The new politics of trade negotiations: the case of the EU-Korea FTAFootnote^*

* This paper was supported by a Korea University grant. The author thanks two anonymous referees for their constructive comments.

References

• Dür, Andreas, and Dirk De Bievre. 2007. “Inclusion without Influence? CSOs in the European Trade Policy.” Journal of Public Policy 27 (1): 79–101.                                                                                                                                                                                                                     10.1017/S0143814X0700061X
   Google Scholar
• Elsig, Manfred, and Cederic Dupont. 2012. “European Union Meets South Korea: Bureaucratic Interests, Exporter Discrimination and the Negotiations of Trade Agreements.” Journal of Commomn Market Studies 50 (3): 492–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. “Global Europe: Competing in the World – A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy.” COM(2006) 567.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. “Trade, Growth and World Affairs: Trade Policy as a Core Component of the EU’s 2020 Strategy.” COM(2010) 612.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. October, 2015. Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Jarman, Holly. 2010. “Collaboration and Consultation: Functional Representation in EU Stakeholder Dialogues.” Draft paper prepared for presentation at the IPSA International Conference “Is there a European Model of Governance? A Comparative Perspective”, Luxembourg, March 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Feasibility Study. November, 2007. “A Qualitative Analysis of a Potential Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and South Korea.” Study submitted by a consortium consisting of Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels (Project Coordinator) and Korean Institute for International and Economic Policy (KIEP), Seoul to DG Trade. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Yoo-Duk. 2012. “Role of Trade Associations in EU Trade Policy Making Procedure: Case Studies of Global Europe and Korea-EU FTA.” Korean Journal of Contemporary European Studies 30 (3): 31–64. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Yoo-Duk. 2015. “European Lobbying of European Car Industries: Case Studies of EU’s FTA with Korea, Japan and USA.” Korean Journal of Contemporary European Studies 33 (2): 1–48. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hyun-Jung. 2013. “An Analysis on the EU’s FTA Strategy by Framework of Three-level Games Theory. Focus on the Korea-EU FTA, EU-ASEAN FTA and EU-Japan FTA.” The Journal of International Relations 16 (2): 138–157. (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Heungchong, June 1, 2016. “Five Years After the Korea-EU FTA Entered into Force.” A Special Lecture at the KU-KIEP-SBS EU Centre at Korea University.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Heungchong. June, 2007. “The Start of Negotiations for a Korea-EU FTA: Background and Negotiation Strategy.” Current Issues and Policies: 9–12 . (in Korean)
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, Finn, and Christilla Roederer-Rynning. 2017. “Introduction: the new EU FTAs as contentious market regulation.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 763–779. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1372430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Seungjoo, and Min Gyo Koo. 2006. “South Korea’s Multi-Track FTA Strategy: Moving from Reactive to Proactive.” A paper presented at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA, 31 August–3 September 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Makiyama, Hosuk, and Bert Verschelde. Familiar Fault Lines: The Myth of EP Independence in Economic Policy-making. ECIPE Bulletin No. 14/2014.
   Google Scholar
• Messerlin, Patrick A.. November 13, 2012. “The EU Pivoting to East Asia.” Policy Brief, Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Sung-Hoon. 2004. “ASEM and the Future of Asia-Europe Relations: Background, Characteristics and Challenges.” Asia Europe Journal 2 (3): 341–354.10.1007/s10308-004-0106-8
   Google Scholar
• Park, Sung-Hoon. 2014. “Korea’s Trade Policy in the Light of Monthly Meetings for Export Promotion in 1970s.” In A Detailed Analysis of Monthly Meetings for Export Promotion, edited by Park Myungho, 168–201. Sejong: KDI Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Sung-Hoon, and Minkyo Koo. 2007. “Forming a Cross-Regional Partnership: The South Korea – Chile FTA and Its Implications.” Pacific Affairs 80 (2), Summer: 259–278.10.5509/2007802259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postnikov, Evgeny. 2015. “EU Trade Policy and Civil Society: Different Channels, Same Success?” Paper prepared for presentation at the European Union Studies Association Fourteenth Biannial Conference, Boston, March 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two-level Games.” International Organization 42 (3), Summer: 427–460.10.1017/S0020818300027697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sally, Razeen. 2007. “Looking East: The European Union’s New FTA Negotiations in Asia.” Jan Tumlir Policy Essays, No. 03/2007, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE).
   Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2010. “The ‘Global Europe’ Services and Investment Agenda: Bringing Politics Back into the Study of EU Trade Policy.” Paper presented at the EU in International Affairs Conference, Brussels, 22–24 April.
   Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. 2013. “The Power of Economic Ideas: A constructivist Political Economy of EU Trade Policy.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 9 (4): 597–617.
   Google Scholar
• Solis, Mireya, and Saori N. Katada. 2007. “Understanding East Asian Cross-Regionalism: An analytical Framework.” Pacific Affairs 80 (2), Summer: 229–257.10.5509/2007802229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar