The coral reefs of global governance: how formal IOs make informality work

References

• Abbott, Kenneth W., and Benjamin Faude. 2021. “Hybrid Institutional Complexes in Global Governance.” Review of International Organizations 13 (3): 397–426 .
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, Kenneth W, and Benjamin Faude. 2022. “Choosing Low-cost Institutions in Global Governance.” International Theory 17 (3): 263- 291.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, Kenneth W., Jessica F. Green, and Robert O. Keohane. 2016. “Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance.” International Organization 70 (2): 247–277. doi:10.1017/S0020818315000338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aked, N. H., and P. J. Gummett. 1976. “Science and Technology in the European Communities: The History of the Cost Projects.” Research Policy 5 (3): 270–294. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(76)90030-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, Christopher J., Uwe Puetter, and Dermot Hodson. 2015. The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastrict Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brummer, Chris. 2020. “A Theory of Everything: A Historically Grounded Understanding of Soft Law and the BIS.” In Promoting Global Monetary and Financial Stability, edited by Claessens Borio and McCauley Clement, and Shin, 112-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 1986. “EUREKA and the European Technology Community.” Communication from the Commission to the Council COM(86) (664).
   Google Scholar
• COST. 2011. “The Legal Status of COST.” European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research, http://www.cost-coa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2_the_legal_status.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Communities. 1981. “Letter from the President of the Council of the European Communities to the Foreign Ministers of the States Invited to Participate in Scientific and Technical Cooperation.” In European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research. Brussels: COST Secretariat, 47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, Luke, Okker Van Batenburg, Jean-Pierre Chevillot, Stefan Kuhlmann, Muhittin Oral, and Neville Reeve. 1999. Strategic Review of EUREKA: Building Europe’s Innovation Network. Brussels: EUREKA Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Jessica F. 2013. “Order Out of Chaos: Public and Private Rules for Managing Carbon.” Global Environmental Politics 13 (2): 1–25. doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Jessica F, and Jennifer Hadden. 2021. “How Did Environmental Governance Become Complex? Understanding Mutualism between Environmental NGOs and International Organizations.” International Studies Review 23 (4): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, Thomas, and Charles Roger. 2014. “Orchestration and Transnational Climate Governance.” The Review of International Organizations 9 (1): 59–82. doi:10.1007/s11558-013-9174-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Darren G., David A Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, and Michael J. Tierney. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heldt, Eugénia, and Henning Schmidtke. 2017. “Measuring the Empowerment of International Organizations: The Evolution of Financial and Staff Capabilities.” Global Policy 8 (August): 51–61. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Tobias Lenz, and Gary Marks. 2019. A Theory of International Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Raymond F. 1976. “The International Role of ‘Domestic’ Bureaucracy.” International Organization 30 (3): 405–432. doi:10.1017/S002081830001835X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2014). Organizational Progeny: Why Governments are Losing Control Over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine, Mareike. 2013. Informal Governance in the European Union: How Governments Make International Organization Work. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, Tobias, Jeanine Bezuijen, Liesbet Hooghe, and Gary Marks. 2015. “Patterns of International Organization: Task Specific Vs. General Purpose.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49: 131–156.
   Google Scholar
• Manulak, Michael W., and Duncan Snidal. 2021. “The Supply of Informal International Governance: Hierarchy Plus Networks in Global Governance.” In Global Governance in a World of Change, edited by Michael N. Barnett, Jon C.W. Pevehouse, and Kal Raustiala, 182-213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, Kerstin, and Anja Jakobi. 2010. Mechanisms of OECD Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, Stewart. 2015. “The New ‘New Multilateralism’: Minilateral Cooperation, but at What Cost?” Global Summitry 1 (2): 115–124. doi:10.1093/global/guv008.
   Google Scholar
• Pauwelyn, Joost, Ramses Wessel, and Jan Wouters. 2012. Informal International Lawmaking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, John. 1993. High Technology and the Competition State: An Analysis of the Eureka Initiative. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, John, and Margaret Sharp. 1998. Technology Policy in the European Union. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pevehouse, Jon C.W., Timothy Nordstrom, Roseanne W. McManus, and Anne Spencer Jamison. 2020. “Tracking Organizations in the World: The Correlates of War IGO Version 3.0 Datasets.” Journal of Peace Research 57 (3): 492–503. doi:10.1177/0022343319881175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesenhuber, Heinz. 2015. “A Truly European Project: Interview with Heinz Riesenhuber, Former Minister of Scientific Research for Germany.” In Making History: The EUREKA 30th Anniversary Report, 14–15. Brussels: Research Media.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, Charles B. 2020. The Origins of Informality: Why the Legal Foundations of Global Governance are Shifting, and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, Charles B., and Sam Rowan. 2021a. “Analyzing International Organizations: How the Concepts We Use Affect the Answers We Get.” The Review of International Organizations. doi:10.1007/s11558-021-09432-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger, Charles B., and Sam S. Rowan. 2021b. “The New Terrain of Global Governance: Mapping Membership and Fragementation across Formal and Informal IOs.” Paper presented at the ISA Annual Convention, USA: Las Vegas, Nevada (online).
   Google Scholar
• Roland, Jean-Luc. 1988. A Review of COST Cooperation since Its Beginnings. Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchettini, Antonio. 1974. “La Cooperation Européenne Dans le Domaine de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique.” Review Trimestrielle de Droit Européenne 10 (31): 449.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, Wayne. 1992. High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2019. “Differentiated Integration and European Union Politics.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Politics. Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/politics/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1142.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Randall W. 2013. “Informal Governance in International Organizations: Introduction to the Special Issue.” The Review of International Organizations 8 (2): 121–136. doi:10.1007/s11558-013-9168-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 2001. “Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UIA. 2019. Yearbook of International Organizations. 56th ed. Brussels: Union of International Associations.
   Google Scholar
• Vabulas, Felicity. 2019. “The Importance of Informal Intergovernmental Organizations: A Typology of Transnational Administration with Independent Secretariats.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration, edited by Diane Stone and Kim Moloney, 401-418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vabulas, Felicity, and Duncan Snidal. 2013. “Organization without Delegation: Informal Intergovernmental Organizations (Iigos) and the Spectrum of Intergovernmental Arrangements.” The Review of International Organizations 8 (2): 193–220. doi:10.1007/s11558-012-9161-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heumen, Lennaert, and Mechthild Roos. 2019. The Informal Construction of Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verdier, Pierre-Hugues. 2009. “Transnational Regulatory Networks and Their Limits.” Yale Journal of International Law 34 (1): 112–231.
   Google Scholar