The Return of Intergovernmentalism? De-Europeanisation and EU Foreign Policy Decision-making

References

• Adler, E. 2002. “Constructivism and International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, and B. Simmons, 95–118. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. 2004. “Role Identity and the Europeanisation of Foreign Policy: A Political-cultural Approach.” In Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy, edited by B. Tonra and T. Christiansen, 81–98. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Badell, D. (2021). “The EU, Migration and Contestation: The UN Global Compact for Migration, from Consensus to Dissensus.” Global Affairs online
   Google Scholar
• Balfour, R., et al.. 2016. Europe’s Troublemakers: The Populist Challenge to Foreign Policy. Brussels: European Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Barbé, E., and P. Morillas. 2019. “The EU Global Strategy: The Dynamics of a More Politicized and Politically Integrated Foreign Policy.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (6): 753–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baun, M. J., and D. Marek, eds. 2013. The New Member States and the European Union: Foreign Policy and Europeanization. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. 2003. ““Going Native“ In Europe?” Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2): 209–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002239377.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. 2005. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59 (4): 801–826. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, O. 2019. “The Politicization of EU External Relations.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (5): 790–802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1478878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2019). “Council Conclusions,” 10341/1917 June. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10341-2019-INIT/en/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conceição-Heldt, E. da 2006. “Taking Actors‘ Preferences and the Institutional Setting Seriously: The EU Common Fisheries Policy.” Journal of Public Policy 26 (3): 279–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X06000572.
   Google Scholar
• Dyduch, J., and P. Müller. 2021. “Populism Meets EU Foreign Policy: The de-Europeanization of Poland´s Foreign Policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” Journal of European Integration 43 (5): 569–586.
   Google Scholar
• Elgström, O., and C. Jönsson. 2005. European Union Negotiations: Processes, Networks and Institutions. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elgström, O., and C. Jönsson,2000. “Negotiation in the European Union: bargaining or problem-solving?” Journal of European Public Policy 7(5): 684–704. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760010014902
   Google Scholar
• Franck, T. M. 2000. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., and R. O. Keohane, eds. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, E. 2009. The Europeanization of National Foreign Policy: Continuity and Change in European Crisis Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, N. 2020. “Germany in European Diplomacy: Minilateralism as a Tool for Leadership.” German Politics 29 (1): 25–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2018.1563891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 1993. “The Capability-expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31 (3): 305–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. 1966. “Obstinate or Obsolete? the Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe.” Daedalus 95 (3): 862–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S. C. 2019. “The Politics of Overlapping Organizations: Hostage-taking, Forum-shopping and Brokering.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (6): 883–905. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1512644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, P. T. 1995. “Two Paradigms of Negotiation: Bargaining and Problem Solving.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542 (1): 24–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716295542001003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. 2012. “Decision-making in Security and Defense Policy: Towards Supranational Inter-governmentalism?” Cooperation and Conflict 47 (4): 433–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712462770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupille, J. 1999. “The European Union and International Outcomes.” International Organization 53 (2): 409–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899550922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. 1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization 40 (1): 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, T., and D. Junge. 2009. “Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power?” European Union Politics 10 (4): 507–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509346780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lax, D. A., and J. K. Sebenius. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York and London: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, J. S. 1994. “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield.” International Organization 48 (2): 279–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. 2018. “Right-wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages.” Environmental Politics 27 (4): 712–732. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 2007. “Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (2): 122–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006296345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52 (4): 943–969. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibben, H. E. 2010. “Issue Characteristics, Issue Linkage, and States’ Choice of Bargaining Strategies in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (5): 694–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003748682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. 2000. “What Single Voice? European Institutions and EU-U.S. Trade Negotiations.” International Organization 54 (1): 103–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., and M. A. Vachudova. 2018. “Liberal Intergovernmentalism, Illiberalism and the Potential Superpower of the European Union.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (7): 1631–1647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalski, A., and A. Danielson. 2020. “Overcoming Dissent: Socialization in the EU’s Political and Security Committee in a Context of Crises.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 58 (2): 328–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C. (2020). “Strategic Autonomy for Europe - the Aim of Our Generation. Speech.” 28 September. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/09/28/l-autonomie-strategique-europeenne-est-l-objectif-de-notre-generation-discours-du-president-charles-michel-au-groupe-de-reflexion-bruegel/
   Google Scholar
• Monteleone, C. 2021. “Foreign Policy and De-Europeanization under the M5S-League Government: Exploring the Italian Behavior in the UN General Assembly.” Journal of European Integration 43 (5): 551–567 .
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2009. “Liberal Intergovernmentalism.” In European Integration Theory, edited by A. Wiener and T. Diez, 64–87. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moret, E. 2016. Effective Minilateralism for the EU: What, When and How. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Morillas, P. 2020. “Autonomy in Intergovernmentalism: The Role of De Novo Bodies in External Action during the Making of the EU Global Strategy.” Journal of European Integration 42 (2): 231–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1666116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, P., K. Pomorska, and B. Tonra. 2021. “Introduction: The Domestic Challenge to EU Foreign Policy-Making: From Europeanisation to de-Europeanisation?” Journal of European Integration 43 (5): 519–534.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall, S. 1992. European Political Co-operation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raik, K., and E. Rikmann. 2021. “Resisting Domestic and External Pressure Towards de-Europeanization of Foreign Policy? The Case of Estonia.” Journal of European Integration 43 (5): 603–618 .
   Google Scholar
• Raimondo, A., C. Tsardanidis, and S. Stavridis. 2021. “The Eurozone Crisis’ Impact: A De-Europeanization of Greek and Portuguese Foreign Policies?” Journal of European Integration 43 (5): 535–550.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. 2000. ““Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics.” International Organization 54 (1): 1–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. 2004. “Social Constructivism and European Integration.” In European Integration Theory, edited by A. Wiener and T. Diez, 159–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera Escartin, A. 2020. “Populist Challenges to EU Foreign Policy in the Southern Neighbourhood: An Informal and Illiberal Europeanisation?” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (8): 1195–1214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W. 1996. “Membership Matters: Limits of the Functional Approach to European Institutions.” Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (3): 404–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1988. “The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration.” Public Administration 66 (3): 239–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. 2006. “The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(4): 845–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2001. “The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.” International Organization 55 (1): 47–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801551414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2003. “Strategic Action in a Community Environment: The Decision to Enlarge the European Union to the East.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2): 156–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002239375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2004. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and D. C. Thomas. 2009. “Normative Institutionalism and EU Foreign Policy in Comparative Perspective.” International Politics 46 (4): 491–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szalai, P. (2019). “There Is No Real ‘European Foreign Policy’, Says Former EU Diplomat.” EurActiv.com, 14 June
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. C. 2009. “Explaining the Negotiation of EU Foreign Policy: Normative Institutionalism and Alternative Approaches.” International Politics 46 (4): 339–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2009.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. C. 2011. Making EU Foreign Policy: National Preferences, European Norms and Common Policies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.C. 2012. Still Punching Below its Weight? Coherence and Effectiveness in European Union Foreign Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(3): 457–474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. (2020). “On Foreign Policy, EU Has to Speak up – Even if It’s Not with One Voice.” Politico.eu, 1 October
   Google Scholar
• Tonra, B. 2001. The Europeanisation of National Foreign Policy: Dutch, Danish and Irish Foreign Policy in the European Union. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tonra, B. (2018). “Europeanisation and De-Europeanisation of EU Member State Foreign Policies: Mirror Image or Discrete Phenomenon?” Nortia. http://www.eufp.eu/europeanisation-and-de-europeanisation-eu-member-state-foreign-policies-mirror-image-or-discrete
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. New York/Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation/Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, T. 2021. “De-Europeanisation of Czech Policy Towards Eastern Partnership Countries under Populist Leaders.” Journal of European Integration 43 (5): 587–602.
   Google Scholar
• Woertz, E., and E. Soler I Lecha (2020). “Populism and Euro-Mediterranean Cooperation: The Barcelona Process 25 Years After.” Mediterranean Politics online
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R. Y., and C. Hill. 2012. National and European Foreign Policy: Towards Europeanization. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar