629
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Engaging in Reconciliation in Australia, and the Challenge of Institutional Reform

References

  • Anderson, P.J., Yip, S.Y., and Diamond, Z.M., 2023. Universities Australia 2017–2020 Indigenous Strategy: A Meta-Synthesis of the Issues and Challenges. Higher Education Research & Development, 42 (4), 785–800. doi:10.1080/07294360.2022.2123899.
  • Blommaert, J., 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610295.
  • Clark, T., de Costa, R., and Maddison, S., 2017. Non-Indigenous Australians and the ‘Responsibility to Engage’? Journal of Intercultural Studies, 38 (4), 381–396. doi:10.1080/07256868.2017.1341393.
  • de Costa, R., and Clark, T., 2015. On the Responsibility to Engage: Non-Indigenous Peoples in Settler States. Settler Colonial Studies, 6, 1–18. doi:10.1080/2201473X.2015.1065560.
  • Gunstone, A., 2009. Indigenous Rights and the 1991–2000 Australian Reconciliation Process. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1 (3), 35–51.
  • Halloran, M.J., 2007. Indigenous Reconciliation in Australia: Do Values, Identity and Collective Guilt Matter? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1002/casp.876.
  • Hodges, A., 2015. 'Intertextuality in Discourse. In: Deborah Tannen, Heidi Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, eds. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Second Edition West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 42–60.
  • Hughes, J., 2018. Agency Versus Structure in Reconciliation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41 (4), 624–642. doi:10.1080/01419870.2018.1381340.
  • Humphrey, Michael, 2006. Reconciliation and the Therapeutic State. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 26 (3), 203–220. doi:10.1080/07256860500153492.
  • Jacobs, T., 2019. Poststructuralist Discourse Theory as an Independent Paradigm for Studying Institutions: Towards a New Definition of ‘Discursive Construction’ in Institutional Analysis. Contemporary Political Theory, 18 (3), 379–401. doi:10.1057/s41296-018-0279-3.
  • Maddison, S., 2016. Conflict Transformation and Reconciliation: Multi-Level Challenges in Deeply Divided Societies. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.
  • McMillan, M., and Rigney, S., 2018. Race, Reconciliation, and Justice in Australia: From Denial to Acknowledgment. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41 (4), 759–777. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1340653.
  • Moreton-Robinson, A., 2006. Towards a New Research Agenda? Foucault, Whiteness and Indigenous Sovereignty. Journal of Sociology, 42 (4), 383–395. doi:10.1177/1440783306069995.
  • Moses, A.D., 2011. Official Apologies, Reconciliation, and Settler Colonialism: Australian Indigenous Alterity and Political Agency. Citizenship Studies, 15 (2), 145–159. doi:10.1080/13621025.2011.549698.
  • Ott, Brian and Walter, Cameron, 2000. Intertextuality: Interpretive practice and textual strategy. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17 (4), 429–446. doi:10.1080/15295030009388412.
  • Page, S., Trudgett, M., and Bodkin-Andrews, G., 2019. Tactics or Strategies? Exploring Everyday Conditions to Facilitate Implementation of an Indigenous Graduate Attributes Project. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41 (4), 390–403. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2019.1609390.
  • Panizza, Francisco and Miorelli, Romina, 2013. Taking Discourse Seriously: Discursive Institutionalism and Post-structuralist Discourse Theory. Political Studies, 61 (2), 301–318. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00967.x.
  • Reconciliation Australia, 2016. The State of Reconciliation in Australia: Our History, our Story, our Future. Kingston, ACT: Reconciliation Australia.
  • Reconciliation Australia, 2021. State of Reconciliation in Australia Report: Moving from Safe to Brave. Kingston, ACT: Reconciliation Australia.
  • Reisigl, M., 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Robert Bayley Richard Cameron and Ceil Lucas, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press, 67–90.
  • Schmidt, V.A., 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (1), 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
  • Schmidt, V A, 2015. Discursive institutionalism: understanding policy in context. . In: Frank Fischer, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnová, etal, eds. Handbook of critical policy studies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 171–189.
  • Short, D., 2012. When Sorry Isn’t Good Enough: Official Remembrance and Reconciliation in Australia. Memory Studies, 5 (3), 293–304. doi:10.1177/1750698012443886.
  • Universities Australia., 2022. Universities Australia Indigenous Strategy 2022–2025. https://universitiesaustralia.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/UA-Indigenous-Strategy-2022-25.pdf
  • Uluru Statement from the Heart., 2017. https://ulurustatement.org/the-statement/view-the-statement/.
  • van Dijk, T.A., 2008. Critical Discourse Analysis and Nominalization: Problem or Pseudo-Problem? Discourse & Society, 19 (6), 821–828. doi:10.1177/0957926508095897.
  • van Dijk, T.A., 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Deboarah Tannen, Heidi E Hamliton, and Deborah Schiffren, eds. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Second Edition West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 466–485.
  • van Leeuwen, T., 2009. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Jan Renkema, ed. Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company , 277–292.
  • Wodak, R., 2004. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Clive Seal, etal, ed. Qualitative Research Practice. First Edition Sage Publications Ltd, 186–201. doi:10.4135/9781848608191.
  • Wodak, R, 2014. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Constant Leung and Brian Street, eds. The Routledge companion to English studies. London, UK: Routledge, 302–316.