From high judges to policy stakeholders: a public policy approach to the CJEU’s power

References

• Adam, C. 2016. The Politics of Judicial Review: Supranational Administrative Acts and Judicialized Compliance Conflict in the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, C. 2018. “Multilevel Conflict over Policy Application. Detecting Changing Cleavage Patterns.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K. 1998. “Who are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice.” International Organization 52: 121–147. doi:10.1162/002081898550572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, K. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K., and J. Vargas. 2000. “Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies: European Community Law and British Gender Equality Policy.” Comparative Political Studies 33. doi:10.1177/0010414000033004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M. 2014. “National Responses to European Court Jurisprudence.” West European Politics 37: 457–474. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.830464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. 2006. “Participation Through Law Enforcement.” Comparative Political Studies 39: 128–152. doi:10.1177/0010414005283220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burley, A.-M., and W. Mattli. 1993. “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.” International Organization 47: 41–76. doi:10.1017/S0020818300004707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C. J., M. Gabel, and C. Hankla. 2008. “Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice.” American Political Science Review 102: 435–452. doi:10.1017/S0003055408080350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C. J., M. Gabel, and C. Hankla. 2012. “Understanding the Role of the European Court of Justice in European Integration.” American Political Science Review 106: 214–223. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., and M. Chaves. 2012. “The Reference Points of EU Judicial Politics.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (1): 25–42. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.632125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichowski, R. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, L. 2002. Justice Contained. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conant, L. 2006. “Individuals, Courts, and the Development of European Social Rights.” Comparative Political Studies 39: 76–100. doi:10.1177/0010414005283218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2012. Resisting the European Court of Justice. West Germany’s Confrontation with European Law, 1949–1979. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliantonio, M. 2018. “The Role of NGOs in Environmental Implementation Conflicts: “Stuck in the Middle” between Infringement Proceedings and Preliminary Rulings?” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. 2018. “A Causal Loop? Understanding the Commission’s New Enforcement Approach in the Context of Non-Compliance with EU Law Even after CJEU Judgments.” Journal of European Integration 40: 769–784.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, G. 1995. “The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union.” International Organization 49: 171–181. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, G., D. R. Kelemen, and H. Schulz. 1998. “The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union.” International Organization 52: 149–176. doi:10.1162/002081898550581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, M.-P. F. 2004. “When Governments Go to Luxembourg : The Influence of Governments on the Court of Justice.” European Law Review 29: 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hanf, K., and F. Scharpf. 1978. Interorganizational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control. Michigan: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, C. 1992. “Who Goes to Court in Europe? an Analysis of Litigation against the European Community.” European Law Review 17: 104–125. doi:10.1080/1350176032000124069.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M. 2018a. “Why Some EU Institutions Litigate More Often than Others: Exploring Opportunity Structures and Actor Motivations in Horizontal Annulment Actions.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M. 2018b. “Power Shifts via the Judicial Arena: How Annulment Cases between EU Institutions Shape Competence Allocation.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (6): 1429-1445. doi:10.1111/jcms.12753.
   Google Scholar
• Haverland, M. 2000. “National Adaptation to European Integration: The Importance of Institutional Veto Points.” Journal of Public Policy 20 (1): 83–103. doi:10.1080/13501760210162366.
   Google Scholar
• Heindlmaier, A., and M. Blauberger. 2017. “Enter at Your Own Risk: Free Movement of EU Citizens in Practice.” West European Politics 40: 1198–1217. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1294383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilson, C. 2017. “Protest and Litigation against Nuclear Power in the 1970s: Exploring Political and Legal Opportunity Structure.” Paper presented at the CES Conference, Glasgow, July 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A. 2018a. “Is the Commission Levelling the Playing Field? Rights Enforcement in the European Union.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, T. 2018b. “How Long to Compliance? Escalating Infringement Proceedings and the Diminishing Power of Special Interests.” Journal of European Integration 40: 785–801.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., and M. Ramesh. 1995. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Toronto, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. A. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. R. 2011. Eurolegalism. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. R., and S. K. Schmidt. 2012. “Introduction – The European Court of Justice and Legal Integration: Perpetual Momentum?” Journal of European Public Policy 19: 1–7. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.632119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. P. 1986. “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 57–85. doi:10.1017/S000712340000380X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoepfel, P., C. Larrue, F. Varone, and M. Hill. 2007. Public Policy Analysis. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer-Hoppe, R. 2018. “The Relationship between ‘Luxemburg’ and European and National Administrative Bodies.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., and D. Naurin. 2016. “Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU.” International Organization 70: 377–408. doi:10.1017/S0020818316000047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. 1972. “Four Systems of Policy, Politics and Choice.” Public Administration Review 32 (4): 298–310. doi:10.2307/974990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, B., and R. Mayntz. 1991. Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Cconsiderations. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., and R. A. W. Rhodes, eds. 1992. Policy Networks in British Government. Wotton-under-edge: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D. S. 2015. An Ever More Powerful Court? the Political Constraints of Legal Integration in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, E., and M. W. Bauer. 2018. “Domestic Resistance against EU Policy Implementation: Member States Motives to Take the Commission to Court.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Mayoral, J., and A. Torres. 2018. “On Judicial Mobilization: Entrepreneuring for Policy Change at Times of Crisis.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• McCown, M. 2003. “The European Parliament before the Bench: ECJ Precedent and EP Litigation Strategies.” Journal of European Public Policy 10: 974–995. doi:10.1080/1350176032000148397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCown, M. 2009. “Interest Groups and the European Court of Justice.” In Lobbying in the European Union: Institutions, Actors, and Issues, edited by D. Coen and J. Richardson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., and A. B. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, H. 1986. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice. Dordrecht, Lancaster, Boston: Matinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. 1982. Policy Styles in Western Europe. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., and A. S. Sweet. 1998. European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., and F. Terpan. 2017. The Court of Justice of the European Union and the Politics of Law. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Actor Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. K. 2014. “Judicial Europeanisation: The Case of Zambrano in Ireland.” West European Politics 37 (4): 769–785. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.919775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, J. A., and H. J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solanke, I. 2011. “‘Stop the ECJ’?: An Empirical Analysis of Activism at the Court.” European Law Journal 17: 764–784. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00561.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A. 1999. “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance.” Comparative Political Studies 32 (2): 147–184. doi:10.1177/0010414099032002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A. 2011. “The European Court of Justice.” In The Evolution of EU Law, edited by P. Craig and G. De Burka, 121–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A., and T. Brunell. 2012. “The European Court of Justice, State Noncompliance, and the Politics of Override.” American Political Science Review 106: 204–213. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A., and T. Brunell. 2013. “Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the ECHR, the EU, and the WTO.” Journal of Law and Courts 1: 61–88. doi:10.1086/668499.
   Google Scholar
• Thierry, J. S., and D. S. Martinsen. 2018. “Lost in Translation: How Street-Level Bureaucrats Condition Union Solidarity.” Journal of European Integration 40: 6.
   Google Scholar
• Van Waarden, F. 1992. “Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks.” European Journal of Political Research 21 (1–2): 29–52. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00287.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. K. 2018. Marketcraft: How Governments Make Markets Work. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. H. H. 1991. “The Transformation of Europe.” The Yale Law Journal 100: 2403–2483. doi:10.2307/796898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q., ed. 1980. The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wind, M. 2010. “The Nordics, the EU and the Reluctance Towards Supranational Judicial Review.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 1039–1063. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02085.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, M., D. S. Martinsen, and G. P. Rotger. 2009. “The Uneven Legal Push for Europe: Questioning Variation When National Courts Go to Europe.” European Union Politics 10: 63–88. doi:10.1177/1465116508099761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar