Partners at Paris? climate negotiations and transatlantic relations

References

• Backstrand, K., and O. Elgstrom. 2013. “The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader to ‘Leadiator’.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (10): 1369–1386. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.781781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cañete, M. A. 2015. “Speech by European Commissioner for Climate and Energy.” COP21, December 7.
   Google Scholar
• Clémençon, R. 2016. “The Two Sides of the Paris Climate Agreement: Dismal Failure or Historic Breakthrough?” Journal of Environment & Development 25 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1177/1070496516631362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2013. “Council Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy,” Foreign Affairs Council Meeting, Luxembourg, 24 June 2013. p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M. K. D. 2007. The European Diplomatic Corps: Diplomats and International Cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M. K. D. 2011. Security Integration in Europe: How Knowledge-Based Networks Have Transformed the European Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M. K. D. 2013. “Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later.” Review of International Studies 39 (1): 137–160. doi:10.1017/S0260210512000034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, M. K. D. 2017. The Politics of Crisis in Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, R. S. 2016. “The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors.” Global Environmental Politics 16 (3): 1–11. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E3, “Building the 2c Coalition: European Climate Diplomacy after Copenhagen,” E3 Discussion Paper, April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS and Commission. 2013. “EU Climate Diplomacy for 2015 and Beyond: Reflection Paper.” Nonpaper
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. O. 2016. “Three Conceptions of Global Political Justice,” Globus Research Papers, November.
   Google Scholar
• EU pavilion at COP 21. December 7, 2015. Participant Observation.
   Google Scholar
• EU pavilion at COP 21. December 8, 2015. Participant Observation.
   Google Scholar
• EU Pavilion at COP 21. 2015. High-Level Panel: What Needs to Happen in Paris? A Policy Response to Rise to the Challenge. 8 December. Paris. Participant Observation.
   Google Scholar
• EU Pavilion at COP 21. 2015. Practitioners Panel: Learning from INDC Preparations and Accelerating Implementation after Paris. December 8. Participant Observation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2005. ‘Winning the Battle against Global Climate Change’, Communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 9 February, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Supporting a Climate for Change: The EU and Developing Countries Working Together. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Africa Climate Briefing. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. The Paris Protocol – A Blueprint for Tackling Global Climate Change beyond 2020. 25 February. Brussels: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council.
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service. 2017. “Environment and Climate Change.” http://www.eeas.europa.eu/environment/gdn/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. doi:10.1162/002081898550789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Secretariat of the Council to Coreper. 2005. Green Diplomacy Network – Report on Results Achieved. May 27. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Green Diplomacy Network. 2005a. “Environmental Sustainability: What Is It and Why Is It Important?.” GDN’s e-Brochures, October 19.
   Google Scholar
• Green Diplomacy Network. 2005b. “International Chemicals Issues.” GDN’s e-Brochures, October 19.
   Google Scholar
• Green Diplomacy Network. 2006. “Maintaining Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity: A Prerequisite for Human Well-Being.” GDN’s e-Brochures, June 16.
   Google Scholar
• Groen, L., and A. Niemann. 2011. “EU Actorness and Effectiveness under Political Pressure at the Copenhagen Climate Change Negotiations,” Paper prepared for the Twelfth European Union Studies Association Conference Boston, Massachusetts, March 3–5, 2011. p. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, C., and F. Berkhout. 2010. “Learning the Hard Way? European Climate Policy after Copenhagen.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 52 (3): 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovi, J., T. Skodvin, and S. Aakre. 2013. “Can Climate Negotiations Succeed?.” Politics and Governance 1 (2): 138–150. doi:10.17645/pag.v1i2.96.
   Google Scholar
• Keleman, R. D., and D. Vogel. 2009. “Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (4): 427–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabey, N., L. Gallagher, and C. Born. 2013. Understanding Climate Diplomacy: Building Diplomatic Capacity and Systems to Avoid Dangerous Climate Change. London: E3G. October.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J. 1992. “Policy Learning and Failure.” Journal of Public Policy 12 (4): 331–354.339. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00005602.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen, A. 2015. “EU to Launch Diplomatic Offensive Ahead of Paris Climate Talks.” The Guardian 20 (January): 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. 2011. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthur, S. 2011. “The European Union’s Performance in the International Climate Change Regime.” European Integration 33 (6): 667–682. doi:10.1080/07036337.2011.606690.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. 2015. “From principals to pragmatism? The changing use of narratives in the EU’s climate diplomacy,” MA Thesis, College of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M., and A. Newsome. 2018. “Transatlantic Relations in Times of Uncertainty: Crises and EU-US Relations.” Journal of European Integration 40 (5): 505–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafhausen, F. 2015. Director General, Federal Ministry of Environment, Building and Nuclear Safety, Germany, EU Pavilion at COP 21, “Practitioners Panel: Learning from INDC preparations and accelerating implementation after Paris, December 8.
   Google Scholar
• Schaik, L. V. 2009. “The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy.” In The Sustainability of the EU’s Model for Climate Diplomacy,edited by Oberthur, Sebastian and Marc Pallemaerts. Brussels: VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaik, L. V., and S. Schunz. 2011. “Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm- or Interest-Driven Actor?” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (1): 169–186. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02214.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H. 2017. “Global Justice and Foreign Policy: The Case of the European Union,” GLOBUS Research Papers, February-May.
   Google Scholar
• Torney, D. 2013. “European Climate Diplomacy: Building Capacity for External Action.” The Finnish Institute for International Affairs Briefing Paper 141 (October): 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Urban Low Emission Development Strategies. 2015. Cities in Action – Update 2015: Low Emission Development in Brazil, India, Indonesia and South Africa. Bonn, Germany: Urban Low Emission Development Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar