The European Union and the governance of contested Global Spaces

References

• Administrative Court of Cologne. 1978. “In Re Duchy of Sealand, Judgment of 3 May 1978.” International Law Reports 80: 683–688.
   Google Scholar
• Afionis, S. 2017. The European Union in International Climate Change Negotiations. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. 2006. “Role Theory and European Foreign Policy: A Framework of Analysis.” In The European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis, edited by O. Elgström and M. Smith, 18–21. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2014. “The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.” Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434268.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. 2023. Hidden Geopolitics: Governance in a Globalized World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Angelov, I. 2018. “Global Commons and Their Strategic Significance for the European Union and NATO.” Security & Future II (2): 67–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, R., and O. Elgström. 2012. “Conflicting Role Conceptions? The European Union in Global Politics.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8 (1): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00157.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodanksy, D. 2012. “What’s in a Concept? Global Public Goods, International Law, and Legitimacy.” The European Journal of International Law 23 (3): 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brimmer, E. 2016. “Global Agenda: Navigating Contested Global Spaces.” New York: Council on Foreign Relations, Accessed December 14, 2022. https://www.cfr.org/blog/global-agenda-navigating-contested-global-spaces.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S. 2018. “Geostrategies, Geopolitics and Ontological Security in the Eastern Neighbourhood: The European Union and the ‘New Cold War’.” Political Geography 62: 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadier, D. 2019. “The Geopoliticisation of the EU´s Eastern Partnership.” Geopolitics 24 (1): 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1477754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimni, B. S. 2021. “The Grotian Tradition, Grotian Moment, and Decolonization: A TWAIL Perspective.” Grotiana 42 (2): 252–276. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760759-42020001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christou, G. 2016. Cybersecurity in the European Union: Resilience and Adaptability in Governance Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coen, D., and T. Pegram. 2018. “Towards a Third Generation of Global Governance Scholarship.” Global Policy 9 (1): 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission on Global Governance. 1995. Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2016. “Implementation Plan on Security and Defence.” Brussels 14392 (16).
   Google Scholar
• Eggenschwiler, J., and J. Kulesza. 2020. “Non-State Actors as Shapers of Customary Standards of Responsible Behaviour in Cyberspace.” In Governing Cyberspace: Behaviour, Power and Diplomacy, edited by D. Broeders and B. van den Berg, 245–262. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative. 2021. Joint Communication on Strengthening the Eu's Contribution to Rules-Based Multilateralism. Brussels, JOIN(2021) Vol. 5, 17 February.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2016. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, ‘Shared Vision. Brussels, June.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2022. A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence. Brussels: The European Union, March.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichs, J., and F. Kratochwil. 2009. “On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology.” International Organization 63 (4): 701–731. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309990142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J., and E. Posner. 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, S. 2009. “‘Patchwork Power’ Europe: The EU’s Representation in International Institutions.” European Foreign Affairs Review 14 (3): 385–403. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2009028.
   Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle, D. 2019. “The Rule of Law and Maritime Security: Understanding Lawfare in the South China Sea.” International Affairs 95 (5): 999–1017. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerber, Th., and S. Lieberman, edited by. 2019. A European Space Policy: Past Consolidation, Present Challenges and Future Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I., and S. R. Ratner. 2021. “International Legal Argumentation: Practice in Need of a Theory International Legal Argumentation: Practice in Need of a Theory.” In Talking International Law: Legal Argumentation Outside the Courtroom, edited by I. Johnstone and S.R. Ratner, 3–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kadercan, B. 2015. “Triangulating Territory: A Case for Pragmatic Interaction Between Political Science, Political Geography, and Critical IR.” International Theory 7 (1): 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul, I., I. Grunberg, and M. A. Stern. 1999. “Defining Global Public Goods.” In Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, edited by I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, and M. A. Stern, 2–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, A. 1985. “The Common Heritage of Mankind: Utopia or Reality?” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 40 (3): 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070208504000302.
   Google Scholar
• Klabbers, J. 2021. International Law. 3rd edn ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D. 1983. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” In International Regimes, edited by S. D. Krasner, 1–21. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambach, D. 2022. “Space, Scale, and Global Politics: Towards a Critical Approach to Space in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 48 (2): 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021052100036X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambach, D., and C. Diehl. 2021. “Die Territorialisierung der Global Commons.” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 28 (2): 5–33. https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2021-2-5.
   Google Scholar
• Long, R. 2012. “The European Union and Law of the Sea Convention at the Age of 30.” In The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention at 30: Successes, Challenges and New Agendas, edited by D. Freestone, 37–47. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, A. L. 2011. “Promoting Critical Thinking and Inquiry Through Maps in Elementary Classrooms.” The Social Studies 102 (3): 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2010.538759.
   Google Scholar
• Nagan, W. P., and A. M. Haddad. 2012. “Sovereignty in Theory and Practice.” San Diego International Law Journal 13 (2): 429–520.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2019 3-4 December. “London Declaration.” North Atlantic Council, Accessed 14 December, 2022, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_171584.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Oduntan, G. 2012. Sovereignty and Jurisdiction in the Airspace and Outer Space: Legal Criteria for Spatial Delimitation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raspotnik, A. 2018. The European Union and the Geopolitics of the Arctic. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Reinicke, W. H. 2000. “The Other World Wide Web: Global Public Policy Networks.” Foreign Policy 117: 44–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149561.
   Google Scholar
• Research Highlight, Nature. 2018. “‘Mining’ Bitcoin Takes More Energy Than Mining Gold.” Nature 563 (7731): 296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M. 2018. The Maritime Turn in EU Foreign and Security Policies: Aims, Actors and Mechanisms of Integration. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Santosuosso, L. 2022. “The Last Frontier: Trends and Challenges Related to the Delineation of the Outer Limits of the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles.” In Trends and Challenges in International Law, edited by M. Arcari, I. Papanicolopulu, and L. Pineschi, 295–329. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sender, O., and M. Wood. 2016. “The Emergence of Customary International Law.” In Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking, edited by C. Brölmann and Y. Radi, 133–159. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sundahl, M. J. 2017. “Legal Status of Spacecraft.” In Routledge Handbook of Space Law, edited by R. S. Jakhu and P. S. Dempsey, 42–58. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 2016. “The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind.” In Research Handbook on Fundamental Concepts of Environmental Law, edited by D. Fisher, 306–334. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General. 2021. Our Common Agenda. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General. 2022. “At ‘Our Common Agenda’ Talks, Secretary-General Says Summits on Future, Sustainable Development Goals ‘Last, Best Chance’ to Manage, Solve Global Challenges.” Press Release, SG/SM/21399, 4 August.
   Google Scholar
• Vanstappen, N., and J. Wouters. 2017. “The EU and the Antarctic: Strange Bedfellows?” In Handbook on the Politics of Antarctica, edited by K. Dodds, A. D. Hemmings, and P. Roberts, 269–283. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Verellen, T. 2020. “European Sovereignty Now? A Reflection on What It Means to Speak of ‘European Sovereignty’.” European Papers 5 (1): 307–318.
   Google Scholar
• Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 1969. United Nations Treaties Series, 1155, 331.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler, J. 2012. “Global Commons Revisited.” Global Policy 3 (1): 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2011.00156.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warf, B., and S. Arias. 2009. “Introduction: The Reinsertion of Space in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” In The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by B. Warf and S. Arias, 1–10. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. 2012. “Building an International Regime Complex for the Arctic: Current Status and Next Steps.” The Polar Journal 2 (2): 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2012.735047.
   Google Scholar
• Žáková, G. 2018. “Cyberspace: Global Public Goods?” Acta Oeconomica Pragensia 26 (2): 68–82. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aop.602.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. 2018. “Contested Global Governance.” Global Policy 9 (1): 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar