Lobbying During the Revision of the EU Emissions Trading System: Does EU Membership Influence Company Lobbying Strategies?

References

• Andersen, S.S., and K.A. Eliassen. 1993. Norway: national corporatism challenged. In National public and private EC lobbying, ed. M.P.C.M. Van Schendelen, 265–282. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R.J. 1999. Business routes of influence in Brussels: exploring the choice of direct representation. Political Studies 47, no. 2: 240–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhagen, P., and N.J. Mitchell. 2009. The determinants of direct corporate lobbying in the European Union. European Union Politics 10, no. 2: 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. 2002a. Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 3: 365–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. 2002b. A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Parliament, the European Commission and the Council of Ministers. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Discussion Paper 02/07.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwen, P. 2004. The logic of access to the European Parliament: business lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no. 3: 473–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M. 2009. The evolution of emissions trading in the European Union: the role of policy networks, knowledge and policy entrepreneurs. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34, no. 3/4: 469–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cementa AB. nd. Hållbarhetsredovisning 2007: Vårt ansvar — att bygga för framtiden, http://www.heidelbergcement.com/NR/rdonlyres/440DC056-0749-494C-8116-5E0D64F1AAC5/0/CementasH%C3%A5llbarhetsredovisning2007.pdf (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. 1998. The European business interest and the nation state: large-firm lobbying in the European Union and member states. Journal of Public Policy 18, no. 1: 75–100.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D. 1999. The impact of US lobbying practice on the European business–government relationship. California Management Review 41, no. 4: 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D. 2007. Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 3: 333–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D. 2009. Business lobbying in the European Union. In Lobbying the European Union: institutions, actors and issues, eds. D. Coen and J. Richardson, 145–168. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and C. Dannreuther. 2002. When size matters. Europeanisation of large and SME business-government relations. Politique Européenne 3: 116–137.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and J. Richardson. 2009. Lobbying the European Union: institutions, actors and issues. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Convery, F. 2009. Origins and development of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics 43, no. 3: 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowles, M.G. 1996. The EU committee of Am Cham: the powerful voice of American firms in Brussels. Journal of European Public Policy 3, no. 3: 338–358.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, C. 2007. The making of the EU emissions trading scheme: status, prospects and implications for business. European Management Journal 25, no. 6: 453–463.
   Google Scholar
• Eising, R. 2007a. Institutional context, organizational resources and strategic choices explaining interest group access in the European Union. European Union Politics 8, no. 3: 329–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eising, R. 2007b. The access of business interests to EU institutions: towards élite pluralism? Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 3: 384–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliassen, K.A., and P. Peneva. 2011. Norwegian non-governmental actors in Brussels 1980–2010: Interest representation and lobbying, Europautredningen, Rapport # 5.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006a. Building a global carbon market. Report pursuant to Article 30 of Directive 2003/87/EC, COM (2006) 676 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006b. Green Paper: European Transparency Initiative, COM(2006) 194 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009a. Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community, Official Journal of the European Union, 5 June 2009, L 140.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009b. Emissions trading: EU ETS emissions fall 3 per cent in 2008, press release, 15 May, http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/794 (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Commission Decision of 24 December 2009 Determining, Pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a List of Sectors and Subsectors which are Deemed to be Exposed to a Significant Risk of Carbon Leakage, Official Journal of the European Union, L1/10.
   Google Scholar
• European Energy Exchange. 2010. Market data on EU emission allowances, http://www.eex.com/en/Market%20Data/Trading%20Data/Emission%20Rights (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A.T. 2008a. Lobbying friends and foes in climate policy: the case of business and environmental interest groups in the European Union. Energy Policy 36, no. 8: 2964–2972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A.T. 2008b. Rational lobbying and EU climate policy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 8, no. 2: 161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A.T. 2009. Taxing greenhouse gas emissions: the case of the energy intensive and petroleum industries in Norway. Working Paper 2009:04, CICERO, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Gullberg, A.T. 2010. Hvem vinner kampen om EUs klimapolitikk? [Who wins the struggle over the EU’s climate policy?]. Internasjonal Politikk 68, no. 1: 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, Y. 2007. The impact of the traditional business–government relationship on the Europeanization of Japanese firms. Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 3: 404–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojnacki, M., and D.C. Kimball. 1999. The who and how of organizations’ lobbying strategies in committee. Journal of Politics 61, no. 4: 999–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lier-Hansen, S. 2008. Klimapolitikk i bakleksa [Climate policy lagging behind], Aftenposten, 12 June. Available at http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/article2479122.ece (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, C. 2007. Networking vs. allying: the decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 3: 366–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markussen, P., and G.T. Svendsen. 2005. Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy 33, no. 2: 245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcem. nd. Rapport om bærekraftig utvikling 2007: Vårt ansva— å bygge for framtiden, http://www.heidelbergcement.com/NR/rdonlyres/1CDF9DB8-5CBC-4FF6-B560-5B238836EAE2/0/Norcem_sust07_web.pdf (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Norsk Hydro. nd. Annual report 2007, http://www.hydro.com/upload/Annual_reporting/annual_2007/downloadcenter/Reports/01_annual%20report.pdf (accessed 20 October 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Norske Skog. nd. Annual report 2007, http://capellamedia.ipapercms.dk/NorskeSkog/Reports/Annualreports/AnnualReport07/ (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Oanda. 2010. Historical exchange rates [webpage], http://www.oanda.com/currency/historical-rates (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Pang, C.R. 2004. Policy networks and multiple lobbying strategies in EU trade policy-making: a Korean perspective. Asia Europe Journal 2, no. 3: 429–444.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, L. 2008. Metal unions side with bosses to battle EU climate package. EUobserver, December 2, http://euobserver.com/?aid=27220 (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., and P. Alexandrova. 2012. Foreign interests lobbying Brussels: participation of non-EU members in Commission consultations. Journal of Common Market Studies 50, no. 4: 614–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCA. 2008. Annual report 2007, http://www.sca.com/Documents/en/Annual_Reports/Annual_Report_2007_en.pdf (accessed 20 October 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J.B., and J. Wettestad. 2008. EU emissions trading: initiation, decision-making and implementation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J.B., and J. Wettestad. 2010. Fixing the EU emissions trading system? Understanding the post-2012 changes. Global Environmental Politics 10, no. 4: 101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skodvin, T., A.T. Gullberg, and S. Aakre. 2010. Target-group influence and political feasibility: the case of climate policy design in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 17, no. 6: 854–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSAB. 2008. Annual report 2007, http://feed.ne.cision.com/wpyfs/00/00/00/00/00/0B/D4/1F/wkr0003.pdf (accessed 20 April 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sæverud, I.A., and J. Wettestad. 2006. Norway and emissions trading: from global front-runner to EU follower. International Environmental Agreements 6, no. 1: 91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Wettestad, J. 2009. EU energy-intensive industries and emission trading: losers becoming winners? Environmental Policy and Governance 19, no. 5: 309–320.
   Google Scholar