Reframing the language of human rights? Political group contestations on women’s and LGBTQI rights in European Parliament debates

References

• Benford, R.D., and D.A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T.A., and T. Risse. 2009. “Venus Approaching Mars? The European Union’s Approaches to Democracy Promotion in Comparative Perspective.” In Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law, edited by A. Magen, T. Risse, and M.A. McFaul, 34–60. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brack, N. 2018. Opposing Europe in the European Parliament. Rebels and Radicals in the Chamber. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bracke, S., and D. Paternotte. 2016. “Unpacking the Sin of Gender.” Religion & Gender 6 (2): 143–154. doi:10.18352/rg.10167.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, L. 2006. “Contesting Women’s Rights: Charting the Emergence of a Transnational Conservative Counter-network.” Global Society 20 (4): 491–520. doi:10.1080/13600820600929853.
   Google Scholar
• Chiva, C. 2019. “Overcoming Male Dominance? The Representation of Women in the European Parliament Delegations of the Post-Communist EU Member States.” In Gendering the European Parliament. Structures, Policies and Practices, edited by P. Ahrens and L. Rolandsen Agustín, 177–197. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Vlieger, P., and I. Tanasescu. 2012. “Changing Forms of Interactions between the European Commission and Interest Groups: The Case of Religious Lobbying.” Journal of European Integration 34 (5): 447–463. doi:10.1080/07036337.2011.595485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feliu, L., and F. Serra. 2015. “The European Union as a ‘Normative Power’ and the Normative Voice of the European Parliament.” In The European Parliament and Its International Relations, edited by S. Stavridis and D. Irrera, 17–34. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M.M. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism. Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debate in the United States and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (2): 304–344. doi:10.1086/378343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbagnoli, S. 2016. “Against the Heresy of Immanence: Vatican’s ‘Gender’ as a New Rhetorical Device against the Denaturalization of the Sexual Order.” Religion & Gender 6 (2): 187–204. doi:10.18352/rg.10156.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, A.E. 2014. “Champion of Human Rights: The European Parliament and the Helsinki Process.” Journal of Contemporary History 49 (2): 390–409. doi:10.1177/0022009413515537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilby, L., M. Koivusalo, and S. Atkins. 2020. “Global Health without Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights? Analysis of United Nations Documents and Country Statements, 2014–2019.” BMJ Global Health 2021 6 (3): e004659. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig, A. 2018. “Political Genderphobia in Europe: Accounting for Right-wing Political-religious Alliances against Gender-sensitive Education Reforms since 2012.” Zeitschrift für Religion, Gesellschaft und Politik 2 (2): 193–219. doi:10.1007/s41682-018-0026-x.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., A. Noury, and G. Roland. 2005. “Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (2): 209–234. doi:10.1017/S0007123405000128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and C.J. Wilson. 2002. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 956–989. doi:10.1177/001041402236310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlina, K. 2015. “Local Histories, European LGBT Designs: Sexual Citizenship, Nationalism, and “Europeanisation” in post-Yugoslav Croatia and Serbia.” Women’s Studies International Forum 49: 73–83. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2014.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., and E. Lombardo. 2020. “Opposition Strategies of Right Populists against Gender Equality in a Polarized European Parliament.” International Political Science Review: 019251212096395. Online First. doi:10.1177/0192512120963953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korolczuk, E. 2016. “The Vatican and the Birth of Anti-Gender Studies.” Religion & Gender 6 (2): 293–296. doi:10.18352/rg.10181.
   Google Scholar
• Korolczuk, E, and A. Graff. 2018. “Gender as ‘Ebola from Brussels’: The Anti-colonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43 (4): 797–821. doi:10.1086/696691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kováts, E., and M. Põim, eds. 2015. Gender as Symbolic Glue: The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-Gender Mobilizations in Europe. Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Budapest: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Kováts, E. 2018. “Questioning Consensuses: Right-Wing Populism, Anti-Populism, and the Threat of ‘Gender Ideology’.” Sociological Research Online 23 (2): 528–538. doi:10.1177/1360780418764735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhar, R., and D. Paternotte, eds. 2017. Anti-gender Campaigns. Mobilizing against Equality. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kulpa, R., and J. Mizielińska, eds. 2011. De-centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, E., P. Meier, and M. Verloo, eds. 2009. The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policymaking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, M., and R. Rubinstein. 1995. “Sampling in Qualitative Research. Rationale, Issues and Methods.” Research on Aging 17 (1): 89–113. doi:10.1177/0164027595171005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, D., and A. Werner. 2019. International Populism. The Radical Right in the European Parliament. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Mckenzie, L., and K.L. Meer. 2016. “Human Rights Conditionality in European Union Trade Negotiations: The Case of the EU–Singapore FTA.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (4): 832–849. doi:10.1111/jcms.12522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondo, E., and C. Close. 2018. “Morality Politics in the European Parliament. A Qualitative Insight into MEPs’ Voting Behaviour on Abortion and Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.” Journal of European Integration 40 (7): 1001–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Mos, M. 2018. “The Fight of the Religious Right in Europe: Old Whines in New Bottles.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 1 (3): 325–343. doi:10.1332/251510818X15395100277595.
   Google Scholar
• Mos, M. 2020. “Ambiguity and Interpretive Politics in the Crisis of European Values: Evidence from Hungary.” East European Politics 36 (2): 267–287. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1724965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternotte, D., and R. Kuhar. 2018. “Disentangling and Locating the “Global Right”: Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe.” Politics and Governance 6 (3): 6–19. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i3.1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puar, J. 2013. “Rethinking Homonationalism.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 45 (2): 336–339. doi:10.1017/S002074381300007X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawłuszko, M. 2021. “And if the Opponents of Gender Ideology are Right? Gender Politics, Europeanization, and the Democratic Deficit.” Politics & Gender 17 (2) 301–323 doi:10.1017/S1743923X19000576 . Online first.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger, L. 2016. The Voice of People(s): Deliberation and Negotiation in EP Committees. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2006. “Competition and Community: Constitutional Courts, Rhetorical Action, and the Institutionalization of Human Rights in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (8): 1247–1264. doi:10.1080/13501760600999557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootmaeckers, K. 2019. “Constructing European Union Identity through LGBT Equality Promotion: Crises and Shifting Othering Processes in the European Union Enlargement.” Political Studies Review 18 (3): 346–361. doi:10.1177/1478929919877624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootmaeckers, K, H. Touquet, and P. Vermeersch. 2016. “Introduction: EU Enlargement and LGBT Rights – Beyond Symbolism?” In The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics, edited by K Slootmaeckers, H. Touquet, and P. Vermeersch, 1–16. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verloo, M., and D. Paternotte. 2018. “The Feminist Project under Threat in Europe.” Politics and Governance 6 (3): 1–5. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i3.1736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharenko, E. 2020 Anti-gender mobilisations in Europe. Greens/EFA of the European Parliament https://heidihautala.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Anti-gender-Mobilisations-in-Europe_Nov25.pdf [22.8.2021]
   Google Scholar