Supporting the EU’s Approach to Climate Change: The Discourse of the Transnational Media Within the ‘Brussels Bubble’

References

• Bäckstrand, K., and O. Elgström. 2013. The EU’s role in climate change negotiations: from leader to ‘leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy 20, no. 10: 1369–86.10.1080/13501763.2013.781781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baisnee, O. 2002. Can political journalism exist at the EU level? In Political journalism: new challenges, new practices, eds. R. Kuhn and E. Neveu, 108–127. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baisnée, O. 2007. The European public sphere does not exist (at least it’s worth wondering …). European Journal of Communication 22, no. 4: 493–503.10.1177/0267323107083065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balčytienė, A., K. Raeymaeckers, E. de Bens, A. Vinciūnienė, and R. Schröder. 2006. Understanding the complexity of EU communication: the spokespersons’ perspective. AIM Working Papers, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. 2007. Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science 16, no. 2: 223–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A., and J. Burgess. 2005. Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis 25, no. 6: 1457–69.10.1111/risk.2005.25.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff, P. 2010. Cold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics 19, no. 4: 637–56.10.1080/09644016.2010.489718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2009. Joint progress report and follow-up recommendations on climate change and international security (CCIS) to the Council, Council Document 16645/09, 19 November. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, J. 2010. The Copenhagen conference: how should the EU respond? Dublin: Institute of International and European Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, C., and A. Georgiev. 2010. Why the transatlantic alliance climate change partnership matters more than ever. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010a. Climate change: commission invites to an informed debate on the impacts of the move to 30% EU greenhouse gas emissions cut if and when the conditions are met, IP/10/618, 26 May. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010b. Climate change: European Commission sets out strategy to reinvigorate global action after Copenhagen, 9 March, http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/hedegaard/headlines/news/2010-03-09_01_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Special Eurobarometer 372 on climate change, October, May. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commissioner for Climate Action. 2010a. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a central plank of Europe’s climate policy, VI International Conference New Energy User Friendly, SPEECH/10/321, 18 June. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commissioner for Climate Action. 2010b. Statement of Connie Hedegaard, European Commissioner for climate action, on council conclusions today, MEMO/10/106, 26 March. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2009. Climate change: European Parliament at COP15 – a voice of ambition, EP-Document 20091207IPR66098, 8 December.
   Google Scholar
• Firmstone, J. 2004. Final case report on communication strategies of the media: EU, The Transformation of Political Mobilisation and Communication in European Public Spheres Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Gareth, H. 2014. The myth of the shrinking EU Press Corps. http://garethharding.com/the-myth-of-the-shrinking-eu-press-corps/
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, N.T., and T. Marshall. 2011. Mediated climate change in Britain: scepticism on the web and on television around Copenhagen. Global Environmental Change 21, no. 3: 1035–44.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavin, N.T., L. Leonard-Milsom, and J. Montgomery. 2011. Climate change, flooding and the media in Britain. Public Understanding of Science 20, no. 3: 422–38.10.1177/0963662509353377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, H., and R. Kunelius. 2006. Journalists imagining the European public sphere: professional discourses about the EU news practices in ten countries. Javnost – The Public 13, no. 4: 63–79.10.1080/13183222.2006.11008925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., M. Hjerpe, C. Parker, and B.-O. Linnér. 2012. The legitimacy of leadership in international climate change negotiations. AMBIO 41, no. S1: 46–55.10.1007/s13280-011-0240-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R.D. 2010. Globalizing European Union environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 17, no. 3: 335–49.10.1080/13501761003662065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilian, B., and O. Elgström. 2010. Still a green leader? The European Union’s role in international climate negotiations. Cooperation and Conflict 45, no. 3: 255–73.10.1177/0010836710377392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, K. 2012. EU talking only to ‘Brussels Bubble’ inhabitants, not citizens, openDemocracy, http://www.opendemocracy.net/kwinten-lambrecht/eu-talking-only-to-brussels-bubble-inhabitants-not-citizens
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S. 2008. EU membership and the press: an analysis of the Brussels correspondents from the new member states. Journalism 9, no. 4: 443–64.10.1177/1464884908091294
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., and M.C. Hinrichsen. 2010. Role conceptions of Brussels correspondents from the new member states. Javnost – The Public 17, no. 1: 73–86.10.1080/13183222.2010.11009027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, P. 1993. Between trust and suspicion: how political journalists solve the dilemma. European Journal of Communication 8, no. 1: 33–51.10.1177/0267323193008001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. 2011. Global climate governance after Cancun: options for EU leadership. The International Spectator 46, no. 1: 5–13.10.1080/03932729.2011.567900
   Google Scholar
• Olausson, U. 2010. Towards a European identity? The news media and the case of climate change. European Journal of Communication 25, no. 2: 138–52.10.1177/0267323110363652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panichi, J. 2012. Embedded in the Brussels Bubble, Presseurop.eu, December 28, http://www.presseurop.eu/en/content/article/3172791-embedded-brussels-bubble
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C.F., C. Karlsson, M. Hjerpe, and B.-O. Linnér. 2012. Fragmented climate change leadership: making sense of the ambiguous outcome of COP-15. Environmental Politics 21, no. 2: 268–86.10.1080/09644016.2012.651903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, K., and L. Cosjin. 2006. The difficulties for an efficient EU communication strategy as a triangle between EU – institutions/spokespersons, correspondents and national media. RevistaRomână de Jurnalism şi Comunicare 4: 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Raeymaeckers, K., L. Cosijn, and A. Deprez. 2007. Reporting the European Union. Journalism Practice 1, no. 1: 102–19.10.1080/17512780601078894
   Google Scholar
• Skovgaard, J. 2014. EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics 23, no. 1: 1–17.10.1080/09644016.2013.818304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. 2005. Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Analysis 25, no. 6: 1471–82.10.1111/risk.2005.25.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanier, B. 2012. Europe, anyone? The ‘communication deficit’ of the European Union revisited. Baden-Baden: Nomos.10.5771/9783845236797
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. 2006. European media studies. London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar