–319.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (1967). Quine on meaning and existence I. Review of Metaphysics, 21, 124–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, F. & Horvath, J. (2008). In defence of metaphysical analyticity. Ratio, XXI(3), 300–313.
   Google Scholar
• Horwich, P. (1997). Implicit definition, analytic truth, and a priori knowledge. Noûs, 31(4), 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1999). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, P. (2007). Quine. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hylton, P.. (2021). Carnap and quine on analyticity: The nature of the disagreement. Noûs, 55(2), 445–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhl, C. & Loomis, E. (2010). Analyticity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. I. (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. P. H. Nidditch (Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malcom, N. (1940). Are necessary propositions really verbal? Mind, new series, 49 (1940), 189–203.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, E. & Laurence, S. (2001). Boghossian on analyticity. Analysis, 61(4), 293–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60(1), 20–43.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O.. (1960). Carnap and logical truth. Synthese, 12(4), 350–374.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O.. (1966). The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O.. (1973). Roots of Reference. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O.. (1991). Two dogmas in retrospect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 21(3), 265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O.. (1992). Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinton, A. (1964). The “A Priori” and the Analytic. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 64, 31-54.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, G. (2008). Truth in Virtue of Meaning: A Defence of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. (2009). Analytic truths and grammatical propositions. In: H.-J. Glock & J. Hyman (comps.), Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Essays for P. M. S. Hacker. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–108.
   Google Scholar
• Sidelle, A. (2009). Conventionalism and the contingency of conventions. Noûs, 43(2), 224–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sider, T. (2001). Four-dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sider, T.. (2003). Reductive theories of modality. In: M. J. Loux & D. W. Zimmerman (comps.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 180–208.
   Google Scholar
• Sider, T.. (2011). Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sober, E. (2000). Quine. The Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 74(1), 237–280.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. (2010). The metaphysical conception of analyticity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXXXII(2), 507–514.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. L. (2007). Ordinary Objects. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topey, B. (2019). Linguistic convention and worldly fact. Philosophical Studies, 176(7), 1725–1752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugendhat, E. (1982). Traditional and Analytic Philosophy (P. A. Gorner, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waismann, F. (1949). Analytic-synthetic. Analysis, 10(2), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. (2007). The Philosophy of Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yablo, S. (1992). Review of necessity, essence, and individuation: A defense of conventionalism. Philosophical Review, 101(4), 878–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar