References
- Acharya, A. 2004. How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localisation and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization 58, no. 2: 239–75.
- Aggestam, L. 2008. Introduction: ethical power Europe? International Affairs 84, no. 1: 1–11.10.1111/inta.2008.84.issue-1
- Amnesty International. 2013. Kazakhstan: old habits: the routine use of torture and other Ill-treatment in Kazakhstan, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR57/001/2013/en (accessed 10 March 2014).
- Bailey, D., and F. Bossuyt. 2011. A critical remedy for the (apparently irremediable) ‘Normativity Outcomes Gap’: the European Union as a conveniently-conflicted counter-hegemon through trade, http://euce.org/eusa/2011/papers/7l_2bailey.pdf (accessed 11 March 2014).
- Barbé, E., O. Costa, A. Herranz-Surralléés, and M. Natorski. 2009. Which rules shape EU external governance? Foreign and security policies. Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 6: 873–94.
- Bengtsson, R., and O. Elgstrom. 2012. Conflicting role conceptions? The European Union in global politics. Foreign Policy Analysis 8, no. 1: 93–108.
- Bouwen, P. 2002. Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy 9, no. 3: 365–90.
- Clark, I. 2003. Legitimacy in global order. Review of International Studies 29, no. 1: 75–95.
- Clark, I. 2007. Legitimacy in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Cooley, A. 2012. Great games, local rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929825.001.0001
- Council of Ministers. 2003. A secure Europe in a better world. Brussels: Council of the European Union, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/78367.pdf (accessed 17 March 2014).
- Council of Ministers. 2009. The European Union and Central Asia: the new partnership in action. Brussels: Council of the European Union, http://www.eeas.europa.eu/central_asia/docs/2010_strategy_eu_centralasia_en.pdf. (accessed 13 March 2014).
- Dimitrova, A., and R. Dragneva. 2009. Constraining external governance: interdependence with Russia and the CIS as limits to the EU's rule transfer in the Ukraine. Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 6: 853–72.10.1080/13501760903087894
- Emmanouilidis, J. 2011. A cure for the EU’s legitimacy deficit, BEPA monthly brief, http://www.emmanouilidis.eu/publications/2011/2011_bepa_monthly.php (accessed 15 March 2014).
- Eriksen, E. 2006. The EU — a cosmopolitan polity? Journal of European Public Policy 13, no. 2: 252–69.10.1080/13501760500451683
- European Commission. 2006. Communication from the European Commission to the Council and the Parliament — on strengthening the European neighbourhood policy, COM(2006) 726 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0726:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 12 March 2014).
- European Commission. 2008. Report on the implementation of the European security strategy — providing security in a changing world. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, http://www.eu-un.europa.eu/documents/en/081211_EU%20Security%20Strategy.pdf (accessed 15 March 2014).
- European Commission. 2012. Joint communication to the European parliament, the European Council and the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions — delivering on a new European neighbourhood policy, JOIN(2012) final 14, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/docs/2012_enp_pack/delivering_new_enp_en.pdf (accessed 15 March 2014).
- Fawn, R. 2013. International Organizations and internal conditionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137305497
- Føllesdal, A. 2006. Survey article: the legitimacy deficits of the European Union. Journal of Political Philosophy 14, no. 4: 441–68.10.1111/jopp.2006.14.issue-4
- Ginsberg, R. 2001. The European Union in international politics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Greenwood, J. 2007. Organized civil society and democratic legitimacy in the European Union. British Journal of Political Science 37, no. 02: 333–57.10.1017/S0007123407000166
- Hill, C. 1993. The capability — expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies 31, no. 3: 305–28.10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x
- Hurd, I. 1999. Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization 53, no. 2: 379–408.10.1162/002081899550913
- IRI/Gallup. 2011. Kazakhstan national opinion poll, http://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/Full%20English%20Version%20Kazakhstan%20IRI%20Poll%20Feb%202011.pdf (accessed 12 March 2014).
- Isaacs, R. 2010. ‘Papa’ Nazarbayev: the discourse of charismatic leadership and nation-building in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 10, no. 3: 435–52.
- Kavalski, E. 2012. Central Asia and the rise of normative powers: contextualising the security governance of the European Union, China and India. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Kohler-Koch, B., and B. Rittberger. 2007. Charting crowded territory: debating the democratic legitimacy of the European Union. In Debating the democratic legitimacy of the European Union, eds. B. Kohler-Koch and B. Rittberger, 1–29. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Krapohl, S., n.d. Input or output? How to legitimise supranational risk regulation, http://regulation.upf.edu/ecpr-07-papers/vkrapohl.pdf (accessed 13 March 2014).
- Lewis, D. 2012. Who’s socialising whom? Regional organisations and contested norms in Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies 64, no. 7: 1219–37.
- Lindgren, K., and T. Persson. 2010. Input and output legitimacy: synergy or trade-off? Empirical evidence from an EU survey. Journal of European Public Policy 17, no. 4: 449–67.10.1080/13501761003673591
- Manners, I. 2002. Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 2: 235–58.10.1111/jcms.2002.40.issue-2
- Nau, H. 2002. Correspondence: institutionalised disagreements. International Security 27, no. 1: 174–185.
- Orbie, J. 2006. Civilian power Europe: review of the original and current debates. Cooperation and Conflict 41, no. 1: 123–8.10.1177/0010836706063503
- OSCE. 2012. Kazakhstan’s parliamentary vote, though well administered, did not meet key democratic principles, http://www.osce.org/odihr/86984 (accessed 9 March 2014).
- Roth, K. 2007. Human rights in the 21st century: problems and prospects. Talk given at the London School of Economics, London, http://www.lse.ac.uk/humanRights/events/International_HR_day_2007.aspx (accessed 10 March 2014).
- Raikhan, S. 2013. Eurasian ideas of N.A. Nazarbayev as the basis for modern integration. Procedia — Social and Behavioural Sciences 89: 377–86.
- Ruggie, J. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36, no. 2: 379–415.
- Schatz, E. 2006. Access by accident: legitimacy claims and democracy promotion in authoritarian Central Asia. International Political Science Review/Revue internationale de science politique 27, no. 3: 263–84.10.1177/0192512106064463
- Schatz, E. 2008. Transnational image making and soft authoritarian Kazakhstan. Slavic Review 67, no. 1: 50–62.10.2307/27652766
- Schimmelfennig, F. 2012. Europeanisation beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance, 7, no. 1, http://europeangovernance.livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2012-1/download/lreg-2012-1Color.pdf.
- SzenteGoldston, V. 2012. An EU Central Asia strategy with teeth (and heart), http://euobserver.com/opinion/116761 ( accessed 15 March 2014).
- The Economist. 2011. Kazakhstan’s benevolent father: long live the khan, http://www.economist.com/node/17858817 (accessed 20 September 2014).
- Tonra, B. 2011. Democratic foundations of EU foreign policy: narratives and the myth of EU exceptionalism. Journal of European Public Policy 18, no. 8: 1190–207.10.1080/13501763.2011.615209
- Tsertsvadze, T., and V. Axyonova. 2013. Trading values with Kazakhstan. http://www.eucentralasia.eu/uploads/tx_icticontent/EUCAM-PB-32-Trading-values-KZ-EN_01.pdf (accessed 20 September 2014).
- US State Department. 2005. Kazakhstan, http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61656.htm (accessed 9 March 2014).
- White, B. 2004. Foreign policy analysis and the new Europe. In Contemporary European foreign policy, eds. W. Carlsnaes, K. Jørgensen and B. White, 11–31. London: Sage.
- Wimmel, A. 2009. Theorizing the democratic legitimacy of European governance: a labyrinth with no exit? Journal of European Integration 31, no. 2: 181–99.10.1080/07036330802642763
- Winston, M. 2002. NGO strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics and International Affairs 16, no. 1: 71–87.10.1111/j.1747-7093.2002.tb00376.x
- Youngs, R. 2009. Democracy promotion as external governance? Journal of European Public Policy 16, no. 6: 895–915.10.1080/13501760903088272