‘Sadly, Not All Love Affairs Are Meant To Be … ’ Attitudes Towards Interfaith Relationships in a Conflict Zone

References

• Ahern, F.M., et al.,1985. Familial resemblances for cognitive abilities and personality in an Egyptian sample. Personality and individual differences, 9, 155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Alston, J.P. McIntosh, W.A., and Wright, L.M., 1976. Extent of interfaith marriages among white Americans. Sociological analysis, 37, 261–264. doi: 10.2307/3710568
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C.R., 1987. Communicating under uncertainty. In: M.E. Roloff and G.R. Miller, eds. Interpersonal processes: new directions in communication research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 39–62.
   Google Scholar
• Biever, J.L., Bobele, M., and North, M.W., 1998. Therapy with intercultural couples: a postmodern approach. Counselling psychology quarterly, 11 (2), 181–188. doi: 10.1080/09515079808254053
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bright, J., 2000. A history of Israel – 4th edition. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L.M., McNatt, P.S., and Cooper, G.D., 2003. Ingroup romantic preferences among Jewish and non-Jewish White undergraduates. International journal of intercultural relations, 27 (3), 335–354. doi: 10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Statistics, Israel, 2013. Available from: http://www1.cbs.gov.il/reader/newhodaot/hodaa_template.html?hodaa=201311097.
   Google Scholar
• Cila, J. and Lalonde, R.N., 2013. Personal openness toward interfaith dating and marriage among Muslim young adults: the role of religiosity, cultural identity, and family connectedness. Group processes and intergroup relations. doi:1368430213502561.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. 2006. Interreligious unions in Canada. Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 11-008. Available from: http://wwwstatcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2006003/pdf/9478-eng.pdf [Accessed 1 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S.M. 1988. American assimilation or Jewish revival? Bloomington: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J.D. and Widman, T., 2002. The effect of group size on interfaith marriage among catholics. Journal for the scientific study of religion, 41 (3), 397–404. doi: 10.1111/1468-5906.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnan, H., 1990. Mixed marriage in comparative perspective: gender and power in Northern Ireland and Pakistan. Journal of comparative family studies, 21, 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etcheverry, P.E. Le, B., and Hoffman, N.G., 2012. Predictors of friend approval for romantic relationships. Personal relationships, 4, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Falicov, C.J., 1995. Training to think culturally: a multidimensional comparative framework. Family process, 34 (4), 373–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00373.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsoun, S.K. and Zacharia, C.E., 1997. Palestine and the Palestinians. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felmlee, D., 2003. Interaction in social networks. In: J. Delamater, ed. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Plenum, 389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Felmlee, D. and Sprecher, S., 2000. Romantic partners' perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal relationships, 7, 325–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, A.P., 2002. Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – a critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological bulletin, 128, 78–88. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, R.G., 2007. Guess who’s been coming to dinner? Trends in interracial marriage over the 20th century. The journal of economic perspectives, 21 (2), 71–90. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.2.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, S.O. and Brennan, K.A., 2001. Establishing and maintaining satisfaction in multicultural relationships. In: J.H. Harvey and A. Wenzel, eds. Close romantic relationships: maintenance and enhancement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, G.E., Lewis Jr, R., and Ford-Robertson, J., 2015. Most Americans are now opposed to laws against interracial marriage, but their behavior does not yet reflect these attitudes. [LSE US Centre]. Available from: http://bit.ly/1Hp0ROp [Accessed 23 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Goli, S., Singh, D., and Sekher, T.V., 2013. Exploring the myth of mixed marriages in India: evidence from a nation-wide survey. Journal of comparative family studies, 44 (2), 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M.M., 1964. Assimilation in American life: the role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haji, R. Lalonde, R.N. Durbin, A., and Naveh-Benjamin, I., 2011. A multidimensional approach to identity: religious and cultural identity in young Jewish Canadians. Group processes and intergroup relations, 14, 3–18. doi: 10.1177/1368430210370602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, T.M. and Kalbfleisch, P.J., 2000. Interracial dating: the implications of race for initiating a romantic relationship. Howard journal of communications, 11, 49–64. doi: 10.1080/106461700246715
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F., 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P.C. and Pargament, K.I., 2008. Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality: implications for physical and mental health research. American psychologist, 58 (1), 64–74. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A.B., 1950. Cultural factors in the selection of marriage mates. American sociological review, 15, 619–627. doi: 10.2307/2086915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, F. Wu, Z. Schimmele, C., and Myles, J., 2015. Cross-country variation in interracial marriage: a USA–Canada comparison of metropolitan areas. Ethnic and racial studies, 38 (9), 1591–1609. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2015.1005644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, K. and Chacon-Puignau, G., 1995. Assortative mating: sex differences in mate selection for married and unmarried couples. Human biology, 67, 111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner, K. and Kao, G., 2005. Interracial relationships and the transition to adulthood. American sociological review, 70 (4), 563–581. doi: 10.1177/000312240507000402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, D., 1998. Mixed marriages in Islam: an anthropological perspective on Pakistan. Journal of the anthropological society of Oxford, 29, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, M.C. Thiessen, D., and Young, R.K., 1996. Mate assortment in dating and married couples. Personality and individual differences, 21 (2), 217–221. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(96)00066-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, S.E., Birrell, B., and Heard, G., (2009). Intermarriage by birthplace and ancestry in Australia. People and place, 17 (1), 15–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lara, T., and Duba Onedera, J. (2008). Inter-religion marriages. In: J. Duba Onedera (Ed.), The role of religion and marriage and family counselling. New York: Taylor and Francis, 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Leeman, A.B., 2009. Interfaith marriages in Islam: an examination of the legal theory behind the traditional and reformist positions. Indiana law journal, 84, 742–771.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, H.J. Sabagh, G., and Thomes, M.M., 1957. Interfaith marriages. Social problems, 4, 329–335. doi: 10.2307/799290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loving v. Virginia, 388 US 1, 1967. FindLaw for legal professional. Available from: http://findlaw.com/us/388/1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Madek, C.A., 2005. Killing dishonor: effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk transnational law review, 29, 53.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S.K. and Markstrom-Adams, C., 1995. Attitudes on interfaith dating among Jewish adolescents contextual and developmental considerations. Journal of family issues, 16 (6), 787–811. doi: 10.1177/019251395016006006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. Bradford, L.J. Drzewiecka, J.A., and Chitgopekar, A.S., 2003. Intercultural dating patterns among young white U.S. Americans: have they changed in the Past 20 years? Howard journal of communications, 14 (2), 53–73. doi: 10.1080/10646170304270
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R.M., 2000. An exploratory study of interracial dating on a small college campus. Sociological viewpoints, 16, 46–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, J., 2009. The status of women under Islamic law and modern Islamic legislation, 3rd ed. Leiden Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Novkov, J., 2008. Racial Union: law, intimacy, and the White state in Alabama, 1865–1954. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, M.R. 2007. Personal relationships, personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center Report. 2010. The rise of intermarriage. Available from: http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/02/16/the-rise-of-intermarriage/.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Z., 1997. Breaking the racial barriers: variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990. Demography, 34 (2), 263–276. doi: 10.2307/2061704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Z., 2005. Breaking the last Taboo: interracial marriage in America. Contexts, 4 (4), 33–37. doi: 10.1525/ctx.2005.4.4.33
   Google Scholar
• Reich, W.A. Ramos, J.M., and Jaipal, R., 2000. Ethnic identity and interethnic dating in Portuguese young adults. Asian journal of social psychology, 3, 153–161. doi: 10.1111/1467-839X.00060
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, M.J. and Gee, C.B., 2008. Open communication and partner support in intercultural and interfaith romantic relationships: a relational maintenance approach. Journal of social and personal relationships, 25 (4), 539–559. doi: 10.1177/0265407508090872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter, M.D., Krause, J.M., and Stirlen, A., 2005. Intercouple dating on a college campus. College student journal, 39 (3), 449–455.
   Google Scholar
• Roer-Strier, D. and Ben Ezra, D., 2006. Intermarriages between Western women and Palestinian men: multidirectional adaptation processes. Journal of marriage and family, 68 (1), 41–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Root, M.P.P., 2001. Love’s revolution: Interracial marriage. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. and Rubin, I., 1995. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggi, S. 1998. Commodifying honor in female sexuality: honor killings in Palestine. Middle east report, 206, 12–15. doi: 10.2307/3012473
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, I., 2012. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Amsterdam Avenue, NY: Teachers college Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, H.C., Hood, K.B., and Wright, B.L., 2014. Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet effect (Driscoll, Davis, & Lipetz. 1972). Social psychology, 45 (3), 170–178. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, H.C. and Write, B.L., 2009. Social networks: effects on developed relationships. Encyclopedia of human relationships, 3, 1543–1548.
   Google Scholar
• Smooha, S., 1999. The advances and limits of the Israelization of Israel’s Palestinian citizens. In: K. Abdel-Malek and D.C. Jacobson, eds. Israeli and Palestinian identities in history and literature. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 9–33.
   Google Scholar
• Smooha, S., 2010. Arab-jewish relations in Israel: alienation and rapprochement. Peaceworks, 67, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• The Signal. 2013. The official student newspaper of Georgia State University. The Signal. Available from: http://www.gsusignal.com/news/ahmad-ghasmary-brings-awareness-about-honor-killings-1.2525158?pagereq=1#.UkpGr2TIyQY [Accessed 1 June 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L.T., 1951. The factor of religion in the selection of marriage mates. American sociological review, 16 (4), 487–491. doi: 10.2307/2088280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignoles, V.L. Schwartz, S.J., and Luyckx, K., 2011. Introduction: toward an integrative view of identity. In: Handbook of identity theory and research. New York: Springer, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R.S., 1994. Learning from strangers – the art and methods of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, R. Houston, S. Ellis, M. Holloway, S., and Hudson, M., 2003. Crossing racial lines: geographies of mixed-race partnering and multiraciality in the United States. Progress in human geography, 27 (4), 457–474. doi: 10.1191/0309132503ph444oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahya, S. and Boag, S., 2014a. ‘Till faith do us part … ’: the relation between religious affiliation and attitudes towards cross-cultural and interfaith dating and marriage. Marriage and family review, 50, 480–504. doi: 10.1080/01494929.2014.909376
   Google Scholar
• Yahya, S. and Boag, S., 2014b. ‘My family would crucify me!’: the perceived influence of social pressure on cross-cultural and interfaith dating and marriage. Sexuality and culture, 18 (4), 759–772. doi: 10.1007/s12119-013-9217-y
   Google Scholar
• Yahya, S. and Boag, S., n.d. When love meets God and Man: factors involved in cross-cultural and interfaith marriages. International Journal of Intercultural Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Yahya, S., et al., 2012. When education meets conflict: Palestinian and Jewish-Israeli parental attitudes towards peace promoting education. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320. doi: 10.1080/17400201.2012.698386
   Google Scholar