Influence of Sampling Design Parameters on Biomass Predictions Derived from Airborne LiDAR Data

References

• Andersen, H.-E., Reutebuch, S.E., and McGaughey, R.J. 2006. “A rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods.” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 32(No. 5): pp. 355–366. doi:https://doi.org/10.5589/m06-030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascough Ii, J.C., Maier, H.R., Ravalico, J.K., and Strudley, M.W. 2008. “Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making.” Ecological Modelling, Vol. 219(No. 3–4): pp. 383–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson, P. 2000. “DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models.” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 33: pp. 111–118.
   Google Scholar
• Baldini, S., Berti, S., Cutini, A., Mannucci, M., Mercurio, R., and Spinelli, R. 1989. “Prove sperimentali di primo diradamento in un soprassuolo di pino marittimo (Pinus pinaster Ait.) originato da incendio: aspetti silvicolturali, di utilizzazione e caratteristiche della biomassa.” Annali Istituto Sperimentale Selvicoltura, Vol. 20: pp. 385–436.
   Google Scholar
• Bolstad, P., Jenks, A., Berkin, J., Horne, K., and Reading, W.H. 2005. “A comparison of autonomous, WAAS, Real-time, and post-processed Global Positioning Systems (GPS) accuracies in northern forests.” Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 22(No. 1): pp. 5–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/22.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Bouvier, M., Durrieu, S., Fournier, R.A., and Renaud, J.-P. 2015. “Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 156: pp. 322–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., and Lugo, A.E. 1984. “Biomass of tropical forests: A new estimate based on forest volumes.” Science (New York, N.Y.).), Vol. 223(No. 4642): pp. 1290–1293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.223.4642.1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Liska, R., and Saltelli, A. 2007. “The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling.” Ecological Modelling, Vol. 203(No. 1–2): pp. 167–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chave, J., Condit, R., Aguilar, S., Hernandez, A., Lao, S., and Perez, R. 2004. “Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 359(No. 1443): pp. 409–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., and McRoberts, R. 2016. Statewide mapping and estimation of vegetation aboveground biomass using airborne lidar, 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 4442–4444.
   Google Scholar
• Corona, P., and Fattorini, L. 2008. “Area-based lidar-assisted estimation of forest standing volume.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 38(No. 11): pp. 2911–2916. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CREM. 2009. Guidance on the development evaluation and application of environmental models (Technical Report). US Environmental Protection Agency. Available at http://www.epa.gov/crem/library/cred_guidance_0309.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, C., Senga Kiessé, T., Renaud, J.-P., Morneau, F., Rivoire, M., Santenoise, P., Longuetaud, F., Mothe, F., Hervé, J.-C., and Bouvet, A. 2013. Rapport final EMERGE sur les modèles de volumes. Projet ANR- 08-BIOE-003, Programme BIOE 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dik, E.J. 1984. “Estimating the wood volumes of standing trees in forestry practice.” Uitvoerig Verslag « De Dorschkamp » (Netherlands), Vol. 19: pp. 1–114.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, L., Huang, W., Johnson, K., Swatantran, A., McRoberts, R.E., and Dubayah, R. 2017. “Implications of allometric model selection for county-level biomass mapping.” Carbon Balance and Management, Vol. 12(No. 1): pp. 18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0086-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duplat, P., Perrotte, G., France, O.N., and Des, F. 1981. Inventaire et estimation de l’accroissement des peuplements forestiers. Office National Des Forêts.
   Google Scholar
• Durrieu, S., Véga, C., Bouvier, M., Gosselin, F., Renaud, J.-P., and Saint-André, L. 2015. “Optical remote sensing of tree and stand heights.” In Remote Sensing Handbook Vol II: Land Resources Monitoring, Modeling, and Mapping with Remote Sensing, edited by Prasad S. Thenkabail, Chapter: 17, 449–485. Boca Raton: CRC Press - Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Eid, T., Gobakken, T., and Næsset, E. 2004. “Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 19(No. 6): pp. 512–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580410019463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ene, L.T., Næsset, E., and Gobakken, T. 2016. “Simulation-based assessment of sampling strategies for large-area biomass estimation using wall-to-wall and partial coverage airborne laser scanning surveys.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 176: pp. 328–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Impact Assessment Guidelines (p. 92). SEC.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, J.Y., Liu, G.H., and Xu, S.L. 1996. “Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China.” Acta Ecologica Sinica, Vol. 16: pp. 497–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2015.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Fassnacht, F.E., Latifi, H., and Hartig, F. 2018. “Using synthetic data to evaluate the benefits of large field plots for forest biomass estimation with LiDAR.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 213: pp. 115–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraysse, J., and Cotten, L. 2008. Gestion de la fertilisation en fonction de l’exportation de biomasse. Sylvogene project, final report, 116–145.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, G.W., Magnussen, S., Wulder, M.A., and Niemann, K.O. 2011. “Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 115(No. 2): pp. 636–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobakken, T., and Næsset, E. 2008. “Assessing effects of laser point density, ground sampling intensity, and field sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 38(No. 5): pp. 1095–1109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobakken, T., and Næsset, E. 2009. “Assessing effects of positioning errors and sample plot size on biophysical stand properties derived from airborne laser scanner data.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 39(No. 5): pp. 1036–1052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/X09-025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, S., and Dubayah, R. 2011. “Advances in remote sensing technology and implications for measuring and monitoring forest carbon stocks and change.” Carbon Management, Vol. 2(No. 3): pp. 231–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.11.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawbaker, T.J., Keuler, N.S., Lesak, A.A., Gobakken, T., Contrucci, K., and Radeloff, V.C. 2009. “Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR‐optimized sampling design.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 114 (NO. G2):doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000870.
   Google Scholar
• Heurich, M., and Thoma, F. 2008. “Estimation of forestry stand parameters using laser scanning data in temperate, structurally rich natural European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests.” Forestry, Vol. 81(No. 5): pp. 645–661. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpn038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren, J., Nilsson, M., and Olsson, H. 2003. “Simulating the effects of lidar scanning angle for estimation of mean tree height and canopy closure.” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 29(No. 5): pp. 623–632. doi:https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounzandji, A., Jonard, M., Nys, C., Saint-André, L., and Ponette, Q. 2015. “Improving the robustness of biomass function: from empirical to functional approaches.” Annals of Forest Science, Vol. 72(No. 6): pp. 795–810. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0423-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Sun, G., Dubayah, R., Cook, B., Montesano, P., Ni, W., and Zhang, Z. 2013. “Mapping biomass change after forest disturbance: Applying LiDAR footprint-derived models at key map scales.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 134: pp. 319–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., Leckie, D., Gougeon, F., Yu, X., and Maltamo, M. 2008. “Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 29(No. 5): pp. 1339–1366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701736489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, F.A., and Hixon, H.J. 1952. “The most efficient size and shape of plot to use for cruising in old-growth Douglas-fir timber.” Journal of Forestry, Vol. 50: pp. 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Joly, D., Brossard, T., Cardot, H., Cavailhes, J., Hilal, M., and Wavresky, P. 2010. “Les types de climats en France, une construction spatiale.” Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography. http://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/23155, doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.23155.
   Google Scholar
• Junttila, V., Maltamo, M., and Kauranne, T. 2008. “Sparse Bayesian estimation of forest stand characteristics from airborne laser scanning.” Forest Science, Vol. 54: pp. 543–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Yu, X., Vastaranta, M., Hyyppä, H., Kukko, A., Holopainen, M., Heipke, C., et al. 2012. “An international comparison of individual tree detection and extraction using airborne laser scanning.” Remote Sensing, Vol. 4(No. 4): pp. 950–974. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4040950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E., and Schwyzer, A. 2001. Control survey of the terrestrial inventory. Swiss National Forest Inventory: methods and Models of the Second Assessment, edited by P. Brassel and H. Lischke, 114–124. Birmensdorf: WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kitahara, F., Mizoue, N., and Yoshida, S. 2010. “Effects of training for inexperienced surveyors on data quality of tree diameter and height measurements.” Silva Fennica, Vol. 44(No. 4): pp. 657–667. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, L., Korpela, I., Heiskanen, J., and Maltamo, M. 2011. “Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 115(No. 4): pp. 1065–1080. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laes, D., Reutebuch, S.E., McGaughey, R.J., and Mitchell, B. 2011. “Guidelines to estimate forest inventory parameters from lidar and field plot - Companion document to the Advanced lidar applications - Forest inventory modeling class.” Vol. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Larjavaara, M., and Muller Landau, H.C. 2013. “Measuring tree height: a quantitative comparison of two common field methods in a moist tropical forest.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 4(No. 9): pp. 793–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefsky, M.A., Harding, D., Cohen, W.B., Parker, G.G., and Shugart, H.H. 1999. “Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 67(No. 1): pp. 83–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00071-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexerød, N.L., and Eid, T. 2006. “An evaluation of different diameter diversity indices based on criteria related to forest management planning.” Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 222(No. 1–3): pp. 17–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Andersen, H.-E., and McGaughey, R. 2008. “A comparison of statistical methods for estimating forest biomass from light detection and ranging data.” Western Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 23(No. 4): pp. 223–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/23.4.223.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K., Treitz, P., Baldwin, K., Morrison, I., and Green, J. 2003. “Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests.” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 29(No. 5): pp. 658–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.5589/m03-025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looss, B., Janon, A., and Pujol, G. 2018. Sensitivity: Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Outputs. R package version 1.15.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sensitivity
   Google Scholar
• Magnussen, S., Nord-Larsen, T., and Riis-Nielsen, T. 2018. “Lidar supported estimators of wood volume and aboveground biomass from the Danish national forest inventory (2012–2016).” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 211: pp. 146–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, M., Fransson, J.E., and Holmgren, J. 2007. “Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse density of laser data.” Forest Science, Vol. 53: pp. 619–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltamo, M., Bollandsas, O.M., Næsset, E., Gobakken, T., and Packalen, P. 2011. “Different plot selection strategies for field training data in ALS-assisted forest inventory.” Forestry, Vol. 84(No. 1): pp. 23–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltamo, M., Eerikäinen, K., Packalén, P., and Hyyppä, J. 2006. “Estimation of stem volume using laser scanning-based canopy height metrics.” Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 79(No. 2): pp. 217–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpl007.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, H.A., and Dardenne, P. 1998. “Validation and verification of regression in small data sets.” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 44(No. 1–2): pp. 99–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00167-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRoberts, R.E., Chen, Q., Walters, B.F., and Kaisershot, D.J. 2018. “The effects of global positioning system receiver accuracy on airborne laser scanning-assisted estimates of aboveground biomass.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 207: pp. 42–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset, E. 1997. “Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data.” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 52(No. 2): pp. 49–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(97)83000-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset, E. 2002. “Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 80(No. 1): pp. 88–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset, E. 2004. “Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 19(No. 2): pp. 164–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580310019257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset, E. 2009. “Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 113(No. 1): pp. 148–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næsset, E., Bollandsås, O.M., and Gobakken, T. 2005. “Comparing regression methods in estimation of biophysical properties of forest stands from two different inventories using laser scanner data.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 94(No. 4): pp. 541–553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R., Krabill, W., and Tonelli, J. 1988. “Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 24(No. 2): pp. 247–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90028-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Nordkvist, K., Jonzén, J., Lindgren, N., Axensten, P., Wallerman, J., Egberth, M., et al. 2017. “A nationwide forest attribute map of Sweden predicted using airborne laser scanning data and field data from the National Forest Inventory.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 194: pp. 447–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, R.R., and Cook, R.D. 1984. “Cross-validation of regression models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 79(No. 387): pp. 575–583. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2288403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piedallu, C., and Gégout, J.C. 2005. “Effects of forest environment and survey protocol on GPS accuracy.” Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 71(No. 9): pp. 1071–1078. doi:https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.71.9.1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel, J.R., Béland, M., Caspersen, J., and Achim, A. 2018a. “A mathematical framework to describe the effect of beam incidence angle on metrics derived from airborne LiDAR: The case of forest canopies approaching turbid medium behaviour.” Remote sensing of environment, Vol. 209: pp. 824–834.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel, J.-R., Auty, D., De Boissieu, F., and Sánchez Meador, A. 2018b. lidR: Airborne LiDAR Data Manipulations and Visualisation for Forestry Applications. R package version 1.6.0, https://github.com/JeanRomain/lidR
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S. 2008. Global Sensitivity Analysis: the Primer. New-York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shaiek, O., Loustau, D., Trichet, P., Meredieu, C., Bachtobji, B., Garchi, S., and Aouni, M.H. 2011. “Generalized biomass equations for the main aboveground biomass components of maritime pine across contrasting environments.” Annals of Forest Science, Vol. 68(No. 3): pp. 443–452. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-011-0044-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snee, R.D. 1977. “Validation of regression models: methods and examples.” Technometrics, Vol. 19(No. 4): pp. 415–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1267881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobol′, I. M. 1974. The Monte Carlo Method. Popular Lectures in Mathematics, 72. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. (Order No. 767493; ERIC Number: ED184845).
   Google Scholar
• Strunk, J., Temesgen, H., Andersen, H.-E., Flewelling, J.P., and Madsen, L. 2012. “Effects of lidar pulse density and sample size on a model-assisted approach to estimate forest inventory variables.” Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 38(No. 5): pp. 644–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.5589/m12-052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantola, S., Giglioli, N., Jesinghaus, J., and Saltelli, A. 2002. “Can global sensitivity analysis steer the implementation of models for environmental assessments and decision-making?.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (Serra), Vol. 16(No. 1): pp. 63–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-001-0085-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomppo, E., Gschwantner, M., Lawrence, M., and McRoberts, R. E. 2010. National Forest Inventories. Pathways for Common Reporting. European Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Treitz, P., Lim, K., Woods, M., Pitt, D., Nesbitt, D., and Etheridge, D. 2012. “LiDAR sampling density for forest resource inventories in Ontario, Canada.” Remote Sensing, Vol. 4(No. 4): pp. 830–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4040830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J.C., Wulder, M.A., Varhola, A., Vastaranta, M., Coops, N.C., Cook, B.D., Pitt, D., and Woods, M. 2013. “A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach.” The Forestry Chronicle, Vol. 89(No. 6): pp. 722–723. doi:https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2013-132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M., Pitt, D., Penner, M., Lim, K., Nesbitt, D., Etheridge, D., and Treitz, P. 2011. “Operational implementation of a LiDAR inventory in Boreal Ontario.” The Forestry Chronicle, Vol. 87(No. 4): pp. 512–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2011-050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. 2000. Optics and Lasers: Including Fibers and Optical Waveguides (Vol. 5). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zanne, A. E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D. A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., Miller, R. B., Swenson, N. G., Wiemann, M. C., and Chave, J. 2009. Global wood density database. Dryad. Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10255/dryad, 235.
   Google Scholar
• Zolkos, S.G., Goetz, S.J., and Dubayah, R. 2013. “A meta-analysis of terrestrial aboveground biomass estimation using lidar remote sensing.” Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 128: pp. 289–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar