2,447
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Deciding on EU External Migration Policy: The Member States and the Mobility Partnerships

Pages 223-239 | Published online: 30 Sep 2011

References

  • Acosta , D. 2009 . The good, the bad and the ugly in EU migration law: is the European Parliament becoming bad and ugly? (The adoption of Directive 2008/15: The Returns Directive) . European Journal of Migration and Law , 11 ( 1 ) : 19 – 39 .
  • Angenendt , S. 2007 . Circular Migration. A Sustainable Concept for Migration Policy? , SWP Comments 11 Berlin : SWP .
  • Aspinwall , M.D. and Schneider , G. 2000 . Same menu separate tables: the institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration . European Journal of Political Research , 38 ( 1 ) : 1 – 36 .
  • Beach , D. 2005 . The dynamics of European integration. Why and when EU institutions matter , Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan .
  • Carrera , S. and Hernández i Sagrera , R. 2009 . The externalisation of the EU’s labour immigration policy. Towards mobility or insecurity partnerships? CEPS Working Document 321 , Brussels : CEPS .
  • Caviedes , A. 2004 . The open method of co-ordination in immigration policy: a tool for prying open Fortress Europe? . Journal of European Public Policy , 11 ( 2 ) : 289 – 310 .
  • Checkel, J.T. 2005. It’s the process stupid! Process tracing in the study of European and international politics. Arena Working Paper 26. Oslo: Arena.
  • Chou, M.-H. 2006. EU and the migration-development nexus: what prospects for EU-wide policies? Working Paper 37. Oxford: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society.
  • Chou, M.-H. 2009. European Union migration strategy towards West Africa: the origin and outlook of ‘Mobility Partnerships’ with Cape Verde and Senegal. Paper presented at the EUSA Biennial Conference on ‘Information and ideas on the European Union’, Los Angeles, 23–25 April.
  • Chou, M.-H., and M. Gibert. 2010. From Cotonou to circular migration: the EU, Senegal and the ‘Agreement Duplicity’. Paper prepared for the ‘Migration: A World in Motion’ conference, Maastricht, 18–20 February.
  • Commission. 1991. Commission communication to the Council and the European Parliament on Immigration. SEC (91) 1855. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2001. An open method of coordination for the community immigration policy. COM (2001) 387. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2002. A community return policy on illegal residents. COM (2002) 564. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2006a. Thematic Programme for the Cooperation with Third Countries in the areas of Migration and Asylum. COM (2006) 26. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2006b. The Global Approach to Migration one year on: towards a comprehensive European migration policy. COM (2006) 735. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2007. On circular migration and mobility partnerships between the European Union and third countries. COM (2007) 248. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2008. Eastern Partnership. COM (2008) 823. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2009a. Mobility partnerships as a tool of the Global Approach to Migration. SEC (2009) 1240. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Commission. 2009b. Thematic programme for cooperation with third countries in the areas of migration and asylum. Restricted call for proposals 2009-2010. Guidelines for grant applicants, https://www.webgate.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/online-services/index.cfm?ADSSChck=1251915408483&do=publi.detPUB&searchtype=QS&orderby=upd&orderbyad=Desc&nbPubliList=15&page=1&aoref=128764 (accessed 14 February 2011).
  • Commission. 2010. Cooperation with third countries on migration, http://www.ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/policies/immigration/immigration_relations_en.htm (accessed 5 August 2010).
  • Commission. (n.d.) Provisional list of awarded full application after call for proposals, http://www.ec.europa.eu/europeaid/what/migration-asylum/documents/provisional_list_of_warded_proposals_2009_2010.pdf (accessed 14 February 2011).
  • Cornelius , W.A. and Tsuda , T. 2004 . “ Controlling immigration: the limits of government intervention ” . In Controlling Immigration. A Global Perspective , Edited by: Cornelius , W.A. , Tsuda , T. , Martin , P.L. and Hollifield , J.F. 3 – 48 . Stanford : Stanford University Press .
  • Council . 2002 . Seville European Council 21–22 June 2002 – Presidency Conclusions , Brussels : Council of the European Union .
  • Council . 2005 . Brussels European Council 15–16 December 2005 – Presidency Conclusions , Brussels : Council of the European Union .
  • Council . 2006 . Brussels European Council 14–15 December 2006 – Presidency conclusions , Brussels : Council of the European Union .
  • Council . 2007a . Draft conclusions on extending and enhancing the Global Approach to Migration, 13 June 2007 , Brussels : Council of the European Union .
  • Council . 2007b . Draft Council conclusions on mobility partnerships and circular migration in the framework of the Global Approach to Migration , Brussels : Council of the European Union .
  • Council. 2008a. Joint declaration on a mobility partnership between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova. 9460/08 ADD 1. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
  • Council. 2008b. Joint declaration on a mobility partnership between the European Union and the Republic of Cape Verde. 9460/08 ADD 2. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
  • Council. 2009a. The Stockholm Programme – An open and secure Europe serving and protecting the citizens. 16484/1/09. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
  • Council. 2009b. Joint declaration on a mobility partnership between the European Union and Georgia. 16396/09 ADD 1. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
  • European Parliament. 2008a. Resolution on a more effective EU policy for the South Caucasus: from promises to actions. P6_TA(2008)0016. Strasbourg: European Parliament.
  • European Parliament. 2008b. Parliamentary questions 17 September 2008. Written question by Franck Vanhecke (NL) to the Commission, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=WQ&reference=E-2008-4918&language=EN (accessed 5 August 2010).
  • Eurostat. 2008. Immigration in the EU27 in 2006, Eurostat news release 162/2008, 18 November, http://www.epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/documents/Tab/3-18112008-EN-AP.PDF (accessed 20 August 2009).
  • Frattini, F. (2006) Migration and development: time for creative and courageous approaches, Speech to the EU-Africa Ministerial Conference on Migration and Development, Tripoli, 22 November, http://www.europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/06/728&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en (accessed 14 December 2009).
  • Geddes , A. 2005 . Getting the best of both worlds? Britain the EU and migration policy . International Affairs , 81 ( 4 ) : 723 – 740 .
  • Geddes , A. 2008 . Immigration and European integration. Beyond Fortress Europe? , Manchester : Manchester University Press .
  • Guiraudon , V. 2000 . European integration and migration policy: vertical policy- making as venue Shopping . Journal of Common Market Studies , 38 ( 2 ) : 251 – 271 .
  • Guiraudon , V. 2001 . Seeking new venues: the Europeanization of migration related policies . Swiss Political Science Review , 7 ( 3 ) : 2 – 8 .
  • Guiraudon , V. and Lahav , G. 2000 . A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate. The case of migration control . Comparative Political Studies , 33 ( 2 ) : 163 – 195 .
  • Henson , P. and Malhan , N. 1995 . Endeavours to Export a Migration Crisis: policy making and Europeanisation in the German migration dilemma . German Politics , 4 ( 3 ) : 128 – 144 .
  • Héritier, A. 2001. New modes of governance in Europe: policy-making without legislating? Max Planck Project Group Common Goods: Law, Politics and Economics 2001/14. Bonn: Max Planck Institute.
  • Hoffmann , S. 1966 . Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe . Daedalus , 95 ( 3 ) : 862 – 915 .
  • Joppke , C. 1998 . “ Immigration challenges the nation-state ” . In Challenge to the nation-state. Immigration in Western Europe and the United States , Edited by: Joppke , C. 5 – 46 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Lavenex , S. 2006 . Shifting up and out: the foreign policy of European immigration control . West European Politics , 29 ( 2 ) : 329 – 350 .
  • Lavenex , S. and Uçarer , E.M. 2004 . The external dimension of Europeanization. The case of immigration policies . Cooperation and Conflict , 39 ( 4 ) : 417 – 433 .
  • Luedtke , A. 2011 . Uncovering European Union immigration legislation: policy dynamics and outcomes . International Migration , 49 ( 2 ) : 1 – 27 .
  • Martin, P., and G. Zürcher. 2008. Managing migration: the global challenge. Population Bulletin 63, no. 1. Washington: Population Reference Bureau.
  • Messina , A.M. 2007 . The logics and politics of post-WWII migration to Western Europe , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Moravcsik , A. 1993 . Preferences and power in the European Community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach . Journal of Common Market Studies , 31 ( 4 ) : 473 – 524 .
  • Moravcsik , A. and Nicolaïdis , K. 1999 . Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: interests, influence, institutions . Journal of Common Market Studies , 37 ( 1 ) : 59 – 85 .
  • Olsen , J.P. 2007 . Europe in search of political order. An institutional perspective on unity/diversity, citizens/their helpers, democratic design/historical drift and the co-existence of orders , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Papagianni , G. 2006 . Institutional and policy dynamics of EU migration law , Leiden : Martinus Nijhoff .
  • Parkes , R. 2009 . EU mobility partnerships: a model of policy coordination? . European Journal of Migration and Law , 11 ( 4 ) : 327 – 345 .
  • Reslow , N. 2010 . Migration and development? An assessment of recent EU policy initiatives . Journal of Contemporary European Research , 6 ( 1 ) : 3 – 21 .
  • Ripoll Servent, A. 2010. Adapt or die: how co-decision shaped the fate of the ‘Returns’ directive in the European Parliament. Paper presented at the ECPR Fifth Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, Porto, 23–26 June.
  • Schain , M.A. 2009 . The state strikes back: immigration policy in the European Union . The European Journal of International Law , 20 ( 1 ) : 93 – 109 .
  • Seawright , J. and Gerring , J. 2008 . Case selection techniques in case study research . Political Research Quarterly , 61 ( 2 ) : 294 – 308 .
  • Sterkx , S. 2008 . “ The external dimension of EU asylum and migration policy: expanding fortress Europe? ” . In Europe’s global role: external policies of the European Union , Edited by: Orbie , J. 117 – 138 . London : Ashgate .
  • Stetter , S. 2004 . Cross-pillar politics: functional unity and institutional fragmentation of EU foreign policies . Journal of European Public Policy , 11 ( 4 ) : 720 – 739 .
  • van Criekinge, T. 2010. The EU-Africa migration partnership: A case study of the EU’s migration dialogue with Senegal and Ghana. Paper presented at the Migration Working Group, EUI, Florence, 24 February.
  • Wallace , H. 2005 . “ Exercising power and influence in the European Union: the roles of member states ” . In The member states of the European Union , Edited by: Bulmer , S. and Lequesne , C. 24 – 44 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Wiesbrock, A. 2009. Legal migration to the European Union: ten years after Tampere. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University.
  • Wiesbrock, A., and H. Schneider. 2009. Circular migration and mobility partnerships. Briefing paper prepared for the European Parliament’s committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. PE 410.680. Brussels: European Parliament

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.