3,526
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Maximizing Influence in the European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: From Small State Policy to Smart State Strategy

&
Pages 523-539 | Published online: 10 Feb 2011

References

  • Antola , E. and Lehtimäki , M. 2001 . Small states in the EU , Turku : Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence .
  • Archer , C. and Nugent , N. 2002 . Introduction: small states and the European Union . Current Politics and Economics of Europe , 11 ( 1 ) : 1 – 10 .
  • Arter , D. 2000 . Small state influence within the EU: the case of Finland’s northern dimension initiative . Journal of Common Market Studies , 38 ( 5 ) : 677 – 97 .
  • Bailer , S. 2004 . Bargaining success in the European Union: the impact of exogenous and endogenous power resources . European Union Politics , 5 ( 1 ) : 99 – 123 .
  • Baldwin , R. and Widgrén , M. 2004 . “ Council voting in the constitutional treaty: devil in the details ” . In CEPS Policy Brief, no. 53 , Brussels : Centre for European Policy Studies .
  • Benedetto , G. 2005 . Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: the dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe’s parliament . Journal of European Public Policy , 12 ( 1 ) : 67 – 88 .
  • Bengtsson , R. , Elgström , O. and Tallberg , J. 2004 . Silencer or amplifier? The European Union presidency and the Nordic countries . Scandinavian Political Studies , 27 ( 3 ) : 311 – 34 .
  • Björkdahl , A. 2008 . Norm advocacy: a small state strategy to influence the EU . Journal of European Public Policy , 15 ( 1 ) : 135 – 54 .
  • Borrás , S. and Jacobsson , K. 2004 . The open method of co‐ordination and new governance patterns in the EU . Journal of European Public Policy , 11 ( 2 ) : 185 – 208 .
  • Bouwen , P. 2002 . Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access . Journal of European Public Policy , 9 ( 3 ) : 365 – 90 .
  • Bouwen , P. 2004 . The logic of access to the European parliament: business lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs . Journal of Common Market Studies , 42 ( 3 ) : 473 – 95 .
  • Broman , M. 2008 . Taking advantage of institutional possibilities and network opportunities: analyzing Swedish strategic action in EU negotiations , Lund : Lund University .
  • Bunse , S. , Magnette , P. and Nicolaïdis , K. 2005 . Is the Commission the small member states’ best friend? Report 9/2005 , Stockholm : SIEPS .
  • CEPS, EGMONT, and EPC . 2007 . The Treaty of Lisbon: implementing the institutional innovations. November 2007 , Brussels : CEPS, EGMONT and EPC .
  • Christiansen , T. 1997 . Tensions of European governance: politicized bureaucracy and multiple accountability in the European Commission . Journal of European Public Policy , 4 ( 1 ) : 73 – 90 .
  • Corbett , R. , Jacobs , F. and Shackleton , M. 2003 . The European Parliament , London : John Harper .
  • Dür , A. and Mateo , G. 2010a . Choosing a bargaining strategy in EU negotiations: power, preferences, and culture . Journal of European Public Policy , 17 ( 5 ) : 680 – 93 .
  • Dür , A. and Mateo , G. 2010b . Bargaining power and negotiation tactics: the negotiations on the EU’s financial perspective, 2007–2013 . Journal of Common Market Studies , 48 ( 3 ) : 557 – 78 .
  • Edwards , G. 2006 . “ Introduction: the European Commission in perspective ” . In The European Commission , Edited by: Spence , D. and Edwards , G. 1 – 24 . London : John Harper .
  • European Parliament . 2007 . Conciliations and codecisions. A guide to how the parliament co‐legislates , Brussels : European Parliament .
  • Evans , G. and Newham , J. 1998 . Dictionary of international relations , London : Penguin .
  • Follesdal , A. 2006 . Survey article: the legitimacy deficits of the European Union . The Journal of Political Philosophy , 14 ( 4 ) : 441 – 68 .
  • Follesdal , A. and Hix , S. 2006 . Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: a response to Majone and Moravcsik . Journal of Common Market Studies , 44 ( 3 ) : 633 – 62 .
  • Friis , L. 1998 . “ EU enlargement and the Luxembourg Summit: a case study in agenda setting ” . In Explaining European integration , Edited by: Wivel , A. 56 – 77 . Copenhagen : Copenhagen Political Studies Press .
  • Gegout , C. 2002 . The Quint: acknowledging the existence of a big four‐US directoire at the heart of the European Union’s foreign policy decision‐making process . Journal of Common Market Studies , 40 ( 2 ) : 331 – 44 .
  • Geurts , C. 1998 . “ The European Commission: a natural ally of small states in the EU institutional framework? ” . In Small states inside and outside the European Union , Edited by: Goetschel , L. 49 – 64 . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic .
  • Greenwood , J. 2007 . Representing interests in the European Union , Houndmills : Macmillan .
  • Heisenberg , D. 2005 . The institution of “consensus” in the European Union: formal versus informal decision making in the council . European Journal of Political Research , 44 ( 1 ) : 65 – 90 .
  • Hosli , M.O. and Machover , M. 2004 . The Nice Treaty and voting rules in the council: a reply to Moberg (2002) . Journal of Common Market Studies , 42 ( 3 ) : 497 – 521 .
  • Hoyland , B. 2006 . Allocation of codecision reports in the Fifth European Parliament . European Union Politics , 7 ( 3 ) : 30 – 50 .
  • Jakobsen , P.V. 2009 . Small states, big influence: the overlooked Nordic influence on the civilian ESDP . Journal of Common Market Studies , 47 ( 1 ) : 81 – 102 .
  • Joenniemi , P. 1998 . From small to smart: reflections on the concept of small states . Irish Studies in International Affairs , 9 : 61 – 2 .
  • Katzenstein , P. 2003 . Small states and small states revisited . New Political Economy , 8 ( 1 ) : 9 – 30 .
  • Keukeleire , S. 2001 . Directorates in the CFSP/CESDP of the European Union: a plea for “restricted crisis management groups” . European Foreign Affairs Review , 6 ( 1 ) : 75 – 101 .
  • Knudsen , O.F. 1996 . “ Analysing small‐state security: the role of external factors ” . In Small states and the security challenge in the new Europe , Edited by: Bauwens , W. , Clesse , A. and Knudsen , O.F. 3 – 20 . London : Brassey’s .
  • Kronsell , A. 2002 . Can small states influence EU norms? Insights from Sweden’s participation in the field of environmental politics . Scandinavian Studies , 74 ( 3 ) : 287 – 304 .
  • Kurpas , S. , Grøn , C. and Kaczynski , P. 2008 . The European Commission after enlargement: does more add up to less? , Brussels : CEPS .
  • Kurpas , S. and Kaczynski , P. 2009 . Inching towards a second Irish referendum. CEPS Commentary 15 , Brussels : CEPS .
  • Larsen , H. 2005 . Analysing the foreign policy of small states in the EU: the case of Denmark , Houndmills : Palgrave .
  • Maes , I. and Verdun , A. 2005 . Small states and the creation of EMU: Belgium and the Netherlands, Pace‐setters and gate‐keepers . Journal of Common Market Studies , 43 ( 2 ) : 327 – 48 .
  • Magnette , P. and Nicolaïdis , K. 2004 . Coping with the Lilliput syndrome: large vs. small member states in the European Convention . Politique Europeene , 14 : 1 – 25 .
  • Mamadouh , V. and Raunio , T. 2003 . The Committee system: powers, appointments and report allocation . Journal of Common Market Studies , 41 ( 2 ) : 333 – 51 .
  • Mattila , M. 2004 . Contested decisions: empirical analysis of voting in the European Union Council of Ministers . European Journal of Political Research , 43 ( 1 ) : 29 – 50 .
  • Mazey , S. and Richardson , J. 2006 . “ Interest groups and EU policy‐making: organizational logic and venue shopping ” . In European Union. Power and policy‐making , Edited by: Richardson , J. 247 – 68 . London : Routledge .
  • Moberg , A. 2002 . The Nice Treaty and voting rules in the Council . Journal of Common Market Studies , 40 ( 2 ) : 259 – 82 .
  • Mouritzen , H. and Wivel , A. 2005 . The geopolitics of Euro‐Atlantic integration , London : Routledge .
  • Naurin , D. 2009 . Most common when least important: deliberation in the European Council of Ministers . British Journal of Political Science , 40 ( 1 ) : 31 – 50 .
  • Neumann , I.B. and Gstöhl , S. 2006 . “ Introduction: Lilliputians in Gulliver’s World? ” . In Small states in international relations , Edited by: Ingebritsen , C. , Neumann , I.B. , Gstöhl , S. and Beyer , J. 3 – 36 . Seattle : University of Washington Press .
  • Odell , J.S. 2002 . Creating data on international negotiation strategies, alternatives and outcomes . International Negotiation , 7 ( 1 ) : 39 – 52 .
  • Panke , D. 2010 . Good instructions in no time? Domestic coordination of EU policies in 19 small states . West European Politics , 33 ( 4 ) : 770 – 90 .
  • Peterson , J. 2008 . Enlargement, reform and the Commission. Weathering a perfect storm? . Journal of European Public Policy , 15 ( 5 ) : 761 – 80 .
  • Pruitt , D.G. 1983 . Strategic choice in negotiation . American Behavioural Scientist , 27 ( 2 ) : 167 – 94 .
  • Schout , A. 1998 . The presidency as juggler: managing conflicting expectations . EIPASCOPE , 2 : 1 – 9 .
  • Steinmetz , R. and Wivel , A. 2010 . Small states in Europe: challenges and opportunities , Aldershot : Ashgate .
  • Tallberg , J. 2003 . The agenda‐shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency . Journal of European Public Policy , 10 ( 1 ) : 1 – 19 .
  • Tallberg , J. 2008 . Bargaining power in the European Council . Journal of Common Market Studies , 46 ( 3 ) : 685 – 708 .
  • Thomson , R. 2008 . The Council Presidency in the European Union: responsibility with power . Journal of Common Market Studies , 46 ( 3 ) : 593 – 617 .
  • Thorhallsson , B. 2006a . “ The role of small states in the European Union ” . In Small states in international relations , Edited by: Ingebritsen , C. , Neumann , I.B. , Gstöhl , S. and Beyer , J. 218 – 27 . Seattle : University of Washington Press .
  • Thorhallsson , B. 2006b . The size of sates in the European Union: theoretical and conceptual perspectives . Journal of European Integration , 28 ( 1 ) : 7 – 31 .
  • Thorhallsson , B. and Wivel , A. 2006 . Small states in the European Union: what do we know and what would we like to know? . Cambridge Review of International Affairs , 19 ( 4 ) : 651 – 68 .
  • Treaty on European Union . 1992 . Official Journal of the European Union C 191 29 July 1992
  • Treaty of Lisbon . 2007 . Official Journal of the European Union C 306 17 December 2007
  • Tsakatika , M. 2005 . Claims to legitimacy: the European Commission between continuity and change . Journal of Common Market Studies , 43 ( 1 ) : 193 – 220 .
  • Wallace , W. Small European States and European Policy–Making: Strategies, Roles, Possibilities . In between Autonomy and Influence: Small States and the European Union, W. Wallace, et al., . pp. 11 – 26 . Oslo : Arena . Arena Report No. 1/99
  • Wallace , H. 2005 . “ An institutional anatomy and five policy modes ” . In Policy‐making in the European Union , Edited by: Wallace , H. , Wallace , W. and Pollack , M.A. 49 – 90 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Warntjen , A. 2008 . The Council Presidency: power broker or burden? An empirical analysis . European Union Politics , 9 ( 3 ) : 315 – 38 .
  • Widgrén , M. 2008 . “ The impact of council’s internal decision‐making rules on the future EU ” . CESifo Working Paper, no. 2195. http://www.cesifo-group.de/pls/guestci/download/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%202008/CESifo%20Working%20Papers%20January%202008/cesifo1_wp2195.pdf
  • Wivel , A. 2005 . The security challenge of small EU member states: interests, identity and the development of the EU as a security actor . Journal of Common Market Studies , 43 ( 2 ) : 393 – 412 .
  • Wivel , A. 2010 . “ From small state to smart state: devising a strategy for influence in the European Union ” . In Small states in Europe: challenges and opportunities , Edited by: Steinmetz , R. and Wivel , A. 15 – 29 . Aldershot : Ashgate .
  • Yoshinaka , A. , McElroy , G. and Bowler , S. Rapporteurs in the European Parliament: Distributional, informational or partisan? . Paper prepared for the 2006 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association . April 20–23 , Chicago, IL.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.