Sidelined Member States: Commission-learning from Experts in the Face of Comitology

References

• Aldrich, H.E. 1979. Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Alfé, M., Christiansen, T., and Piedrafita, S. 2008. Comitology committees in the enlarged European Union, ARENA Working Paper No. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. 2002. Limitations to agency control in European Union policy-making: the Commission and the poverty programmes. Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 3: 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. 2006. Co-managing programme implementation: conceptualizing the European Commission’s role in policy execution. Journal of European Public Policy 13, no. 5: 717–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthoin Antal, A., M. Dierkes, J. Child, and I. Nonaka. 2001. Organizational learning and knowledge: reflections on the dynamics of the field and challenges for the future. In Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge, eds. M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child and I. Nonaka, 921–939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J. 2008. The origins of the EU comitology system: a case of informal agenda-setting by the Commission. Journal of European Public Policy 15, no. 2: 208–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S. 2009. The politics of the Lisbon Strategy: the changing role of the Commission. West European Politics 32, no. 1: 97–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2008. The political functions of expert knowledge: knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy 15, no. 4: 471–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M.L. 2000. Scientific uncertainty and learning in European Union environmental policymaking. Policy Studies Journal 28, no. 3: 576–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R.K. 2011. Varieties of expert legitimacy in EU policy formulation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Bremen.
   Google Scholar
• Child, J. 1997. Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Prospect and retrospect. Organization Studies 18, no. 1: 43–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., and B. Vaccari. 2006. The 2006 reform of comitology: problem solved or dispute postponed? EIPASCOPE 2006, no. 3: 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cram, L. 1994. The European Commission as a multi-organization: social policy and IT policy in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 1, no. 2: 196–217.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., and E. Friedberg. 1980. Actors and systems. The politics of collective action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C.A. 2010. Epistemic communities and two goals of delegation: hormone growth promoters in the European Union. Science and Public Policy 37, no. 3: 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C.A., and O. James. 2007. Principal–agent modelling and learning. The European Commission, experts and agricultural hormone growth promoters. Public Policy and Administration 22, no. 4: 403–422.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, R. 1997. Comitology: Little procedure with big implications. West European Politics 20, no. 3: 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Dreger, J. 2011. A tale of two cities: about the way politics and technocracy utilize knowledge in the European Commission. An emission trading scheme case study. Unpublished manuscript, Humboldt University Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Friedewald, M., and O. Raabe. 2011. Ubiquitos computing: an overview of technology impacts. Telematics and Informatics 28: 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S., D. Nicolini, and F. Odella. 1998. Towards a social understanding of how people learn in organizations. The notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning 29, no. 3: 273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Barroso, J.L., C. Feijóo, and E. Karnitis. 2008. The European policy for the development of an information society: the right path? Journal of Common Market Studies 46, no. 4: 787–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., and U. Sverdrup. 2008. Who consults? The configuration of expert groups in the European Union. West European Politics 31, no. 4: 725–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., and U. Sverdrup. 2010. Enlightened decision making? The role of scientists in EU governance. Politique Européenne 32, no. 3: 125–149.
   Google Scholar
• Gornitzka, Å., and U. Sverdrup. 2011. Access of experts: information and EU decision-making. West European Politics 34, no. 1: 1452–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. 2008 Organic intellectuals at work? The high-level group of company law experts in European corporate governance regulation. In Contradictions and limits of neoliberal European governance, eds. B. van Apeldoorn et al. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 125–141.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G.P. 1991. Organizational learning. The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Sciences 2, no. 1: 88–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., and D.G. Dimitrakopoulos. 2007. The European Commission and the future of Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 14, no. 8: 1249–1270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, S. 2008. Nothing but consultation: the place of organized civil society in EU policy-making across policies. European Governance Papers, EUROGOV No. C-08-03.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. 1997. From entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy 4, no. 3: 422–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, T., and J. Murk. 2007. The Commission’s relations with expert advisory groups. In The role of committees in the policy-process of the European Union, eds. T. Christiansen and T. Larsson, 64–95. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D.A., and J.G. March. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14, no. 2: 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, B., and J.G. March. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S. 2005. The social processes of organizational sense-making. Academy of Management Journal 48, no. 1: 21–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 1997. The new European agencies: regulation by information. Journal of European Public Policy 4, no. 2: 262–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misuraca, G., D. Broster, and C. Centeno. 2012. Digital Europe in 2030: designing scenarios for ICT in future governance and policy-making. Government Information Quarterly 29, no. 1: 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Neyer, J. 2000. Justifying comitology: the promise of deliberation. In European integration after Amsterdam: institutional dynamics and prospects for democracy, eds. K. Neunreither and A. Wiener, 112–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhold, C. 2001. Much ado about nothing? Comitology as a feature of EU policy implementation and its effects on the democratic arena. Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Political Science Series, No. 78.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A. 2003. Control mechanism or deliberative democracy? Two images of comitology. Comparative Political Studies 36, no. 1–2: 125–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C.M. 1999. The public policy of the European Union: wither politics of expertise? Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 5: 757–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C.M. 2009. Measuring policy learning: regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 8: 1145–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roobeek, A.J.M. 1990. Beyond the technology race. An analysis of technology policy in seven industrial countries. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A., and H.A. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. 2006. The joint-decision-trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies 48, no. 5: 1006–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. 1999. The role of the Delors Committee in the creation of EMU: an epistemic community? Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 2: 308–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J.P. 1995. Managerial and organizational cognition: notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science 6, no. 3: 280–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonka, A. 2008. Decision-making dynamics in the European Commission: partisan, national or sectoral? Journal of European Public Policy 15, no. 8: 1145–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D., S. Gutwirth, M. Friedewald, P. Hert de, M. Langheinrich, and A. Moscibroda. 2009. Privicay, trust and policy-making: challenges and responses. Computer Law and Security Review 25, no. 1: 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zito, A.R. 2001. Epistemic communities, collective entrepreneurship and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 8, no. 4: 585–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito, A.R. 2009. European agencies as agents of governance and EU learning. Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 8: 1224–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar