Candidate turnover in EP- versus national elections: a new perspective on the second-order logic? A comparative analysis

References

• Adams, J., M. Clark, L. Ezrow, and G. Glasgow. 2006. “Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 513–529. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, S., J. M. Hansen, S. Hirano, and J. M. Snyder jr. 2007. “The Incumbency Advantage in US Primary Elections.” Electoral Studies 26 (3): 660–668. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2007.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bértoa, F. C., and T. Weber. 2019. “Restrained Change: Party Systems in Times of Economic Crisis.” The Journal of Politics 81 (1): 233–245. doi:10.1086/700202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomgaarden, H. G., D. Johann, and S. Kritzinger. 2016. “Voting at National versus European Elections: An Individual Level Test of the Second Order Paradigm for the 2014 European Parliament Elections.” Politics & Governance 4 (1): 130–144. doi:10.17645/pag.v4i1.472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchert, J., and K. Stolz. 2011. “Institutional Order and Career Patterns: Some Comparative Considerations.” Regional & Federal Studies 21 (2): 271–282. doi:10.1080/13597566.2011.530022.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. M., and M. S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417–439. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, E. 2005. The Extreme Right in Western Europe: Success or Failure?. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, R. 2014. “‘European Elections are Second-Order Elections’: Is Received Wisdom Changing?.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (6): 1194–1198. doi:10.1111/jcms.12187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, W. T. 2015. Career Behaviour and the European Parliament All Roads Lead Through Brussels?. OUP: Oxford. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716402.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, W. T. 2016. “First-Order Contests for Second-Order Parties? Differentiated Candidate Nomination Strategies in European Parliament Elections.” Journal of European Integration 38 (7): 807–822. doi:10.1080/07036337.2016.1200569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E., and S. B. Hobolt. 2012. “When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 246–268. doi:10.1177/1465116511434788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E., and S. B. Hobolt. 2020. Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Dodeigne, J. 2014. “(Re-)Assessing Career Patterns in Multi-Level Systems: Insights from Wallonia in Belgium.” Regional & Federal Studies 24 (2): 151–171. doi:10.1080/13597566.2013.865605.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H., and P. Manow 2019 “Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies.”. Development version.
   Google Scholar
• Ecevit, Y. A., and G. Kocapınar. 2018. “Do Party Lists Matter? Political Party Strategies in Legislative Candidate Nominations.” Parliamentary Affairs 71 (3): 697–716. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasso, V., and T. Nannicini. 2015. “So Closed: Political Selection in Proportional Systems.” European Journal of Political Economy 40: 260–273. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, R., and G. Rahat. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572540.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., and B. Hoyland. 2011. The Political System of the European Union. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. doi:10.1007/978-0-230-34418-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., and M. Marsh. 2007. “Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections.” The Journal of Politics 69 (2): 495–510. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00546.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., and C. E. De Vries. 2015. “Issue Entrepreneurship and Multiparty Competition.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (9): 1159–1185. doi:10.1177/0010414015575030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerner, J. M. 2019. “Adding Fuel to the Flames? Politicisation of EU Policy Evaluation in National Parliaments.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 60 (4): 805–821. doi:10.1007/s11615-019-00213-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignazi, P. 2006. Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Koskimaa, V., M. Mattila, A. Papageorgiou, and A. von Schoultz. 2021. “Revamping the Menu – or Just Offering What’s in Stock? Candidate List Volatility in Open-List PR Systems. Evidence from Finland.” European Political Science Review 13 (4): 449–466. doi:10.1017/S1755773921000175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees-Marshment, J. (ed.). 2012. Abingdom Handbook of Political Marketing. Routledge:Routledge. doi10.4324/9780203349908
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, F. 2022. “Talking About Europe? Explaining the Salience of the European Union in the Plenaries of 17 National Parliaments During 2006–2019.” European Union Politics 24 (2): 370–389. published online. doi:10.1177/14651165221143962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, M. 2020. “European Parliament Elections as Second-Order National Elections.” In Assessing the 2019 European Parliament Elections, edited by S. Kritzinger, C. Plescia, K. Raube, J. Wilhelm, and J. Wouters, 69–75. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780367816926-8.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E., and D. T. Studlar. 2004. “Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 87–108. doi:10.1017/S000712340300036X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. M. 2005. “Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success.” The American Political Science Review 99 (3): 347–359. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklin, E. 2014. “EU Politicisation and National Parliaments: Visibility of Choices and Better Aligned Ministers?.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 20 (1): 78–92. doi:10.1080/13572334.2013.871486.
   Google Scholar
• Muyters, G., and B. Maddens. 2023. “Explaining Candidate Turnover. Evidence from a Comparative Analysis in 10 European Established Democracies with a List-PR System.” European Political Science Review 1–20. online first: 05/01/2023). doi:10.1017/S1755773922000601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyters, G., G.-J. Put, and B. Maddens. 2022. “A Longitudinal Analysis of Party Level Candidate Turnover Drivers in the Flexible-List PR System of Flanders (Belgium) (1987–2019).” Acta Politica 58 (2): 266–284. published online 1-32. doi:10.1057/s41269-022-00243-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2005. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615955.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., and J. Lovenduski. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. Z., and Y. Schomer. 2013. “A Cross-National Analysis of Party Switching.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (1): 111–141. doi:10.1111/lsq.12005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plescia, C., J. Wilhelm, and S. Kritzinger. 2020. “First-Order Breakthrough or Still Second- Order? An Assessment of the 2019 EP Elections.” In Assessing the 2019 European Parliament Elections, edited by S. Kritzinger, C. Plescia, K. Raube, J. Wilhelm, and J. Wouters, 76–95. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780367816926-9.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, E. N., and J. A. Tucker. 2014. “Revisiting Electoral Volatility in Post-Communist Countries: New Data, New Results and New Approaches.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 123–147. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Put, G.-J., G. Muyters, and B. Maddens. 2021. “The Effect of Candidate Electoral Experience on Ballot Placement in List Proportional Representation Systems.” West European Politics 44 (4): 969–990. doi:10.1080/01402382.2020.1768664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C., and P. De Wilde. 2018. “The Opposition Deficit in EU Accountability: Evidence from Over 20 Years of Plenary Debate in Four Member States.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (1): 194–216. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehmert, J. 2022. “Party Elites’ Preferences in Candidates: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Political Behavior 44 (3): 1149–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results’.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. 2018. The European Parliament. London: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-40709-2.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. 2005. Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: OUP. doi:10.1093/0199273421.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Salvati, E. 2021. “The Persistent Dilemma of Supranational Representation. Framing the Weakness of the European Parliament’s Representative Function in Light of the Rise of Euroscepticism.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 30 (3): 445–460. published online. doi:10.1080/14782804.2021.1909543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2020. “Politicisation Management in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 27 (3): 342–361. doi:10.1080/13501763.2020.1712458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H. 2005. “The European Parliament Elections of June 2004: Still Second-Order?.” West European Politics 28 (3): 650–679. doi:10.1080/01402380500085962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., and E. Teperoglou. 2015. “The 2014 European Parliament Elections in Southern Europe: Second-Order or Critical Elections?.” South European Society & Politics 20 (3): 287–309. doi:10.1080/13608746.2015.1078271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., M. E. Valdini, and K. Suominen. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators Under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 437–449. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikk, A., and P. Köker 2015. “Candidate Turnover and Party System Change in Central and Eastern Europe.” ECPR General Conference paper, Montreal, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., and R. J. Bosker. 2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, K. 2003. “Moving Up, Moving Down: Political Careers Across Territorial Levels.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (2): 223–248. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudulich, L., and S. Trumm. 2017. “A Comparative Study of the Effects of Electoral Institutions on Campaigns.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 381–399. doi:10.1017/S0007123416000570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treib, O. 2014. “The Voter Says No, but Nobody Listens: Causes and Consequences of the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Elections.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (10): 1541–1554. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.941534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdini, M. E. 2012. “A Deterrent to Diversity: The Conditional Effect of Electoral Rules on the Nomination of Women Candidates.” Electoral Studies 31 (4): 740–749. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandeleene, A., and E. van Haute. 2021. “A Comparative Analysis of Selection Criteria of Candidates in Belgium.” Frontiers in Political Science 3 (777747). doi:10.3389/fpos.2021.777747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, S., and R. Zur 2023. “The Salience of European Integration is a Key Indicator of Far-Right Electoral Success.” LSE blogs, January 26
   Google Scholar