The construction of the EU as a strategic entrepreneur:the internal-external-internal nexus

References

• Adelle, C., K. Biedenkopf, and D. Torney, eds. 2018. European Union External Environmental Policy: Rules, Regulation and Governance beyond Borders. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Barroso, J. M. D. (2010) State of the Union 2010, Speech, Strasbourg, 7 September, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-10-411_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, W. M., and J. Ege. 2016. “Bureaucratic Autonomy of International Organizations’ Secretariats.” JEPP 23 (7): 1019–1037.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W., S Eckhard, J. Ege, and C. Knill. 2017. “A Public Administration Perspective on International Organizations.” In International Bureaucracy: Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research, edited by Bauer M.W, C. Knill, and S. Eckhard, 1–12. London/New York: Palgrave MacMilland.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and R.H. Cox. 2016. “Ideas as Coalition Magnets: Coalition Building, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Power Relations.” JEPP 23 (3): 428–445.
   Google Scholar
• Bendiek, A., and H. Kramer. 2010. “The EU as a ‘Strategic’ International Actor: Substantial and Analytical Ambiguities.” European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (4): 453–474. doi:10.54648/EERR2010034.
   Google Scholar
• Biedenkopf, K., and F. Petri. 2021. “The European External Action Service and EU Climate Diplomacy: Coordinator and Supporter in Brussels and Beyond.” European Foreign Affairs Review 26 (1): 71–86. doi:10.54648/EERR2021007.
   Google Scholar
• Boin, A., M. Busuioc, and M. Groenleer. 2013. “Building European Union Capacity to Manage Transboundary Crises: Network or lead-agency Model?” Regulation & Governance 8 (4): 418–436. doi:10.1111/rego.12035.
   Google Scholar
• Bongardt, A., and F. Torres. 2022. “The European Green Deal: More than an Exit Strategy to the Pandemic Crisis, a Building Block of a Sustainable European Economic Model.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (1): 170–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, A. 2015. “Exporting Standards: The Externalization of the EU’s Regulatory Power via Markets.” International Review of Law and Economics 42: 158–173. doi:10.1016/j.irle.2014.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M. 2009. “The Evolution of Emissions Trading in the European Union–The Role of Policy Networks, Knowledge and Policy Entrepreneurs.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (3–4): 469–487. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2006. The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 2013. “A Global Actor past Its Peak?” International Relations 27 (3): 375–390. doi:10.1177/0047117813497299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H. 1982. “Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” JCMS 1-2: 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Conceição-Heldtda, E., and S. Meunier. 2014. “Speaking with a Single Voice: Internal Cohesiveness and External Effectiveness of the EU in Global Governance.” JEPP 21 (7): 961–979.
   Google Scholar
• Cottey, A. 2020. “A Strategic Europe.” JCMS 58 (2): 276–291.
   Google Scholar
• Damro, C. 2012. “Market Power Europe.” JEPP 19 (5): 682–699.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. 2014. “EU Actorness, Cohesiveness and Effectiveness in Environmental Affairs.” JEPP 21 (7): 1017–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Domorenok, E., P. Graziano, and L. Polverari. 2021. “Policy Integration, Policy Design and Administrative Capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy”.Policy and Society, 40(1): 58–78 doi:10.1080/14494035.2021.1930697.
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F. 1972. “Europe’s Role in World Peace.” In Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, edited by R. Mayne. London: Fontana/Collins and Chatham House: PEP, 32–47.
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F. 1973. “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence.” In A Nation Writ Large? Foreign-Policy Problems Before the European Community, edited by M. Kohnstamm and W. Hager, 1–21. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, C., S. Oberthür, and I. Von Homeyer. 2020. “The Covid-19 Crisis: A Critical Juncture for EU Climate Policy Development?” Journal of European Integration 42 (8): 1095–1110. doi:10.1080/07036337.2020.1853117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and A. D. James. 2015. “Understanding the Emergence of New Science and Technology Policies: Policy Entrepreneurship, Agenda Setting and the Development of the European Framework Programme.” Research Policy 44 (6): 1252–1265. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEAS (2016) Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf, accessed April 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, J. 2017. “Comparing the Autonomy of International Public Administrations: An ideal-type Approach.” Public Administration 95 (3): 555–570. doi:10.1111/padm.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. Communication from the Commission A Sustainable Europe for A Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development, (Commission's proposal to the Gothenburg European Council), Brussels, 15.5.2001, COM(2001)264 final
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2020. Circular Economy Action Plan: For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/circular-economy/new_circular_economy_action_plan.pdf, accessed June
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, A. 2020. “Developing the Circular Economy in the European Union.” In Circular Economy: Global Perspective, edited by S. K. In. Ghosh, 389–412. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch-Roy, O., D. Benson, and D. Monciardini. 2020. “Going around in Circles? Conceptual Recycling, Patching and Policy Layering in the EU Circular Economy Package.” Environmental Politics 29 (6): 983–1003. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1673996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. 2013. Strategy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friant, M. C., W.J. Vermeulen, and R. Salomone. 2021. “Analysing European Union Circular Economy Policies: Words versus Actions.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 27: 337–353. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., S. Obertür, and M. Mühleck. 2013. “European Union Actorness in International Institutions: Why the EU Is Recognized as an Actor in Some International Institutions, but Not in Others.” JCMS 51 (5): 849–865.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., and N. Sitter. 2015. “Soft Power with a Hard Edge: EU Policy Tools and Energy Security.” Review of International Political Economy 22 (5): 941–965. doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1008547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, L., and A. Niemann. 2013. “The European Union at the Copenhagen Climate Negotiations: A Case of Contested EU Actorness and Effectiveness.” International Relations 27 (3): 308–324. doi:10.1177/0047117813497302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C. 1990. “European Foreign Policy: Power Bloc, Civilian Model — or Flop?.” In The Evolution of an International Actor. Western Europe’s New Assertiveness, edited by R. Rummel, 31–55. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. 2010. “The EU as a Global Actor: Grand Strategy for a Global Grand Bargain?” JCMS 48 (3): 455–474.
   Google Scholar
• Jabko, N. 2006. Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W., and S. Meunier. 2010. “Europe and the Management of Globalization.” JEPP 17 (3): 299–317.
   Google Scholar
• Jankauskas, V., and S. Eckhard. 2019. “International Bureaucracies as Strategic Actors: How the Better Regulation Reform Strengthens the European Commission.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60 (4): 681–699. doi:10.1007/s11615-019-00189-3.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, E. Ana. 2017. “Resilience as the New EU Foreign Policy Paradigm: A Pragmatist Turn?” European Security 26 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1247809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C. 2009. “Liberty versus Security? EU Asylum Policy and the European Commission.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 5 (2): 148–170. doi:10.30950/jcer.v5i2.172.
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C. 2010. “The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the Lisbon Treaty: Commission Policy Entrepreneurship?” European Security 19 (2): 169–189. doi:10.1080/09662839.2010.531705.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. 2010. “Globalizing European Union Environmental Policy.” JEPP 17 (3): 335–349.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, A. 2003. “European’s Union’s Africa Policy: The Commission as Policy Entrepreneur in the CFSP.” The European Foreign Affairs Review 8 (2): 221. doi:10.54648/EERR2003014.
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. 1997. “From Policy Entrepreneur to Policy Manager: The Challenge Facing the European Commission.” JEPP 4 (3): 422–438.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. 2002. “The EU: A Global Military Actor?.” Cooperation and Conflict 37: 283–302.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S. “Transforming Ecological Modernization ‘From Within’ or Perpetuating It? The Circular Economy as EU Environmental Policy Narrative.” Environmental Politics. 2021. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltby, T. 2013. “European Union Energy Policy Integration: A Case of European Commission Policy Entrepreneurship and Increasing Supranationalism.” Energy Policy 55: 435–444. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” JCMS 40 (2): 235–258.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2009. “Global Europa: Mythology of the European Union in World Politics.” JCMS 48 (1): 67–87.
   Google Scholar
• Menz, G. 2013. “The European Commission as a Policy Entrepreneur in European Migration Policy Making.” Regions and Cohesion 3 (3): 86–102. doi:10.3167/reco.2013.030305.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S., and K. Nicolaïdis. 2006. “The European Union as a Conflicted Trade Power.” JEPP 13 (6): 906–925.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. 2007. “Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations.” JCMS 45 (4): 905–926.
   Google Scholar
• Nathalie, Tocci. 2016. “The Making of the EU Global Strategy.” Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 461–472. doi:10.1080/13523260.2016.1232559.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A. L., and E. Posner. 2016. “Transnational Feedbacks, Soft Law, and Preferences in Global Financial Regulation.” Review of International Political Economy 23 (1): 123–152. doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1104375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotná, T. 2017. “The EU as a Global Actor: United We Stand, Divided We Fall.” JCMS 55: 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., and C. Dupont. 2021. “The European Union’s International Climate Leadership: Towards a Grand Climate Strategy?” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (7): 1095–1114 doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.1918218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, M. 2009. “Paradoxes and Contradictions in EU Democracy Promotion in the Mediterranean: The Limits of EU Normative Power.” Democratization 16 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1080/13510340802575809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. R. 2015. “How Do Policy Entrepreneurs Influence Policy Change? Framing and Boundary Work in EU Transport Biofuels Policy.” Environmental Politics 24 (2): 270–287. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.976465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. 1999. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalim. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. 2010. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pircher, B. 2020. “The Council of the EU in Times of Economic Crisis: A Policy Entrepreneur for the Internal Market.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 16 (1): 65–81. doi:10.30950/jcer.v16i1.1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, T. (2011) The Treachery of Strategies: A Call for True EU Strategic Partnerships, Egmont Paper 45, http://aei.pitt.edu/32321/1/ep45.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rhinard, M. 2010. Framing Europe: The Policy Shaping Strategies of the European Commission. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters Publishing BV.
   Google Scholar
• Rietig, K., and C. Dupont. 2021. “Presidential Leadership Styles and Institutional Capacity for Climate Policy Integration in the European Commission.” Policy and Society,40 (1):. 19–36. doi:10.1080/14494035.2021.1936913.
   Google Scholar
• Schaik, L.van, and S. Schunz. 2012. “Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm- or interest-driven Actor?” JCMS 50 (1): 169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Schunz, S., and C. Damro. 2020. “Expanding Actorness to Explain EU External Engagement in Originally Internal Policy Areas.” JEPP 27 (1): 122–140.
   Google Scholar
• Schunz, S. 2021. “Analyzing the Effectiveness of European External Action.” In The External Action of the European Union, edited by Gstöhl S and S. Schunz, 134–147. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (2003). Legitimacy And/or Policy Effectiveness?: Network Governance and GMO Regulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(3), 321–338. 10.1080/1350176032000085333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.P. 2010. “Single Market, Global Competition: Regulating the European Economy in a Global Economy.” Jepp 17 (7): 936–953.
   Google Scholar
• Stavridis, S. 2008. “”Militarising” the EU: The Concept of Civilian Power Europe Revisite’.” The International Spectator, Italian Journal of International Affairs 36 (4): 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. 2017. “.” In Framing the EU Global Strategy: A Stronger Europe in a Fragile World. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. (2018) Towards a European Security and Defence Union: Was 2017 a Watershed? JCMS, 56. Annual Review, 131–141
   Google Scholar
• Toje, A. 2008. “The European Union as a Small Power, or Conceptualizing Europe’s Strategic Actorness.” European Integration 30 (2): 199–215. doi:10.1080/07036330802005425.
   Google Scholar
• Torney, D., and M.C.D. Cross. 2018. “Environmental and Climate Diplomacy: Building Coalitions through Persuasion.” In European Union External Environmental Policy: Rules, Regulation and Governance Beyond Borders, edited by Adelle C., K. Biedenkopf and D. Torney. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J., M. Marcussen, T. Larsson, and F. Veggeland. 2010. Unpacking International Organizations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. 2016. “Advances to the Study of International Public Administration.” JEPP 23 (7): 1097–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Vennesson, P. 2010. “Competing Visions for the European Union Grand Strategy.” European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (1): 57–75. doi:10.54648/EERR2010004.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. 2012. The Politics of Precaution: Regulating Health, Safety, and Environmental Risks in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Völker, T., Z. Kovacic, and R. Strand. 2020. “Indicator Development as a Site of Collective Imagination? The Case of European Commission Policies on the Circular Economy.” Culture and Organization 26 (2): 103–120. doi:10.1080/14759551.2019.1699092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warleigh –Lack, A., and B. Rosamond. 2010. “Across the EU Studies–New Regionalism Frontier: Invitation to a Dialogue.” JCMS 48 (4): 993–1013.
   Google Scholar
• Wendon, B. 1998. “The Commission as image-venue Entrepreneur in EU Social Policy.” JEPP 5 (2): 339–353.
   Google Scholar
• Wettestad, J. 2005. “The Making of the 2003 EU Emissions Trading Directive: An ultra-quick Process Due to Entrepreneurial Proficiency?” Global Environmental Politics 5 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1162/1526380053243477.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. 2014. “Europe as a Global Regulator? The Limits of EU Influence in International Food Safety Standards.” JEPP 21 (6): 904–922.
   Google Scholar
• Zeilinger, B. 2021. “The European Commission as a Policy Entrepreneur under the European Semester.” Politics and Governance 9 (3): 63–73. doi:10.17645/pag.v9i3.4102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar