Advanced search
Publication Cover
Applied Spectroscopy Reviews Volume 57, 2022 - Issue 8: Toward a better understanding of indoor air quality holistically integrating improved and new instrumental analytical techniques
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,801
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Particulate matter indoors: a strategy to sample and monitor size-selective fractions

Benjamin Bergmansa ISSEP - Institut Scientifique de Service Public, Liege, BelgiumCorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4324-449X
ORCID Icon,
Andrea Cattaneob Risk Assessment for Human Health (RAHH) Research Group, Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Como, ItalyCorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2962-7259
ORCID Icon,
Regina M. B. O. Duartec CESAM – Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, PortugalORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1825-6528
ORCID Icon,
João F. P. Gomesd CERENA – Centro de Ambiente e Recursos Naturais/Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal;e ISEL-Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa, Lisboa, PortugalORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-6669
ORCID Icon,
Dikaia Saragaf Atmospheric Chemistry & Innovative Technologies Laboratory, INRASTES, National Center for Scientific Research “DEMOKRITOS”, Athens, GreeceORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-0776
ORCID Icon,
Mila Ródenas Garcíag Fundación CEAM (Centro de Estudios Ambientales del Mediterráneo) - EUPHORE Labs. C/Charles R. Darwin, Paterna (Valencia), Spain
,
Xavier Querolh Institute for Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, SpainORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-9899
ORCID Icon,
Leonarda F. Liottai Institute for the Study of Nanostructured Materials, National Research Council (ISMN -CNR), Palermo, Italy
,
John Safellj NosmoTech Ltd., Cambridge, UK
,
Andrea Spinazzéb Risk Assessment for Human Health (RAHH) Research Group, Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Como, Italy
,
Sabrina Rovellib Risk Assessment for Human Health (RAHH) Research Group, Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Como, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6403-5101
ORCID Icon,
Francesca Borghib Risk Assessment for Human Health (RAHH) Research Group, Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Como, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3452-2803
ORCID Icon,
Domenico M. Cavallob Risk Assessment for Human Health (RAHH) Research Group, Department of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, Como, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1853-2999
ORCID Icon,
Florentina Villanuevak Instituto de Investigación en Combustión y Contaminación Atmosférica, Universidad de Castilla La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain;l Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Castilla La Mancha, Albacete, SpainORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-1823
ORCID Icon,
Alessia Di Giliom Department of Biology, University of Bari (Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro), Bari, ItalyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9951-4498
ORCID Icon,
Thomas Maggosf Atmospheric Chemistry & Innovative Technologies Laboratory, INRASTES, National Center for Scientific Research “DEMOKRITOS”, Athens, GreeceORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-4402
ORCID Icon &
Victor G. Mihuczn Institute of Chemistry, ELTE - Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
 show all
Pages 675-704 | Published online: 20 Jun 2022

References

  • Bennitt, F. B.; Wozniak, S. S.; Causey, K.; Burkart, K.; Brauer, M. Estimating Disease Burden Attributable to Household Air Pollution: New Methods within the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob. Health. 2021, 9, S18. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00126-1
  • Han, Y.; Li, X.; Zhu, T.; Lv, D.; Chen, Y.; Hou, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, M. Characteristics and Relationships between Indoor and Outdoor PM2.5 in Beijing: A Residential Apartment Case Study. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2016, 16, 2386–2395. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2015.12.0682
  • Lakey, P. S. J.; Won, Y.; Shaw, D.; Østerstrøm, F. F.; Mattila, J.; Reidy, E.; Bottorff, B.; Rosales, C.; Wang, C.; Ampollini, L.; et al. Spatial and Temporal Scales of Variability for Indoor Air Constituents. Commun. Chem. 2021, 4, 1–7. doi:10.1038/s42004-021-00548-5
  • Oeder, S.; Dietrich, S.; Weichenmeier, I.; Schober, W.; Pusch, G.; Jörres, R. A.; Schierl, R.; Nowak, D.; Fromme, H.; Behrendt, H.; Buters, J. T. M. Toxicity and Elemental Composition of Particulate Matter from Outdoor and Indoor Air of Elementary Schools in Munich, Germany. Indoor Air. 2012, 22, 148–158. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00743.x
  • Park, M.; Joo, H. S.; Lee, K.; Jang, M.; Kim, S. D.; Kim, I.; Borlaza, L. J. S.; Lim, H.; Shin, H.; Chung, K. H.; et al. Differential Toxicities of Fine Particulate Matters from Various Sources. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17007.
  • Lakey, P. S. J.; Won, Y.; Shaw, D.; Østerstrøm, F. F.; Mattila, J.; Reidy, E.; Bottorff, B.; Rosales, C.; Wang, C.; Ampollini, L.; et al. Spatial and Temporal Scales of Variability for Indoor Air Constituents. Commun. Chem 2021, 4, 1–7.
  • Spinazzè, A.; Borghi, F.; Rovelli, S.; Mihucz, V. G.; Bergmans, B.; Cattaneo, A.; Cavallo, D. M. Combined and Modular Approaches for Multicomponent Monitoring of Indoor Air Pollutants. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2021, 0, 1–37. doi:10.1080/05704928.2021.1995405
  • ISO - International Organization for Standardization. 2008 ISO 16000-12:2008 - Indoor air — Part 12: Sampling strategy for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).
  • ISO - International Organization for Standardization. 2019 ISO 16000-37:2019 - Indoor air — Part 37: Measurement of PM2,5 mass concentration.
  • Duarte, R. M. B. O.; Gomes, J. F. P.; Querol, X.; Cattaneo, A.; Bergmans, B.; Saraga, D.; Maggos, T.; Di Gilio, A.; Rovelli, S.; Villanueva, F. Advanced Instrumental Approaches for Chemical Characterization of Indoor Particulate Matter. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2021, 0, 1–41. doi:10.1080/05704928.2021.2018596
  • Sakellaris, I.; Saraga, D.; Mandin, C.; de Kluizenaar, Y.; Fossati, S.; Spinazzè, A.; Cattaneo, A.; Mihucz, V.; Szigeti, T.; de Oliveira Fernandes, E.; et al. Association of Subjective Health Symptoms with Indoor Air Quality in European Office Buildings: The OFFICAIR Project. Indoor Air. 2021, 31, 426–439. Issue2 . doi:10.1111/ina.12749
  • Kruza, M.; McFiggans, G.; Waring, M. S.; Wells, J. R.; Carslaw, N. Indoor Secondary Organic Aerosols: Towards an Improved Representation of Their Formation and Composition in Models. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 240, 117784. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117784
  • Pagels, J.; Wierzbicka, A.; Nilsson, E.; Isaxon, C.; Dahl, A.; Gudmundsson, A.; Swietlicki, E.; Bohgard, M. Chemical Composition and Mass Emission Factors of Candle Smoke Particles. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2009, 40, 193–208., doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.10.005
  • Beko, G.; Weschler, C. J.; Wierzbicka, A.; Karottki, D. G.; Toftum, J.; Loft, S.; Clausen, G. Ultrafine Particles: Exposure and Source Apportionment in 56 Danish Homes. dx. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 10240–−10248. doi:10.1021/es402429h
  • Weschler, C. J. Ozone's Impact on Public Health: Contributions from Indoor Exposures to Ozone and Products of Ozone-Initiated Chemistry. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1489–1496. doi:10.1289/ehp.9256
  • Urso, P.; Cattaneo, A.; Garramone, G.; Peruzzo, C.; Cavallo, D. M.; Carrer, P. Identification of Particulate Matter Determinants in Residential Homes. Build. Environ. 2015, 86, 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.12.019
  • Li, Z.; Wen, Q.; Zhang, R. Sources, Health Effects and Control Strategies of Indoor Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5): A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 586, 610–622. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.029
  • Sarwar, G.; Olson, D. A.; Corsi, R. L.; Weschler, C. J. Indoor Fine Particles: The Role of Terpene Emissions from Consumer Products. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2004, 54, 367–377. doi:10.1080/10473289.2004.10470910
  • Aoki, T.; Tanabe, S. I. Generation of Sub-Micron Particles and Secondary Pollutants from Building Materials by Ozone Reaction. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 3139–3150. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.053
  • Nazaroff, W. W. Indoor Particle Dynamics. Indoor Air. 2004, 14(Suppl 7), 175–183. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00286.x
  • Lai, A. C. K. Particle Deposition Indoors: A Review. Indoor Air. 2002, 12, 211–214. doi:10.1046/j.0905-6947.2002.1r159a.x
  • Rovelli, S.; Cattaneo, A.; Nuzzi, C. P.; Spinazzè, A.; Piazza, S.; Carrer, P.; Cavallo, D. M. Airborne Particulate Matter in School Classrooms of Northern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11. doi:10.3390/ijerph110201398
  • Qian, J.; Peccia, J.; Ferro, A. R. Walking-Induced Particle Resuspension in Indoor Environments. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 89, 464–481. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.035
  • International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 1994 ICRP Publication 66 - Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection.
  • Hoover, M. D.; Stefaniak, A. B.; Day, G. A.; Geraci, C. L. 2007 Exposure Assessment Considerations for Nanoparticles in the Workplace. In Nanotoxicology: Characterization, Dosing and Health Effects, Monteiro-Riviere, N.A., Tran, C.L., Eds., CRC Press: Boca Raton, pp. 71–83.
  • Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet, GLOBAL HEALTH METRICS. October 2020, 396, P1223–1249. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2
  • Seaton, A.; MacNee, W.; Donaldson, K.; Godden, D. Particulate Air Pollution and Acute Health Effects. Lancet 1995, 345, 176–178. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90173-6
  • Donaldson, K.; Stone, V.; Borm, P. J.; Jimenez, L. A.; Gilm our, P. S.; Schins, R. P.; Knaapen, A. M.; Rahman, I.; Faux, S. P.; Brown, D. M.; MacNee, W. Oxidative Stress and Calcium Signaling in the Adverse Effects of Environmental Particles (PM10). Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 34, 1369–1382. doi:10.1016/S0891-5849(03)00150-3
  • Shimada, A.; Kawamura, N.; Okajima, M.; Kaewamatawong, T.; Inoue, H.; Morita, T. Translocation Pathway of the Intratracheally Instilled Ultrafine Particles from the Lung into the Blood Circulation in the Mouse. Toxicol. Pathol. 2006, 34, 949–957. anddoi:10.1080/01926230601080502
  • Kulkarni, P.; Baron, P. A.; Kulkarni, P.; Baron, P. A. 2011 An Approach to Performing Aerosol Measurements. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, 3rd ed., Willeke, K., Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 55–65. doi:10.1002/9781118001684.ch5
  • ISO - International Organization for Standardization. 2012 ISO 13138:2012 - Air quality — Sampling conventions for airborne particle deposition in the human respiratory system.
  • ISO - International Organization for Standardization. 1995 ISO 7708:1995 - Air quality — Particle size fraction definitions for health-related sampling.
  • Fine, P. M.; Cass, G. R.; Simoneit, B. R. T. Chemical Characterization of Fine Particle Emissions from the Wood Stove Combustion of Prevalent United States Tree Species. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2004, 21, 705–721. doi:10.1089/ees.2004.21.705
  • Minguillón, M. C.; Arhami, M.; Schauer, J. J.; Sioutas, C. Seasonal and Spatial Variations of Sources of Fine and Quasi-Ultrafine Particulate Matter in Neighborhoods near the Los Angeles-Long Beach harbor. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 7317–7328. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.07.036
  • ISO - International Organization for Standardization. 2021. ISO/DIS 16000-42 - Indoor air—Part 42: Measurement of the particle number concentration by Condensation Particle Counters. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/77911.html. (accessed 16 May 2022).
  • CEN - European Committee for Standardization. 1993 CEN EN 481:1993 - Workplace atmospheres - Size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne.
  • CEN - European Committee for Standardization. 2019 EN 689:2018 + AC:2019 Workplace exposure - Measurement of exposure by inhalation to chemical agents - Strategy for testing compliance with occupational exposure limit values - European Standards.
  • ISO - International Organization for Standardization. 2018 ISO - ISO 16000-34:2018 - Indoor air — Part 34: Strategies for the measurement of airborne particles. ISO - International Organization for Standardization.
  • Gilmour, M. I.; McGee, J.; Duvall, R. M.; Dailey, L.; Daniels, M.; Boykin, E.; Cho, S.-H.; Doerfler, D.; Gordon, T.; Devlin, R. B. Comparative Toxicity of Size-Fractionated Airborne Particulate Matter Obtained from Different Cities in the United States. Inhal. Toxicol. 2007, 19, 7–16. doi:10.1080/08958370701490379
  • Pauluhn, J. Retrospective Analysis of 4-Week Inhalation Studies in Rats with Focus on Fate and Pulmonary Toxicity of Two Nanosized Aluminum Oxyhydroxides (Boehmite) and Pigment-Grade Iron Oxide (Magnetite): The Key Metric of Dose is Particle Mass and Not Particle Surface Area. Toxicology. 2009, 259, 140–148. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2009.02.012
  • Atkinson, R. W.; Fuller, G. W.; Anderson, H. R.; Harrison, R. M.; Armstrong, B. Urban Ambient Particle Metrics and Health: A Time-Series Analysis. Epidemiology 2010, 21, 501–511. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181debc88
  • World Health Organization. 2006 WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/345329/9789240034228-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • WHO European Centre for Environment and Health. 2010 WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. Available at: www.euro.who.int. (accessed 12 October 2021).
  • European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2014 EN 12341:2014 Ambient air - Standard gravimetric measurement method for the determination of the PM10 or PM2,5 mass concentration of suspended particulate matter.
  • Wang, Z.; Calderón, L.; Patton, A. P.; Sorensen Allacci, M. A.; Senick, J.; Wener, R.; Andrews, C. J.; Mainelis, G. Comparison of Real-Time Instruments and Gravimetric Method When Measuring Particulate Matter in a Residential Building. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2016, 66, 1109–1120. doi:10.1080/10962247.2016.1201022
  • Watson, J. G.; Chow, J. C.; Shah, J. J.; Pace, T. G. The Effect of Sampling Inlets on the PM-10 and PM-15 to TSP Concentration Ratios. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1983, 33, 114–119. doi:10.1080/00022470.1983.10465552
  • Koistinen, K. J.; Kousa, A.; Tenhola, V.; Hänninen, O.; Jantunen, M. J.; Oglesby, L.; Kuenzli, N.; Georgoulis, L. Fine Particle (PM25) Measurement Methodology, Quality Assurance Procedures, and Pilot Results of the EXPOLIS Study. J. Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1999, 49, 1212–1220. doi:10.1080/10473289.1999.10463916
  • Cattaneo, A.; Peruzzo, C.; Garramone, G.; Urso, P.; Ruggeri, R.; Carrer, P.; Cavallo, D. Airborne Particulate Matter and Gaseous Air Pollutants in Residential Structures in Lodi Province, Italy. Indoor Air. 2011, 21, 489–500. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00731.x
  • Weisel, C. P.; Zhang, J. (.; Turpin, B. J.; Morandi, M. T.; Colome, S.; Stock, T. H.; Spektor, D. M.; Korn, L.; Winer, A.; Alimokhtari, S.; et al. Relationship of Indoor, Outdoor and Personal Air (RIOPA) Study: study Design, Methods and Quality Assurance/Control Results. J. Exp. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2005, 15, 123–137. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500379
  • Mihucz, V. G.; Szigeti, T.; Dunster, C.; Giannoni, M.; de Kluizenaar, Y.; Cattaneo, A.; Mandin, C.; Bartzis, J. G.; Lucarelli, F.; Kelly, F. J.; Záray, G. An Integrated Approach for the Chemical Characterization and Oxidative Potential Assessment of Indoor PM2.5. Microchem. J. 2015, 119, 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2014.10.006
  • Szigeti, T.; Dunster, C.; Cattaneo, A.; Cavallo, D.; Spinazzè, A.; Saraga, D. E.; Sakellaris, I. A.; de Kluizenaar, Y.; Cornelissen, E. J. M.; Hänninen, O.; et al. Oxidative Potential and Chemical Composition of PM2.5in Office Buildings across Europe - the OFFICAIR Study. Environ. Int. 2016, 92–93, 324–333. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.015
  • Mandin, C.; Trantallidi, M.; Cattaneo, A.; Canha, N.; Mihucz, V. G.; Szigeti, T.; Mabilia, R.; Perreca, E.; Spinazzè, A.; Fossati, S.; et al. Assessment of Indoor Air Quality in Office Buildings across Europe – the OFFICAIR Study. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 579, 169–178. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.238
  • Babich, P.; Davey, M.; Allen, G.; Koutrakis, P. Method Comparisons for Particulate Nitrate, Elemental Carbon, and PM2.5 Mass in Seven U. S. Cities. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2000, 50, 1095–1105. doi:10.1080/10473289.2000.10464152
  • Cyrys, J.; Dietrich, G.; Kreyling, W.; Tuch, T.; Heinrich, J. PM2.5 Measurements in Ambient Aerosol: Comparison between Harvard Impactor (HI) and the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) System. Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 278, 191–197. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00648-9
  • Yanosky, J. D.; MacIntosh, D. L. A Comparison of Four Gravimetric Fine Particle Sampling Methods. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2001, 51, 878–884. doi:10.1080/10473289.2001.10464320
  • Singh, M.; Misra, C.; Sioutas, C. Field Evaluation of a Personal Cascade Impactor Sampler (PCIS). Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 4781–4793. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.013
  • Winberry, W. T.; Forehand, L.; Murphy, N. T.; Ceroli, A.; Phinney, B. 1990 Compendium of methods for the determination of air pollutants in indoor air. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6943454.
  • Watson, J. G.; Chow, J. C. 2011 Ambient Aerosol Sampling. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, Kulkarni, P., Baron, P.A., Willeke, K., Eds., Wiley, pp 591–614, 3rd ed.
  • Watson, J. G.; Tropp, R. J.; Kohl, S. D.; Wang, X.; Chow, J. C. Filter Processing and Gravimetric Analysis for Suspended Particulate Matter Samples. Aerosol Sci. Eng. 2017, 1, 93–105. doi:10.1007/s41810-017-0010-4
  • Soo, J. C.; Monaghan, K.; Lee, T.; Kashon, M.; Harper, M. Air Sampling Filtration Media: Collection Efficiency for Respirable Size-Selective Sampling. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2016, 50, 76–87. doi:10.1080/02786826.2015.1128525
  • Chow, J. C.; Watson, J. G. Review of Measurement Methods and Compositions for Ultrafine Particles. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2007, 7, 121–173. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2007.05.0029
  • Brown, A. S.; Yardley, R. E.; Quincey, P. G.; Butterfield, D. M. Studies of the Effect of Humidity and Other Factors on Some Different Filter Materials Used for Gravimetric Measurements of Ambient Particulate Matter. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 4670–4678. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.028
  • Kajino, M.; Winiwarter, W.; Ueda, H. Modeling Retained Water Content in Measured Aerosol Mass. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40, 5202–5213. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.016
  • Perrino, C.; Canepari, S.; Catrambone, M. Comparing the Performance of Teflon and Quartz Membrane Filters Collecting Atmospheric PM: Influence of Atmospheric Water. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2013, 13, 137–147. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.07.0167
  • Using, A.; Samplers, C.; Fractions, A.; Agents, C.; Concentrations, P, ASTM D6552-06(2021) Standard Practice for Controlling and Characterizing Errors in Weighing Collected. ASTM International (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2011, 06, 1–8. doi:10.1520/D6552-06R21
  • McMurry, P. H. A Review of Atmospheric Aerosol Measurements. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 1959–1999. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00455-0
  • Huang, L.; Bohac, S. V.; Chernyak, S. M.; Batterman, S. A. Composition and Integrity of PAHs, Nitro-PAHs, Hopanes and Steranes in Diesel Exhaust Particulate Matter. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, doi:10.1007/s11270-013-1630-1.
  • Tasić, V.; Jovašević-Stojanović, M.; Vardoulakis, S.; Milošević, N.; Kovačević, R.; Petrović, J. Comparative Assessment of a Real-Time Particle Monitor against the Reference Gravimetric Method for PM10 and PM2.5 in Indoor Air. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 54, 358–364. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.030
  • Chung, A.; Chang, D. P. Y.; Kleeman, M. J.; Perry, K. D.; Cahill, T. A.; Dutcher, D.; McDougall, E. M.; Stroud, K. Comparison of Real-Time Instruments Used to Monitor Airborne Particulate Matter. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2001, 51, 109–120. doi:10.1080/10473289.2001.10464254
  • Alves, C.; Nunes, T.; Silva, J.; Duarte, M. Comfort Parameters and Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in School Classrooms and Outdoor Air. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2013, 13, 1521–1535. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.11.0321
  • Sioutas, C.; Kim, S.; Chang, M.; Terrell, L. L.; Gong, H. Field Evaluation of a Modified DataRAM Mie Scattering Monitor for Real-Time PM2.5 Mass Concentration Measurements. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 4829–4838. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00244-2
  • Wang, X.; Chancellor, G.; Evenstad, J.; Farnsworth, J. E.; Hase, A.; Olson, G. M.; Sreenath, A.; Agarwal, J. K. A Novel Optical Instrument for Estimating Size Segregated Aerosol Mass Concentration in Real Time. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 939–950. doi:10.1080/02786820903045141
  • Wallace, L. A.; Wheeler, A. J.; Kearney, J.; Van Ryswyk, K.; You, H.; Kulka, R. H.; Rasmussen, P. E.; Brook, J. R.; Xu, X. Validation of Continuous Particle Monitors for Personal, Indoor, and Outdoor Exposures. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2011, 21, 49–64. doi:10.1038/jes.2010.15
  • Fissan, H.; Neumann, S.; Trampe, A.; Pui, D. Y. H.; Shin, W. G. Rationale and Principle of an Instrument Measuring Lung Deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area. J. Nanopart. Res. 2006, 9, 53–59. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9156-8
  • Sorensen, C. M.; Gebhart, J.; O’Hern, T. J.; Rader, D. J. 2011 Optical Measurement Techniques: Fundamentals and Applications. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, Kulkarni, P., Baron, P.A., Willeke, K., Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 269–312, 3rd ed.
  • Kangasluoma, J.; Hering, S.; Picard, D.; Lewis, G.; Enroth, J.; Korhonen, F.; Kulmala, M.; Sellegri, K.; Attoui, M.; Petäjä, T. Characterization of Three New Condensation Particle Counters for Sub-3\,nm Particle Detection during the Helsinki CPC Workshop: The ADI Versatile Water CPC, TSI 3777 Nano Enhancer and Boosted TSI 3010. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2017, 10, 2271–2281. doi:10.5194/amt-10-2271-2017
  • Cattaneo, A.; Taronna, M.; Garramone, G.; Peruzzo, C.; Schlitt, C.; Consonni, D.; Cavallo, D. M. Comparison between Personal and Individual Exposure to Urban Air Pollutants. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 370–379. doi:10.1080/02786821003662934
  • Kupc, A.; Bischof, O.; Tritscher, T.; Beeston, M.; Krinke, T.; Wagner, P. E. Laboratory Characterization of a New Nano-Water-Based CPC 3788 and Performance Comparison to an Ultrafine Butanol-Based CPC 3776. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 183–191. doi:10.1080/02786826.2012.738317
  • European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016 CEN/TS 16976:2016 : Ambient air - Determination of the Particle Number Concentration of Atmospheric Aerosol.
  • ISO - International Organization for Standardization. 2020 ISO 15900:2020 - Determination of particle size distribution — Differential electrical mobility analysis for aerosol particles.
  • European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2020 CEN/TS 17434:2020: Ambient air - Determination of the Particle Number Size Distribution of Atmospheric Aerosol Using a Mobility Particle Size Spectrometer (MPSS).
  • Volkwein, J. C.; Maynard, A. D.; Harper, M. 2011 Workplace Aerosol Measurement. In Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, Kulkarni, P., Baron, P.A., Willeke, K., Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 571–590, 3rd ed.
  • Maynard, A. D.; Kuempel, E. D. Airborne Nanostructured Particles and Occupational Health. J. Nanopart. Res. 2005, 7, 587–614. doi:10.1007/s11051-005-6770-9
  • Maynard, A. D.; Aitken, R. J. Assessing Exposure to Airborne Nanomaterials: Current Abilities and Future Requirements. Nanotoxicology 2007, 1, 26–41. doi:10.1080/17435390701314720
  • Oberdörster, G.; Stone, V.; Donaldson, K. Toxicology of Nanoparticles: A Historical Perspective. Nanotoxicology 2007, 1, 2–25. doi:10.1080/17435390701314761
  • Oberdörster, G.; Oberdörster, E.; Oberdörster, J. Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 823–839. doi:10.1289/ehp.7339
  • Albuquerque, P. C.; Gomes, J. F.; Bordado, J. C. Assessment of Exposure to Airborne Ultrafine Particles in the Urban Environment of Lisbon, Portugal. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2012, 62, 373–380. doi:10.1080/10962247.2012.658957
  • Fierz, M.; Houle, C.; Steigmeier, P.; Burtscher, H. Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 1–10. doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.516283
  • Fierz, M.; Meier, D.; Steigmeier, P.; Burtscher, H. Miniature Nanoparticle Sensors for Exposure Measurement and TEM Sampling. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015, 617, 12034.
  • Marra, J.; Voetz, M.; Kiesling, H.-J. Monitor for Detecting and Assessing Exposure to Airborne Nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 2010, 12, 21–37. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9695-x
  • Todea, A. M.; Beckmann, S.; Kaminski, H.; Asbach, C. Accuracy of Electrical Aerosol Sensors Measuring Lung Deposited Surface Area Concentrations. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2015, 89, 96–109. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.07.003
  • Asbach, C.; Kaminski, H.; Fissan, H.; Monz, C.; Dahmann, D.; Mülhopt, S.; Paur, H. R.; Kiesling, H. J.; Herrmann, F.; Voetz, M.; Kuhlbusch, T. A. J. Comparison of Four Mobility Particle Sizers with Different Time Resolution for Stationary Exposure Measurements. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11, 1593–1609. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9679-x
  • Asbach, C.; Kaminski, H.; Von Barany, D.; Kuhlbusch, T. A. J.; Monz, C.; Dziurowitz, N.; Pelzer, J.; Vossen, K.; Berlin, K.; Dietrich, S.; et al. Comparability of Portable Nanoparticle Exposure Monitors. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 2012, 56, 606–621.
  • Levin, M.; Gudmundsson, A.; Pagels, J. H.; Fierz, M.; Mølhave, K.; Löndahl, J.; Jensen, K. A.; Koponen, I. K. Limitations in the Use of Unipolar Charging for Electrical Mobility Sizing Instruments: A Study of the Fast Mobility Particle Sizer. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 556–565. doi:10.1080/02786826.2015.1052039
  • Levin, M.; Witschger, O.; Bau, S.; Jankowska, E.; Koponen, I. K.; Koivisto, A. J.; Clausen, P. A.; Jensen, A.; Mølhave, K.; Asbach, C.; Jensen, K. A. Can we Trust Real Time Measurements of Lung Deposited Surface Area Concentrations in Dust from Powder Nanomaterials? Aerosol. Air Qual. Res. 2016, 16, 1105–1117. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2015.06.0413
  • Leavey, A.; Fang, J.; Sahu, M.; Biswas, P. Comparison of Measured Particle Lung-Deposited Surface Area Concentrations by an Aerotrak 9000 Using Size Distribution Measurements for a Range of Combustion Aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 966–978. doi:10.1080/02786826.2013.803018
  • Leskinen, J.; Joutsensaari, J.; Lyyränen, J.; Koivisto, J.; Ruusunen, J.; Järvelä, M.; Tuomi, T.; Hämeri, K.; Auvinen, A.; Jokiniemi, J. Comparison of Nanoparticle Measurement Instruments for Occupational Health Applications. J. Nanopart. Res. 2012, 14, 718.
  • Asbach, C.; Fissan, H.; Stahlmecke, B.; Kuhlbusch, T. A. J.; Pui, D. Y. H. Conceptual Limitations and Extensions of Lung-Deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM). J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11, 101–109. doi:10.1007/s11051-008-9479-8
  • Borghi, F.; Spinazzè, A.; Rovelli, S.; Campagnolo, D.; Del Buono, L.; Cattaneo, A.; Cavallo, D. M, Luca Del Buono Miniaturized Monitors for Assessment of Exposure to Air Pollutants: A Review. IJERPH 2017, 14, 909. doi:10.3390/ijerph14080909
  • Fanti, G.; Borghi, F.; Spinazzè, A.; Rovelli, S.; Campagnolo, D.; Keller, M.; Cattaneo, A.; Cauda, E.; Cavallo, D. M. Features and Practicability of the Next-Generation Sensors and Monitors for Exposure Assessment to Airborne Pollutants: A Systematic Review. Sensors. 2021, 21, 4513. doi:10.3390/s21134513
  • Howard, J.; Murashov, V.; Cauda, E.; Snawder, J. Advanced Sensor Technologies and the Future of Work. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2022, 65, 3–11. doi:10.1002/ajim.23300
  • Morawska, L.; Thai, P. K.; Liu, X.; Asumadu-Sakyi, A.; Ayoko, G.; Bartonova, A.; Bedini, A.; Chai, F.; Christensen, B.; Dunbabin, M.; et al. Applications of Low-Cost Sensing Technologies for Air Quality Monitoring and Exposure Assessment: How Far Have They Gone? Environ. Int. 2018, 116, 286–299. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.018
  • Fishbain, B.; Lerner, U.; Castell, N.; Cole-Hunter, T.; Popoola, O.; Broday, D. M.; Martinez Iñiguez, T.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.; Jovasevic-Stojanovic, M.; Topalovic, D.; et al. An Evaluation Tool Kit of Air Quality Micro-Sensing Units. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 575, 639–648. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.061
  • Castell, N.; Dauge, F. R.; Schneider, P.; Vogt, M.; Lerner, U.; Fishbain, B.; Broday, D.; Bartonova, A. Can Commercial Low-Cost Sensor Platforms Contribute to Air Quality Monitoring and Exposure Estimates? Environ. Int. 2017, 99, 293–302. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.007
  • Chojer, H.; Branco, P. T. B. S.; Martins, F. G.; Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M.; Sousa, S. I. V. Development of Low-Cost Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Devices: Recent Advancements. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 727, 138385. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138385
  • Zhang, H.; Srinivasan, R. A Systematic Review of Air Quality Sensors, Guidelines, and Measurement Studies for Indoor Air Quality Management. Sustain. 2020, 12, 9045. doi:10.3390/su12219045
  • Kang, Y.; Aye, L.; Ngo, T. D.; Zhou, J. Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Air Quality Sensors: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 818, 151769. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151769
  • Kumar, P.; Skouloudis, A. N.; Bell, M.; Viana, M.; Carotta, M. C.; Biskos, G.; Morawska, L. Real-Time Sensors for Indoor Air Monitoring and Challenges Ahead in Deploying Them to Urban Buildings. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 560-561, 150–159. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.032
  • Schieweck, A.; Uhde, E.; Salthammer, T.; Salthammer, L. C.; Morawska, L.; Mazaheri, M.; Kumar, P. Smart Homes and the Control of Indoor Air Quality. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 94, 705–718. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.057
  • Jovašević-Stojanović, M.; Bartonova, A.; Topalović, D.; Lazović, I.; Pokrić, B.; Ristovski, Z. On the Use of Small and Cheaper Sensors and Devices for Indicative Citizen-Based Monitoring of Respirable Particulate Matter. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 206, 696–704. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.08.035
  • Sá, J. P.; Alvim-Ferraz, M. C. M.; Martins, F. G.; Sousa, S. I. V. Application of the Low-Cost Sensing Technology for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring: A Review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 28, 102551. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2022.102551
  • Lewis, A. Von Schneidemesser, E.; and Peltier, R. Low-Cost Sensors for the Measurement of Atmospheric Composition: overview of Topic and Future Applications, WMO, 2018.
  • Peltier, R. E.; Castell, N.; Clements, A. L.; Dye, T.; Hüglin, C.; Kroll, J. H.; Lung, S. C. C.; Ning, Z.; Parsons, M.; Penza, M.; et al. An Update on Low-Cost Sensors for the Measurement of Atmospheric Composition, WMO, 2020. https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10620
  • Technical Committee CEN/TC264/ WG 42 - Air Quality - Gas sensors.
  • Li, J.; Li, H.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Abokifa, A. A.; Lu, C.; Biswas, P. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Indoor Particulate Matter Concentration with a Low-Cost Sensor Network. Build. Environ. 2018, 127, 138–147. (November 2017): doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.001
  • Cho, J. H.; Moon, J. W. Integrated Artificial Neural Network Prediction Model of Indoor Environmental Quality in a School Building. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 344, 131083. (November 2021): doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131083
  • Yuchi, W.; Gombojav, E.; Boldbaatar, B.; Galsuren, J.; Enkhmaa, S.; Beejin, B.; Naidan, G.; Ochir, C.; Legtseg, B.; Byambaa, T.; et al. Evaluation of Random Forest Regression and Multiple Linear Regression for Predicting Indoor Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations in a Highly Polluted City. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 245, 746–753. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.034
  • Loy-Benitez, J.; Vilela, P.; Li, Q.; Yoo, C. K. Sequential Prediction of Quantitative Health Risk Assessment for the Fine Particulate Matter in an Underground Facility Using Deep Recurrent Neural Networks. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 316–324. (November 2018): doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.024
  • Saini, J.; Dutta, M.; Marques, G. Sensors for Indoor Air Quality Monitoring and Assessment through Internet of Things: A Systematic Review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193. doi:10.1007/s10661-020-08781-6

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.