European Parliament resolutions—effective agenda setting or whistling into the wind?

References

• Allerkamp, D. K. (2014), “The Presidency Effect.” Dissertations—ALL, 139. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/139
   Google Scholar
• Anweg, R., and L. Nijzink. 1995. “Beyond the Two-Body Image: Minister and MPs.” Chapter 5 In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, edited by H. Doring, 152–178. Mannheim, Germany: Mannheim Center for European Social Research (MZES).
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., and M. S. Baratz. 1963. “Decisions and Non-Decisions: An Analytical Framework.” American Political Science Review 57 (3): 632–642. doi:10.2307/1952568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., C. Green-Pedersen, and B. D. Jones. 2006. “Comparative Studies of Policy Agendas.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 959–974. doi:10.1080/13501760600923805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braghiroli, S. 2014. “Voting on Russia in the European Parliament: The Role of National and Party Group Affiliations.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 (1): 58–81. doi:10.1080/14782804.2014.978747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, O., and C. Dri. 2014. “How Does the European Parliament Contribute to the Construction of the EU’s Interregional Dialogue?.” In Intersecting Inter-Regionalism. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, edited by F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, and F. Söderbaum. Vol. 7, 129–150. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, J., and E. Rogers. 1996. Agenda-setting. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• George, T., and G. Garrett. 1996. “Agenda Setting, Power Indices, and Decision Making in the European Union.” International Review of Law and Economics 16 (3): 345–361. doi:10.1016/0144-8188(96)00021-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J. 2011. Interest Representation in the European Union. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. 2002. “Constitutional Agenda-Setting through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam.” British Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 259–280. doi:10.1017/S0007123402000108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. D., F. Baumgartner, and J. C. Talbert. 1993. “The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 657–671. doi:10.2307/2938742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, D., D. Earnshaw, and N. Cowan. 1994. “Ripples or Waves: The European Parliament in the European Community Policy Process.” Journal of European Public Policy 1 (1): 27–52. doi:10.1080/13501769408406946.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. 2003. “Necessary, but Not Sufficient: Understanding the Impact of Treaty Reform on the Internal Development of the European Parliament.” Journal of European Public Policy 10 (6): 884–911. doi:10.1080/1350176032000148351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. 2012. “The Normalization of the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5): 635–645. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.646769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., and B. Oztas. 2017. “Leading the Band or Just Playing the Tune? Reassessing the Angedna Setting Powers of the European Commission.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (8): 1118–1150. doi:10.1177/0010414016666839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. 1999. “What Affects the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence? An Analysis of the Success of Ep Amendments.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (3): 521–538. doi:10.1111/jcms.1999.37.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A. 2002. “Moving beyond Procedure: An Empirical Analysis of European Parliament Legislative Influence.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (7): 784-813. doi:10.1177/0010414002035007002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, S., and J. Freese. 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 3rd Edition. Texas, USA: STATA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, I. 1995. “Private Members’ Initiatives and Amendments.” Chapter 14 In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, edited by H. Doring, 448–487. Mannheim, Germany: Mannheim Center for European Social Research (MZES).
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, A. 2003. “The Legislative Powers and Impact of the European Parliament.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (2): 227–247. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, B., and G. Tsebelis, eds. 2011. The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, B. E., and G. Tsebelis, Eds. 2010. The Role of Government in Legislative Agenda Setting. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reh, C., A. Heritier, E. Bressanelli, and C. Koop. 2011. “Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (9): 1112–1142. doi:10.1177/0010414011426415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. 2005. Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond the Nation State. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, T., and H. Rosenthal. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33: 27–43. doi:10.1007/BF03187594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. A Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. Revised edition (1975). USA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Selck, T., and B. Steunenberg. 2004. “Between Power and Luck: The European Parliament in the EU Legislative Process.” European Union Politics 5 (1): 25–46. doi:10.1177/1465116504040444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, J., and B. Rittberger. 2003. “Dynamics of Formal and Informal Institutional Change in the EU.” Journal of European Public Policy 10 (6): 858–883. doi:10.1080/1350176032000148342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. 1994. “The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter.” American Political Science Review 88 (1): 128–142. doi:10.2307/2944886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., and G. Garrett. 1997. “Agenda Setting, Vetoes and the European Union’s Codecision Procedure.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 3 (3): 74–92. doi:10.1080/13572339708420519.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, D. 2009. “Just a Lobbyist? the European Parliament and the Consultation Procedure.” European Union Politics 10 (1): 7–34. doi:10.1177/1465116508099759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlake, M. 1994. Modern Guide to the European Parliament. New York, NY: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar