Examining the effects of EU Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA) funding on perceptions of civil society among CSOs in Turkey: a case study of Batman province

References

• Anheier, Helmut. 2013. Civil Society: Measurement, Evaluation, Policy. Sterling, VA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, and Allper Kaliber. 2016. “Encounters with Europe in an Era of Domestic and International Turmoil: Is Turkey a De-Europeanising Candidate Country?” South European Society and Politics 21 (1): 1–14.10.1080/13608746.2016.1155282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baç, Meltem M. 2005. “Turkey’s Political Reforms and the Impact of the European Union.” South European Society and Politics 10 (1): 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja A., Antoaneta Dimitrova, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2016. “European Union Enlargement and Integration Capacity.” Journal of European Public Policy (Special Issue) 24 (2): 157–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, Samprit, Ali S. Hadi, and Bertram Price. 2000. Regression Analysis by Example. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• CIVICUS, CSI (Civil Society Index). 2015. Who We Are. https://www.civicus.org/index.php/who-we-are.
   Google Scholar
• Cizre, Umit. 2004. “Problems of Democratic Governance of Civil-Military Relations in Turkey and the European Union Enlargement Zone.” European Journal of Political Research 43 (1): 107–125.10.1111/ejpr.2004.43.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dağı, Ihsan. 2004. “Rethinking Human Rights, Democracy, and the West: Post-Islamist Intellectuals in Turkey.” Critical Middle Eastern Studies 13 (2): 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry Jay. 1994. “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5 (3): 4–17.10.1353/jod.1994.0041
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, Don A. 2011. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Etobicoke, ON: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Charles H. 1984. “Issue Preferences, Socialization, and the Evolution of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (3): 459–478.10.2307/2110900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Mark, Cees van der Eijk, and Michael Marsh. 1996. “What Voters Teach Us about Europe-Wide Elections; What Europe-Wide Elections Teach Us about Voters.” Electoral Studies 15 (2): 149–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, Matthew J. 1998a. “Economic Integration and Mass Politics: Market Liberalization and Public Attitudes in the European Union.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 936–953.10.2307/2991736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, Matthew J. 1998b. “Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories.” The Journal of Politics 60 (2): 333–354.10.2307/2647912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, Matthew J., and Kenneth Scheve. 2007. “Mixed Messages: Party Dissent and Mass Opinion on European Integration.” European Union Politics 8 (1): 37–59.10.1177/1465116507073285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, Volkart Finn. 2004. Assessing and Strengthening Civil Society Worldwide: A Project Description of the CIVICUS Civil Society Index: A Participatory Needs Assessment and Action-Planning Tool for Civil Society. Johannesburg: Civicus.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Marc Morjé, and Leah Gilbert. 2008. “A Cross-National Comparison of the Internal Effects of Participation in Voluntary Organizations.” Political Studies 56 (1): 12–32.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyden, Goran. 1997. “Civil Society, Social Capital, and Development: Dissection of a Complex Discourse.” Studies in Comparative International Development 32  (1): 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNL (The International Center for Not-for-Profit Law). 2015. Civic Freedom Monitor. Turkey. http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/turkey.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kadıoğlu, Ayşe. 2005. “Civil Society, Islam and Democracy in Turkey: A Study of Three Islamic Non-Governmental Organizations.” The Muslim World 95 (1): 23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. 2012. “Kulturkampf in Turkey: The Constitutional Referendum of 12 September 2010.” South European Society and Politics 17 (1): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliber, Alper. 2014. “Europeanization in Turkey. in Search of a New Paradigm of Modernization.” Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 16 (1): 30–46.10.1080/19448953.2013.864182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, Ayhan. 2017. “A Tale of Two Cities: Aleppo and Istanbul.” European Review 25 (3): 365–387.10.1017/S1062798717000084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketola, Markus. 2011. “EU Democracy Promotion in Turkey: Funding NGOs, Funding Conflict?” The International Journal of Human Rights 15 (6): 787–800.10.1080/13642987.2011.572551
   Google Scholar
• Ketola, Markus. 2012. “EU Support for NGOs in Turkey is Not a Short-Cut to Democratic Change.” LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
   Google Scholar
• Ketola, Markus. 2013. Europeanization and Civil Society Turkish NGOs as Instruments of Change?. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137034526
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, Paul. 2005. “The European Union and Grassroots Democratization in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 6 (3): 361–377.10.1080/14683840500235456
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, Paul. 2011. “Political Conditionality and European Union's Cultivation of Democracy in Turkey.” Democratization 18 (4): 910–931.10.1080/13510347.2011.584732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubicek, Paul. 2013. European Union and Democratization. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzmanovic, Daniella. 2010. “Project Culture and Turkish Civil Society.” Turkish Studies 11 (3): 429–444.10.1080/14683849.2010.506730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, R. Timothy and Craig R. Hullett. 2002. “Eta Squared, Partial Eta Squared, and Misreporting of Effect Size in Communication Research.” Human Communication Research 28  (4): 612–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, Jürgen, and Berthold Rittberger. 2008. “Shifting Europe’s Boundaries: Mass Media, Public Opinion and Enlargement of the EU.” European Union Politics 9 (2): 243–267.10.1177/1465116508089087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya. 2008. “Turkey-EU Relations: Beyond the Current Stalemate.” Insight Turkey 10 (4): 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya. 2010. “Contesting for Turkey’s Political Centre: Domestic Politics, Identity Conflicts, and the Controversy over EU Membership.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 18 (3): 361–376.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya, and Şuhnaz Yilmaz. 2009. “Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey during the AKP Era.” Turkish Studies 10 (1): 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, Julie. 2011. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS Version 18. 4th ed. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pridham, Geoffrey. 2006. “European Union Accession Dynamics and Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Future Perspectives.” Government and Opposition 41 (3): 373–400.10.1111/goop.2006.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D., Robert Leonardi, and Raffaella Y. Nanetti. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saktanber, Ayşe. 2006. “Women and the Iconography of Fear: Islamization in Post-Islamist Turkey.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 32 (1): 21–31.10.1086/505890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 2000. “The Political Basis of Support for European Integration.” European Union Politics 1 (2): 147–171.10.1177/1465116500001002001
   Google Scholar
• Sarkissian, Ani, and Ş. İlgü Özler. 2012. “Democratization and the Politicization of Religious Civil Society in Turkey.” Democratization 20 (6): 1014–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier. 2004. “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy  11  (4): 661–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sever, Aysan and Rustem Erkan. 2004. The Dark Faces of Poverty, Patriarchal Oppression and Social Change: Female Suicides in Batman, Turkey. Working paper Issue 282. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Şimşek, Sefa. 2004. “The Transformation of Civil Society in Turkey: From Quantity to Quality.” Turkish Studies 5 (3): 46–74.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, Royce, and Bruce C. Straits. 1999. Approaches to Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, Nathalie. 2005. “Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or Anchor for Reform?” South European Society and Politics 10 (1): 73–83.10.1080/13608740500037973
   Google Scholar
• Toros, Emre. 2007. “Understanding the Role of Civil Society as an Agent for Democratic Consolidation: The Turkish Case.” Turkish Studies 8 (3): 395–415.10.1080/14683840701489274
   Google Scholar
• TSI  (Turkish Statistical Institute). 2015. Population and Demography. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/Start.do.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Way, Lucan A., and Steven Levitsky. 2007. “Linkage, Leverage, and the Post-Communist Divide.” East European Politics and Societies 21 (1): 48–66.10.1177/0888325406297134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zihnioğlu, Özge. 2013. “The ‘Civil Society Policy’ of the European Union for Promoting Democracy in Turkey: Golden Goose or Dead Duck?” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 13 (3): 381–400.10.1080/14683857.2013.814232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar