Remote Sensing Contributions to the Scale Issue

References

• Ahern, F.J., D.N.N. Horler, J. Cihlar, W.J. Bennett, and E. MacAulay. 1983. “Digital Processing to Improve Classification Results at Resolutions of 5 to 50 Meters”. In Proceedings of the SPIE Symposium on Techniques for Extraction from Remotely Sensed Images. Rochester, NY, 16–19 August, pp. 153–170.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T.F.H., and T.W. Hoekstra. 1991. “Role of Heterogeneity in Scaling of Ecological Systems Under Analysis”. In Ecological Studies 86: Ecological Heterogeneity, J. Kolasa, and S.T.A. Pickett, eds. Springer-Verlag, pp. 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T.F.H., and T.B. Starr. 1982. Hierarchy Perspective for Ecological Complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 310 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Amrhein, C., and H. Reynolds. 1996. “Using Spatial Statistics to Assess Aggregation Effects”, Geographical Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Arbia, G., R. Benedetti, and G. Espa. 1996. “Effects of the MAUP on Image Classification”, Geographical Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P.M. 1997. “Selecting the Spatial Resolution of Airborne MSS Imagery for Small-Scale Agricultural Mapping”, International Journal of Remote Sensing. Vol. 18, No. 9, pp. 1903–1917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P.M., and P.J. Curran. 1995. “Defining an Optimal Size of Support for Remote Sensing Investigations”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 768–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bénié, G.B., and K.P.B. Thomson. 1992. “Hierarchical Image Segmentation Using Local and Adaptive Similarity Rules”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 13, No. 8, pp. 1559–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, B.J., and M.D. MacKenzie. 1995. “Effects of Sensor Spatial Resolution on Landscape Structure Parameters”, Landscape Ecology. Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, L., and S.J. Walsh. 1993. “Scale Dependencies of Vegetation and Topography in a Mountainous Environment of Montana”, The Professional Geographer, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, P.J., T.-H. Hong, and A. Rosenfeld. 1981. “Segmentation and Estimation of Image Region Properties Through Cooperative Hierarchical Computation”, IEEE Transactions on Systems. Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-11, No. 12, pp. 802–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M.M., P.A. Matson, C. Wessman, and J. Gamon. 1993. “Prospects for Scaling”. In Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe, Ehleringer, J.R. and C.B. Field, eds, Academic Press, pp. 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, C., and N.S.-N. Lam. 1997. “Understanding the Scale and Resolution Effects in Remote Sensing and GIS”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Quattrochi, D.A. and M.F. Goodchild, eds., pp. 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W.B., T.A. Spies, and G.A. Bradshaw. 1990. “Semivariograms of Digital Imagery for Analysis of Conifer Canopy Structure”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 34, pp. 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., and T. Maxwell. 1994. “Resolution and Predictability: An Approach to the Scaling Problem”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulombe, A., L. Charbonneau, R. Brochu et D. Morin. 1991. “L'apport de l'analyse texturale dans la définition de l'utilisation du sol en milieu urbain”, Journal canadien de télédétection, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• Csillag, F., 1997. “Quadtrees: Hierarchical Multiresolution Data Structures for Analysis of Digital Images”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Quattrochi, D.A. and M.F. Goodchild, eds, pp. 247–271.
   Google Scholar
• Cullinan, V.I., M.A. Simmons, and J.M. Thomas. 1997. “A Bayesian Test of Hierarchy Theory: Scaling Up Variability in Plant Cover from Field to Remotely-Sensed Data”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 12, pp. 273–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushnie, J.L., 1987. “The Interactive Effect of Spatial Resolution and Degree of Internal Variability Within Land-Cover Types on Classification Accuracies”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFries, R.S., J.R. Townshend, and S.O. Los. 1997. “Scaling Land Cover Heterogeneity for Global Atmosphere-Biosphere Models”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Quattrochi, D.A., and M.F. Goodchild. eds, pp. 231–246.
   Google Scholar
• Dionne, D., J.G. Boureau, M. Deshayes, D. Gratton et D.J. Marceau. 1996. “Étude de la résolution spatiale optimale dans un milieu forestier de moyenne montagne”, Bulletin de la Société française de photogrammétrie et télédétection. Vol. 141, 1996–1, pp. 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Dubé, P., G.J. Hay, and D.J. Marceau. 1998. “Voronoi Diagrams, Extended Area-Stealing Interpolation, and Tree-Crown Recognition: A Fuzzy Approach”. Proceedings of the Workshop on Automated Interpretation of High Spatial Resolution Digital Imagery for Forestry. February 10–12, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Ehleringer, J.R., and C.B. Field. 1993. Scaling Physiological Processes. Leaf to Globe. Academic Press, 388 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Forshaw, M.R.B., A. Haskell, P.F. Miller, D.J. Stanley, and J.R.G. Townshend. 1983. “Spatial Resolution of Remotely Sensed Imagery. A Review Paper”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 497–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin, M.J., 1999. “Spatial Statistics in Landscape Ecology”. In Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications, Klopatek, J.M., and Gardner, R.H., eds, Springer-Verlag, pp. 253–279.
   Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A.S., 1989. “Scale-Independent Spatial Analysis”. In Accuracy of Spatial Databases. Goodchild, M., S. Gopal, Eds, Taylor and Francis, pp. 221–228.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, J., and C.E. Woodcock. 1997. “Multiscale Vegetation Data for the Mountains of Southern California: Spatial and Categorical Resolution”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Quattrochi, D.A. and M.F. Goodchild, eds, pp. 141–168.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S.E., M.A. Wulder, and M.B. Lavigne. 1996. “Automated Derivation of Geographic Window Sizes for Use in Remote Sensing Digital Image Texture Analysis”, Computers and Geosciences, Vol. 22. No. 6. pp. 665–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S.E., W. Bowers, J. Hudack, and G. McDermid. 1992. “Estimating Structural Damage in Balsam Fir Stands Using Semivariance”. Proceedings of the 15th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, June, Vancouver, British Columbia, pp. 96–99.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S.E., and D.R. Peddle. 1990. “Classification of SPOT HRV Imagery and Texture Features”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 551–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedl, M.A., 1997. “Examining the Effects of Sensor Resolution and Sub-Pixel Heterogeneity on Spectral Vegetation Indices: Implications for Biophysical Modeling”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Quattrochi, D.A., and M.F. Goodchild, eds. pp. 113–139.
   Google Scholar
• Friedl, M.A., F.W. Davis, J. Michaelsen, and M.A. Moritz. 1995. “Scaling and Uncertainty in the Relationship Between the NDVI and Land Surface Biophysical Variables: An Analysis Using a Scene Simulation Model and Data from FIFE”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 54, pp. 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohn, R.C., 1998. Remote Sensing for Landscape Ecology. Lewis Publishers, 99 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, P., D.J. Marceau, and P.J. Howarth. 1992. “A Comparison of Spatial Feature Extraction Algorithms for Land-Use Classification with SPOT HRV Data”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 40, pp. 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., and D.A. Quattrochi. 1997. “Scale, Multiscaling, Remote Sensing, and GIS”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Quattrochi, D.A. and M.F. Goodchild, eds., pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gougeon, F.A. 1995. “A Crown-Following Approach to the Automatic Delineation of Individual Tree Crowns in High Spatial Resolution Aerial Images”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 274–284.
   Google Scholar
• Haggett, P., A.D. Cliff, and A. Frey. 1977. Locational Analysis in Human Geography, Locational Models. Edward Arnold, 605 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, G.J., 1993. Visualizing 3-D Texture: A Three Dimensional Structural Approach To Model Forest Texture. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Victoria, 81 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, G.J., and K.O. Niemann. 1994. “Visualizing 3-D Texture: A Three-Dimensional Structural Approach to Model Forest Texture”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, G.J., K.O. Niemann, and G.F. McLean. 1996. “An Object-Specific Image-Texture Analysis of H-Resolution Forest Imagery”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 55, pp. 108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, G.J., D.G. Goodenough, and K.O. Niemann, 1997. “Spatial Thresholds, Image-Objects, and Upscaling: A Multi-Scale Evaluation”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, G.J., and D.J. Marceau. 1998. “Are Image-Objects the Key For Upscaling Remotely Sensed Data?” Proceedings of the Modeling Complex Systems Conference, July 12–17, New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L., and B. Boots. 1996. “MAUP Effects in the Principal Axis Factoring Technique”, Geographical Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hyppänen, H., 1996. “Spatial Autocorrelation and Optimal Spatial Resolution of Optical Remote Sensing Data in Boreal Forest Environment”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 17, No. 17, pp. 3441–3452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irons, J.R., B.L. Markham, R.F. Nelson, D.L. Toll, D.L. Williams, R.S. Latty, and M.L. Stauffer. 1985. “The Effects of Spatial Resolution on the Classification of Thematic Mapper Data”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 1385–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P.G. 1995. “Scaling Processes and Problems”, Plant, Cell, and Environment, Vol. 18, pp. 1079–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinski, D.E., and J. Wu. 1996. “The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem and Implications for Landscape Ecology”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusaka, T., and Y. Kawata. 1991. “Hierarchical Classification of Landsat TM Image Using Spectral and Spatial Information”. Proceedings of IGARSS, June 3–6, Espoo, Finland, pp. 2187–2190.
   Google Scholar
• Latty, R.S., and R.M. Hoffer. 1981. “Computer-Based Classification Accuracy Due to the Spatial Resolution Using Per-Point Versus Per-Field Classification Techniques”. Symposium of Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data, pp. 384–392.
   Google Scholar
• Leckie, D., and F. Gougeon. 1998. International Workshop on Automated Interpretation of High Spatial Resolution Digital Imagery for Forestry, February 10–12, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S.A., 1992. “The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology”, Ecology, Vol. 73, pp. 1943–1967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau, D.J. 1999. “The Scale Issue in the Social and Natural Sciences”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Marceau, D.J. 1992. The Problem of Scale and Spatial Aggregation in Remote Sensing: An Empirical Investigation Using Forestry Data. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, 180 p.
   Google Scholar
• Marceau, D.J., and G.J. Hay. 1998. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Scaling and Modeling in Forestry: Applications in Remote Sensing and GIS, March 19–21, Montréal, Canada, Department of Geography, University of Montreal, 180 p.
   Google Scholar
• Marceau, D.J., P.J. Howarth, and D.J. Gratton. 1994a. “Remote Sensing and the Measurement of Geographical Entities in a Forested Environment; Part 1 : The Scale and Spatial Aggregation Problem”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau, D.J., D.J. Gratton, R. Fournier, and J.P. Fortin. 1994b. “Remote Sensing and the Measurement of Geographical Entities in a Forested Environment; Part 2: The Optimal Spatial Resolution”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marceau, D.J., P.J. Howarth, J.M.M. Dubois, and D.J. Gratton. 1990. “Evaluation of the Gray-Level Cooccurrence Matrix (GLCM) Method for Land-Cover Classification Using SPOT Imagery”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 513–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, B.L., and J.R.G. Townshend. 1981. “Land Cover Classification Accuracy as a Function of Sensor Spatial Resolution”. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 1075–1090.
   Google Scholar
• McNulty, S.G., J.M. Vose, and W.T. Swank. 1997. “Scaling Predicted Pine Forest Hydrology and Productivity Across the Southern United States”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Quattrochi, D.A., and M.F. Goodchild, eds., pp. 187–209.
   Google Scholar
• Meentemeyer, V., 1989. “Geographical Perspectives of Space, Time, and Scale”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 3, Nos. 3/4, pp. 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meentemeyer, V., and E.O. Box. 1987. “Scale Effects in Landscape Studies”. In Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance, M.G. Turner, ed., Springer-Verlag, pp. 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, A., and C.E. Woodcock. 1995. “The Influence of Scale and the Spatial Characteristics of Landscapes on Land-Cover Mapping Using Remote Sensing”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, R.V., C.T. Hunsaker, S.P. Timmins, B.L. Jackson, K.B. Jones, K.H. Ritters, and J.D. Wickham. 1996. “Scale Problems in Reporting Landscape Pattern at the Regional Scale”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill, R.V., D.L. De Angelis, J.B. Waide, and T.F.H. Allen. 1986. A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S. 1977. A Geographical Solution to Scale and Aggregation Problems in Region-Building, Partitioning and Spatial Modeling. Institute of British Geographers, Transactions, New Series, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 459–472.
   Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S., 1978. “An Empirical Study of Some Zone-Design Criteria”, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 10, pp. 781–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Openshaw, S., 1984. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography (CATMOG), No. 38, 40 p.
   Google Scholar
• Pax-Lenney, M., and C.E. Woodcock. 1997. “The Effect of Spatial Resolution on the Ability to Monitor the Status of Agricultural Lands”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 61, pp. 210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peddle, D.R., and S.E. Franklin. 1989. “High Resolution Satellite Image Texture for Moderate Relief Terrain Analysis”. Proceedings of IGARSS/12^th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Vol. 2, pp. 653–655.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, S.T.A., and P.S. White. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Academic Press, 472 p.
   Google Scholar
• Puech, C., 1994. “Thresholds of Homogeneity in Targets in the Landscape. Relationship with Remote Sensing”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 2421–2435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pultz, T.J., and R.J. Brown. 1987. “SAR Image Classification of Agricultural Targets Using First- and Second-Order Statistics”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• Quattrochi, D.A., and M.F. Goodchild. 1997. Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS. Lewis Publishers, 406 p.
   Google Scholar
• Raffy, M. 1992. “Change of Scale in Models of Remote Sensing: A General Method for Spatialization of Models”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 40, pp. 101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffy, M. 1993. Deuxième réunion sur les changements d'échelle dans les modèles de l'environnement et de la télédétection. Strasbourg, 17–19 mai. Groupement scientifique de télédétection spatiale, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Ramstein, G., and M. Raffy. 1989. “Analysis of the Structure of Radiometric Remotely Sensed Images”. International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 1049–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosswall, T., G. Woodmansee, and P.G. Risser. 1988. Scales and Global Change. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, F.G., and J.E. Sarno. 1976. Additional Studies of Forest Classification Accuracy as Influenced by Multispectral Scanner Spatial Resolution. ERIM 122700–4-R, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 49 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, F.G., W.A. Malila, J.E. Sarno, and R.F. Nalepka. 1977. “The Influence of Multispectral Scanner Spatial Resolution on Forest Feature Classification”. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 25–29 April, Ann Arbor, pp. 1279–1288.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D.C. 1994. Quantitative Ecology. Spatial and Temporal Scaling. Academic Press, 395 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sivapalan, M., and J.D. Kalma. 1995. “Scale Problems in Hydrology: Contributions of the Robertson Workshop”, Hydrological Processes, Vol. 9, pp. 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souriau, M. 1994. “Scaling and Physical Thresholds: The Case of Continental Topography”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, No. 12, pp. 2403–2408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Onge, B.A., and F. Cavayas. 1995. “Estimating Forest Stand Structure from High Resolution Imagery Using the Directional Variogram”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 16, No. 11, pp. 1999–2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J.B., E.T. Engman, R.A. Feddes, and Y. Kerr. 1996. Scaling Up in Hydrology Using Remote Sensing. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J.B., E.T. Engman, R.A. Feddes, and Y.H. Kerr. 1998. “Scaling Up in Hydrology Using Remote Sensing: Summary of a Workshop”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 181–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilton, J.C. 1991. “A Tool for Interactive Exploration of Hierarchical Segmentation”. Proceedings of IGARSS, June 3–6, Espoo, Finland, pp. 1099–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Townshend, J.R.G., and C.O. Justice. 1988. “Selecting the Spatial Resolution of Satellite Sensors Required for Global Monitoring of Land Transformations”, International Journal of Remote Sensing. Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 187–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, D.P., R. Dodson, and D. Marks. 1996. “Comparison of Alternative Spatial Resolutions in the Application of a Spatially Distributed Biogeochemical Model Over Complex Terrain”, Ecological Modeling, Vol. 90, pp. 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M.G., V.H. Dale, and R.H. Gardner. 1989. “Predicting Across Scales: Theory Development and Testing”, Landscape Ecology, Vol. 3, No. 3/4, pp. 245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S.J., R.V. O'Neill, W. Conley, M.R. Conley, and H.C. Humphries. 1991. “Pattern and Scale: Statistics for Landscape Ecology”. In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, eds, Springer-Verlag, pp. 17–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ustin, S.L., M.O. Smith, and J.B. Adams. 1993. “Remote Sensing of Ecological Processes: A Strategy for Developing and Testing Ecological Models Using Spectral Mixture Analysis”. In Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe, Ehleringer, J.R. and C.B. Field, eds. Academic Press, pp. 339–357.
   Google Scholar
• Visvalingam, M. 1991. “Areal Units and the Linking of Data: Some Conceptual Issues”. In Spatial Analysis and Spatial Policy Using Geographic Information Systems, L. Worrall, ed., Belhaven Press, pp. 12–37.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S.J., A. Moody, T.R. Allen, and D.G. Brown. 1997. “Scale Dependence of NDVI and Its Relationship to Mountainous Terrain”. In Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS, Quattrochi, D.A. and Goodchild, M.F., eds, Lewis Publishers, pp. 27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E.F. 1995. “Scaling Behavior of Hydrological Fluxes and Variables: Empirical Studies Using a Hydrological Model and Remote Sensing Data”. Hydrological Processes, Vol. 9. pp. 331–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, C.E., A.H. Strahler, and D.L.B. Jupp. 1988a. “The Use of Variograms in Remote Sensing: Part I. Scene Models and Simulated Images”. Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 25, pp. 323–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, C.E., A.H. Strahler, and D.L.B. Jupp. 1988b. “The Use of Variograms in Remote Sensing: Part II. Real Digital Images”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 25, pp. 349–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, C.E., and A.H. Strahler. 1987. “The Factor of Scale in Remote Sensing”, Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 21, pp. 311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., and O.L. Loucks. 1995. “From Balance of Nature to Hierarchical Patch Dynamics: A Paradigm Shift in Ecology”, The Quaterly Review of Biology, Vol. 70, pp. 439–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulder, M., and B. Boots. 1998a. “Local Spatial Autocorrelation Characteristics of Landsat TM Imagery of a Managed Forest Area”, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, under revision.
   Google Scholar
• Wulder, M., and B. Boots. 1998b. “Local Spatial Autocorrelation Characteristics of Remotely Sensed Imagery Assessed with the Getis Statistic”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 19, No. 11, pp. 2223–2231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar