The European Union’s roles in global atmospheric governance: evolving towards a ‘spacifier’?

References

• Aggestam, L. 2006. “Role Theory and European Foreign Policy.” In The European Union’s Roles in International Politics, Concepts and Analysis, edited by O. Elgström and M. Smith, 11–29. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. 2021. “Role Theory and the Study of Leadership in EU External Action.” In The External Action of the European Union – Concepts, Approaches, Theories, edited by S. Gstöhl and S. Schunz, 40–53. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, S. 1998. The Development of the Climate Regime: Positions, Evaluations and Lessons. FNI Report 3/98. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., and O. Elgström. 2013. “The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader to ‘Leadiator’.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (10): 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belis, D., S. Schunz, D. Jayaram, and T. Wang. 2018. “Climate Diplomacy and the Rise of ‘Multiple Bilateralism’ Between China, India and the EU.” Carbon & Climate Law Review 12 (2): 85–97. https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2018/2/4.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, R., and O. Elgström. 2012. “Conflicting Role Conceptions? The European Union in Global Politics.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00157.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell, J. 2020 8 February. Embracing Europe’s Power. Project Syndicate. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/embracing-europe-s-power-by-josep-borrell-2020-02.
   Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B., Y. Qiu, N. Sinkovics, and W. Kürsten. 2021. “Qualitative Research: Extending the Range with Flexible Pattern-Matching.” Review of Managerial Science 15 (2): 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00451-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimmer, E. 2016. “Global Agenda: Navigating Contested Global Spaces.” New York: Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://www.cfr.org/blog/global-agenda-navigating-contested-global-spaces.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, G. 2015. “Global Justice.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-global.
   Google Scholar
• Caney, S. 2020. “Climate Justice.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-climate.
   Google Scholar
• CAT (Climate Action Tracker). 2021. EU. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Climalife. 2014. EU Proposal to Phase-Down HFCs Under the Montreal Protocol. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://climalife.dehon.com/eu-proposal-to-phase-down-hfcs-under-the-montreal-protocol.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 1982. Decision on the Consolidation of Precautionary Measures Concerning Chlorofluorocarbons in the Environment. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 1996. 1939th Council Meeting – Environment. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 1997. “Meeting Document. CONS/ENV/97/1 Rev.1.” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2019. Preparations for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Meetings (Santiago de Chile), 2-13 December Preparations for the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 12796/1/19 REV 1. Brussels, 9 October.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2021. Preparations for the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Meetings (Glasgow, 31 October-31 October) ‒ Council Conclusions. 12594/21. Glasgow, 31 October.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2022. Council Conclusions on EU Climate Diplomacy: Accelerating the Implementation of Glasgow Outcomes. 6120/22. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., and P. Pattberg. 2006. “Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics.” Global Governance 12 (2): 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01202006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie, D. L. 2015. “Still No Time for Complacency: Evaluating the Ongoing Success and Continued Challenge of Global Ozone Policy.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 5 (1): 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0199-3.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, D. L. 2020. “Ozone Regime.” In Essential Concepts of Global Environmental Governance, edited by J.-F. Morin and A. Orsini, 177–180. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Earsom, J., and T. Delreux. 2021. “Evaluating EU Responsiveness to the Evolution of the International Regime Complex on Climate Change.” International Environmental Agreements 21 (4): 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09541-8.
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2021. Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases 2021. 2 December. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/fluorinated-greenhouse-gases-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, E. O. 2016. Three Conceptions of Global Political Justice. GLOBUS Research Paper 1/2016. Oslo: ARENA.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. “Limiting Global Climate Change to 2° Celsius: The Way Ahead for 2020 and Beyond.” In COM, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Climate Action: Commission Proposes Significant Reduction in Emissions of Climate-Warming Fluorinated Gases. Press Release. 7 November. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_12_1180.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “The Paris Protocol – a Blueprint for Tackling Global Climate Change Beyond 2020.” In COM, 81. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2022a. EU at COP26 Climate Change Conference. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/climate-action-and-green-deal/eu-cop26-climate-change-conference_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2022b. “Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937.” In COM, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2022c. “Proposal for a Regulation on Substances that deplete the Ozone Layer and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1005/2009Proposal for a Regulation on Substances that deplete the Ozone Layer and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1005/2009.” In COM, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2023. Overview of Sustainable Finance. Accessed November 3, 2022.https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/overview-sustainable-finance_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 1988. “Presidency Conclusions.” Rhodes, December 2-3.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 1990. Conclusions of the Presidency. Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World. Brussels: European Security Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the EU. 2014. Regulation on Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006. Brussels, April16.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the EU. 2023a. Regulation 2023/956 Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. L 130/52. Brussels, 16 May.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the EU. 2023b. Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on the Making Available on the Union Market and the Export from the Union of Certain Commodities and Products Associated with Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010. L 150/206. Brussels, 9 June.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action – a Stronger Europe: A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Brussels, June.
   Google Scholar
• G-20. 2021. G20 Rome Leaders’ Declaration. Rome, October 31.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, A. 2020. Stars with Stripes: The Essential Partnership Between the European Union and the United States. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. 2019. “Making Sense on Its Own Terms – India in the HFC and Aviation Negotiations.” In India in a Warming World, edited by N.K. Dubash, 230–249. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2017. Ministerial Meeting on Climate Action Co-Chairs Summary. 16 September. Accessed November 3, 2022. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/news/2017/09/ministerial_meetingonclimateaction.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, M., and J. Gupta, eds. 2000. “Leadership.” Climate Change and European Leadership: A Sustainable Role for Europe?, 15–24. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. 1990. “The European Community and the Protection of the Ozone Layer.” Journal of Common Market Studies 28 (3): 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1990.tb00367.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. 2010. “Globalizing European Union Environmental Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (3): 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003662065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, S. 2006. “Interpreted Values: A Normative Reading of EU Role Conceptions and Performance.” In The European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, edited by O. Elgström and M. Smith, 47–65. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Naess, T. 2004. “The Effectiveness of the EU’s Ozone Policy.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4 (1): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INEA.0000019051.06627.2e.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. 1999. “The EU as an International Actor: The Protection of the Ozone Layer.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (4): 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., and L. Groen. 2017. “The European Union and the Paris Agreement: Leader, Mediator, or Bystander?” WIREs Climate Change 8 (1): e445. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.445.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, K., and C. Verkuijl. 2016. “‘Ozone Family’ Delivers Landmark Deal for the Climate.” Environmental Policy and Law 46 (6): 371–375.
   Google Scholar
• Schunz, S. 2014. European Union Foreign Policy and the Global Climate Regime. Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schunz, S. 2019. “The European Union’s Environmental Foreign Policy: From Planning to a Strategy?” International Politics 56 (3): 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0130-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunz, S. 2022. “The ‘European Green Deal’ – a Paradigm Shift? Transformations in the European Union’s Sustainability Meta-Discourse.” Political Research Exchange 4 (1): 2085121. https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2022.2085121.
   Google Scholar
• Schunz, S., B. De Botselier, and S. Lopéz Piqueres. 2020. “The European Union’s Diplomacy: Protecting Non-Human Nature?” In Non-Human Nature in World Politics: Theory and Practice, edited by C. Pereira Castro and A. Saramago, 235–259. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2022. Report of the Thirty-Fourth Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer. UNEP/OzL.Pro.34/9. Montreal, 9 November.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schaik, L., and S. Schunz. 2012. “Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm- or Interest-Driven Actor?” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (1): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02214.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler, J. 2001. “Future Directions: The Atmosphere as a Global Commons.” Atmospheric Environment 35 (13): 2427–2428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00127-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Lucke, F. 2021. “Principled Pragmatism in Climate Policy? The EU and Changing Practices of Climate Justice.” Political Geography 86:102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Lucke, F., T. Diez, S. Aamodt, and B. Ahrens. 2021. The EU and Global Climate Justice – Normative Power Caught in Normative Battles. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R., J. Connelly, and D. Liefferink, eds. 2017. The European Union in International Climate Change Politics. Still Taking a Lead?. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar