National parliaments and the new contentiousness of trade

References

• Armingeon, K. 2002. “The Effects of Negotiation Democracy: A Comparative Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (1): 81–105.10.1111/ejpr.2002.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auel, K., and A. Benz. 2005. “The Politics of Adaptation: The Europeanisation of National Parliamentary Systems.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 372–393.10.1080/13572330500273570
   Google Scholar
• Auel, K., O. Rozenberg, and A. Tacea. 2015. “To Scrutinise or Not to Scrutinise? Explaining Variation in EU-related Activities in National Parliaments.” West European Politics 38 (2): 282–304.10.1080/01402382.2014.990695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COSAC. 2015. Twenty-third by-Annual Report: Developments in European Union Procedures and Practices Relevant to Parliamentary Scrutiny. Accessed December 21, 2016. https://parleu2015.lv/files/cosac_plenary/en-23-bi-annual-report-final-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B., and J. E. Fossum. 2009. “The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU.” European Political Science Review 1 (2): 249–271.10.1017/S1755773909000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum, B., and J. Fossum. 2013. Practices of Inter-Parliamentary Coordination in International Politics: The European Union and beyond. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, E., and H. Jensen. 2005. “Europeanisation of Executive–Legislative Relations: Nordic Perspectives.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 394–411.10.1080/13572330500273604
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., and G. Siles-Brügge. 2016. TTIP. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.10.14361/9783839434123
   Google Scholar
• Devuyst, Y. 2013. “European Union Law and Practice in the Negotiation of International Trade Agreements.” Journal of International Business and Law 12 (2): 259–316.
   Google Scholar
• Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2014. “Public Opinion and Interest Group Influence: How Citizen Groups Derailed the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (8): 1199–1217.10.1080/13501763.2014.900893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckes, C. 2015. “How the European Parliament’s Participation in International Relations Affects the Deep Tissue of the EU’s Power Structures.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12 (4): 904–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU-oplysningen. 2016. “Søg:TTIP.” Accessed December 9, 2016. https://www.eu.dk/da/search?msf=&Kategori=INFO&q=TTIP&as=1&SortBy=SortDate&SortOrder=desc#sort
   Google Scholar
• Ewert, I. 2016. “The EU-China Bilateral Investment Agreement: Between High Hopes and Real Challenges”. Egmont Security Policy Brief 68.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and A. L. Newman. 2010. “Making Global Markets: Historical Institutionalism in International Political Economy." Review of International Political Economy 17 (4): 609–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frears, J. R. 1975. “The French parliament and the European community.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 14 (2): 140–156.10.1111/j.1468-5965.1975.tb00745.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Garibay, R. 2013. “Coordination Practices in the Parliamentary Control of Justice and Home Affairs Agencies: The Case of Europol.” In Practices of Inter-Parliamentary Coordination in International Politics: The European Union and beyond, edited by B. Crum and J. Fossum, 87–104. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and D. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hillion, C., and P. Koutrakos, eds. 2010. Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and Its Member States in the World. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. 2016. “The Truth about Trade: What Critics Get Wrong about the Global Economy.” Foreign Affairs 95 (4): 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jančić, D. 2017. “TTIP and Legislative–Executive Relations in EU Trade Policy.” West European Politics 40 (1): 202–221. doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1240407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, Finn, and Christilla Roederer-Rynning. 2017. “Introduction: the new EU FTAs as contentious market regulation.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 763–779. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1372430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J., ed. 2006. The State after Statism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. 1983. Organised Democracy: Political Institutions in a Welfare State – The Case of Norway. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Passos, R. 2010. “Mixed Agreements: A View from the European Parliament.” In Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and Its Member States in the World, edited by C. Hillion and P. Koutrakos, 269–294. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pelkmans, Jacques. 2017. “Business dimensions of EU’s new FTAs.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 781–794. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2017.1372431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., and T. Winzen. 2015. “The European Union’s Multilevel Parliamentary System.” In The European Union: Power and Policy-making, edited by S. Mazey and J. Richardson, 107–133. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzutto, F. 1996. “The French Parliament and the EU: Loosening the Constitutional Straitjacket.” In National Parliaments and the European Union, edited by P. Norton, 46–60. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, G. 2016. “A Match Made in Heaven? Explaining Patterns of Cooperation between the Commission and the European Parliament.” Journal of European Integration 38 (4): 409–424.10.1080/07036337.2016.1141903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 2009. “Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity.” European Political Science Review 1 (2): 173–204.
   Google Scholar
• Shonfield, A. 1965. Modern Capitalism. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, A. M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Putte, L., F. De Ville, and J. Orbie. 2014. The European Parliament’s New Role in Trade Policy: Turning Power into Impact. CEPS Special Report no. 89. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Wendler, F. 2014. “Justification and Political Polarization in National Parliamentary Debates on EU Treaty Reform.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (4): 549–567.10.1080/13501763.2014.882388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler, F. 2016. Debating Europe in National Parliaments. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-51727-2
   Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. 2012. “National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-national and Longitudinal Comparison.” West European Politics 35 (3): 657–672.10.1080/01402382.2012.665745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock, S. 2015. “Trade Policy: Policy-making after the Treaty of Lisbon.” In Policy-making in the European Union. 7th ed., edited by H. Wallace, M. A. Pollack, and A. R. Young, 388–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Alasdair R. 2017. “European trade policy in interesting times.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 909–923. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1371705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar