Designed Diffusion? The Impact of an EU Instrument for Public Management Reform in the Western Balkans

References

• Babbie, E. 1990. Survey research methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and K. Jacobsson. 2004. The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 11, no. 2: 185–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2012a. From Europeanisation to diffusion: introduction. West European Politics 35, no. 1: 1–19.10.1080/01402382.2012.631310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2012b. When Europeanisation meets diffusion: exploring new territory. West European Politics 35, no. 1: 192–207.10.1080/01402382.2012.634543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A., and B. Steunenberg. 2000. The search for convergence of national policies in the European Union: an impossible quest? European Union Politics 1, no. 2: 201–226.10.1177/1465116500001002003
   Google Scholar
• EACEA – Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. 2012. Overview of the higher education systems in the Tempus partner countries: Western Balkans, a Tempus study, No. 13, November. Brussels: EACEA, http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus/tools/documents/13_high_educ_sys_121218_EN_single.pdf ( accessed November 15 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, S., and M. Lodge. 2000. National tunes and a European melody? Competition law reform in the UK and Germany. Journal of European Public Policy 7, no. 1: 63–79.10.1080/135017600343278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., and O. Treib. 2008. Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to new member states. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46, no. 2: 293–313.10.1111/jcms.2008.46.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. 2002. New modes of governance in Europe: policy-making without Legislating? In Common goods: reinventing European and international governance, eds. A. Héritier, 185–206. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., and D. Lehmkuhl. 2008. The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance: sectoral governance and democratic government. Journal of Public Policy 28, no. 1: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C.C. 1995. Contemporary public management: a new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration 10, no. 2: 104–117.10.1177/095207679501000208
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C.C., and H.Z. Margetts. 2007. The tools of government in the Digital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J., ed. 2009. International perspectives on the governance of higher education. Alternative frameworks for coordination. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.E., D.E. Hanna, and D. Olcott. 2003. Bridging the gap: leadership, technology, and organizational change for university deans and chairpersons. Madison, WI: Atwood.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., R.K.W. Wurzel, and A. Zito. 2005. The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies 53: 477–496.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J. 2005. A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. 1996. Evaluating the Tempus programme: successes and problems of higher education development in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education in Europe 21, nos 2–3: 34–48.
   Google Scholar
• Koprić, I., A. Musa, and G.L. Novak. 2011. Good administration as a ticket to the European administrative space. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu 61, no. 5, 1515–1560.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen, P., and B. Stensaker. 2011. The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. Higher Education 61, no. 6: 757–769.10.1007/s10734-010-9360-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, R., P. Ruffio, and P. Heinämäki. 2011. TEMPUS @ 20, a retrospective of the TEMPUS programme over the past 20 years, 1990–2010. Brussels: EACEA, http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus/tools/documents/tempus_en_110308.pdf ( accessed 15 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, O.W., J. Boli, G.M. Thomas, and F.O. Ramirez. 1997. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology 103, no. 1: 144–181.10.1086/ajs.1997.103.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J.H. 2004. Civil service reform in post-communist Europe: the bumpy road to depoliticisation. West European Politics 27, no. 1: 71–103.10.1080/01402380412331280813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. 2002. The many faces of Europeanization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 5: 921–952.10.1111/jcms.2002.40.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, A. 2011. The enigma of quality in Greek higher education: a mixed methods study of introducing quality management into Greek higher education. Enshcede: University of Twente, CHEPS.10.3990/1.9789036531559
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. 2003. Measuring performance in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., M.G. Cowles, and J. Caporaso. 2001. Europeanization and domestic change: introduction. In Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change, eds. T. Risse, M.G. Cowles, and J. Caporaso, 1–20. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L.M. 2002. The tools of government: a guide to the new governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2005. Introduction: conceptualizing the Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. In The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, eds. F. Schimmelfennig and U. Sedelmeier, 1–28. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sissenich, B. 2007. Building states without society: European Union enlargement and the transfer of EU social policy to Poland and Hungary. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., J. Enders, and H. de Boer. 2007. Comparative analysis. The extent and impact of higher education governance reform across Europe. Enschede: CHEPS, NIFU STEP, CHE, ESMU.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, D., and J.W. Meyer. 1993. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society 22: 487–511.10.1007/BF00993595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholoniat, L. 2010. The career of the open method of coordination: lessons from a ‘Soft EU instrument’. West European Politics 33, no. 1: 93–117.10.1080/01402380903354122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, J. Douglas. 2010. Building organizational capacity: strategic management in higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O. 2008. Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs. Living Reviews in European governance 3, no. 5: 1–30, http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-5 ( accessed 15 November 2012).
   Google Scholar
• van der Sleen, M. 2003. Mid-term evaluation report of the third phase of the Tempus programme (2000–2006). Rotterdam: Ecorys-Nei.
   Google Scholar
• Vukasovic, M. 2013. Change of higher education in response to European pressures: conceptualization and operationalization of Europeanization of higher education. Higher Education 66, no. 3: 311–324.10.1007/s10734-012-9606-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, L. 1993. TEMPUS as an instrument of reform. European Journal of Education 28, no. 4: 429–436.10.2307/1503410
   Google Scholar