References
- Ajani, G. 1995. By chance and prestige: legal transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe. The American Journal of Comparative Law 43, no. 1: 93–117.
- Aoun, E. 2012. The European Union and international criminal justice: living up to its normative preferences? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50, no. 1: 21–36.10.1111/jcms.2012.50.issue-1
- Bellamy, R., and D. Castiglione. 2003. Legitimizing the Euro-‘polity’ and its ‘regime’: the normative turn in EU studies. European Journal of Political Theory 2, no. 1: 7–34.10.1177/1474885103002001277
- Bieber, F. 2011. Building impossible states? State-building strategies and EU membership in the Western Balkans. Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 10: 1783–802.
- Biegoń, D. 2013. Specifying the arena of possibilities: post-structuralist narrative analysis and the European Commission’s legitimation strategies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51, no. 2: 194–211.10.1111/jcms.2013.51.issue-2
- Bobek, M. 2007. Iudex Ex Machina: institutional and mental transitions of Central and Eastern European judiciairies. In Judicial reforms in Central and Eastern European countries, eds. R. Coman and J.-M. De Waele, 107–35. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
- Bodnar, A., and L. Bojarski. 2011. Judicial independence in Poland. In Judicial independence in transition, ed. A. Seibert-Fohr, 667–738. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Börzel, T. 2003. Shaping and taking EU policies: member state responses to Europeanization. Queen’s Papers on Europeanization, no. 2: 1–15.
- Börzel, T., and Th. Risse. 2000. When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestic change. European Integration Online Papers 4, no. 15: 1–27.
- Börzel, T., and Th. Risse. 2012. From Europeanisation to diffusion: introduction. West European Politics 35, no. 1: 1–19.10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
- Coman, R. 2009. Réformer la justice dans un pays post-communiste. Le cas de la Roumanie [Reforming the judiciary in a post-communist country. The case of Romania]. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université.
- Coman, R. Forthcoming 2014a. Concordia discors. From cumulative Europeanization to deeper European integration. In Europeanization and European integration. From incremental to structural change, eds. R. Coman, Th. Kostera, and L. Tomini, 1–16. Basingstroke: Palgrave.
- Coman, R. Forthcoming 2014b. Quo Vadis judicial reforms? The quest for judicial independence in Central and Eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies.
- Crespy, A. 2011. Qui a peur de Bolkestein? Résistances, conflit et démocratie dans l’Union européenne [Who is afraid of Bolkestein? Resistances, conflict and democracy in the European]. Paris: Economica.
- Crespy, A., and N. Verschueren. 2009. From Euroscepticism to resistances to European integration: an interdisciplinary perspective. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10, no. 3: 377–93.
- Dallara, C. 2007. Challenges to the democratic judicial reform in Serbia: legacy of the past, political actors interests and the EU vagueness. In Judicial reforms in Central and Eastern European countries, eds. R. Coman and J.-M. De Waele, 251–84. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
- Delpeuch, T. 2007. Evaluation of sociological critiques of international legal reforms transfers based on an analysis of American Judicial Assistance in Bulgaria. In Judicial reforms in Central and Eastern European countries, eds. R. Coman and J.-M. De Waele, 79–107. Bruges: Vanden Broele.
- Delpeuch, Th., and M. Vassileva. Forthcoming. Towards a political sociology of the transfer of legal reforms by international agencies.
- Exadaktylos, T., and C.M. Radaelli, eds. 2012. Research design in European studies. Establishing causality in Europeanization. New York: Palgrave.
- Febbrajo, A., and W. Sadurski, eds. 2010. Central and Eastern Europe after transition. Towards a new socio-legal semantics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Fleck, Z. 2011. Judicial independence in Hungary. In Judicial independence in transition, ed. A. Seibert-Fohr, 793–835. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Ginsburg, N., and T. Garoupa. 2009. Guarding the guardians. Judicial councils and judicial independence. American Journal of Comparative Law 57: 201–32.
- Grabbe, H. 2001. How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European Public Policy 8, no. 6: 1013–31.10.1080/13501760110098323
- Grabbe, H. 2002. European Union conditionality and the acquis communautaire. International Political Science Review 23, no. 3: 249–68.10.1177/0192512102023003003
- Graziano, P., and M.P. Vink, eds. 2008. Europeanization. New research agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hammerslev, O. 2007. Reform strategies around the Bulgarian Judicial Branch: social struggles converted into struggles about court reforms. In Judicial reforms in Central and Eastern European Countries, eds. R. Coman and J.-M. De Waele, 135–57. Bruges: Vanden Broele.
- Hammerslev, O. 2011. The European Union and the United States in Eastern Europe: two ways of exporting law, expertise and state power. In Bryant lawyers and the rule of law in an era of globalization, eds. Y. Dezalay and B.G. Garth, 134–55. London: Routledge.
- Haughton, T. 2007. When does the EU make a difference? Conditionality and the accession process in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Studies Review 5, no. 2: 233–46.10.1111/psr.2007.5.issue-2
- Haughton, T. 2011. Half full but also half empty: Conditionality, compliance and the quality of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Studies Review 9, no. 3: 323–33.10.1111/psr.2011.9.issue-3
- Heidbreder, E. 2013. European Union governance in the shadow of contradicting ideas: the decoupling of policy ideas and policy instruments. European Political Science Review 5, no. 1: 133–50.10.1017/S1755773912000069
- Hughes, J., G. Sasse, and C. Gordon. 2004a. Conditionality and compliance in the EU’s eastward enlargement: regional policy and the reform of sub-national government. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no. 3: 523–51.10.1111/jcms.2004.42.issue-3
- Hughes, J., G. Sasse, and C. Gordon. 2004b. Europeanization and regionalization in the EU’s enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230503182
- Imig, D., and S. Tarrow, eds. 2001. Contentious Europeans: protest and politics in an emerging polity. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Kochenov, D. 2004. Behind the Copenhagen façade: the meaning and the structure of the Copenhagen political criterion of democracy and the rule of law. European Integration Online Papers 8, no. 10: 1–36.
- Kosar, D. 2010. Judicial Accountability and Democratic Transition: Visegrad Story, Paper Presented at The 8th World Congress of Constitutional Law, December, Mexico City, http://www.juridicas.unam.mx/wccl/ponencias/16/288.pdf
- Kuhn, Z. 2011. Judicial administration reforms in Central-Eastern Europe: lessons to be learned. In Judicial independence in transition, ed. A. Seibert-Fohr, 603–17. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Larkins, Ch.M. 1996. Judicial independence and democratization: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. The American Journal of Comparative Law 44, no. 4: 605–26.10.2307/840623
- Lavenex, S. 2010. Justice and home affairs: communitarization with hesitation. In Policy-making in the European Union, eds. H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack, and A.R. Young, 457–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Magalhaes, P.C. 1999. The politics of judicial reform in Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics 32, no. 1: 43–62.10.2307/422432
- Melone, A.P. 1996. The struggle for judicial independence and the transition toward democracy in Bulgaria. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 29, no. 2: 231–43.10.1016/S0967-067X(96)80007-9
- Mendelski, M. 2012. EU-driven judicial reforms in Romania: a success story? East European Politics 28, no. 1: 23–42.
- Morlino, L., and W. Sadurski, eds. 2010. Democratisation and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European post-communist countries. New York: Routledge.
- Nicolaidis, K. 2001. Conclusion: the federal vision beyond the federal state. In The federal vision, eds. K. Nicolaidis and R. Howse, 443–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245002.001.0001
- Nicolaidis, K., and R. Kleinfeld. 2012. Rethinking Europe’s rule of law and enlargement agenda: the fundamental dilemma. The Jean Monnet Working Papers Series, no. 12/12: 1–91.
- Papadimitriou, D., and D. Phinnemore. 2004. Europeanization, conditionality and domestic change: the twinning exercise and administrative reform in Romania. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no. 3: 619–39.10.1111/jcms.2004.42.issue-3
- Parau, C. 2010. East side story: how transnational coalitions contested EU conditionality. Europe-Asia Studies 62, no. 9: 1527–54.10.1080/09668136.2010.515797
- Parau, C. 2011. The drive for judicial supremacy. In Judicial independence in transition, ed. A. Seibert-Fohr, 619–67. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Piana, D. 2010. Judicial accountabilities in New Europe. From rule of law to quality of justice. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
- Pickering, P.M. 2011. The constraints on European institutions’s conditionality in the Western Balkans. Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 10: 1939–44.
- Pridham, G. 2006. Assessing democratic consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe: the European dimension. Acta Politica 41: 342–69.10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500165
- Radaelli, C.M. 2000. Whiter Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. European Integration Online Papers 4, no. 8: 1–24.
- Rosamond, B. 2000. Theories of European integration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
- Sadurski, W. 2004. Accession’s democracy dividend: the impact of the EU enlargement upon democracy in the new member states of Central and Eastern Europe. European Law Journal 10, no. 4: 371–401.
- Saurugger, S. 2012. Beyond non-compliance with legal norms. In Research design in European studies. Establishing causality in Europeanization, eds. T. Exadaktylos and C.M. Radaelli, 105–25. New York: Palgrave.
- Saurugger, S., and F. Terpan, eds. 2013. L’intégration européenne: instruments d’opposition, de contournement, d’adaptation [The European integration: instruments of opposition, workaround and adaptation]. Quaderni 80.
- Schmidt, V.A. 2006. Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Schmitter, P.C. 1971. A revised theory of European integration. In Regional integration: theory and research, eds. N.L. Lindberg and S.A. Scheingold, 232–64. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Sedelmeier, U. 2012. Is Europeanisation through conditionality sustainable? Lock-in of institutional change after EU accession. West European Politics 35, no. 1: 20–38.10.1080/01402382.2012.631311
- Seibert-Fohr, A., ed. 2011. Judicial independence in transition. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Sticka, M. 2007. ‘Top-down control slows Czech judicial reform, despite EU impetus’ in Transparency International. Global Corruption Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Stone Sweet, A. 2010. The European Court of Justice and the judicialization of EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance 5, no. 2: 1–51.
- Stone Sweet, A., and W. Sandholtz. 1997. European integration and supranational governance. Journal of European Public Policy 4, no. 3: 297–317.10.1080/13501769780000011
- Uitz, R. 2010. Hungary: high hopes revisited. In Democratisation and the European Union. Comparing Central and Eastern European post-communist countries, eds. L. Morlino and W. Sadurski, 45–71. New York: Routledge.
- Weiler, J. 1995. Une révolution tranquille. La Cour de justice des communautés européennes et ses interlocuteurs [A quiet revolution: the European Court of justice and its interlocutors]. Revue française de science politique 8, no. 32: 119–38.
- Whitman, R.G., ed. 2011. Normative power Europe. Empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Wolczuk, K. 2007. Constitutional politics. In Developments in Central and East European politics, eds. S. White, J. Batt, and P.G. Lewis, 229–44. New York: Palgrave.
Primary sources
- The Budapest Times. “Government unbowed by threat of EU judgment day”, 19 March 2012.
- The Budapest Times. “Orban writes to Barroso”, 21 March 2012.
- Council of Europe. Opinion 663/2012.
- European Commission. 1998. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary’s progress towards accession.
- European Commission. 1999. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary’s progress towards accession.
- European Commission. 2001. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary’s progress towards accession, SEC(2001) 1748.
- European Commission. 2002. Regular report from the Commission on Hungary’s progress towards accession, SEC(2002) 1404.
- European Commission. 2003. Comprehensive monitoring report on Hungary’s preparations for membership.
- European Commission for Democracy through Law. Opinion on the new constitution of Hungary, No. 621/2011.
- Hungarian Government. “Tibor Navracsics on Conservative Home”, 10 January 2012.
- Hungarian Government. “The Hungarian government is committed to cooperating with the European Union”, 10 February 2010.
- Hungarian Government. “Zoltan Kovacs: partial solutions are not solutions”, 8 March 2012.
- Hungarian Government. “Parliament has adopted Hungary’s new constitution”.
- Hungarian Government. “Hungary seeks rapprochement with EU”, 14 March 2012.
- Hungarian Government. “Deputy Prime Minister outlines govt. response on contentious laws to CoE SecGen”, 22 March 2012.
- José Manuel Durao Barroso. “A Europe of values and principles”, 18 January 2012.
- Vivian Reding. European Parliamentary Debates, Strasbourg, 8 June 2011.
- Vivian Reding. “EU Justice Commissioner observations on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the future of the European Union”, Tallinn, 31 May 2012.