Experimentalist governance beyond European Territorial Cooperation and cohesion policy: macro-regional strategies of the European Union (EU) as emerging ‘regional institutions’?

References

• Ágh, A. 2016. “The EU Strategy for the Danube Region.” In A ‘Macro-Regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence, edited by S. Gänzle and K. Kern, 145–168. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Balsiger, J. 2016. “The EU Strategy for the Alpine Region.” In A ‘Macro-Regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence, edited by S. Gänzle and K. Kern, 189–213. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. A Place-based Approach to Meeting European Union challenges and Expectations. Independent Report Prepared at the Request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Beazley, C. 2007. “An EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Making a Success of the 2004 Enlargement.” Baltic Rim Economies 6: 14.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström, A. 2013. Concept Note by PAC Education. Capacity-Building in the EUSBSR. Stockholm: Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., S. Zillmer, M. Toptsidou, and F. Holstein. 2015. Territorial Governance and Cohesion Policy. Luxembourg: Spatial Foresight.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and C. Radaelli. 2011. “The Politics of Governance Architectures: Creation, Change and Effects of the Eu Lisbon Strategy.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (4): 463–484. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.560069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charron, N., L. Dijkstra, and V. Lapuente. 2014. “Regional Governance Matters. Quality of Government within European Union Member States.” Regional Studies 48 (1): 68–90. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.770141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottey, A., ed. 1999. Subregional Cooperation in the New Europe. Building Security, Prosperity and Solidarity from the Barents to the Black Sea. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the Baltic Sea States. 5–6 March 1992. 1st Ministerial Session – Copenhagen Declaration Conference of Foreign Ministers of the Baltic Sea States. Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2013. Council Conclusions on the Added Value of Macro-Regional Strategies. Brussels, 14926/13. Brussels: Council of the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2014. Council Conclusions on the Governance of Macro-Regional Strategies. Brussels, 16207/14. Brussels: Council of the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Cugusi, B., and A. Stocchiero. 2016. “The European Union Strategy for the Adriatic-Ionian Region.” In A ‘Macro-Regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence, edited by S. Gänzle and K. Kern, 169–188. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dangerfield, M. 2016. “From Sub-Regionalism to Macro-Regionalism in Europe and the European Union.” In A ‘Macro-Regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence, edited by S. Gänzle and K. Kern, 25–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Debarbieux, B., M. F. Price, and J. Balsiger. 2015. “The Institutionalization of Mountain Regions in Europe.” Regional Studies 49 (7): 1193–1207. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.812784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., S. Hedin, P. Schmitt, and J. Sterling. 2010. “EU Macro-Regions and Macro-Regional Strategies – A Scoping Study.” Nordregio Electronic Working Paper 4. Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. 2010. “Baltic Sea, Danube and Macro-Regional Strategies – A Model for Transnational Cooperation in the EU?” Notre Europe Study and Research 86. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009a. Communication – Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. COM(2009) 248 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009b. Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication from the Commission Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Impact Assessment. COM(2009) final SEC(2009) 703. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010a. Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication from the Commission Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Impact Assessment. COM(2009)248 final SEC(2009) 703. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010b. Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication from the Commission Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region. Action Plan. COM(2010)715 final SEC(2010) 1489. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Commission Staff Working Document Accompanying the Communication from the Commission Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Adriatic and Ionian Region. Action Plan. COM(2014) 357 final SWD(2014) 190 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “New Role for Macro-regions in European Territorial Cooperation.” In Study Commissioned by DG Internal Policies. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016a. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of EU Macro-Regional Strategies. COM(2016) 805 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016b. Commission Staff Working Document - Accompanying the ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of EU Macro-Regional Strategies. SWD(2016) 443. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017. Report on the Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy Review. JOIN(2017) 18 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Communities. 1999. ESDP – European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg. Brussels: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Economic and Social Committee. 2013. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Concerning the Added Value of Macro-Regional Strategies. COM(2013) 468 final.Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2005. Resolution on the Future of the Northern Dimension. P6_TA(2005)0430. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2006. “From European Spatial Development to Territorial Cohesion Policy.” Regional Studies 40 (6): 667–678. doi:10.1080/00343400600868937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2010. “Beyond Lisbon: Soft European Spatial Planning.” disP – the Planning Review 46 (182): 14–24. doi:10.1080/02513625.2010.10557098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., and J. Mirtl. 2017. “Experimentalist Governance in a Multi-Level Environment. The EU’s Macro-Regional Strategies for the Baltic Sea and Danube Regions.” In The Rise of Common Political Order. Institutions, Public Administration and Transnational Space, edited by J. Trondal, 154–175. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S. 2017a. “Macro-Regional Strategies of the European Union (EU) and Experimentalist Design of Multi-Level Governance: The Case of the EU Strategy for the Danube Region.” Regional & Federal Studies 27 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/13597566.2016.1270271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S. 2017b. “Macro-Regional Strategies of the European Union, Russia and Multilevel Governance in Northern Europe.” Journal of Baltic Studies 48 (4): 397–406. doi:10.1080/01629778.2017.1305201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., D. Stead, F. Sielker, and T. Chilla. 2018. “Macro-Regional Strategies, Cohesion Policy, and Regional Cooperation in the European Union.” Political Studies Review. doi:10.1177/1478929918781982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., and K. Kern, eds. 2016a. A ‘Macro-Regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, J. 2014. Answers to the European Parliament Questionnaire to the Commissioner Designate Johannes Hahn European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. 2001. “The Governance Approach to European Integration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (2): 245–264. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetoo, S. 2018. “Experimentalist Governance to Foster Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region: A Focus on the ‘Turku Process.’” Sustainability 10 (8): 2685–2696. doi:10.3390/su10082685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B., and B. Rittberger. 2006. “The “Governance Turn” in EU Studies.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44: 27–49. Annual Review. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00642.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2015. “The External Face of Differentiated Integration: Third Country Participation in EU Sectoral Bodies.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 836–853. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1020836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuffen, D., B. Rittberger, and F. Schimmelfennig. 2013. Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2013. “Euro-Meso-Macro: The New Regions in Iberian and European Space.” Regional Studies 47 (8): 249–1266. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.602336. Accessed on March 5, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2016. “Territorial Cohesion: An EU Concept.” European Journal of Spatial Development 60. Available at: http://www.nordregio.org/publications/territorial-cohesion-an-eu-concept/.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C. 2011. “The Lisbonization of Eu Cohesion Policy: A Successful Case of Experimentalist Governance?” European Planning Studies 19 (3): 519–537. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., and P. Schmitt. 2012. “When Soft Spaces Harden: The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.” Environment and Planning A 44 (2): 263–280. doi:10.1068/a44188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2016. “Exploring European Union Macro-Regional Strategies through the Lens of Multilevel Governance.” In A ‘Macro-Regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence, edited by S. Gänzle and K. Kern, 75–98. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Plangger, M. 2018. “Building Something Beautiful with Stones: How Regions Adapt To, Shape and Transform the EU Opportunity Structure.” Regional & Federal Studies 28 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13597566.2017.1354851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F. 2016. Diagnostic Monitoring: An Overview with Application to Smart Specialization. Note to DG Regio, Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., and J. Zeitlin. 2008. “Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union.” European Law Journal 14: 271–327. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., and J. Zeitlin. 2012. “Experimentalism in the EU: Common Ground and Persistent Difference.” Regulation and Governance 6 (3): 410–426. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01157.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. 1996. “Examining the Present Euro-Polity with the Help of Past Theories.” In Governance in the European Union, edited by G. Marks, F. W. Scharpf, P. C. Schmitter, and W. Streeck, 121–150. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sielker, F. 2015. “New Approaches in European Governance? Perspectives of Stakeholders in the Danube Macro-Region.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 3 (1): 88–95. doi:10.1080/21681376.2015.1116957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sielker, F., and D. Rauhut. 2018. “The Rise of Macro-Regions in Europe.” In European Territorial Cooperation, edited by E. Medeiros, 153–169. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 1996. “The European Union and a Changing Europe: Establishing the Boundaries of Order.” Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (1): 5–28. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00558.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solly, A. 2016. “Place-Based Innovation in Cohesion Policy: Meeting and Measuring the Challenges.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 3 (1): 193–198. doi:10.1080/21681376.2016.1150199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D. 2011. “European Macro-Regional Strategies: Indications of Spatial Rescaling?” Planning Theory and Practice 12 (1): 163–167. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.545664.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. 2014. “European Integration and Spatial Rescaling in the Baltic Region: Soft Spaces, Soft Planning and Soft Security.” European Planning Studies 22 (4): 680–693. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.772731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, P. 2013. “Twenty Years of Governance: Where Does It Come From? What Is It? Where Is It Going?” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (6): 817–837. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.781818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. 2016. “EU Experimentalist Governance in Times of Crisis.” West European Politics 39 (5): 1073–1094. doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1181873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar