European trade policy in interesting times

References

• Baldwin, R. 2011. “21st Century Regionalism: Filling the Gap Between 21st Century Trade and 20th Century Trade Rules.” CEPR Policy Insight No. 56. London: Center for Economic Policy Research, May.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, M. 2006. “EU Trade Politics – Heaven or Hell?” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 926–42.10.1080/13501760600838698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. 2016. ‘Manufacturing Discontent: The Rise to Power of Anti-TTIP Groups’, ECIPE Occasional Paper 02/2016. Brussels: European Center for International Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• BerlesmannStiftung. 2016. “Attitudes to Global Trade and TTIP in Germany and the United States.” GED Study.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Buonanno, Laurie A. 2017. “The new trade deals and the mobilisation of civil societyorganizations: comparing EU and US responses.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 795–809. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1371711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlemagne. 2016. “If the EU Cannot Do Trade, What Can It Do?” Economist, October 29.
   Google Scholar
• Ciofu, S. M. and Stefanuta, N. 2016. “TTIP, the Bullied Kid of Twitter.” Accessed October 19, 2016. http://gppreview.com/author/sabina-maria-ciofu/
   Google Scholar
• CJEU (Court of Justice of the European Union). 2017. “Opinion 2/15 of the Court.” May 16. Accessed May 18, 2017. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=190727&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=742542
   Google Scholar
• Commission. 2010. “Trade, Growth and World Affairs: Trade Policy as a Core Component of the EU’s 2020 Strategy.” COM, 612, November, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Commission. 2013. “Investment Protection and Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement in EU agreements.” Accessed January 8, 2017. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2013/november/tradoc_151916.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Commission. 2015. “Trade for All Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy.” COM, 497 final, October14.
   Google Scholar
• Commission. 2016a. “Proposal for a Council Decision on the provisional application of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the Other Part.” COM 470 final, July5.
   Google Scholar
• Commission. 2016b. Standard Eurobarometer, 86, December.
   Google Scholar
• Commission. 2017. “Reflection Paper on Harnessing Globalisation.” COM, 240, May 10.
   Google Scholar
• Conceição-Heldt, E. da, and S. Meunier. 2014. “Speaking with a Single Voice: Internal Cohesiveness and External Effectiveness of the EU in Global Governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (7): 961–979.10.1080/13501763.2014.913219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., and J. Orbie. 2011. “The European Union’s Trade Policy Response to the Crisis: Paradigm Lost or Reinforced?” European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 15/2, http://eiop.or.at/texte/2011-002a.htm.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., and G. Siles-Brügge. 2016. “Why TTIP is a Game-Changer and its Critics Have a Point.” Journal of European Public Policy. 1–15. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Democracy Corps. 2016. “Public Anger about Corporate Power Dominant Factor in Views on Trade and TTP.” Memo for Public Citizen, July 13. Accessed September 9, 2016. http://www.democracycorps.com/attachments/article/1036/Dcor_Public%20Citizen_June%20National_Memo_7.13.2016_FINAL%20FOR%20RELEASE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, Roberto. 2017. “TTIP: contentious market regulation.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 859–874. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1372431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F. 1973. “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence.” In A Nation Writ Large? Foreign-Policy Problems before the European Community, edited by M. Kohnstamm and W. Hager. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. 2010. Protection for Exporters: Power and Discrimination in Transatlantic Trade Relations, 1930–2010. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A. 2015. “Interest Group Influence on Public Opinion: A Survey Experiment on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.” Unpublished manuscript. Accessed September 29, 2015. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3981.9683
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and M. Elsig. 2011. “Principals, Agents, and the European Union’s Foreign Economic Policies.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (3): 323–338.10.1080/13501763.2011.551066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2014. “Public Opinion and Interest Group Influence: How Citizen Groups Derailed the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (8): 1199–1217.10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist. 2016. “Drawbridges Up: The New Divide in Rich Countries is Not between Left and Right but Between Open and Closed.” July, 30.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 2003. “Is Trade Policy Democratic? And Should It Be?” In The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-Making and Negotiations in International Economic Relations, edited by N. Bayne and S. Woolcock, 147–159. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden, J., and L. L. Martin. 2002. “International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions.” In Political Science: State of the Discipline, III, edited by I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner, 118–146. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Goff, P. 2017. “Limits to Deep Integration: Canada between the EU and the US.” Paper to the 15th Biennial International Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Miami, May 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., and M. Smith. 2005. “International Relations and the European Union: Themes and Issues.” In International Relations and the European Union, edited by C. Hill and M. Smith, 3–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hübner, Kurt, Anne-Sophie Deman, and Tugce Balik. 2017. “EU and trade policy-making: the contentious case of CETA.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 843–857. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1371708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knops, R. W. et al. 2014. “Letter in the Framework of the Political Dialogue: The Role of National Parliaments in Free Trade Agreements.” June 25. Accessed January 6, 2017. http://www.ttip2014.eu/files/content/docs/Full%20documents/Letter_to_Mr_De_Gucht_-_role_of_national_parliaments_in_free_trade_agree..._181-238913.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, Finn, and Christilla Roederer-Rynning. 2017. “Introduction: the new EU FTAs as contentious market regulation.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 763–779. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1372430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pen, M. 2017. “144 Engagements Présidentiels.” Accessed May 19, 2017. http://www.marine2017.fr/2017/02/04/projet-presidentiel-marine-le-pen/
   Google Scholar
• Malmström, C. 2016. "Shaping Globalisation Through EU Trade Policy," Speach to European Parliament Trade Policy Day, Brussels. November 9. Accessed August 28, 2017. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/november/tradoc_155082.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.10.1111/jcms.2002.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T. 2017. “Prime Minister’s Letter to Donald Tusk Triggering Article 50.” March 29. Accessed April 21, 2017. http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/604079/Prime_Ministers_letter_to_European_Council_President_Donald_Tusk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. 2005. Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., and K. Nicolaïdis. 1999. “Who Speaks for Europe? The Delegation of Trade Authority in the EU.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (3): 477–501.10.1111/jcms.1999.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., and J.-F. Morin. 2015. “No Agreement is an Island: Negotiating TTIP in a Dense Regime Complex.” In The Politics of Transatlantic Trade Negotiations: TTIP in a Globalized World, edited by J.-F. Morin, T. Novotná, F. Ponjaert and M. Telò, 173–185. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, Sophie, and Jean-Frédéric Morin. 2017. “The European Union and the space-time continuum of investment agreements.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 891–907. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1371706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., and K. Nicolaïdis. 2006. “The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (6): 906–925.10.1080/13501760600838623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C., H., Von Der Burchard, and S. Marks 2016. “How the EU Threw Away its Trade Powers: By Passing the Buck to National and Regional Parliaments, the Commission Loses Control Over One of its Core Competencies.” Politico, October 19.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Sunghoon. 2017. “The new politics of trade negotiations: the case of the EU-Korea FTA.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 827–841. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1371707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelkmans, Jacques. 2017. “Business dimensions of EU’s new FTAs.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 781–794. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1372432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, Christilla, and Morten Kallestrup. 2017. “National parliaments and the new contentiousness of trade.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 811–825. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1371710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. 1956. “An Essay on Bargaining.” American Economic Review 46 (3): 281–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. J. 2017. “‘Narrative Economics,’ Presidential Address to the American Economic Association.” Chicago, January 7.
   Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. 2016. “Civil Society and the Battle over the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP): A Constrained Politicisation of Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)?” Paper prepared for the workshop on ‘21st Century Trade Politics: TTIP as a Test Case?’ Georgia Tech, Atlanta, 29–30 April, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Hitoshi. 2017. “The new politics of trade: EU-Japan.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 827–841. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1371709.
   Google Scholar
• Trump, D. J. 2016. “Declaring America’s Economic Independence.” June 28. Accessed September 9, 2016. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/full-transcript-trump-job-plan-speech-224891
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2014. World Investment Report 2014: Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, S. 2005. “Trade Policy: From Uruguay to Doha and Beyond.” In Policy-Making in the European Union. 5th ed, edited by H. Wallace and W. Wallace, 377–399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock, S. 2015. “Trade Policy: Policy-Making after the Treaty of Lisbon.” In Policy-Making in the European Union. 7th ed, edited by H. Wallace, M. A. Pollack and A. R. Young, 388–406. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. 2002. Extending European Cooperation: The European Union and the ‘New’ International Trade Agenda. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. 2015. “Liberalizing Trade, Not Exporting Rules: The Limits to Regulatory Coordination in the EU’s ‘New Generation.” Preferential Trade Agreements’, Journal of European Public Policy 22 (9): 1253–1275.10.1080/13501763.2015.1046900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. R., and J. Peterson. 2014. Parochial Global Europe: 21st Century Trade Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579907.001.0001
   Google Scholar