The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance

References

• Anderson, J.E. 1975. Public policy-making. New York: Holt-Preager.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W. 2006. Co-managing programme implementation: conceptualizing the European Commission’s role in policy execution. Journal of European Public Policy 13, no. 5: 717–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A. 2005. Mind the gap! European integration between level and scope. Journal of European Public Policy 12, no. 2: 217–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, P., and S. James. 2014. Policy windows, ambiguity and commission entrepreneurship: explaining the relaunch of the European Union’s economic reform agenda. Journal of European Public Policy 21, no. 1: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2011. Press release. 3119th Council Meeting, General Affairs. Luxemburg, 11 October 2011, 15336/11.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2013. Explanatory note, accompanying document to council recommendations to member states under the European semester 2013. 11336/13.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011a. Press release, Brussels, 14 September 2011. MEMO/11/602.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011b. Press release, Brussels, 12 December 2011. MEMO/11/898.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012a. Press release, Brussels, 17 January 2012. IP/12/24.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012b. Press release, Brussels, 25 April 2012. IP/12/407.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012c. Press release, Brussels, 18 November 2012. IP/12/1277.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013a. Financial assistance to Greece, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/assistance_eu_ms/greek_loan_facility/index_en.htm (accessed 31 August 2013).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013b. Press release, Brussels, 29 May 2013. MEMO/13/463.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013c. Press release, Brussels, 12 March 2013. MEMO/13/196.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013d. Press release, Brussels, 10 July 2013d. IP/13/674.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2010. Conclusions of the European Council. 25/26 March 2010. EUCO 7/10.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. 2013. Intergovernmentalism and its limits: assessing the European Union's answer to the Euro crisis. Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 9: 1003–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallerberg, M., B. Marzinotto, and G.B Wolff. 2012. On the effectiveness and legitimacy of EU economic policies, Bruegel Policy Briefs, Issue 4/2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, A. 2014. Redesigning financial supervision in the European Union (2009–2013). Journal of European Public Policy 21, no. 2: 151–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 2013. The little engine that wouldn’t: supranational entrepreneurship and the Barroso Commission. Journal of European Integration 35, no. 3: 301–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2008. A Postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. 2013. Greece: ex post evaluation of exceptional access under the 2010 stand-by arrangement, IMF Country Report No. 13/156.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C.O. 1970. An introduction to the study of public policy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., and A. Menon. 2004. EU member states and the Prodi Commission. In The changing European Commission, ed. D.G. Dimitrakopoulos, 89–104. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., J. Peterson, M.W. Bauer, S. Connolly, R. Dehousse, L. Hooghe, and A. Thompson. 2013. The European Commission of the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., and J. Tosun. 2011. Policy-making. In Comparative politics, ed. D. Caramani, 373–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. 1997. From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy 4, no. 3: 422–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L.N., and S.A. Scheingold. 1970. Europe’s would-be polity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lütz, S., and M. Kranke. 2011. The paradox of weakness in crisis lending: how the European Commission prevails over the IMF, Mimeo, 11 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Menz, G., and M.P. Smith. 2013. Kicking the can down the road to more Europe? Salvaging the Euro and the Future of European Economic Governance, Journal of European Integration 35, no. 3: 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merler, S., J. Pisani-Ferry, and G.B. Wolff. 2012. The role of the ECB in financial assistance: some early observations, European Parliament-IP/A/ECON/NT/2012-04.
   Google Scholar
• Ondarza, N. v. 2011. Koordinatoren an der Spitze: Politische Führung in den reformierten Strukturen der Europäischen Union [Coordinators at the top: political leadership in the reformed strucutres of the European Union], SWP-Studie.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. 2012. The college of commissioners. In The institutions of the European Union, 3rd ed. eds. J. Peterson and M. Shackleton, 96–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C., and P. Pochet. 2012. Why and how (still) Study the open method of co-ordination (OMC)? Journal of European Social Policy 22, no. 3: 336–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. 2012. Europe’s deliberative intergovernmentalism: the role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance. Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 2: 161–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salines, M., G. Glöckler, and Z. Truchlewski. 2012. Existential crisis, incremental response: the eurozone’s dual institutional evolution 2007–2011. Journal of European Public Policy 19, no. 5: 665–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. 2001. Notes toward a theory of multilevel governing in Europe. Scandinavian Political Studies 24, no. 1: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2012. Zwischen Neo-und Postfunktionalismus: Die Integrationstheorien und die Eurokrise [Between neo- and postfunctionalism: integration theories and the euro crisis]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 53, no. 3: 394–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2014. European integration in the euro crisis: the limits of postfunctionalism. Journal of European Integration.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C. 1970. A revised theory of regional integration. International Organization 24, no. 4: 836–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, D. 2012. The euro area crises, shifting power relations and institutional change in the European Union. Global Policy 3, no. 1: 28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., A. Wetzel, and G. Zapryanova. 2014. Coping with crisis: Europe’s challenges and strategies. Journal of European Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. 2010. An emergent European executive order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar