Framing TTIP in the wake of the Greenpeace leaks: agonistic and deliberative perspectives on frame resonance and communicative power

References

• Barisione, M., and A. Ceron. 2017. “A Digital Movement of Opinion? Contesting Austerity through Social Media.” In Social Media and European Politics, edited by M. Barisione and A. Michailidou, 77–104. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barisione, M., and A. Michailidou, eds. 2017. Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., and C. Mahoney. 2008. “The Two Faces of Framing.” European Union Politics 9 (3): 435–449. doi:10.1177/1465116508093402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 2005. “From Demos to Demoi. Democracy across Borders.” Ratio Juris 18 (3): 293–314. doi:10.1111/14679337200500300.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 2007. Democracy across Borders. From Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. 2010. “Democratizing the Global Order: from Communicative Freedom to Communicative Power.” Review of International Studies 2010 (36): 431–447. doi:10.1017/S0260210510000094.
   Google Scholar
• Bouza García, L. 2015. Participatory Democracy Civil Society in the EU: Agenda-Setting and Institutionalisation. Houndsmills, Basingstoke. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bouza, L., and A. Oleart. 2018. “From the 2005 Constitution’s ‘permissive Consensus’ to TTIP’s ‘empowering Dissensus’: the EU as a Playing Field for Spanish Civil Society.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 14 (2): 87–104. doi:10.30950/jcer.v14i2.862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. 2018. The Circulation of Anti-austerity Protest. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1997. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by J. Bohman and W. Rehg, 67–91. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, M. 2014. Europeans and the Public Sphere: Communication without Community? Stuttgart: Ibidem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, M. 2016. “The ECI’s Contribution to the Emergence of a European Public Sphere.” In Bridging the Gap? Opportunities and Constraints of the European Citizens’ Initiative, edited by M. Conrad, A. Knaut, and K. Böttger, 64–80. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., and L. Parks. 2017. “The Connection between Parliamentary and Extra-parliamentary Opposition in the EU. From ACTA to the Financial Crisis.” Journal of European Integration 39 (4): 453–467. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1309038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., and G. Siles-Brügge. 2016. TTIP: the Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., and G. Siles-Brügge. 2017. “Why TTIP Is a Game-changer and Its Critics Have a Point.” Journal of European Public Policy 24 (10): 1491–1505. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1254273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., and J. Orbie. 2014. “The European Commission’s Neoliberal Trade Discourse since the Crisis: Legitimizing Continuity through Subtle Discursive Change.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 16: 149–167. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.12022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez, R. 2017. “TTIP: Contentious Market Regulation.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 859–874. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1372431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/14602466199301304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. 2004. “Communicative Power in Habermas’s Theory of Democracy.” European Journal of Political Theory 3 (4): 433–454. doi:10.1177/1474885104045914.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., and M. Ruge. 1965. “The Structure of Foreign News.” Journal of Peace Research 1: 64–90. doi:10.1177/002234336500200104.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W., and A. Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Duran Huet, P., and L. Eliasson. 2017. “Supporters’ Responses to Contested Trade Negotiations: the European Commission’s Rhetoric on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30 (5–6): 489–506. doi:10.1080/09557571.2018.1461807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, J., and K. Tuokko. 2017. “The European Citizens’ Initiative: the Territorial Extension of a European Political Public Sphere?” European Politics and Society 18 (2): 166–181. doi:10.1080/23745118.2016.1202234.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D., and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hübner, K., A. Deman, and T. Balik. 2017. “EU and Trade Policy-making: the Contentious Case of CETA.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 843–857. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1371708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutt, R. 2017. “The World’s Most Popular Social Networks, Mapped.” World Economic Forum, 20th March 2017. Accessed 15 November 2018. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/03/most-popular-social-networks-mapped/
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, K., H. Moe, and J. Svensson. 2008. “Habermas, Mouffe and Political Communication. A Case for Theoretical Eclecticism.” Javnost - The Public 15 (3): 5–22. doi:10.1080/1318222200811008973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., and P. Statham, eds. 2010. The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, F., and C. Roederer-Rynning. 2017. “Introduction: the New EU FTAs as Contentious Market Regulation.” Journal of European Integration 39 (7): 763–779. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1372430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., and K. Nicolaidis. 1999. “Who Speaks for Europe? the Delegation of Trade Authority in the EU.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (3): 477–501. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Oleart, A., and L. Bouza. 2018b. “Overcoming the Taboo: Disputes over European Values via the European Citizens’ Initiative.” In European Values: Challenges and Opportunities for EU Governance, edited by F. Foret and O. Calligaro, 157–173. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oleart, A., and L. Bouza. 2018a. “Democracy at Stake: Multipositional Actors and Politicization in the EU Civil Society Field.” Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (4): 870–887. doi:10.1285/i20356609v11i2p423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, T. 2013. “Internet-based Media, Europe and the Political Public Sphere.” Media, Culture and Society 35 (1): 97–104. doi:10.1177/0163443712464563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Soler, J. 2018. “The Last Will Be the First. A Study of European Issue Publics on Twitter.” Partecipazione E Conflitto 11 (2): 423–447. doi:10.1285/i20356609v11i2p423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, R. S., and A. Demidov. 2018. “Beyond the Brussels Bubble? National Civil Society Organisations in the European Union.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 14 (2): 56–67. doi:10.30950/jcer.v14i2.980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. 2017. “Transatlantic Investor Protection as a Threat to Democracy: The Potency and Limits of an Emotive Frame.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30 (5–6): 464–488. doi:10.1080/09557571.2018.1461805.
   Google Scholar
• Trenz, H.-J., M. Conrad, and G. Rosén. 2009. “Impartial Mediator or Critical Watchdog? the Role of Political Journalism in EU Constitution-making.” Comparative European Politics 7 (3): 342–363. doi:10.1057/cep.2008.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. 2017. “Intergovernmental Policy Makes Transnational Politics? the Unusually Transnational Politics of TTIP.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30 (5–6): 527–548. doi:10.1080/09557571.2018.1455639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. R., and J. Peterson. 2014. Parochial Global Europe: 21st Century Trade Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar