Cross-dimensional network of democracy promotion: public administration reform in post-Euromaidan Ukraine

References5

• Ademmer, E. 2017. Russia’s Impact on EU Policy Transfer to the post-Soviet Space. The Contested Neighbourhood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, T., Gunn, J., Lough, J., Lutsevych, O., Nixey, J., Sherr, J., Wolczuk K. 2017. “The Struggle for Ukraine”, Chatham House report, October
   Google Scholar
• Balabushko, O. “State Secretaries Reform in Ukraine. Attempt to Delineate Responsibilities between Ministers and Senior Civil Servants”, World Bank Group Policy Research Working Paper, WPS7702, June 2016
   Google Scholar
• Bátora, J., and P. Rieker. 2018. “EU-supported Reforms in the EU Neighbourhood as Organized Anarchies: The Case of post-Maidan Ukraine.” Journal of European Integration 40 (4): 461–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1467412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilous, A., and T. Tyshchuk, 2019. “Civil Service Reform in Ukraine: Patterns of Success in Reforming Institutions”, VoxUkraine and International Renaissance Foundation
   Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., and M. Haverlvand. 2012. Designing Case Studies. Explanatory Approaches in small-N Research. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkvadze, K. 2017. “Hitting the Saturation Point: Unpacking the Politics of Bureaucratic Reform in Hybrid Regimes.” Democratization 24 (4): 651–769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1247808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., and B. Lebanidze. 2017. “Coherence, Cohesiveness and Consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy.” In The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, edited by T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber, 189–199. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, S., and N. Shapovalova. 2017. “The European Neighbourhood Policy Promotion of Civil Society.” In The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, edited by T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber, 494–505. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Condrey, S., S. Slava-Prodan, P. Battaglio, and M. Palinchak. 2013. “Ukrainian Public Management: Top down or Bottom up Reform.” In Public Administration in Post-Communist Countries, edited by S. Liebert, S. E. Condrey, and D. Goncharov, 7–22. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• CPLR. 2017. “Activity Report for 2017”. Kyiv: Centre for Policy and Legal Reform
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., and V. Lapuente. 2017. V. Organizing Leviathan. Politicians, Bureaucrats and the Making of Good Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Encarnacion, O. 2011. “Assisting Civil Society and Promoting Democracy.” In Oxford Handbook of Civil Society, edited by M. Edwards, 469–479. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. “Commission Implementing Decision of 29. 04.2018modifying the Commission Decision C (2013) 859 of 20 November 2013 on the ENP Annual Action Programme 2013 in Favour of Ukraine to Be Financed from the General Budget of the European Union”. C 2906 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “Joint Proposal for Council Decision on the Union Position within the Association Council Established by the Association Agreement between the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and Its Member States, of the One Part and Ukraine, of the Other Part with Regard to the Adoption of a Recommendation on the Implementation of the EU-Ukraine Association Agenda”. JOIN 4 final.
   Google Scholar
• Foa, R., and G. Ekiert. 2017. “The Weakness of Post-communist Civil Society Reassessed.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (2): 419–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., and S. Lavenex. 2017. “Democracy Promotion by Functional Cooperation.” In The Routledge Handbook on the European Neighbourhood Policy, edited by T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber, 467–480. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., S. Lavenex, F. Schimmelfennig, T. Skripka, and A. Wetzel. 2015. Democracy Promotion by Functional Cooperation. The European Union and Its Neighbourhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2013. “What Is Governance?” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 26 (3): 347–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzymała-Busse, A., and P. Jones Luong. 2015. “The Peculiarities of Post-communist State-development: Institutional Consolidation and Elite Competition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, edited by S. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, L. Johan D., F. Nullmeier, and J. D. Stephens, 587–601. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn-Fuhr, I., and S. Worschech. 2014. “External Democracy Promotion and Divided Civil Society – The Missing Link.” In Civil Society and Democracy Promotion, edited by T. Beichelt, I. Hahn-Fuhr, F. Schimmelfennig, and S. Worschech, 11–42. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H., and R. Ortung, eds. 2016. Beyond the Euromaidan. Comparative Perspectives on Advancing Reform in Ukraine. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. 2011. “Civil Society in Post-communist Europe.” In Oxford Handbook of Civil Society, edited by M. Edwards, 135–145. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivashkina, V. 2016. “ID Stepanova: Pochemu Preemnikom Saakshvili Stal Zamestitel General Kravchenko I Kum Palitsy.” Strana. December 26.
   Google Scholar
• Kudelia, S. 2012. “The Sources of Continuity and Change of Ukraine’s Incomplete State.” Communist and Post-communist Studies 45 (3–4): 417–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langebein and Wolczuk. 2012. “Convergence without Membership? The Impact of the European Union in the Neighbourhood: Evidence from Ukraine.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (6): 863–881. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.614133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch, D. 2016. Assisting Reform in Post-communist Ukraine 2000-2012. The Illusions of Donors and the Disillusion of Beneficiaries. Stuttgart: Ibidem.
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, D. 2019. “Leaving like an Englishman: Assisting Institutional Reform in Post-communist Ukraine.” Development Policy Review 37 (1): 111–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2006. “Linkage and Leverage: Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change.” Comparative Politics 38 (4): 379–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20434008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S. 2008. “Counterfactuals and Case Studies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady, and D. Collier, 627–644. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LZI. 2017. “Shadow Report: Reforma Derzhavnoi Sluzhby”. Kyiv: Laboratoria Zakondodavchikh Initsiatyv
   Google Scholar
• LZI. 2019. “Tinyovy Zvit (Shadow Report): Gromadska Otsinka Reformy Derzhavnogo Upravlinnia”. Kyiv: Laboratoria Zakonodavchikh Initiatsiv
   Google Scholar
• Mathernova, K. 2019. “Ukraine and the European Union.” In Reforms in Ukraine after Revolution of Dignity, edited by I. Miklos and P. Kuhta, 144–160. Toronto: SAGSUR.
   Google Scholar
• Matsiuevskiy, Y. 2017. “Old Political Habits Die Hard in Ukraine”. Washington: PONARS
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, L., ed. 2013. Interviewing in Political Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Najem, M. 2015. “Get’ Rabstvo U Derzhsluzhbі: Єvrooptimіsti Proti Rіshennia Nacіonal’noi Rady Reform Shhodo Vіdklikannja Zakonu Pro Derzhavnu Sluzhbu”, Ukrainska Pravda, 21 September. Available at https://blogs.pravda.com.ua/authors/nayem/55ff95a2f2c4f/
   Google Scholar
• Nanivska, V. 2017. “Rozslild U Spravi Ukrainskix Reform: Chastyna 1”. Livy Bereg, May 10
   Google Scholar
• Nitsova, S., G. Pop-Eleches, and G. Robertson 2018. “Revolution and Reform in Ukraine: Evaluating Four Years of Reform.” PONARS Eurasia
   Google Scholar
• Panchuk, D., F. Bossuyt, and J. Orbie. 2017. “Fabienne Bossyut and Jan Orbie. “The Substance of EU Democratic Governance Promotion via Transgovernmental Cooperation with the Eastern Neighbourhood.” Democratization 24 (6): 1044–1065. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1271785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parandii, C., and B. Jarabik. 2018. “Civil Society and Ukraine’s Reform: Mission Exhausted? A Case Study of the Reanimation Package for Reforms.” In Civil Society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine. From Revolution to Consolidation, edited by N. Shapovalova and O. Olga Burlyuk, 183–211. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Popova, M., and D. Beers. 2020. “Non-revolution of Dignity for Ukraine’s Judges: Judicial Reform after the Euromaidan.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 28 (1): 113–142.
   Google Scholar
• Pravda, U. 2019. “Poroshenko Na Nacradі Reform Namagavsja Zavaliti Zakon Pro Derzhsluzhbu, Pіdtrimanij ЄS”, Ukrainska Pravda, September 21.
   Google Scholar
• Reanimation Package of Reforms. 2017a. “Reforms under the Microscope”. Kyiv: Sofia-A
   Google Scholar
• Reanimation Package of Reforms. 2017b. “Roadmap of Reforms in Ukraine”. Kyiv: RPR
   Google Scholar
• Reanimation Package of Reforms. 2019. “Sectoral Policy Briefs on Reforms in Ukraine”. Kyiv:RPR
   Google Scholar
• Richter, S., and N. Wunsch. 2019. “Money, Power, Glory: The Linkages between EU Conditionality and State Capture in the Western Balkans.” Journal of European Public Policy. advance online publication.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samokhvalov, V. 2006. “Ukraine and the Orange Revolution: Democracy or ‘Velvet Restoration.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 6 (2): 257–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850600694338.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. 2013. “Linkages and the Promotion of Democracy: The EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood.” Democratization 20 (4): 553–591. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.659014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and H. Scholtz. 2008. “EU Democracy Promotion in the European Neighbourhood: Political Conditionality, Economic Development and Transnational Exchange.” European Union Politics 9 (2): 187–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116508089085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapovalova, N., and O. Burlyuk. 2018. “Civil Society and Change in Ukraine post-Euromaidan: An Introduction.” In Civil Society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine. From Revolution to Consolidation, edited by N. Shapovalova and O. Burlyuk, 11–41. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shapovalova, N., and R. Youngs. 2012. “EU Democracy Promotion in the Eastern Neighbourhood: A Turn to Civil Society?”. Madrid: FRIDE
   Google Scholar
• Shymkiv, D. 2015. “Monitoring Progresu Refrom, U Kvartal 2015 Roku”. Kyiv: National Reform Council
   Google Scholar
• SIGMA. 2018. “Baseline Measurement Report: The Principles of Public Administration – Ukraine 2018”. OECD
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., S. Soule, H. Kriesi, and H. McCammon, eds. 2019. The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Soloneko, I. 2009. “External Democracy Promotion in Ukraine: The Role of the European Union.” Democratization 16 (4): 709–731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340903083851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solonenko, I. 2018. “Public Administration Reform in Ukraine: Hurdle Race with a Slow Start”. Berlin: DGAP
   Google Scholar
• Tolstrup, J. 2013. “When Can External Actors Influence Democratization? Leverage, Linkages and Gatekeeper Elites.” Democratization 20 (4): 716–742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.666066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukraine Crisis Media Centre. 2015a. “Stvorennia Professiynoi, Vysokooplachuvannoi Derzhavnoi Sluzhby E Krytychno Vazhlyvym”. Kyiv
   Google Scholar
• Ukraine Crisis Media Centre. 2015b. “Reforma Derzhavnoi Sluzhby I Ukhvalennia Profilnogo Zakonu Nemozhlyvi Bez Publichnoi Pidtrymky Pershykh Osib Derzhavy, Experty Ta Zhurnalisty”
   Google Scholar
• Ukrainy, V. R. 2015a. “Zasidannia Komitety Z Pytanii Derzhavnogo Budivnytstva, Regionalnoi Politky and Mistsevogo Samovriaduvannia”. July 15
   Google Scholar
• Ukrainy, V. R. 2015b. “Zasidannia Komitety Z Pytanii Derzhavnogo Budivnytstva”. October 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Ukrainy, V. R. 2015c. “Zasidannia Komitety Z Pytanii Derzhavnogo Budivnytstva”. October 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ukrainy, V. R. 2015d. “Zasidannia Komitety Z Pytanii Derzhavnogo Budivnytstva”. October 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ukrainy, V. R. 2015e. “Zasidannia Komitety Z Pytanii Derzhavnogo Budivnytstva”. October 30.
   Google Scholar
• Vasylyev, Y. 2016. “Two Years of Poroshenko’s Presidency: Dangerous Political Maneuvers Next to a Battlefield”. New Eastern Europe, June 27
   Google Scholar
• VoxUkraine, 2019. “iMoRe Focus: New Civil Service Legislation”, November
   Google Scholar
• VoxUkraine, 2020. “Medium-term Construction Planning and Competition Rules for Civil Servants”. iMoRe №123, January
   Google Scholar
• VoxUkraine, 2020b. “Evaluation of Public Servants: How to Avoid Making It the Instrument of Political Struggle”, March
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, A. 2016. “The Substance of EU Democracy Promotion: Conceptual Framework.” In The Substance of EU Democracy Promotion, edited by A. Wetzel and J. Orbie, 1–23. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. 2020. “Ukraine and the Oligarchs: Endless Delay of Reforms”, ECFR Commentary, May 13
   Google Scholar
• Zanuda, A., 2016. “Vidstavka Abromavichusa: Ne Dilom, a Slovom?”, BBC Украiна, February 3
   Google Scholar
• Zarembo, K., and L. Litra. 2019. “Ukraine. New Engines for Partnership.” In The Eastern Partnership a Decade On. Looking Back, Thinking Ahead, edited by S. Secrieru and S. Sinikukka, 28–42. Paris: ISS.
   Google Scholar